Skip to main content
Log in

Plant functional composition and ecosystem properties: the case of peatlands in South Africa

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assumption that ecosystems with similar emergent properties consist of similar functional groupings of plant species is tested by comparing three peatlands from different bioregions across South Africa. They are Mfabeni Swamp in the subtropical coastal region, Wakkerstroom on the inland plateau, and Goukou wetland in the Winter Rainfall region of the Western Cape. In each of the three peatlands, about 400 small vegetation plots have been made from which the abundance of each species per wetland can be assessed. The most dominant species in these plots have been investigated for 17 traits. The functional composition of the vegetation types has been compared across the three peatlands and Functional Diversity has been calculated, taking the dominance of each species into account. One peatland differed greatly from the other two, since the dominant species was of a functional type (“Palmiet/woody sedge”) that was very divergent from any other peatland species found in the study. This functional type can be considered an ecosystem engineer and the effects that this functional type has on the ecosystem results in the occurrence of many other functional types that do not occur in the other peatlands. When we consider emergent traits of an ecosystem as a function of all the plant functional traits that occur in that ecosystem, then peatlands can be regarded as a heterogeneous group of ecosystems. Even if emergent properties such as peat formation are similar between ecosystems, those ecosystems may still consist of very different functional groups. Ecosystem engineers have an impact on the final functional composition of an ecosystem and the degree in which ecosystem engineering plays a role in peatlands differs between different peatlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PFT:

Plant functional type

FD:

Functional diversity

References

  • Bartha S, Campetella G, Canullo R, Bodis J, Mucina L (2004) On the importance of fine-scale complexity in vegetation restoration studies. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 30:101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloem KJ, Theron GK, Van Rooyen N (1993) Wetland plant communities of the Verlorenvallei Nature Reserve in the North-eastern Sandy Highveld, Transvaal. S Afr J Bot 59:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, Keddy PA (1993) A functional classification of wetland plants. J Veg Sci 4:591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box EO, Fujiwara K (2005) Vegetation types and their broad-scale distribution. In: der Maarel Van (ed) Vegetation Ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 106–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook CDK (2004) Aquatic and wetland plants of Southern Africa. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden 281

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk JK, Fennessy MS (2002) Wetland plants, Biology and ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Cabido M (1997) Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. J Veg Sci 8:463–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Watts CH (2005) Are systems with strong underlying abiotic regimes more likely to exhibit alternative stable states ? Oikos 110:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K, Nielsen SLEnríquez, Agusti S (1995) Comparative functional plant ecology: rationale and potentials. Trends Ecol Evol 10:418–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellery WN, Grenfell M, Grenfell S, Kotze DC, McCarthy TS, Tooth S, Grundling P-L, Beckedahl H, LeMaitre DC, Ramsay L (2008). WET-Origins. Controls on the distribution and dynamics of wetlands in South Africa. Wetland Management Series. Water Research Commission Report No.TT 334/08, Pretoria

  • Ewart-Smith J, Ollis D, Day J, Malan H (2006) National wetland inventory: development of a wetland classification system for South Africa. report prepared for the water research commission and south african national biodiversity institute

  • Gaucherand S, Lavorel S (2007) New method for rapid assessment of the functional composition of herbaceous plant communities. Aust Ecol 32:927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germishuizen G, Meyer NL (2003) Plants of Southern Africa: an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria

  • Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (2007) Comparative plant ecology. A functional approach to common British species. Castlepoint Press, Colvend

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Monographs in population biology 32. Princeton University Press, Princeton 375

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Guttierez JL, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Lambrinos JG, Talley TS (2010) A framework for understanding physical ecosystem engineering by organisms. Oikos 119:1862–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J Veg Sci 3:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (2000) Wetland ecology. Principles and conservation. Cambridge studies in ecology. Cambridge, pp 614

  • Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (2002) The functional consequences of biodiversity Empirical progress and theoretical extensions Monographs in population biology 33. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Knevel IC, Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Kleyer M (2003) Life-history traits of the Northwest European flora: the LEDA database. J Veg Sci 14:611–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg, Forbes TDA (1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 12:474–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble IR, Gitay H (1996) A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J Veg Sci 7:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2007) Dendrograms and measuring functional diversity. Oikos 116:1422–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Hector A, Gaston KJ (2004) How do different measures of functional diversity perform ? Ecology 85:847–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (2007) Plant functional ecology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 724

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164:143–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin H, Jeglum J (2006) The biology of peatlands. Biology of Habitats Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 343

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Semenova GV, Van der Maarel E (2000) Plant functional types—a strategic perspective. J Veg Sci 11:917–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B (2010) Community assembly, natural selection and maximum entropy models. Oikos 119:604–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B, Vile D, Garnier E (2006) From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity. Science 314:812–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson MG (2008) Plant systematics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (eds) (1997) Plant Functional Types. Their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Book Series 1. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnier G, Shipley B, Navas M-L (2010) Plant traits, species pools and the prediction of relative abundance in plant communities: a maximum entropy approach. J Veg Sci 21:318–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2003) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (2005) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, McCarthy TS (2007) Wetlands in drylands: geomorphological and sedimentological characteristics, with emphasis on examples from southern Africa. Prog Phys Geogr 31:3–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter CE (2002) The vegetation ecology of Mfabeni peat Swamp, St. Lucia. MSc thesis, University of Pretoria

  • Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E (2006) Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance. Ecol Lett 9:1061–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Keddy PA (1999) Ecological assembly rules. Perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O (1999) Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 10:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BD (1999) Water and plants in freshwater wetlands. In: Baird AJ, Wilby RL (eds) Ecohydrology Plants and water in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Routledge, New York, pp 127–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Willby NJ, Abernethy VJ, Demars BOL (2000) Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshw Biol 43:43–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisheu IC, Keddy PA (1992) Competition and centrifugal organization of ecological communities: theory and tests. J Veg Sci 3:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward FI, Cramer W (1996) Plant functional types and climatic changes: introduction. J Veg Sci 7:306–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the University of the Free State - Qwaqwa Campus Research Funds. Grateful thanks to Piet-Louis Grundling, Nerosha Govender (Isimangaliso Wetland Authority), Birdlife International, and Wim Filmalter who granted me access to the research sites. Nozipho Ndwalane and Althea Grundling provided valuable assistance during the fieldwork, Nina van Vliet from the Agricultural Research Council carried out the chemical analysis of the plants and Ngaka Mzizi helped out with other analyses on the plants. Some of the discussions about the species Palmiet (Prionium serratum) with Muthama Muasya found their way into this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erwin J. J. Sieben.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sieben, E.J.J. Plant functional composition and ecosystem properties: the case of peatlands in South Africa. Plant Ecol 213, 809–820 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0043-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0043-3

Keywords

Nomenclature

Navigation