MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE 78:1001–1009 (2015)
Botanical Features for Identification of Gymnosporia
arenicola Dried Leaf
GUSTAVO DA SILVA, RITA SERRANO, ELSA TEIXEIRA GOMES, AND OLGA SILVA*
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed. ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade De Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto,
Lisbon 1649-003, Portugal
KEY WORDS
Herbal medicines; histochemistry; light microscopy; scanning electron
microscopy
ABSTRACT
Gymnosporia arenicola Jordaan (Celastraceae) is a shrub or small tree, which
naturally occurs in coastal sand dunes of Southern Mozambique and South Africa. Its dried leaf
is often used in traditional medicine for the treatment of infectious and inflammatory diseases.
Hereby, we present results of studies carried out according to the pharmacopoeia standards for
the identification of herbal drugs, in the whole, fragmented, and powdered plant material. These
results were complemented with scanning electron microscopy and histochemical techniques.
The leaf microscopic analysis revealed a typical dorsiventral mesophyll with a corresponding
spongy parenchyma–palisade parenchyma ratio of 0.60, anomocytic and paracytic stomata, papillate cells with a diameter of 4.00 6 0.40 mm, multicellular uniseriate nonglandular trichomes
with a length of 27.00 6 4.10 mm and cristalliferous idioblasts containing calcium oxalate cluster
crystals with a diameter of 23.04 6 5.84 mm. The present findings demonstrate that the G. arenicola leaf has both nonglandular trichomes and hypoderm, features not previously described in
the corresponding botanical section (Gymnosporia sect. Buxifoliae Jordaan). The establishment
of these new botanical markers for the identification of G. arenicola leaf is essential for quality,
safety and efficacy reasons. Microsc. Res. Tech. 78:1001–1009, 2015. V 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
C
INTRODUCTION
Gymnosporia arenicola Jordaan [syn. Maytenus heterophylla (Eckl. and Zeyh.) N. Robson subsp. arenaria
N. Robson] is an African medicinal plant commonly
known as ‘Sand spike-thorn’ or ‘Sandpendoring’, as
English and Afrikaans vernacular names, respectively
(Jordaan and van Wyk, 1999). This botanical species
naturally occurs in coastal sand dunes of Southern
Mozambique and South Africa, partially integrated in
the Maputaland Centre of Endemism (Jordaan and
van Wyk, 1999). This region is recognized as center of
plant biodiversity and G. arenicola is considered an
endangered species, included in the Red List of South
African Plants (Raimondo et al., 2009).
G. arenicola is often employed in African traditional
medicine against infectious and inflammatory diseases
(da Silva G et al., 2011a; Hedberg et al., 1982; Hutchings et al., 1996; Jansen and Mendes, 1991; Neuwinger,
2000). Preliminary studies, of our research group, indicate anti-inflammatory activity of the leaf ethanol
extract of this species and consequently confirm its traditional use as an herbal medicine (da Silva G et al.,
2011b). Results like these are particularly important for
the users of African health systems, due to their high
dependence of herbal medicines and scarce pharmacological/toxicological investigation on some species, such
as G. arenicola. In addition to the scarce pharmacological and toxicological profile of these herbal medicines,
there is very limited information to identify and
authenticate such species. In the absence of a pharmacopeial monograph for herbal medicines as G. arenicola,
C
V
2015 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.
the establishment of macro- and microanatomical
botanical markers is essential for quality, safety, and
efficacy proposes (Serrano et al., 2010).
G. arenicola is a shrub, suffrutex, or small tree that
belongs to the Celastraceae family. The taxonomical
classification of this family was recently changed at
the generic level. As currently circumscribed, the former genus Maytenus Mol. emend Mol., even after the
reinstatement of Gymnosporia (Wight and Arn.)
Hook.f., is still clearly a heterogeneous group of
species. This view is also supported by other authors
(Jordaan and van Wyk, 2003, 2006).
The genus Gymnosporia (after the inclusion of some
Maytenus species in this genus) is also a heterogeneous taxon, which requires the division into more natural groups (Jordaan and van Wyk, 2003). The complex
phylogenetic relationships between members of the
Celastraceae family were previously studied by other
authors (Simmons et al., 2001a,b).
The anatomy and leaf micromorphology of some species of the Celastraceae family was already characterized, aiming at the selection anatomical characters for
the species identification (Duarte and Debur, 2005;
*Correspondence to: Olga Silva, Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, Department of
Pharmacological Sciences. Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa. Av.
Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal; E-mail: odsilva@ff.ulisboa.pt
Received 8 June 2015; accepted in revised form 3 August 2015
REVIEW EDITOR: Prof. Alberto Diaspro
Contract grant sponsor: National Research Foundation (FCT) (Portugal); Contract grant number: FCT-PEst-OE/SAU/UI4013/2011.
DOI 10.1002/jemt.22565
Published online 25 August 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
1002
G. DA SILVA ET AL.
Gomes, 2001; Jain et al., 2009; Joffily and Vieira, 2010;
Lin and Zhang, 2010). Epidermal structure and stomatal ontogeny in some Celastraceae species were already
described (Pant and Kidwai, 1965). Various microscopic parameters were used to identify Gymnosporia
rothiana (Walp) Lawson, including stomatal number,
stomatal index, palisade ratio, vein islet number, and
vein termination number (Jain et al., 2009).
The present study aims at the botanical characterization of G. arenicola dried leaf, according to the
current methods described on the occidental Pharmacopoeias for the quality control and botanical identification of herbal drugs. The methodology used on this
study consists of the macroscopic and microscopic
analysis of the whole, fragmented and powdered plant
material. For deeper botanical characterization, we
have complemented the usual stereomicroscopy and
light microscopy (LM) analysis by the use of scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) and histochemical
techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Material
Gymnosporia arenicola Jordaan was collected in
November 2011 by O. Silva in Macaneta Beach (Marraquene District, Mozambique), which is inserted in a
Tropical Wet/Dry region with a mean annual temperature comprised between 22 and 248C and a mean
annual precipitation of 1200 mm3.
The collection of all the plant material was authorized by the responsible local authorities. All the plant
material was dried under controlled conditions of
humidity (75 6 5%) and temperature (21 6 18C) in the
dark. The drying conditions that were used in this
study are the usual conditions applied for herbal medicines and consequently the morphological analysis was
observed in the dried plant material and not in fresh
material. The identification of the plant material was
conducted by Adelia Diniz, “Jardim Bot^
anico Tropical—IICT” (Lisbon) by comparison with voucher Herbarium specimen O. Silva, s.n., 1.10.2006 of the LISC
Herbarium, Institute for Tropical Scientific Research
(Lisbon). Leaf samples (30) were randomly selected
from 250 g of the collected raw material (minimum of
50 leaves from 10 different trees) using the samplings
rules of the European Pharmacopeia for herbal drugs
(EDQM, 2007).
Powdered Plant Material
A representative portion of the total collected raw
material selected to study was powdered using an Analytical Mill A-10 water-cooled laboratory mill (Staufen,
Germany) and mounted in a 60% chloral hydrate aqueous solution, according to European Pharmacopoeia
(EDQM, 2007).
Macroscopic Analysis
Each dried leaf sample of G. arenicola was directly
observed with the naked eye and using an Olympus
SZ61 stereobinocular microscope coupled with an
Olympus ColorView IIIu camera (Tokyo, Japan).
Image analysis was performed with Cell D 2006 Olympus Software (Tokyo, Japan).
Light Microscopy
Each dried leaf sample of G. arenicola was previously hydrated in water. For the anatomical analysis,
the leaf was sectioned freehand. Lamina transverse
sections (midrib and distal part of the blade) and tangential longitudinal sections (leaf surface) were
cleared and mounted in a 60% chloral hydrate aqueous
solution. Microscopic analysis of the prepared leaf sections and powdered plant material was conducted on
an Olympus CX40 upright microscope (Tokyo, Japan),
coupled with an Olympus ColorView IIIu camera
(Tokyo, Japan). Image analysis was performed with
Cell D 2006 Olympus Software (Tokyo, Japan).
Scanning Electron Microscopy
The dried plant material was sectioned, dehydrated
at 358C for 24 h and directly mounted on stubs using
double-side adhesive tape. Ten samples were sputtered
with a thin layer of gold in a JEOL JSM-1200 Fine
Coater and observed in a JEOL JSM-T220 SEM at 15
kV, with a digital image acquisition integrated system
(MA).
Histochemical Tests
The chromatic staining reactions were performed in
leaf transverse sections before examination under LM.
The histochemical tests were 10% ferric trichloride for
detection of o-dihydroxyphenols (Johansen, 1940),
Brady’s reagent (2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine) for terpenoids with carbonyl group (Ganter and Jolles, 1969),
Dittmar’s reagent for alkaloids (Furr and Mahlberg,
1981), Sudan red III for total lipids (Bronner, 1975),
and Lugol’s solution (I2KI) for starch (Pearse, 1960).
All histochemical tests were compared with the respective unstained controls. The results were observed by
LM, using an Olympus CX40 upright microscope
(Tokyo, Japan), coupled with an Olympus ColorView
IIIu camera (Tokyo, Japan). Image analysis was performed with Cell D 2006 Olympus Software (Tokyo,
Japan).
Statistical Data
For the determination of the macroscopic features,
the observations were performed in 10 adult leaves
(n 5 10), and for the microscopic measurements, 10
replicates were determined in 1 mm2 for each sample,
following the pharmacopoeia recommendations
(EDQM, 2007).
All the macro- and microscopic results were
expressed as mean 6 SD, with the exception of the
determination of the spongy parenchyma–palisade
parenchyma ratio and stomatal indexes.
The stomatal index (SI) was determined by the following formula:
SI5
100 3 number of stomata
number of epidermal cells1number of stomata
All the statistical data are summarized in Table 1.
RESULTS
The leaf of G. arenicola (Fig. 1) is simple and entire,
pale green colored, with oblong or ovate to obovate
lamina. The apex is round to emarginated and the
Microscopy Research and Technique
LEAF IDENTIFICATION OF GYMNOSPORIA ARENICOLA
1003
TABLE 1. Quantitative macro- and microscopic main features of G.
arenicola leaf
Statistical
parameters N 5 10
Structure
Dimension
Mean
value
Standard
deviation
Lamina (cm)
Length
Width
Thickness
Diameter
Length
Width
Length
Width
Length
Width
Length
Width
Length
Width
Width
Length
5.8
2.6
5.30
23.04
16.24
30.13
33.54
26.63
15.25
32.25
50.30
19.88
33.14
34.83
4.00
27.00
1.0
0.2
0.67
5.84
0.77
2.58
4.53
2.65
1.11
4.83
4.96
0.76
1.91
2.30
0.40
4.10
Cuticle (mm)
Crystaliferous idioblasts (mm)
Upper epidermis (mm)
Hypodermis (mm)
Lower epidermis (mm)
Palisade parenchyma (mm)
Spongy parenchyma (mm)
Papillate cells (mm)
Trichomes (mm)
base is cuneate. The margin is indurate, revolute,
entire to irregularly serrulated, and the petiole is
short. The leaf surface is apparently glaucous, glabrous, coriaceous, or subcoriaceous. Venation and midrib are more prominent on the lower surface of the
blade.
LM analysis of transversal sections of G. arenicola
leaf (Fig. 2) shows an asymmetric organization with a
mesophyll comprising three to five strata of palisade
parenchyma (Fig. 2a) and various layers of spongy
parenchyma, with a corresponding spongy parenchyma–palisade parenchyma ratio of 0.60. Uniseriate
upper (Fig. 2b) and lower epidermises (Figs. 2c–2e) are
coated by a smooth and thick cuticle. A clearly differentiated layer of thick-walled hypodermal cells is present below the upper epidermis, sometimes with
crystalliferous idioblasts containing calcium oxalate
cluster crystals (Fig. 2b). The cells of the palisade tissue are columnar, with their long axes oriented at
right angles to the upper epidermis, with straight
walls which are distinctly thickened and pitted (Fig.
2b). The cells of the lower epidermis are similar to
those of the upper epidermis but they are usually
smaller and the striations on the cuticle are sometimes
less marked (Fig. 2c). The spongy parenchyma cells
are irregular in shape (Fig. 2d) and surface walls of
epidermal cells show short papillate cells (Fig. 2e) and
occasionally multicellular uniseriate nonglandular trichomes (Fig. 2f), composed of three to four cells.
Midrib transversal sections (Fig. 3) show an amphicrival vascular bundle surrounded by a discontinuous
sclerenchymatic sheath, collateral with the xylem.
Phloem is external to xylem. The xylem is toward the
upper epidermis (adaxial surface) and the phloem is
toward the lower epidermis (abaxial surface). A developed angular collenchyma is observed near both epidermis and calcium oxalate cluster crystals are
frequently present in the phloem.
Cristalliferous idioblasts containing with calcium
oxalate cluster crystals may be seen in the hypodermis
(Figs. 2a and 2b) and chlorenchyma and near the
phloem (Figs. 2c and 3).
The leaf surface examination (Fig. 4) by light
and SEM shows a slightly sinuous cuticle in both
Microscopy Research and Technique
Fig. 1. G. arenicola leaf upper and lower surface view (top and bottom, respectively). The leaf is petiolated, simple and entire, with
oblong or ovate to obovate shape and entire to irregularly serrulated
margin. Scale bar: 1 cm. [Color figure can be viewed in the online
issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
epidermises (Figs. 4a, 4c, and 4f), a upper epidermis composed of polygonal to rectangular cells with
straight walls which are distinctly pitted and some
cells show peculiar shinning bodies (Fig. 4b), a random stomata distribution (Fig. 4c), and a lower epidermis with similar cells to those of the upper
epidermis but they are usually smaller and the
striations on the cuticle are sometimes less clearly
marked (Fig. 4d). Anomocytic stomata (Fig. 4d) are
surrounded by a ring of four to six subsidiary cells
and are more frequent than paracytic stomata (Fig.
4e). The calculated SI is 1.25 on the upper epidermis and 6.36 on the lower epidermis.
The powder of G. arenicola dried leaf presents a
green color and the microscopic examination of the
powdered plant material reveals the presence of the
above-mentioned and illustrated structures, eventually with some evidence of physical fragmentation of
the plant tissues. The microanalysis of the powder G.
arenicola leaf revealed crystalliferous idioblasts with
calcium oxalate cluster crystals on hypodermal cells
(Fig. 5a), which were also observed on spongy parenchyma (Fig. 5b), and over the veins and insular areas
(Fig. 5c). Further microscopic elements, as anomocytic
and paracytic stomata, and shinning bodies in the cells
of the stomatal region in the lower epidermis (Fig. 5d)
were also present in the powdered material. Fragments of the lower epidermis containing short surface
papillae (Fig. 5e) and fragments of vascular tissue
with sclerenchyma fibers (Fig. 5f) were observed in the
G. arenicola leaf powder.
1004
G. DA SILVA ET AL.
Fig. 2. LM transverse sections of G. arenicola leaf. a: Cut sections
of the blade showing the leaf asymmetric organization, with three
layers of palisade parenchyma and 60% of the chlorenchyma corresponding to spongy parenchyma. b: A thick cuticle visible in the
upper epidermis, calcium oxalate cluster crystals occurring within
idioblasts in the hypodermis (arrowhead) and thickened pitted
straight walls occurring in the palisade tissue. c: Calcium oxalate
cluster crystals also occurring in spongy parenchyma cells (arrowhead) and a thick cuticle visible in the lower epidermis. d: Spongy
tissue with irregular cells occurring near the lower epidermis and
some stomata with a sub-stomatal chamber (arrow). e: Papillate
cells visible in the lower epidermis (arrowhead). f: Multicelled nonglandular trichome (arrowhead) detail. Scale bars: a 5 100 mm; b–
f 5 50 mm.
The results of the in situ histochemical localization
of alkaloids, o-dihydroxyphenols, terpenoids with carbonyl group, total lipids, and starch are shown in
Figure 6. Dark brownish mesophyll showing the presence of o-dihydroxyphenols is revealed by ferric trichloride (Fig. 6b). Brady’s reagent orange staining
Microscopy Research and Technique
LEAF IDENTIFICATION OF GYMNOSPORIA ARENICOLA
Fig. 3. LM and SEM transverse sections of G. arenicola leaf (a and
b, respectively), showing details of the midrib structure. Amphicrival
bundle, collateral with the xylem, which faces toward the upper surface, surrounded by a discontinuous sclerenchymatic sheath. Collenchyma occurring near both epidermis and also near to the adaxial
xylem. Calcium oxalate cluster crystals near the phloem are readily
visible in LM (arrowhead). Scale bars: a and b 5 100 mm.
allowed the identification of terpenoids containing carbonyl group on the collenchyma (Fig. 6d) and vacuoles
of the mesophyll cells (Fig. 6f). Alkaloids were detected
by Dittmar’s reagent chromatic reaction, showing
brownish-content cells near the midribs and parenchymatous cells (Fig. 6h). Total lipids were identified
on epidermal cells and cuticle, showing the typical red
coloration of Sudan III staining (Fig. 6j). Blue/violet
stained amyloplasts are found in the mesophyll, which
were evidenced by Lugol’s reaction. Figures 6a, 6c, 6e,
6g, and 6i show negative the controls for the staining
tests, respectively.
DISCUSSION
The botanical identification is the first official and
mandatory step for the authentication of herbal medicines, and the identity of the herbal medicine is further
confirmed by the analysis of the respective chemical
profile. Even though actually molecular biology
techniques are applied for the authentication of plant
Microscopy Research and Technique
1005
materials, these techniques are not yet recognized to the
identification of herbal medicines in Pharmacopoeias.
The leaf macroscopic morphology features of G. arenicola follow the description by Jordaan and van Wyk
(1999), which are distinctive from Gymnosporia senegalensis (Lam.) Loes. These distinctive features are
important because both medicinal species are apparently similar, co-exist in some geographical regions
and can be used for some common ethnopharmaceutical purposes (Serrano et al., 2008). The co-existence of
both species in traditional markets may cause the
presence of herbal adulterants/contaminants and mislead the correct species identification among the
population.
Our results revealed that the most distinctive microscopic features in G. arenicola were the presence of a
dorsiventral mesophyll, multicellular covering trichomes and papillae, which are not previously detected
in G. senegalensis (Serrano et al., 2009). Microscopic
analysis of the leaf of G. arenicola revealed the presence
of a striated and papillose cuticle. The presence of papillae is useful for diagnostic purposes. The observation of
a conspicuous thick cuticle coating the epidermis is a
character already reported for the Celastraceae family
and for the Gymnosporia genus (Metcalfe and Chalk,
1950). This morphological feature was particularly
emphasized on South American species of the Celastraceae family, e.g. Maytenus boaria (Metcalfe and Chalk,
1981), M. ilicifolia (Bernardi and Wasicky, 1959), M.
oleoides (Hlwatika et al., 1998), and M. rigida (da
Rocha et al., 2004). According to the above-mentioned
authors, the cuticle helps to prevent water loss efficiently against uncontrolled evaporation, and avoids
collapsing during dehydration processes, which has
been considered of taxonomic value and can be used for
diagnostic purposes. The presence of papillae is useful
for diagnostic purposes and these results are not consistent with the findings of Jordaan and van Wyk
(2006) for the Gymnosporia sect. Buxifoliae Jordaan. In
the Buxifoliae section, the presence of papillae is not
expected, with some exceptions (G. arenicola is not
mentioned as an exception).
Angular collenchyma is present below the upper and
above the lower epidermis, as reported in other species
of this botanical genus, e.g., G. rothiana (Jain et al.,
2009).
As previously mentioned, a clearly differentiated
layer of thick-walled hypodermal cells occur below the
upper epidermis, in agreement with the observations
of Jordaan and van Wyk (2006).
Crystalliferous idioblasts containing calcium oxalate
cluster crystals often occur on the hypodermal cells,
and chlorenchyma. The distribution of these idioblasts
follows the observations of Jordaan and van Wyk
(2006). According to Metcalfe and other authors, these
crystals are common in the Celastraceae family, being
mentioned in Elaeodendron, Catha, and Maytenus
(Metcalfe and Chalk, 1950; Jain et al., 2009).
The presence of calcium oxalate crystals in the
Celastraceae family has been registered by numerous
authors. Plant crystalliferous idioblasts have been recognized to assume different functions as storing the
calcium ion, avoiding the oxalate toxic accumulation,
contributing to the mechanical support and protection
against herbivory (Franceschi and Horner Jr, 1980).
1006
G. DA SILVA ET AL.
Fig. 4. SEM (a), (c), and (f) and LM (b), (d), and (e) surface
analysis of G. arenicola leaf. a: Surface view of the upper epidermis revealing absence of stomata and illustrates the morphology
of the epidermal cells and cuticle. b: Paradermal section showing
epidermal cells with straight walls, which are distinctly pitted
and a few cells show larger shinning bodies. c: Surface view of
the lower epidermis showing random distribution of the stomata.
d: Paradermal section of the lower epidermis showing anomocytic
stomata, with a ring of five subsidiary cells. e: Paradermal section of the lower epidermis also showing paracytic stomata
(arrowhead). f: Surface view of the lower epidermis, showing a
slightly sinuous cuticle. Scale bars: a–c and e–f 5 50 mm; d 5 100
mm. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is
available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
Anomocytic and paracytic stomata are present in this
species as described for other species of the Maytenus
genus (da Rocha et al., 2004). Anomocytic stomata also
occur in the Gymnosporia genus (Jain et al., 2009).
The observation of multicellular uniseriate nonglandular trichomes in this species is not according to
Jordaan and van Wyk (2006) findings for the Buxifoliae section. In the Buxifoliae section, the presence of
Microscopy Research and Technique
LEAF IDENTIFICATION OF GYMNOSPORIA ARENICOLA
1007
Fig. 5. LM examination of the powdered leaf of G. arenicola.
Details of fragment tissues with calcium oxalate cluster crystals on
different locations: on hypodermis cell, on spongy parenchyma and
over the veins and insular areas (a, b, and c, respectively); (d) Anom-
ocytic and paracytic stomata in an epidermal fragment and some
shining bodies (arrow) in the cells of the stomatal region. e: Pappilate
cell occurring next to stomata. f: Fragment of vascular sclerenchyma
fibers. Scale bars: a, b, and e 5 50 mm; c, d, and f 5 100 mm.
nonglandular trichomes is not expected, with some
exceptions (G. arenicola is not mentioned as an exception). The occurrence of nonglandular trichomes is
not frequent in the Celastraceae family (Jain et al., 2009).
The mesophyll reveals dorsiventral organization
and the midrib has an amphicrival collateral vas-
cular bundle. Metcalfe and Chalk (1950) have
indicated both dorsiventral and isobilateral mesophyll in Gymnosporia sp. The presence of a dorsiventral mesophyll is consistent with Jordan
and van Wyk (2006) findings for the Buxifoliae
section.
Microscopy Research and Technique
1008
G. DA SILVA ET AL.
Fig. 6. The histochemical results show the staining in LM transverse sections of G. arenicola leaf. a: Negative control for ferric chloride; (b) Ferric trichloride; (c and e) Negative control for 2,4dinitrophenylhydrazine; (d and f) 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine; (g)
Negative control for Dittmar’s reagent; (h) Dittmar’s reagent; (i) Negative control for Sudan III; (j) Sudan III. Scale bars: a–f 5 50 mm; g–
j 5 100 mm. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is
available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
The histochemical results suggest the presence of odihydroxyphenols, terpenoids with carbonyl group,
alkaloids, total lipids, and starch. The detection of
these constituents in situ can be partially correlated
with previous phytochemical studies (Orabi et al.,
2001).
Histochemical analysis allowed the identification of
total lipids on the surface of the epidermal cells and
cuticle, terpenoids on the collenchyma cells near the
midribs and alkaloids, o-dihydroxyphenols, and starch
grains in the mesophyll.
The detection of phenols confirms previous chemical
studies on this species (da Silva G, 2009) and highlights the presence of tanniniferous cells in the Buxifoliae section (Jordaan and van Wyk, 2006). Concerning
the phenolic-storing cells, Metcalfe and Chalk (1950)
have mentioned them in the mesophyll of species of
Cassine, Euonymus, Gymnosporia, Maytenus, Microtropis, Myginda, Pachystima, Siphonodon, Wimmeria,
and Zinowiewia. From Beckman’s point of view, these
specialized cells, distributed within most tissues, synthesize phenolics and store them in their vacuoles during the normal process of differentiation (Beckman,
2000). In addition, based on the Scalbert’s review, phenolic compounds, especially the tannins, exhibit antimicrobial properties involving the inhibition of
extracellular microbial enzymes or oxidative phosphorylation, or deprivation of the substrates required for
microbial growth (Scalbert, 1991).
According to Metcalfe and Chalk (1983), the histochemical analysis is very interesting for systematic
anatomy because these studies often add a distinctive/
restrictive cell distribution pattern and providing relevant phylogenetic relationships for the members of a
certain group.
As mentioned above G. arenicola is characterized by
certain specific anatomical features of the leaf. The stomata type and the calcium oxalate crystals forms were
also found to be useful anatomical characters for the
authentication of this herbal medicine, which confirms
the relevance of these botanical markers in the taxonomy of the Celastraceae family (Gomes and Lombardi,
2010). The epidermis, hypodermis, mesophyll organization, and the presence of trichomes/papillae revealed
to be very useful characters for the identification of
this plant, as suggested by Jordaan and van Wyk
(2006). Our results confirm previous epidermal features described for some Celastraceae, namely the
presence of papillae and uniserriate multicellular covering trichomes (Pant and Kidway, 1965). The present
findings demonstrate that the G. arenicola leaf has
both nonglandular trichomes and hypoderm, which
was not previously described in Gymnosporia sect.
Buxifoliae Jordaan (Jordaan and van Wyk, 2006).
In addition to the conventional pharmacopoeial
methods, SEM and histochemical tests provided additional useful information for diagnostic proposes. The
use of SEM allowed the achievement of detailed
images of certain structures previously observed in
LM. This methodology also allowed the obtention of
three-dimensional images and the investigation of the
surface topology of plant materials, with higher resolution images.
The histochemical results confirmed the presence of
previously identified classes of compounds and allowed
the in situ localization of these compounds. These
results can be considered as a preliminary chemical
identification criteria performed before the consequent
Chemical Identification Test mandatory in all occidental official pharmacopoeias.
The present study provides morpho-anatomical
markers, based on macro- and microscopic features,
for the botanical diagnosis of G. arenicola leaf that
must be considered in an official quality monograph of
this herbal medicine.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge Maria Adelia
Diniz from the Institute for Tropical Scientific
Research (Lisbon) for the provision of literature and
identification of the plant material and Mariana
Borges for her kind assistance in the graphical composition of Figures 1–5. We also thank Telmo Nunes from
the Microscopy and Image Analysis Laboratory of the
Centre for Environmental Biology (Faculty of Sciences,
Microscopy Research and Technique
LEAF IDENTIFICATION OF GYMNOSPORIA ARENICOLA
University of Lisbon) for the technical assistance on
the SEM analysis.
REFERENCES
Beckman CH. 2000. Phenolic-storing cells: keys to programmed cell
death and periderm formation in wilt disease resistance and in
general defense responses in plants? Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 57:
101–110.
Bernardi HH, Wasicky M. 1959. Algumas pesquisas sobre a
“Espinheira-santa” ou “Cancerosa” Maytenus ilicifolia, Martius,
usada como rem
edio popular no Rio Grande do Sul. Santa Maria:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Bronner R. 1975. Simultaneous demonstration of lipids and starch in
plant tissue. Stain Technol 50:1–4.
da Rocha CS, Pimentel RMM, Randau KP, Xavier HS. 2004. Morfoanatomia de Folhas de Maytenus rigida Mart. (Celastraceae): uma
Especie Utilizada Como Medicinal no Nordeste do Brasil. Acta
Farm. Bonaer 23:472–476.
da Silva G. 2009. Plantas medicinais como agentes antimicrobianos e
anti-inflamatorios. Tese de Mestrado Integrado em Ci^encias Farmac^euticas. Faculdade de Farm
acia da Universidade de Lisboa.
da Silva G, Serrano R, Silva O. 2011a. Maytenus heterophylla and
Maytenus senegalensis, two traditional herbal medicines. J Nat Sci
Biol Med 2:59–65.
da Silva G, Taniça M, Rocha J, Serrano R, Gomes ET, Sepodes B,
Silva O. 2011b. In vivo anti-inflammatory effect and toxicological
screening of Maytenus heterophylla and Maytenus senegalensis
extracts. Hum Exp Toxicol 30:693–700.
Duarte MR, Debur MC. 2005. Stem and leaf morphoanatomy of Maytenus ilicifolia. Fitoterapia 76:41–49.
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines, EDQM. 2007.
European Pharmacopoeia, 6th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Franceschi VR, Horner HT, Jr. 1980. Calcium oxalate crystals in
plants. Bot Rev 46:361–427.
Furr Y, Mahlberg PG. 1981. Histochemical analysis of lacticifers and
glandular trichomes in Cannabis sativa. J Nat Prod 44:153–159.
Ganter P, Jolles G. 1969. Histochimie normal et pathologic. Paris:
Gauthier-Villars Ed.
Gomes SMA, Lombardi JA. 2010. Leaf anatomy as a contribution to
e ex Thorne & Reveal (Celasthe taxonomy of Salacioideae N. Hall
traceae). Plant Syst E 289:13–33.
Taxonomia da
Gomes SMA. 2001. Anatomia Foliar como Subsıdio a
Subfamılia Hippocrateoideae (Celastraceae). Minas Gerais: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
Hedberg I, Hedberg O, Madati PJ, Mshigeni KE, Mshiu EN,
Samuelsson G. 1982. Inventory of plants used in traditional medicine in Tanzania. I. Plants of the families Acanthaceae-Cucurbitaceae. J Ethnopharmacol 6:29–60.
Hlwatika CNM, Johnson CT, Bhat RB. 1998. The foliar anatomy and
morphology of two scrub species in relation to forest colonization of
fynbos on Table Mountain (South Africa). Biologia (Bratisl) 53:73–
80.
Hutchings A, Scott A, Lewis G, Cunningham A. 1996. Zulu medicinal
plants—an inventory. Pinetown: University of Natal Press.
Jain AS, Suranaa SJ, Botharaa RC. 2009. Pharmacognostical and
physico-chemical evaluation of the leaves of Gymnosporia rothiana
(Walp) Lawson (Celastraceae). J Pharm Res 2:991–993.
Jansen PCM, Mendes O. 1991. Plantas Medicinais—Seu Uso Tradicional em Moçambique. Maputo: Imprensa do Partido.
Microscopy Research and Technique
1009
Joffily A, Vieira RC. 2005. Anatomia foliar de Maytenus Mol. emend
Mol. (Celastraceae), ocorrente no estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Acta Bot Bras 19:549–561.
Joffily A, Vieira RC. 2010. Cork-warts on the leaf epidermis of four
genera of Celastrideae-Celastraceae. Flora 205:313–318.
Johansen DA. 1940. Plant microtechnique. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jordaan M, van Wyk AE. 1999. Systematic studies in subfamily
Celastrideae (Celastraceae) in southern Africa: two new species of
Gymnosporia from the Maputaland Centre of Endemism. S Afr J
Bot 65:315–320.
Jordaan M, van Wyk AE. 2003. Reinstatement of Gymnosporia
(Celastraceae): implications for the Flora Malesiana region. Telopea
10:155–167.
Jordaan M, van Wyk AE. 2006. Sectional classification of Gymnosporia (Celastraceae), with notes on the nomenclatural and taxonomic
history of the genus. Taxon 55:515–525.
Lin Q, Zhang Z. 2010. Microtropis longicarpa and M. daweishanensis
(Celastraceae), two new species from Yunnan, China. Ann Bot
Fenn 47:141–147.
Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1950. Anatomy of dicotyledons: leaves, stem,
and woods in relation to taxonomy with notes on economic uses.
Oxford: Clarendon.
Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1981. Anatomy of dicotyledons, 2nd ed. Oxford:
Clarendon.
Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1983. Anatomy of dicotyledons, 2nd ed. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Neuwinger HD. 2000. African traditional medicine: a dictionary of
plant use and applications. Stuttgart: MedpharmScientific
Publishers.
Orabi KY, Al-Qasoumi SI, El-Olemy MM, Mossa JS, Muhammad I.
2001. Dihydroagarofuran alkaloid and triterpenes from Maytenus
heterophylla and Maytenus arbutifolia. Phytochemistry 58:475–
480.
Pant DD, Kidwai PF. 1965. Epidermal structure and stomatal ontogeny in some Celastraceae. New Phytol 65:288–295.
Pearse AGE. 1960. Histochemistry. Theoretical and applied. 2nd edition. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone.
Raimondo D, von Staden L, Foden W, Victor JE, Helme NA, Turner
RC, Kamundi DA, Manyama PA. 2009. Red List of South African
Plants. Strelitzia 25. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity
Institute.
Scalbert A. 1991. Antimicrobial properties of tannin. Phytochemistry
30:3875–3883.
Serrano R, da Silva G, Silva O. 2010. Application of light and scanning electron microscopy in the identification of herbal medicines.
In: M
endez-Vilas A, Dıaz J, editors. Microscopy: science, technology, applications and education. Badajoz: Formatex Research Center. pp. 182–190.
Serrano R, Gomes ET, Silva O. 2008. Botanical characterization of
Maytenus senegalensis leaf an African medicinal plant. Planta Med
74:1131
Serrano R, Gomes ET, Silva O. 2009. Identificaç~
ao bot^
anica de Maytenus senegalensis, folha como f
armaco vegetal. Actas do Workshop
Plantas Medicinais e Pr
aticas Fitoterap^
euticas nos Tr
opicos. Lisboa, Ediç~
ao do IICT, CD-ROM.
Simmons MP, Savolainen V, Clevinger CC, Archer RH, Davis JI.
2001a. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from 26S nuclear
ribosomal DNA, phytochrome B, rbcL, atpB, and morphology. Mol
Phylogenet E 19:353–366.
Simmons MP, Clevinger CC, Savolainen V, Archer RH, Mathews S,
Doyle JJ. 2001b. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B gene sequence and morphology. Am J Bot 88:313–325.