Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15, 3-14
Frankfurt, December 2012
Biodiversity Islands in the Savanna – Analysis of the Phytodiversity
on Termite Mounds in Northern Benin
Ivana Kirchmair, Marco Schmidt, Georg Zizka, Arne Erpenbach, Karen Hahn
Summary: Termite mounds represent abundant microhabitats of high biodiversity in tropical savanna ecosystems and are an
important source of landscape heterogeneity in Sub–Saharan West Africa. Floristic composition as well as density, structure
and zonation of plant cover on the mounds were investigated in northern Benin and compared to the adjacent savanna vegetation. A total of 57 abandoned and densely vegetated termite mounds of comparable size and similarly affected by erosion
located in different types of savannas inside and outside of the W National Park and in cotton fields were studied. This study
revealed that termitaria are special habitats differing in density, composition and structure from surrounding savannas. The
plant cover of termite mounds showed a distinctive zonation. Succulents, geophytes, and lianas were much more abundant on
mounds, the family Capparaceae was found exclusively on mounds. The floristic composition and vegetation on termitaria
proved to be rather homogeneous; although those mounds located in cotton fields differed by higher abundance of Poaceae
and lower species richness.
Key words: geophytes, succulents, termitaria, W National Park, zonation
Îles de la biodiversité dans la savane – analyse de la phytodiversité sur les termitières dans le nord
bénin
Résumé: Les termitières représentent de nombreux microhabitats riches en biodiversité dans les écosystèmes de savanes
tropicales et sont une source importante d’hétérogénéité dans les paysages de l’Afrique de l’Ouest subsaharienne. La Flore
des termitières a été étudiées dans le nord du Bénin, ainsi que la densité, la structure et la zonation de la couverture végétale.
De plus ces données ont été comparées avec la végétation des savanes adjacentes. Au total 57 termitières abandonnées et
densément végétalisées, de dimension et d’érosion similaire, ont été étudiées dans les savanes du Parc National de W ainsi
que dans les savanes attenantes et dans des champs de coton. Nous démontrons que les termitières sont des habitats avec une
zonation prononcée de la couverture végétale, différant de la savane environnante par leur densité, leur composition et leur
structure. Les succulentes, les géophytes et les lianes sont plus abondants sur les termitières. De plus la famille des Capparaceae y est exclusivement restreinte. La flore et la végétation des termitières se révéle homogène bien que celles située en
champs de coton différent par une plus grande abondance de graminées (Poaceae) et par une richesse spécifique plus basse.
Mots clés: géophytes, Parc National du W, succulentes, termitières, zonation
biodiversitätsinseln in der savanne – analyse der phytodiversität auf termitenhügeln in nord-benin
Zusammenfassung: Termitenhügel sind häufig vorkommende Mikrohabitate hoher Biodiversität in tropischen SavannenÖkosystemen und spielen eine wichtige Rolle für die Landschaftsheterogenität im subsaharischen Westafrika. In unserem
Untersuchungsgebiet in Nordbenin wurden sowohl die floristische Zusammensetzung als auch Dichte, Struktur und Zonierung der Pflanzendecke untersucht und mit der angrenzenden Savannenvegetation verglichen. Insgesamt wurden 57 verlassene und dicht bewachsene Termitenhügel vergleichbarer Größe und gleichermaßen von Erosion betroffen, die sich in
verschiedenen Savannentypen innerhalb und außerhalb des W-Nationalparks und in Baumwollfeldern befanden, untersucht.
Unsere Untersuchungen zeigen, daß Termitenhügel spezielle Habitate darstellen, die sich in Vegetationsdichte, -zusammensetzung und –struktur deutlich von den sie umgebenden Savannen unterscheiden. Der Pflanzenbewuchs von Termitenhügeln
zeigte eine ausgeprägte Zonierung. Sukkulente, Geophyten und Lianen wurden wesentlich häufiger, die Familie der Capparaceae ausschließlich auf Termitenhügeln gefunden. Die Flora und Vegetation auf Termitenhügeln stellte sich als ziemlich
homogen heraus. Allerdings unterschieden sich die in Baumwollfeldern liegenden Hügel durch eine höhere Abundanz der
Poaceae und eine geringere Artenvielfalt.
Schlagworte: Geophyten, Sukkulenten, Termitenhügel, W-Nationalpark, Zonierung
1 introduction
The most dramatic changes for Sub-Saharan Africa in the
last decades have been the increase in human population and
consequentially an increase of land use, e.g., due to increasing cattle density and the extension of agricultural lands.
These changes especially affected the Sudanian region and
threaten the biodiversity of the Sudanian savannas and their
sustainable use. In the study area, the agricultural area has
considerably increased during the last 25 years (Brink &
Eva 2009). In large part these areas are used for cotton cultivation, which generates 80% of the export receipts of Be-
nin (UNEP 2008). The intensification of agriculture leads to
pollution by pesticides and fertilizers and a reduced fertility
of soil.
National parks and protected areas are a keystone to regional conservation strategies. The W National Park, named after a meander in the River Niger shaped like a “W”, is the
first transboundary biosphere reserve in Africa composed of
protected areas in Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger and forms
together with the Arly National Park in Burkina Faso, the
Pendjari National Park in Benin and neighboring reserves
and hunting zones the so-called WAP complex.
3
Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15
Several mound building termite species occur in W National Park. The largest mounds are constructed by two fungus–cultivating Macrotermes species, M. subhyalinus and
M. bellicosus. Although we could not determine which Macrotermes species originally built the mounds, other genera of termites can be excluded as builders, since they show
very different mound architectures.
Termite mounds of the genus Macrotermes provide specific
habitats to plants and are a prominent feature in the savanna biome in West Africa. Nevertheless, detailed knowledge
about their plant cover is lacking up to now. Their high abundance (up to 20.2 dead mounds per ha, lEpagE 1984) can
lead to a surface cover of up to 10 % (Wood 1988), even
though in this study a single mound covers only a mean area
of 69 m² (range from 16 to 149 m²). Termites have been
identified to play an important role as ecosystem engineers
modifying their environment and inducing changes in resource flow (JonES et al. 1994, dangErfiEld et al. 1998).
By changed chemical and physical soil properties due to
bioturbation during the construction of mounds (WatSon
1977, BachEliEr 1978) they have a far–reaching effect on
vegetation (glovEr et al. 1964). The soil of termitaria is richer in minerals like nitrogen, calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium (WatSon 1977, BachEliEr 1978, JoSEph
et al. 2012) and has higher clay and silt contents than the
surrounding soil (konaté et al. 1999). Through accumulation of bases the pH value of mound soil is higher than the
pH value of the surrounding soil (WatSon 1977). Termite
mounds offer a better soil water availability for plants, especially in deeper soil horizons (konaté et al.1999). These
specific soil conditions and the modification of the habitat
lead to a vegetation cover on the mounds that differs in density, composition and structure from the adjacent savanna
(Smith & YEaton 1998). Therefore, termite mounds are a
source of landscape heterogeneity (konaté et al. 1999), increasing biodiversity of an area. Furthermore, plants growing on termitaria provide additional ecosystem services to
the human population, as they are used for medicinal and
various other purposes (nacoulma 1996, arBonniEr 2002,
krohmEr 2004).
This study contributes to the knowledge of flora and vegetation on termite mounds, and differences in species composition compared to surrounding savannas in the study area
in Northern Benin. We examined to what extent the termite
mounds have an influence on the surrounding vegetation.
Furthermore, the influence of human disturbance on termite mound vegetation in cotton fields was investigated, that
is among others the influence of pesticides and fertilizers.
Additionally, for the first time a zonation of plants on termitaria was investigated.
2 materials and methods
The study area was located in the North of the West African country Benin, close to the village Sampeto and the border of the W National Park (Fig. 1). The elevation is about
270 m a.s.l., annual precipitation (ca. 1000 mm) and mean
temperature (27.3 °C) are within the characteristics of the
Sudanian Zone. Climate is characterized by a dry season
(October–April) and a short rainy season (May–September).
Fig. 1: Transboundary W National Park and neighboring national parks in the border region of Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger. / Parc national transfrontalier du W du Niger et parcs nationaux voisins dans la région frontalière du Bénin, Burkina Faso et Niger. / Grenzübergreifender W-Nationalpark und benachbarte Nationalparks in der Grenzregion von Benin, Burkina Faso und Niger.
4
Kirchmair et al.
We randomly chose 44 termite mounds in near-to-natural
savanna vegetation (grass and shrub savannas), and 13
mounds in intensively fertilized cotton fields as a comparison under anthropogenic influence. Sampling was conducted from September to November 2007.
To ensure comparability, mounds of approximately similar
size and stage of erosion were selected and their circumference was measured. Species inventory and abundance were
documented by phytosociological relevés (these are available online from the West African Vegetation Database: JanSSEn et al. 2011, Schmidt et al. 2012). Species cover was
estimated in percent of the total area for tree (> 5 m), shrub
(1–5 m) and herb layer (< 1 m). We analyzed position of
plants on the termitaria in three zones for herbaceous layers,
and respectively five zones for woody layers from the central top to the peripheral bottom (see Fig. 2).
sion 4.0) on species cover data. We used a starting configuration derived from a PCA to perform NMDS ordination
based on Sørensen’s Index of similarity. Two dimensions
were chosen to be retained in the analysis. For the hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis, we used Sørensen Index and Ward’s linkage. To investigate diversities, Pielou’s
Evenness, Shannon’s Index and Simpson’s Index of Diversity were calculated in addition to species richness. We used
Student’s t-test to determine statistical significance of differences in diversity measures. For a comparison of the top,
middle and bottom zone, respectively the classes 1–5, data
were adjusted for area (individuals per area).
Collected specimens were determined using arBonniEr
(2002), hutchinSon et al. (1954–1972), akoègninou et al.
(2006), BErhaut (1971–1988), Scholz & Scholz (1983)
and poilEcot (1999). Furthermore, we used the West Africa
Herbarium of the Research Institute Senckenberg (FR) and
the online photo guide ‘West African Plants’ (BrunkEn et
al. 2008). Life forms were assigned according to aké aSSi
(2001–2002) and guinko (1984). Nomenclature followed
the online ‘African Plants Database’ (2011), based and
maintained at the Geneva Botanical Garden.
3 results
A total of 156 species of flowering plants from 49 families
were recorded on termite mounds (see Appendix S1). Nearly 40 percent of the recorded species belong to four families. Most species–rich were Fabaceae s. l. with 27 species,
followed by Malvaceae (18 spp.), Poaceae (17 spp.) and Vitaceae (8 spp.).
Fig. 2: Plot design and schema of exact mapping of individuals and
classification of tree layer (class 1=center of termite mound up to class
5=periphery of termite mound) and herb layer zonation (top, middle,
bottom). / Dessin et Schéma de la cartographie exacte des individus,
de la classification des successions arborescentes (de la classe 1 (centre de la termitière) jusqu'à la classe 5 (périphérie de la termitière)) et
de la zonation de la couche herbacée (haut, milieu, bas). / Schema der
Aufnahmeflächen und der exakten Kartierung der Individuen, Zonierung der Baumschicht (Klasse 1=Zentrum bis Klasse 5=Peripherie) und
Krautschicht (obere, mittlere, untere Zone).
To be able to compare the phytodiversity on mounds to that
of the neighboring non–mound vegetation in the savanna,
shrub and tree layer in two reference plots (A and B, see Fig.
2) were investigated to characterize the influence of termite
mounds on the surrounding vegetation. Direct influence of
the mound to adjacent vegetation was expected to be measurable in Plot A. Reference plot B was located at one side of
plot A and selected to best represent the surrounding non–
influenced vegetation. Both savanna plots were designed to
have a total area of 900 m². Plot B had a side length of 30
m. Since plot A was placed around the termite mound itself,
its side length was extended accordingly. No reference plots
were studied for termitaria in cotton fields. The complete
data collection was carried out by the same observer.
To reveal similarities or dissimilarities between termite
mounds and the surrounding savanna regarding their phytodiversity, an ordination and a cluster analysis were performed with the program Community Analysis Package (Ver-
The woody plant layer comprised 54 species from 21 families. Fabaceae were most species rich with 14 species,
followed by Combretaceae (6 spp.), Capparaceae (4 spp.)
and Anacardiaceae (3 spp.). In our study, Capparaceae were
found exclusively on termite mounds.
The woody species diversity found in the adjacent savanna habitats (plots A and B) comprised 63 species from 22
families. The Fabaceae were represented with 17 species,
followed by Combretaceae (11), Rubiaceae (5) and Anacardiaceae (3).
Eleven woody species (which equals 20% of the termite
mounds’ ligneous flora) were either strictly limited to termitaria or at least four times more common on mounds than
in surrounding savannas. The family Capparaceae, with
the species Boscia angustifolia, Boscia salicifolia, Capparis fascicularis and Maerua angolensis and the species
Tamarindus indica (Fabaceae/Caesalpinoideae) and Rhus
natalensis (Anacardiaceae) were found exclusively on termite mounds. On the other hand, 17 species (nearly 30% of
the recorded savanna ligneous flora) including Terminalia
avicennioides, Annona senegalensis, Piliostigma thonningii,
Pteleopsis suberosa were limited to the savanna reference
plots and never occurred on termite mounds.
Regarding plant life forms, termite mounds display a high
diversity of lianas (e.g., Dioscorea dumetorum, Cucumis
maderaspatanus, Cissus quadrangularis), geophytes (e.g.,
Chlorophytum macrophyllum, Chlorophytum pusillum, Tacca leontopetaloides) and succulents (Sansevieria liberica,
5
Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15
Kalanchoe lanceolata, Costus spectabilis). The total flora of
156 species comprised 24 species of lianas, 16 species of
geophytes, 5 species of succulents.
Termite mounds display a clear zonation with most of their
species being unevenly distributed. Our field studies confirm a differentiation of 3 zones for the herb layer on the
mounds. Species richness and coverage of the herb layer decreased from bottom to top of termite mounds. 87 species
were found in the bottom zone, 56 species in the middle
zone and 32 species in the top zone. This decrease in diversity went along with changes in abundance of life forms.
Therophytes displayed higher abundance in the bottom
zone, while succulents and geophytes occurred in highest
abundance in the top zone (Fig. 3). Representatives of Poaceae, Malvaceae and Fabaceae were found principally in the
bottom zone, while Anthericaceae, Vitaceae and Cucurbitaceae occurred principally in the middle zone and Araceae,
Crassulaceae and Dracaenaceae on top of the mounds.
Fig. 4: Spatial preferences of Tamarindus indica, Rhus natalensis, Anogeissus leiocarpa and Combretum nigricans (Adjusted for area). / Préférences spatiales de Tamarindus indica, Rhus natalensis, Anogeissus
leiocarpa et Combretum nigricans (Ajusté en fonction de la superficie).
/ Räumliche Präferenzen von Tamarindus indica, Rhus natalensis, Anogeissus leiocarpa und Combretum nigricans (flächenangepaßt).
te mounds as a relatively homogeneous group which was
clearly separated from the savanna plots A and B. The savanna plots A and B could not be separated by our analyses,
although they were located in different (nevertheless fairly
similar) savanna types found in the area. The cover of both
the shrub and the tree layer was shown to be significantly
higher (p < 0.001) on termite mounds than in the neighboring areas. Shannon’s Index and Simpson’s Index showed
higher diversities on termitaria (see table 1).
Fig. 3: Distribution of life forms (except phanerophytes) in top, middle
and bottom zone of termite mounds (adjusted for area). Few species assigned to more than one life form. / Distribution des types biologiques
(sauf les phanérophytes) dans les zones de la termitière (haut, milieu et
bas) ( Ajusté en fonction de la superficie ). Un petit nombre d'espèces
sont associées à plus d'un type biologique. / Verteilung der Lebensformen (ausgenommen Phanerophyten) in der oberen, mittleren und
unteren Zone der Termitenhügel (flächenangepaßt). Einige Arten mehr
als einer Lebensform zugeordnet.
Spatial preferences also became evident for woody plants.
Species like Tamarindus indica, Opilia amentacea, Capparis fascicularis, Combretum micranthum and Rhus natalensis preferentially occurred in the central part of the mound,
while others like Combretum nigricans, Allophylus africanus and Anogeissus leiocarpa were restricted to the periphery. Interestingly, species principally restricted to termite
mounds like Tamarindus indica and Rhus natalensis were
usually found growing in the central parts. Other species
like Combretum nigricans and Anogeissus leiocarpa often
found to occur also in the adjacent savanna vegetation (plots
A and B) rather grew in the peripheral parts of the termite
mounds (Fig. 4).
The detailed recording of woody species occurrence and
abundance on the mounds and in the adjacent vegetation
allowed an analysis of similarity of vegetation between the
habitats. As described above, species diversity and abundance differed considerably between mounds and adjacent
area, underlining the specific soil and microclimatic conditions these habitats offer. The analyses of species composition and abundance with a cluster analysis and an ordination
(non–metric multidimensional scaling) displayed the termi6
The analyses documented no differences between termite
mounds in different savanna types (grass and shrub savannas), but revealed differences between termite mounds in
savanna environment and those located within cotton fields.
The species richness of herb and shrub layer on the latter
is significantly lower (p < 0.001) than on mounds in savannas. Especially the composition of the herb layer differs,
with more Poaceae species found on the mounds in cotton
fields and a significantly lower (p < 0.01) coverage of the
shrub layer. The termite mounds in cotton fields were also
characterized by the lowest diversity values of the Shannon
and Simpson Index (see table 1).
4 discussion
This study showed clearly that termite mounds represent diversity islands in the savanna biome, characterized by a speTable 1: Means of Shannon Index, Simpson Index and Evenness
(with standard deviation) for termite mounds in different surroundings and savanna plots. / Valeurs moyennes des Indices de Shannon, de Simpson et d'Équitabilité (avec écart-type) pour les termitières dans différentes régions et dans différents types de savanna. /
Mittelwerte des Shannon-Index, Simpson-Index und Evenness (mit
Standardabweichung) für Termitenhügel in verschiedenen Umgebungen und für Savannenflächen.
Location
Shannon
Index
Simpson
Index
Evenness
termite mounds
1,34±0,38
0,35±0,14
64,61±13,56
plots A
2,07±0,37
0,20±0,09
77,17±9,52
plots B
1,86±0,56
0,26±0,17
73,05±14,84
termite mound in
savannas
2,16±0,26
0,19±0,05
62,56±6,57
termite mounds in
cotton fields
1,85±0,20
0,26±0,06
61,68±5,11
Kirchmair et al.
cific, richer flora and usually denser vegetation than found
in surrounding habitats. Similar results are reported by several other studies executed in different parts of Africa, for
example in Uganda (moE et al., 2009), Tanzania (BloESch
2008) and Malawi (BundSchuh et al. 2010), describing a
distinct floristic composition and dense thickets on termite
mounds.
The differences in the species composition between termite
mounds and savannas can be linked to favorable soil conditions due to an enrichment in clay, plant nutrients like carbon, nitrogen, calcium, potassium and magnesium (WatSon
1977, BachEliEr 1978, BloESch 2008, gudEta et al. 2010,
JoSEph et al. 2012) and a better water availability (konaté
et al. 1999) found on termitaria.
The systematic relationship of the species found on termite
mounds is also noteworthy.
Studies on national park scale from the adjacent areas
(mBaYgonE et al. 2008, ouEdraogo et al. 2011) of the
WAP-complex as well as on a country scale (Schmidt 2006)
usually found Poaceae and Fabaceae to be the most diverse
families. In the Pama Reserve and the whole of Burkina
Faso, these two families have been followed in numbers
by Cyperaceae, Rubiaceae, and Euphorbiaceae. The latter were less important on termite mounds, where Vitaceae
and Poaceae followed Malvaceae and Fabaceae in species
richness. The lower importance of Cyperaceae can easily be
explained by their preference for humid or waterlogged localities which were not found on the mounds.
Considering their relatively small size of on average 69 m²
in our study, especially woody plant diversity is strongly
elevated on termite mounds. A very conspicuous feature
of the unique woody plant cover on termite mounds is the
family Capparaceae, which were found exclusively on termitaria in our study. A study of doSSou–Yovo (2009) from
northern Benin also showed that Capparaceae are restricted
to termite mounds. The study of BundSchuh et al. (2010)
in Malawi found that 3 of 5 species restricted to termitaria
belong to the family of Capparaceae.
A potential factor to explain the rather homogeneous species composition on termite mounds might be zoochorous
seed dispersal. By far most of the species occurring principally on termitaria have diaspores for which zoochory can
be assumed. Regarding the floristic composition of termite
mound in our study, 61% of the species can be seen as being
dispersed by animals (see Appendix S1).
While towards the top of the mounds the overall species
diversity decreased, an increasing abundance of succulents
(Sansevieria liberica, Kalanchoe lanceolata, Cissus quadrangularis and Costus spectabilis) could be observed. Succulent growth forms are commonly associated with high soil
nutrient levels under arid conditions (knight et al. 1989),
and we expect a high surface water runoff at the top of the
mound. Additionally, at the top of the termitaria, which offers a slight elevation above grass fires, succulents are well
protected from fire as they are highly sensitive to it (pérEz–
garcia & mEavE 2006). This might be less important for
Costus spectabilis with leaves only appearing in the growing season.
While the plant cover of termite mounds located in different savanna types did not differ significantly, the vegetation of mounds surrounded by cotton fields proved to be less
diverse and displayed a higher abundance of Poaceae. This
may be due to the use of fertilizers, but nevertheless could
also be caused by other factors like direct human impact to
improve the conditions for crops.
Termite mounds are habitats of high socio-economic importance, 62% of the total termite mound flora is used medicinally (nacoulma 1996, arBonniEr 2002, krohmEr
2004). Among these are Tamarindus indica (Fig. 5), Stereospermum kunthianum, Diospyros mespiliformis, Combretum
micranthum, Opilia amentacea, and Grewia bicolor, which
were shown to be restricted or to be much more abundant
Fig 5: Termite mound with Tamarindus indica. / Termitière avec Tamarindus indica. / Termitenhügel mit
Tamarindus indica.
7
Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15
on termitaria (see Appendix S1). Several of these species
have also been found to be restricted to termitaria in different phytogeographical districts of Benin by fandohan et
al. (2012).
We conclude that termite mounds represent abundant and
specific sites with increased and specific diversity concerning species, life forms and vegetation structure. Thus, their
preservation and conservation is of high importance for the
biodiversity in this savanna region.
Acknowledgments
We thank BIOTA West for funding the fieldwork (funding code
01LC0617D1) and the LOEWE research centre “Biodiversity and
Climate” (BiK–F) as well as the UNDESERT project (EU FP7,
grant 243906) for financial support (MS, KH) during the compilation of the manuscript.
We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Brice Sinsin, Université d’Abomey–
Calavi, and his group for the good cooperation and support.
References
african plantS dataBaSE vErSion 3.3.4 (2011): Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève and South
African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. Available
at http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/ (accessed
August 2011).
aké aSSi l, (2001–2002): Flore de la Côte d’Ivoire: catalogue systématique, biogéographie et écologie. Vol. I–II.
Boissiera 57-58. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de Genève.
akoègninou a, van dEr Burg WJ & van dEr maESEn lJg
(2006): Flore analytique du Bénin. Backhuys Publishers,
Wageningen. 1034 p.
arBonniEr m (2002): Arbres, arbustes et lianes des zones
sèches d’Afrique de l’Ouest (2nd ed.). CIRAD / MNHN,
Montpellier / Paris. 574 p.
BachEliEr g (1978): La faune des sols, son écologie et son
action. Documentations techniques 38. ORSTOM, Paris.
391 p.
BErhaut J (1971–1988): Flore Illustrée du Senegal. Vol. I–
VI. Ministère du Developpement Rural et l‘Hydraulique /
Direction des Eaux et Forêts, Dakar.
BloESch u (2008): Thicket clumps: A characteristic feature
of the Kagera savanna landscape, East Africa. J. Veg. Sci.
19: 31–44.
Brink aB & Eva hd (2009): Monitoring 25 years of land
cover change dynamics in Africa: A sample based remote
sensing approach. Appl. Geogr. 29: 501–512.
doSSou–Yovo cho (2007): Diversité des plantes en relation avec les termitières dans le Parc National de la Pendjari
et dans les terroirs riverains. Agricultural engineer thesis.
University of Abomey–Calavi, Benin.
fandohan B, aSSagBadJo aE, Salako vk, van dammE p
& SinSin B (2012): Which one comes first, the tamarind or
the Macrotermes termitarium? Acta Botanica Gallica 159:
345-355.
glovEr pE, trump Ec & WatEridgE lEd (1964): Termitaria and vegetation patterns on the Loita Plains of Kenya. J.
Ecol. 52: 367–377.
gudEta WS, arShad ma, konaté S & nkunika poY
(2010): Termite–induced heterogeneity in African savanna
vegetation: mechanisms and patterns. J. Veg. Sci. 21: 923–
937.
guinko S (1984): Végétation de la Haute-Volta. PhD thesis.
Université de Bordeaux III. 394 p.
hovEStadt t, Yao p & linSEnmair kE (1999): Seed dispersal mechanisms and the vegetation of forest islands in a
West African forest-savanna mosaic (Comoé National Park,
Ivory Coast). Plant Ecol. 144: 1-25.
hutchinSon J, dalziEl Jm, kEaY rJW & hEppEr fn
(1954–1972): Flora of West Tropical Africa. Vol. I–III. The
Whitefriars Press Ltd., London, Tonbridge.
JanSSEn t, Schmidt m, drESSlEr S, hahn k, hiEn m,
konaté S, lYkkE am, mahamanE a, SamBou B, SinSin
B, thiomBiano a, Wittig r & zizka g (2011): Addressing data property rights concerns and providing incentives
for collaborative data pooling: the West African Vegetation
Database approach. J. Veg. Sci. 22: 614-620.
JonES cg, laWton Jh & Shachak m (1994): Organisms as
ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 673–386.
JoSEph gS, SEYmour cl, cumming gS, cumming dhm
& mahlangu z (2012): Termite mounds as islands: woody
plant assemblages relative to termitarium size and soil properties. J. Veg. Sci. Doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01489.x.
knight rS, rEBElo ag & SiEgfriEd Wr (1989): Plant assemblages on Mima–like earth mounds in the Clanwille district, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 55: 465–472.
konaté S, lE roux x, tESSiEr d & lEpagE m (1999): Influence of large termitaria on soil characteristics, soil water
regime, and tree leaf shedding pattern in a West African savanna. Plant and Soil 206: 47–60.
krohmEr J (2004): Umweltwahrnehmung und –klassifikation bei Fulbegruppen in verschiedenen Naturräumen Burkina Fasos und Benins. PhD thesis. Johann–Wolfgang–Goethe–Universität, Frankfurt am Main. 302 p.
lEpagE m (1984): Distribution, density and evolution of
Macrotermes bellicosus nests (Isoptera: Macrotermitinae) in
the North–East of Ivory Coast. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 107–117.
BrunkEn u, Schmidt m, drESSlEr S, JanSSEn t, thiomBiano a. & zizka g (2008): West African plants – a photo
guide. www.westafricanplants.senckenberg.de. Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
mBaYngonE E, Schmidt m, hahn–hadJali k, thiomBiano
a & guinko S (2008): Magnoliophyta of the partial faunal
reserve of Pama, Burkina Faso. Check List 4: 251–266.
BundSchuh tv, Wittig r & hahn k (2010): Effects of human impact on miombo woodland in northern Malawi. Flora et Vegetatio Sudano–Sambesica 13: 22–34.
moE rS, moBaEk r & narmo ak (2009): Mound building termites contribute to savanna vegetation heterogeneity.
Plant Ecol. 202: 31–40.
dangErfiEld Jm, mccarthY tS & EllErY Wn (1998):
The mound–building termite Macrotermes michaelseni as
an ecosystem engineer. J. Trop. Ecol. 14: 507–520.
nacoulma o (1996): Plantes médicinales et pratiques médicales traditionnelles au Burkina–Faso: cas du plateau central. PhD thesis. Université de Ouagadougou. 261 p.
8
Kirchmair et al.
ouédraogo o, Schmidt m, thiomBiano a, hahn k,
guinko S & zizka g (2011): Magnoliophyta, Arly National
Park, Tapoa, Burkina Faso. Check List 7: 85-100.
pérEz–garcia Ea & mEavE Ja (2006): Coexistence and
divergence of savanna and tropical dry forest in southern
Mexico. J. Biogeogr. 33: 438–477.
poilEcot p (1999): Les Poaceae du Niger. Boissiera 56.
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de Genève / IUCN / CIRAD, Geneva. 766 p.
Schmidt m (2006): Pflanzenvielfalt in Burkina Faso - Analyse, Modellierung und Dokumentation. PhD thesis. Johann–Wolfgang–Goethe–Universität, Frankfurt am Main.
188 p.
Schmidt m, JanSSEn t, drESSlEr S, hahn k, hiEn m, konaté S, lYkkE am, mahamanE a, SamBou B, SinSin B,
thiomBiano a, Wittig r & zizka g (2012): The West African Vegetation Database. Biodiversity & Ecology 4: 105110.
Scholz h & Scholz u (1983): Graminées et Cyperacées du
Togo. J. Cramer, Vaduz. 360 p.
Smith fr & YEaton ri (1998): Disturbance by the moundbuilding termite, Trinervitermes trinervoides, and vegetation patch dynamics in a semi–arid, southern African grassland. Plant Ecol. 137: 41–53.
unEp (2008): Africa: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.
UNEP, Nairobi.
WatSon Jp (1977): The use of mounds of the termite Macrotermes falciger (Gerstäcker) as soil amendment. J. Soil
Sci. 28: 664–672.
Wood tg (1988): Termites and the soil environment. Biol.
Fertil. Soils 6: 228–236.
addresses of the authors
Ivana Kirchmair1,2,3, Marco Schmidt1,2,3,*, Georg
Zizka1,2,3, Arne Erpenbach3 & Karen Hahn2,3
(1)
Senckenberg Research Institute, Departement of
Botany and molecular Evolution, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
(2)
Biodiversity and Climate Research Center (BiK–
F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
(3)
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute for
Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Max-von-LaueStr. 9, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
*
Corresponding author. E–mail address: marco.schmidt@senckenberg.de
appendix s1
Plant taxa on 57 termitaria, surrounding and adjacent savanna plots in W National Park, North Benin. / Taxa des plantes sur 57 termitières
des placeaux entourants et voisins en savane du Parc National du W, Nord-Bénin / Pflanzentaxa auf 57 Termitenhügeln der umgebenden
und benachbarten Savannenflächen im W-Nationalpark, Nordbenin.
location
life form
dispersal
mode
medicinal
use
Acanthaceae
Asystasia gangetica (L.) T. Anderson
Blepharis maderaspatensis (L.) B. Heyne ex Roth
Justicia insularis T. Anderson
Monechma ciliatum (Jacq.) Milne–Redh.
T
T
T
T
th
th
th
th
?
ep
?
?
x
Agavaceae
Agave sisalana (Engelm.) Perrine
T
su
en
Amaranthaceae
Achyranthes aspera L.
Pandiaka angustifolia (Vahl) Hepper
Pupalia lappacea (L.) A.Juss.
T
T
T
th
th
he
ep
ep
ep
x
x
x
Amaryllidaceae
Crinum ornatum (L. f. ex Aiton) Bury
Scadoxus multiflorus (Martyn) Raf.
T
T
ge
ge
en
en
x
Anacardiaceae
Lannea acida A. Rich.
Lannea microcarpa Engl. & K. Krause
Ozoroa obovata var. obovata (Oliv.) R. Fern. & A. Fern.
Rhus natalensis Bernh. ex Krauss
T, A, B
T, A, B
A
T
ph
ph
ph
ph
en
en
en
en
x
x
x
x
Annonaceae
Annona senegalensis Pers.
Hexalobus monopetalus (A. Rich.) Engl. & Diels
A, B
T, A, B
ph
ph
en
en
x
x
9
Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15
location
life form
dispersal
mode
T
T
ge
ge
?
?
T
T, A, B
ph, li
ph, li
an
en
T
T
ge
ge
en
en
T, A, B
ph, li
en
x
T
T
T
T
T
T
th
th
th
th
th
th
an
an
an
an
ep
an
x
Balanitaceae
Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Delile
T, A, B
ph
en
x
Bignoniaceae
Stereospermum kunthianum Cham.
T, A, B
ph
en
x
T
T
T
T
ph
ph
ph
ph
en
en
en
en
x
x
Celastraceae
Gymnosporia senegalensis (Lam.) Loes.
T, A, B
ph
en
x
Cochlospermaceae
Cochlospermum planchonii Hook. f.
T, A, B
ch
en
x
T
ge, li
en
T, A, B
B
T, A, B
T, A, B
T, A
T, A, B
T, A, B
A, B
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
an
an
an
an
an
an
an
an
Anthericaceae
Chlorophytum macrophyllum (A. Rich.) Asch.
Chlorophytum pusillum Schweinf. ex Baker
Apocynaceae
Ceropegia racemosa N. E. Br.
Landolphia dulcis (Sabine) Pichon
Araceae
Amorphophallus dracontioides (Engl.) N. E. Br.
Stylochaeton lancifolius Kotschy & Peyr.
Asparagaceae
Asparagus flagellaris (Kunth) Baker
Asteraceae
Aspilia africana (P. Beauv.) C. D. Adams
Aspilia bussei O. Hoffm. & Muschl.
Aspilia helianthoides (Schumach. & Thonn.) Oliv. & Hiern
Aspilia kotschyi (Sch. Bip.) Oliv.
Bidens bipinnata L.
Pseudoconyza viscosa (Mill.) D‘Arcy
Capparaceae
Boscia angustifolia A. Rich.
Boscia salicifolia Oliv.
Capparis fascicularis DC.
Maerua angolensis DC.
Colchicaceae
Gloriosa superba L.
Combretaceae
Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr.
Combretum adenogonium Steud. ex A. Rich.
Combretum collinum Fresen.
Combretum glutinosum Perr. ex DC.
Combretum micranthum G. Don
Combretum molle R. Br. ex G. Don
Combretum nigricans Lepr. ex Guill. & Perr.
Pteleopsis suberosa Engl. & Diels
10
medicinal
use
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Kirchmair et al.
location
life form
ph
ph
ph
dispersal
mode
an
an
an
medicinal
use
x
x
x
Terminalia avicennioides Guill. & Perr.
Terminalia laxiflora Engl. & Diels
Terminalia schimperiana Hochst.
A, B
A, B
A
Commelinaceae
Aneilema beniniense (P. Beauv.) Kunth
Commelina benghalensis L.
Commelina erecta L.
Cyanotis lanata Benth.
T
T
T
T
ch
th
th
th
an
an
an
an
x
x
x
T, B
T
ph, li
th, li
an
an
x
Crassulaceae
Kalanchoe lanceolata (Forssk.) Pers.
T
th, su
an
Cucurbitaceae
Cucumis maderaspatanus L.
Kedrostis foetidissima (Jacq.) Cogn.
T, A
T
th, li
th, li
en
en
T
T
th
th
an
an
T, A, B
T
T, A, B
ge, li
ge, li
ge, li
an
an
an
x
T
ge, su
en
x
Ebenaceae
Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC.
T, A, B
ph
en
Euphorbiaceae
Bridelia ferruginea Benth.
Bridelia scleroneura Müll. Arg.
Euphorbia baga A. Chev.
Flueggea virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Voigt
Jatropha gossypiifolia L.
Tragia senegalensis Müll. Arg.
T, A, B
T, A
T
T, A, B
T
T
ph
ph
he
ph
ch
ph, li
en
en
en
en
en
en
x
x
Fabaceae
Acacia ataxacantha DC.
Acacia erythrocalyx Brenan
Acacia hockii De Wild.
Acacia macrostachya Rchb. ex DC.
Albizia chevalieri Harms
Burkea africana Hook.
Cassia mimosoides L.
Cassia obtusifolia L.
T, A
T, A
T, A, B
T, A, B
T
T, A, B
T
T
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ch
ch
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Convolvulaceae
Ipomoea cairica (L.) Sweet
Ipomoea eriocarpa R. Br.
Cyperaceae
Cyperus difformis L.
Kyllinga debilis C. B. Clarke
Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea dumetorum (Kunth) Pax
Dioscorea quartiniana A. Rich.
Dioscorea togoensis R. Knuth
Dracaenaceae
Sansevieria liberica Gérôme & Labroy
x
x
11
Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15
location
life form
ph
ch
ch
ch
ph
ph
ph
th
ch
ch
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
ph
th, li
th, li
ph
th
ch
th, li
th, li
ph
dispersal
mode
en
an
an
ep
en
en
en
en
an
an
en
en
an
an
en
en
an
en
en
en
an
an
an
an
an
medicinal
use
x
x
Cassia sieberiana DC.
Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC.
Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC.
Desmodium velutinum (Willd.) DC.
Detarium microcarpum Guill. & Perr.
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn.
Entada africana Guill. & Perr.
Indigofera dendroides Jacq.
Indigofera garckeana Vatke
Indigofera tinctoria L.
Isoberlinia doka Craib & Stapf
Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br. ex G. Don
Pericopsis laxiflora (Benth.) Meeuwen
Philenoptera laxiflora (Guill. & Perr.) Roberty
Piliostigma thonningii (Schumach.) Milne–Redh.
Prosopis africana (Guill. & Perr.) Taub.
Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir.
Rhynchosia buettneri Harms
Rhynchosia minima (L.) DC.
Tamarindus indica L.
Tephrosia pedicellata Baker
Uraria picta (Jacq.) DC.
Vigna luteola (Jacq.) Benth.
Vigna racemosa (G. Don) Hutch. & Dalziel
Xeroderris stuhlmannii (Taub.) Mendonça & E.C.Sousa
T, A, B
T
T
T
T, A, B
T, A, B
A, B
T
A, B
T
T, A, B
T, A, B
A, B
A
T, A, B
A, B
T, A, B
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
B
Lamiaceae
Hoslundia opposita Vahl
Hyptis suaveolens Poit.
Leucas martinicensis (Jacq.) R. Br.
Plectranthus gracillimus (T. C. E. Fr.) Hutch. & Dandy
Solenostemon rotundifolius (Poir.) J. K. Morton
T
T
T
T
T
ch
th
th
th
ch
en
?
ep
an
an
x
x
Loganiaceae
Strychnos innocua Delile
Strychnos spinosa Lam.
T, A, B
T, A, B
ph
ph
en
en
x
x
Loranthaceae
Agelanthus dodoneifolius (DC.) Polhill & Wiens
T, A, B
pa
en
x
Malvaceae
Abutilon ramosum (Cav.) Guill. & Perr.
Adansonia digitata L.
Bombax costatum Pellegr. & Vuill.
Gossypium hirsutum L.
Grewia barteri Burret
Grewia bicolor Juss.
Grewia cissoides Hutch. & Dalziel
Grewia flavescens Juss.
Grewia lasiodiscus K. Schum.
Grewia mollis Juss.
Hibiscus cannabinus L.
Hibiscus sineaculeatus F. D. Wilson
T
T
T, A, B
T
A
T, A
T
T, A, B
A
T, A
T
A
ch
ph
ph
ch
ph
ph
ch
ph
ph
ph
th
ch
an
en
en
an
en
en
en
en
en
en
an
an
12
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Kirchmair et al.
location
life form
th
he
he
ph
ch
ch
dispersal
mode
an
an
an
en
en
an
medicinal
use
x
x
T
T
T
T, A, B
B
T
Meliaceae
Pseudocedrela kotschyi (Schweinf.) Harms
A
ph
an
x
Moraceae
Ficus artocarpoides Warb.
Ficus exasperata Vahl
Ficus lutea Vahl
A
T
T
ph
ph
ph
en
en
en
Olacaceae
Ximenia americana L.
T, A, B
ph
en
x
Opiliaceae
Opilia amentacea Roxb.
T, A, B
ph, li
en
x
Orchidaceae
Eulophia guineensis Lindl.
T
ge
an
Poaceae
Andropogon gayanus Kunth
Brachiaria villosa (Lam.) A. Camus
Chasmopodium caudatum (Hack.) Stapf
Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler
Digitaria horizontalis Willd.
Hackelochloa granularis (L.) Kuntze
Hyparrhenia involucrata Stapf
Loudetia togoensis (Pilg.) C. E. Hubb.
Microchloa indica (L. f.) P. Beauv.
Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.
Pennisetum polystachion (L.) Schult.
Rhytachne triaristata (Steud.) Stapf
Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton
Setaria barbata (Lam.) Kunth
Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.
Sporobolus pyramidalis P. Beauv.
Zea mays L.
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
he
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
he
th
ep
an
an
an
an
an
ep
ep
an
ep
ep
ep
an
an
an
an
en
Polygalaceae
Polygala multiflora Poir.
T
th
an
Rhamnaceae
Ziziphus abyssinica A. Rich.
Ziziphus mucronata Willd.
T, A, B
T, A
ph
ph
en
en
x
x
Rubiaceae
Crossopteryx febrifuga (Afzel. ex G. Don) Benth.
Feretia apodanthera Delile
T, A, B
T, A, B
ph
ph
en
en
x
x
Sida alba L.
Sida rhombifolia L.
Sida urens L.
Sterculia setigera Delile
Triumfetta lepidota K. Schum.
Wissadula rostrata (Schumach.) Hook. f.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
13
Flora et Vegetatio Sudano-Sambesica 15
Gardenia aqualla Stapf & Hutch.
Gardenia ternifolia Schumach. & Thonn.
Sarcocephalus latifolius (Sm.) E. A. Bruce
Spermacoce radiata (DC.) Hiern
Spermacoce ruelliae DC.
Sapindaceae
Allophylus africanus P. Beauv.
Sapotaceae
Vitellaria paradoxa C. F. Gaertn.
Taccaceae
Tacca leontopetaloides (L.) Kuntze
Verbenaceae
Vitex doniana Sweet
Vitaceae
Ampelocissus africana (Lour.) Merr. var. africana
Ampelocissus leonensis (Hook. f.) Planch.
Cayratia gracilis (Guill. & Perr.) Suess.
Cissus cornifolia (Baker) Planch.
Cissus populnea Guill. & Perr.
Cissus quadrangularis L.
Cyphostemma adenocaule (Steud. ex A. Rich.) Desc. ex Wild & R.
B. Drumm. subsp. adenocaule
Cyphostemma cymosum (Schumach. & Thonn.) Desc. subsp. cymosum
Zingiberaceae
Costus spectabilis (Fenzl) K. Schum.
Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B. L. Burtt
location
life form
ph
ph
ph
th
th
dispersal
mode
en
en
en
?
?
medicinal
use
x
x
x
x
x
A, B
T, A, B
A, B
T
T
T, A
ph
en
x
T, A, B
ph
en
x
T
ge
en
x
A, B
ph
en
x
T
T, A
T
T, B
T, A, B
T
ph, li
ph, li
ph, li
ch
ph, li
ph, li, su
en
en
en
en
en
en
x
T
ph, li
en
T
ph, l
en
T
T
ge, su
ge
en
en
x
x
x
Location: T= termite mound, A= plot A, B= plot B
Life form according to aké aSSi (2001–2002) and guinko (1984): th=therophyte, ge=geophyte, he=hemicryptophyte,
ph=phanerophyte, li=liana, ch=chamaephyte, su=succulent, pa=parasite
Dispersal mode according to hovEStadt et al. (1999) and own observations: an=anemochorous, ep=epizoochorous,
en=endozoochorous, ?=unknown
Medicinal use according to nacoulma (1996), arBonniEr (2002) and krohmEr (2004).
14