Phylogeny of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): evidence from nrITS sequences and morphology.

Citation metadata

From: Canadian Journal of Botany(Vol. 84, Issue 5)
Publisher: NRC Research Press
Document Type: Report
Length: 10,613 words
Lexile Measure: 1330L

Document controls

Main content

Article Preview :

Abstract: Lotus (120-130 species) is the largest genus of the tribe Loteae. The taxonomy of Lotus is complicated, and a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus is needed. We have conducted phylogenetic analyses of Lotus based on nrITS data alone and combined with data on 46 morphological characters. Eighty-one ingroup nrITS accessions representing 71 Lotus species are studied; among them 47 accessions representing 40 species are new. Representatives of all other genera of the tribe Loteae are included in the outgroup (for three genera, nrITS sequences are published for the first time). Forty-two of 71 ingroup species were not included in previous morphological phylogenetic studies. The most important conclusions of the present study are (1) addition of morphological data to the nrITS matrix produces a better resolved phylogeny of Lotus; (2) previous findings that Dorycnium and Tetragonolobus cannot be separated from Lotus at the generic level are well supported; (3) Lotus creticus should be placed in section Pedrosia rather than in section Lotea; (4) a broad treatment of section Ononidium is unnatural and the section should possibly not be recognized at all; (5) section Heinekenia is paraphyletic; (6) section Lotus should include Lotus conimbricensis; then the section is monophyletic; (7) a basic chromosome number of x = 6 is an important synapomorphy for the expanded section Lotus; (8) the segregation of Lotus schimperi and allies into section Chamaelotus is well supported; (9) there is an apparent functional correlation between stylodium and keel evolution in Lotus.

Key words: Leguminosae, Loteae, Lotus, nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences, morphology.

Resume : Le genre Lotus (120-130 especes) est le plus grand de la tribu des Loteae. La taxonomie des Lotus est complique e, et une revision taxonomique complete du genre s'impose. Les auteurs ont conduit des analyses phylogenetiques des Lotus, sur la base des donnees nrITS isolement et combinees avec les donnees sur 46 caracteres morphologiques. Les auteurs ont etudie 81 accessions nrITS d'un groupe interne representant 71 especes de Lotus; parmi celle-ci, 47 accessions representant 40 especes sont nouvelles. On retrouve des representants de tous les autres genres de la tribu Loteae dans le groupe externe (pour trois de ces genres, on publie les sequences nrITS pour la premiere fois). Des 71 especes du groupe interne, 42 n'ont pas ete incluses dans des etudes morpho-phylogenetiques precedentes. Les plus importantes conclusions de cette etude sont: (1) l'addition de donnees morphologiques a la matrice nrITS conduit a une meilleure resolution phyloge netique des Lotus; (2) on confirme les constats antecedents a l'effet que les Dorycnium et Tetragonolobus ne peuvent pas etre separes des Lotus au niveau du genre; (3) le L. creticus devrait etre place dans la section Pedrosia, plutot que la section Lotea; (4) le traitement general de la section Ononidium n'est pas naturel et la section devrait possiblement ne pas etre reconnue du tout; (5) la section Heinekenia est paraphyletique; (6) la section Lotus doit inclure le L. conimbricensis; la section devient alors monophyletique; (7) le nombre de base de chromosomes x = 6...

Get Full Access
Gale offers a variety of resources for education, lifelong learning, and academic research. Log in through your library to get access to full content and features!
Access through your library

Source Citation

Source Citation   

Gale Document Number: GALE|A150358720