Next Article in Journal
Post-Fire Recovery of Soil Nematode Communities Depends on Fire Severity
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Affecting Plant Composition in Abandoned Railway Areas with Particular Emphasis on Forest Proximity
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity of Auger Beetles (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in the Mid-Cretaceous Forests with Description of Seven New Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alien Species in the Pioneer and Ruderal Vegetation of Ukraine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anthropogenic Transformations of Vegetation in the Kuyalnik Estuary Valley (Ukraine, Odesa District)

by
Dmytro V. Dubyna
1,
Alim A.-A. Ennan
2,
Tetiana P. Dziuba
1,*,
Lyudmyla P. Vakarenko
1,
Galyna M. Shykhaleyeva
2 and
Hanna M. Kiryushkina
2
1
Department of Geobotany and Ecology, M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 01004 Kyiv, Ukraine
2
Environmental Monitoring Department, Physical-Chemical Institute for Environment and Human Protection of Ministry of Education and Science and The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 65000 Odesa, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(12), 1115; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121115
Submission received: 30 October 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Changes and Evolution of Flora and Vegetation under Human Impacts)

Abstract

:
Human influence on the steppe ecosystems of Ukraine caused irreversible loss of biodiversity in the natural zone. Currently, this problem is aggravated by military operations which cover almost half of the steppe zone and are unprecedented in the entire history of their existence. This actualizes the study of vegetation dynamic processes under the influence of the novel anthropogenic factors, and serves as the scientific basis for restoring and preserving steppe vegetation and maintaining its functional stability. The paper highlights anthropogenic changes in vegetation of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley based on long-term comparative phytocenotic surveys and uses of the method of succession series for reconstruction. These changes are representative of the river valleys of the estuaries in the Northern Black Sea region. This work examines vegetation changes induced by runoff overregulation of estuary rivers within the basin, quarrying of sand and limestone, ploughing, grazing, burning, terracing of slopes and their afforestation, excessive mowing of grass stands, and uncontrolled recreation. Subject to the existing anthropogenic impact combined with global climate changes, further vegetation degradation was predicted to occur in the direction of xerophitization and halophitization, reduction in shrubby vegetation areas, degradation of steppe vegetation, and intensification of desertification processes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The anthropogenic impact on native steppe ecosystems in recent decades has become a key factor in changes of their structural and functional relationships, and evolutionary transformations [1]. Fragmented and separated remains of steppe vegetation in Ukraine account for less than 20% [2] of vegetation. The centers of the nature reserve fund mainly cover the slopes of river valleys, estuaries, gullies, mounds, and so on. Issues of anthropogenic vegetation dynamics occupy the principal place in geobotanical studies of vegetation cover. Several scientists [3,4,5,6,7] developed successive changes in vegetation cover, and clarified the challenges to sustainability and risks of biosystem losses [8,9,10]. The anthropogenic aspect of evolution (resistance and synanthropization) has been developed [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Synanthropization of vegetation refers to the process of replacing species of natural communities with synanthropic species that are resistant to anthropogenic impact. Dynamic processes occurring in the vegetation cover were established to be enhanced by climate aridization and constant anthropogenic pressure. This results in the incompleteness of succession links and, accordingly, in the threat of destruction of steppe cenoses [17]. Plant communities in the steppe zone are exposed to transformation as a result of ploughing, overgrazing, burning, uncontrolled recreation, and processes of adventization [18,19,20,21,22,23]. It was proved that the regime of total conservation does not contribute to the preservation of typical steppe phytocenoses because of their mesophytization and replacement with shrubby and meadow or ruderal cenoses [24,25,26,27].
The Kuyalnik Estuary valley is part of the Black Sea estuary system, and is a unique natural and historical mega-geosystem (Figure 1). The estuary is well known for its healing mineralized waters and peloids. Its slopes of various steepness are represented by relatively well-preserved non-transformed areas covered by fescue-feather grass steppe communities, and flat areas are covered by saline-meadow and salt-marsh vegetation [28]. The vegetation development on them occurs under the influence of dynamic processes characterized by continuous variability. A specific characteristic of the vegetation cover in these ecotopes is its direct connection with dynamic physical and geographical conditions, which are characterized by continuous variability. The development of a phytocenotic cover on slopes shows itself in a single, clearly-defined cycle, in which changes of environmental conditions and rearrangements of the group structure are combined and manifested by functional interrelationships. These sloping landscapes of river valleys and gullies are the arenas of evolution, and formation of novel plant species and their communities that began in the postglacial period continue to this day. Such ecotopes are characterized by the highest level of biodiversity in the steppe zone of Eurasia due to the hyperspace of their ecological conditions (from semi-desert to overmoistened), and due to the development of pioneer, climax, and sub-climax types of vegetation organization [29] (Figure 2). The ecosystems in the Kuyalnik Estuary valley and adjacent territories are of great natural and historical value. In recent decades, they have been subjected to environmental hazards as a result of overregulation and restriction of the full and partial flow of rivers within the estuary basin [30,31]. This caused a sharp decrease in the water level of the estuary, salinization, and desertification of large areas within the valley. Annual sea water releases from the Black Sea to the estuary since 2014 have not solved this problem. Primary, this affected the state of plant communities in plain areas [28].
Botanical surveys of the estuary valley started in the 19th century [32]. Ecological and cenotic groundworks [33,34,35,36] made it possible to identify changes in the vegetation cover of this area. The purpose of this work is to find out the characteristics of anthropogenic changes of vegetation in order to solve the methodological problems of protecting and preserving the biodiversity of estuary valleys in the steppe zone of the Northern Black Sea region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Kuyalnik Estuary valley is situated in southwest Ukraine within the Odesa district and belongs to the group of closed estuaries of the Northern Black Sea region; it is one of the oldest in the region. Its shape is meridionally elongated and is separated from the Black Sea by an isthmus up to 3 km wide. Parts of the isthmus are built up and are part of the territory of the city of Odesa. The Kuyalnik Estuary reaches a length of 28 km from the upper reaches (the mouth of the Great Kuyalnik River) to the lower reaches (isthmus), and its width varies between 2 and 4 km. The estuary is shallow, the average depth is 0.5 to 1.5 m, and its salinity is about 300%. The water body is surrounded by high steep slopes, their height varies from north to south from 70–80 m and 15–20 m, respectively. The right bank is slightly higher and less steep than the left one. The slopes are divided by a dense network of gullies of different sizes (Figure 3).
Climatic conditions are determined by the location of the estuary territory within the steppe zone and contribute primarily to the development of steppe and halophytic vegetation. The proximity of the Black Sea softens the dry, hot climate of southern Ukraine. The relatively warm winters with a January temperature of –5 °C, a significant number of frost-free days (on average 220) and precipitation of 350–420 mm per year [37] create conditions for the development of xerophytic and xeromesophytic vegetation on the coastal slope of the estuary (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
The soil cover is represented by southern chernozems, southern chernozems residual-saline, slightly saline, and soils transitional from dark chestnut to southern chernozems [38]. Estuary-sea and estuary-delta loamy-clay deposits occur in the coastal zone.
According to geobotanical zoning, the territory of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley belongs to the Odesa district of cereal and wormwood-cereal steppes, saline meadows, salt marshes, and vegetation of carbonate outcrops of the Black Sea and Azov steppe sub-province of the Pontic steppe province (zone) of the Eurasian Steppe region [37].

2.2. The Dataset

The survey of vegetation changes was based on 720 original phytosociological relevés made by the authors from 2007–2017, in accordance with the methodological principles of the J. Braun-Blanquet school [39]. The relevés were made along the entire perimeter of the estuary valley, from the water edge to watersheds covered by native vegetation. The total area of the study area is about 105 km2. In the inter-estuary territories and on the plains surrounding the estuary valley, natural vegetation has been destroyed as a result of economic activity. Steppe vegetation has been preserved only on the steep slopes of the estuary valley, on the right and the left. It is presented fragmentarily due to terracing and afforestation of the right bank and the active development of erosion processes on the left. The slopes are drained by beams on the microslopes, of which steppe vegetation is also fragmentary. Halophytic and air-aquatic vegetation occupies the low coastal areas of the estuary valley. Trees and shrubs are concentrated on the slopes and in the beams.
The area of vegetation plots in most relevés was 25 m2. For smaller areas of vegetation, the sizes varied from 3 m2 (for example, Scorzonero parviflorae-Juncetum gerardii, Puccinellio distantis-Spergularietum salinae, etc.) to 20 m2 (Bassietum sedoidis, Halimionetum pedunculatae, etc.), and larger—50 and 100 (up to 400) m2 (Salvio nemorosae-Festucetum valesiacae, Ephedro distachyae-Stipetum capillatae, Fraxinus excelsior-Quercus robur comm., etc.). The coordinates of the locations of the groups were recorded using GPS devices Garmin eTrex 10 and GPSmap 60. The localization of plots on a cartographic basis was displayed in Google Earth using the TURBOVEG program (Figure 6). The largest number of relevés was made in 10 key sites: the slopes of large gullies, where the greatest vegetation diversity is represented. Nine ecological and cenotic profiles were laid in different parts of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, which encompassed the greatest variety of ecotopes.

2.3. Analysis

Interpretation of phytosociological material was conducted using a modified algorithm of two-factor indicator analysis of species (TWINSPAN) included in the JUICE 7.0 software package [40]. As a result of the analysis and establishment of diagnostic species based on the phi coefficient, 73 associations and 21 unranked communities belonging to 34 alliances, 24 orders, and 15 vegetation classes were identified [36].
The calculation of environmental parameters and the construction of the syntaxon ordination matrix were conducted according to standardized point scales of synphyto-indicative ecological amplitudes developed by Y.P. Didukh [41] and basic statistical analysis in Statistica 7.0 package (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
Vegetation changes were studied by both direct and indirect methods [4]. Direct methods comprised of comparisons of the literature and proprietary data, including phytosociological relevés of sample sites laid out in 2007–2008 and 2016–2017, respectively, and the estuary valley satellite images of 2003–2016 (Google Earth Pro). Indirect methods comprised establishing succession (temporal) relationships based on the analysis of spatial (ecological and phytocenotic) series of communities. Based on a certain ecological gradient, spatial ecological, and genetic vegetation series were distinguished. Reconstruction of the succession series was conducted on the basis of an analysis of geobotanical profiles laid out by the authors in 2016–2017 and vegetation maps of key territories. Methods of ecological relics and initial species were also used to determine the stages of succession [4].

2.4. Nomenclature

Latin names of species were presented according to the taxonomic summary [42]. Syntaxon names correspond to those given in “Prodrome of the Vegetation of Ukraine” [43].

3. Results and Discussion

The vegetation of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley is characterized by a high level of phytocenosis diversity. Its modern territorial and ecological and cenotic differentiation is due to the integrated influence of natural and anthropogenic factors. Amplitudes of syntaxons vary from coenoses of steppe and petrophytic vegetation, formed in dry conditions of the edaphotope, to wetlands, the most moistened and nitrophilous (Figure 7).
Plant communities of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley are in a state of continuous, sequential and catastrophic changes that lead to the complication or simplification of their structure. These changes are caused by natural and anthropogenic factors and characterized by certain spatiotemporal sequences. Catastrophic changes usually occur unexpectedly under the influence of one or more external factors and have both direct and indirect effects on the vegetation cover. Direct ones lead to the total physical destruction of entire plant communities or parts of them. Indirect ones show themselves as a sharp change in the ecological conditions of the biotope, and they affect the direction and time of the course of further post-catastrophic stages of succession [4].
Catastrophic changes in vegetation are caused primarily by hydrological changes in the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, the main of which are the following:
1. Straightening and blocking with more than 20 locks of the riverbed, conducted in the 1970–80s of the last century, and sewerage and damming of the lower reaches of the Great Kuyalnyk River (annual flow 7.6 million m3 per year) (Figure 8). This led to the isolation of underground springs, the interception of river flow, and the disappearance of freshwater wedging points on the slopes of the valley, and siltation of the canalized channel.
2. Random and excessive water withdrawal from the rivers of the basin of the Kuyalnik Estuary, whose area is more than 1860 km2, through the construction of dams. More than 130 artificial reservoirs in the basin accumulate 70% of the natural annual runoff.
3. Plowing in the past and grazing currently have a negative impact on the level, and, most importantly, the mineral composition of groundwater, which is in all areas of the floodplain of the upper reaches of the Kuyalnik Estuary, leads to their secondary salinization (Figure 9).
4. Sand sampling at the mouth of the Great Kuyalnyk River and shell rock in the upper reaches of the Kuyalnik Estuary led to a decrease in freshwater inflow into the floodplain part of the valley with corresponding negative consequences [44].
The scale of the impact of hydrological changes is so significant that, due to the weakening and disappearance of the leaching regime, the vegetation of almost the entire floodplain part of the valley has been transformed in the direction of changing moderately saline meadow communities to excessively saline, and, in some places, solonetz and even solonchak. Unique floodplain saline meadows and swamp communities were totally destroyed, and their restoration is now impossible due to a radical violation of the hydrological regime in the valley territory. The loss of meadow phytodiversity is intensified due to overgrazing of cattle in the floodplain areas. A certain influence is exerted by an increase in summer temperatures by 1–2 degrees Celsius and an increase in the alternation of dry years.
Catastrophic changes in vegetation (salt marsh, saline, saline-meadow steppe, and tree-shrubby) also occurred in part of the valley on which a product pipeline was built connecting the right and left banks of the estuary (Figure 10).
Significant territories were exposed to such changes in the places of current quarries where sand and limestone are extracted. Quarry sand extraction not only destroyed the natural vegetation cover but also radically changed the topography of the territory (Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13).
Large areas filled with mineralized water, depressions that alternate with striped sand mounds and shell rock have been formed. In such areas, the native vegetation was totally destroyed, or is at its final stage of degradation, and the expansion of ruderal species is observed. In subsidence areas, these species are Xanthium albinum, Carduus acanthoides, Grindelia squarrosa, Artemisia santonica, Conyza canadensis, Iva xanthiifolia, and others; in elevated areas, these are: Elytrigia repens, Bassia sedoides, Bromus squarrosus, and Agropyron pectinatum involved in weediness. In the final stages of overgrowth, shrubby vegetation is developed in these areas, mainly consisting of Elaeagnus angustifolia and E. commutata.
The vegetation in the territory between the water areas of the Kuyalnik Estuary and the Black Sea has undergone the greatest catastrophic changes. In historical times, it was represented by sandspits (bay bars) occupied by coastal psammophytic vegetation (Ammophiletea, Cakiletea maritimae, and Crithmo-Staticetea), and its flat sites were covered with halophytic vegetation (Therosalicornietea, Festuco-Puccinellietea, Juncetea maritimi, and Bolboschoenetea maritimi). At the beginning of the 20th century, the sandspits were built-up, and the flat areas were turned into filtration fields for water purification from oil contamination. Later, this area was transformed into a cascade of ponds separated from each other by dams. An international highway passes through this part of the valley (Figure 14).
The vegetation of dams is represented by a ruderal one. In adjacent areas, closed high-grass overgrowth, consisting of Atriplex tatarica, Artemisia annua, Calamagrostis epigeios, Iva xanthiifolia etc., with the participation of Phragmites australis, was formed (Figure 15).
Catastrophic changes in vegetation also occurred on the sandy-shell spits of the Kuyalnik Estuary water area and on the adjacent sloping territories with limestone outcrops that act as centers of growth of plant species belonging to psamophytic-shell and cretophytic floral complexes characterized by a richness of endemic and neoendemic species [28]. These geosystems have historically played an extremely important role as biogenetic reserves and, at the same time, they act as ecological corridors for the exchange of diasporas of florocenotic complexes in the western and eastern areas of the northern Black Sea region. Their destruction and, accordingly, the destruction of vegetation has become a disaster not only for this local territory, but it also negatively affected the state of vegetation cover of the entire region because of the interruption of biogeographic links. The disruption caused by sand and shell rock quarry extraction in this area also breaks the biogenetic links of coastal littoral vegetation of the Black Sea-Caspian region. Ruderal species, such as Tribulus terrestris, Medicago minima, Melilotus albus, Xanthium albinum, and others, are expanding within the transformed territories. Subsidence areas are occupied by seedlings of Elaeagnus angustifolia. Newly formed reservoirs filled with water are overgrown with Potamogeton pectinatus and Zannichellia palustris.
Ploughed areas located in the upper part of the estuary are also areas with catastrophically destroyed native vegetation cover. The total area of the floodplain of the mouth area of the Great Kuyalnyk River turned into agricultural land is about 6 km2, and the amount of the slopes of the Estuary turned into agriculture land is 0.5–1.0 km2. During the exploitation of agricultural lands, the soil physical and chemical characteristics have significantly changed, and the composition of diasporas and soil microflora have also changed [45]. A decrease in the river flow, up to its complete cessation, and prolonged summer droughts resulted in their excessive drainage and salinization. These lands, with a loss of fertility, were abandoned and turned into low-productive pastures. Restorative successions of their vegetation occur in the direction of the formation of salt meadows. Field areas abandoned one or two years ago are overgrown with ruderal species Atriplex tatarica, A. hortensis, Amaranthus retroflexus, and others, which later form communities of associations Amarantho retroflexi-Setarietum glaucae, Atriplicetum tataricae, and Atriplicetum hastatae. The next demutation stage is characterized by the introduction and growth of annual cereals, such as Bromus arvensis, B. squarrosus, and others, which together with Atriplex tatarica and Bassia sedoides form a vegetation cover on middle-aged fallows. These groupings are also unstable. In two or three years, Atriplex tatarica are removed from the vegetation cover, and Artemisia santonica appeared instead, and the cenotic role of Bassia sedoides is enhanced. Communities of Artemisietum santonicae var. Bromus japonicus typical of the saline soil of the estuary valley are being formed. Such communities can maintain their phytocenotic positions under these conditions for 10 or more years.
Catastrophic changes in vegetation occur in the sloping areas of the estuary valley covered by salt-meadow and salt-steppe vegetation, where seasonal unpaved car roads are laid annually. At the same time, vegetation is destroyed in the entire area occupied by such roads and is disturbed on the roadside. Laying transport routes in coastal areas is harmful due to their constant expansion in areas where water is released. Their expansion toward the water area is caused by the breaking up of previously laid roads. Their total width often reaches 200–300 m or more by the end of the season (Figure 16). At the same time, the soil is compacted, and deep ruts are formed with this condition. As stationary observations have shown, the overgrowing of roads with the complete removal of the influence of technology begins in the third year, and less often in the second year. It has been established that wheels compact the soil surface, and its salinity increases even more. These are critical conditions even for succulent saltwort species starting syngenetic processes (Salicornia perennans, Bassia hirsuta, etc.). In addition, the wheels destroy the habitats of the larvae of the mosquito Chironomus plumosus, the waste products of which are in the form of mounds, which are the places for the germination of seeds of succulent soleros. The development of these species contributes to a decrease in salinity and triggers changes in vegetation towards the formation of saline meadows. As observations have shown, the overgrowing of rutted areas on the coast occurs within 5–7 years.
The overgrowing of roads and bicycle roads on the slopes is even slower and is restrained by the influence of storm flows, which intensify the erosion processes of disturbed areas. With a weakening of this influence, overgrowing begins with the formation of ruderal communities, which are dominated by invasive communities (such as Melilotetum albo-officinalis, Chamaeplietum officinalis, Anisantho-Artemisietum austriacae, and Brometum tectorum). Their replacement by quasi-indigenous communities of steppe or solonetz-meadow vegetation, provided there are no repeated disturbances, occurs within 13–20 years.
Forest reclamation was the most destructive anthropogenic factor that led to catastrophic changes. Large-scale terracing of slopes, mainly the right-bank, and their afforestation was conducted in the 1960–70s of the last century. Artificial terraces were arranged with a width of 2–5 m and a depth of 0.5–1 m (Figure 17). Terracing of slopes and formation of tree and shrub plantations was conducted only on the right bank of the valley in an area of 25–30 km2. Elaeagnus angustifolia, E. commutata, Juglans regia, Malus domestica, Ulmus laevis, Rosa canina, Crataegus monogyna, Berberis vulgaris, Armeniaca vulgaris, Rhamnus cathartica, Ligustrum vulgare, Cotinus coggygria, and introduced species Celtis occidentalis, Robinia pseudoacacia, Gleditsia triacanthos, Styphnolobium japonicum, Pinus pallasiana, Amygdalus communis, and some others were planted in the relief depressions. This activity not only simultaneously destroyed the native steppe and petrophytic vegetation, but also radically changed the topographic characteristics and the soil cover structure of slopes.
A survey of terraced slopes in 2016–2017 showed that a satisfactory condition of tree stands was observed only on the slopes of some gullies, particularly Kovalivska. On the parent slopes of the valley, the loss of trees and shrubs in large areas were recorded in. In wooded areas, a sharp decrease in the types of sod and mixed grasses typical of steppe vegetation was observed. The herbaceous layer was almost completely absent in the plantings of trees with high crown closure. Since forest vegetation is not native to the steppe zone, its existence is maintained by the implementation of special measures and the planning of new plantings. This contradicts the natural and historical development of the steppe biota. Therefore, the creation of forest stands, particularly on sloping areas, even without terracing, is environmentally unjustified and harmful since it resulted in the impoverishment of biodiversity. Artificially created forest communities are vulnerable to natural environmental factors. They are affected by pests and diseases. Seed renewal is practically not observed, so they are characterized by a constant tendency to self-destruction. Afforestation also causes fragmentation of native steppe vegetation communities and violation of their natural integrity. At the same time, endemic and relict florocenotic complexes are exposed to significant transformations.
Forest reclamation of slopes resulted in the formation of transformed ecotopes and causes the development of new successive series of vegetation not inherent in this territory. The direction of post-catastrophic recovery processes directly depends on the conditions of newly formed ecotopes. On stabilized slope screes, native grass, or shrubby plant communities that are typical for these conditions often developed rapidly. In particular, O.V. Kostylov recorded the distribution of communities formed by Crataegus praearmata and Prunus spinosa on the slopes in the 19680s [35]. The plantings of Berberis vulgaris, Cotinus coggigria, Rosa canina, Crataegus monogyna, and Ligustrum vulgare were successfully naturalized in the estuary valley (Figure 18). They bear abundant seeds, reproduce by seed, and even form a number of morphotypes.
Native species, such as Ulmus laevis, Pyrus communis, differ do better when they are separate individuals and in plantings in general, while introduced species, especially Pinus pallasiana, are characterized by doing worse (Figure 19).
Ulmus laevis and Elaeagnus angustifolia are naturally restored in gullies and depressions on the slopes, and E. angustifolia forms a strip of vegetation around the estuary. In their grass cover, demutation processes of natural steppe vegetation occur (Figure 20).
In some places, communities of Salvio nemorosae-Festucetum valesiacae associations are developing on terraces with sparse or degraded tree and shrubby stands on chernozem low-humus soils (Figure 21), and Pimpinello titanophilae-Thymetum dimorphi or Ephedro distachyae-Stipetum capillatae are developing on crushed stone washed-out slopes. However, the rate of recovery succession and its outcome depends on the strength of the influence of anthropogenic factors (pastoral, pyrogenic, etc.). When these factors are strong and frequent, further restorative changes in vegetation are very rarely completed with the formation of indigenous plant communities. More often, quasi-native phytocenoses are formed with a large participation of adventitious and ruderal species, particularly Aegilopsetum cylindricae, Anisantho-Artemisietum austriacae, and Melilotetum albo-officinalis communities.
Spontaneous fires caused by non-compliance with fire safety are another destructive anthropogenic factor. The catastrophic consequences of fires in the Kuyalnik Estuary valley were primarily associated with their scale and great power. Given the geomorphological features of the territory, their scale and power are determined by the overlap of top and bottom fires. At the same time, the combustion temperature rises sharply, and the sod of cereals, both in the underground and the surface rhizomatous layer, and tree and shrubby vegetation, are totally burned. During the survey period, particularly in 2016, large areas of the coast, right-bank and left-bank slopes turned into a black desert. In August 2017, the vegetation on the left-bank slopes was burnt in an area of about 5 km in length and in some areas of the right-bank slopes. Fires begin at the end of summer with the appearance of dead wood and at the end after the onset of autumn rains. Fires are intense, especially if they start at the bottom of slopes. In almost all cases, they reach the upper slopes. In other cases, the upper part of the slopes burns out, the fire does not fall into the lower part. The magnitude of the fires is so large that firefighters are often unsuccessful is putting out the fire due to the steepness of the slopes. Their areas are in different years from 200 to 1000 m2.
Dried herbage of savanoid communities on the estuary coasts formed by annual cereals (Aegilops cylindrica, Hordeum murinum, Bromus squarrosus, B. mollis, B. japonicus, and Anisantha tectorum) and tall grass weeds (Centaurea sterilis, C. diffusa, Grindelia squarrosa, and others) create an extremely high fire hazard. These species also form the grass layer in Elaeagnus angustifolia comm. and Elaeagnus commutata comm. Namely, the pyrogenic factor superimposed on global trends in climate change resulted in the emergence and spread of savanoid communities in the territories previously occupied by saline meadows. The combined effect of these two factors was indicated by multiple researchers [46,47,48].
Tree and shrubby stands on terraced slopes and on the coast are subjected to catastrophic pyrogenic effects. Almost all plantings of Gleditsia triacanthos, Robinia pseudoacacia, Elaeagnus angustifolia and E. commutata, a significant part of Pinus pallasiana plantings, and curtains and separate bushes of Crataegus monogyna and Rosa canina were affected by consequences of frequent fires. Artificial tree and shrubby stands (primarily Pinus pallasiana) are quickly degraded, and later deciduous species are removed. Continuous shrubby thickets formed by deciduous shrubs Berberis vulgaris, Cerasus mahaleb, Ligustrum vulgare, and Cotinus coggygria are less exposed to the pyrogenic factor than sparse thickets formed by Crataegus monogyna and Rosa canina. Fires cause the destruction and/or suppression of thickets and separate plants. We associate the effect of the pyrogenic factor with the almost complete absence of communities of shrubby steppes in the estuary valley with the dominant Amygdalus nana and Caragana frutex widely distributed in other regions of the steppe zone. The first species occurs only on the edges of shrubby thickets, while the second species has a low projective cover (up to 15%), although it grows in steppe communities. The height of individual plants barely reaches 20–25 cm. Asparagus verticillatus is the only species of tree and shrubby communities less affected by fires. Due to its powerful root system with many underground renewal buds, individuals of this species quickly increase their vegetative mass after a fire (Figure 22).
In the literature, the influence of fires on the dynamics of grass communities, especially of steppe ones, is covered ambiguously. Issues of pyrogenic successions have been of interest to researchers since the second half of the 20th century [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Authors consider the steppe as a fire-type ecosystem adapted to the powerful flow of energy passing through food chains. Landscapes of true meadow steppes were defined as pyrogenic cyclical [57]. The works of L.Yu. Rodin [58] were devoted to the study of the effect of fires on steppe vegetation; he distinguished three directions of the effect of burning: positive, neutral, and negative. The researcher identified 13 positive aspects in vegetation changes under the influence of burning (65% of the studies analyzed were considered as positive), 6 as neutral (21%) and only 4 as negative (14%). Although the author later acknowledged that catastrophic-scale fires are mostly harmful to steppe biotic diversity, and the use of controlled pasture burning should be strictly regulated [59]. The favorable moderate effect of the pyrogenic factor on the plant communities of protected zonal steppes has been proven by many steppe scientists [55,60,61,62,63,64]. The observations proved that controlled fires, which occur once every 5–10 years, contribute to the normal functioning of zonal steppe groupings by disposing of accumulated litter, suppressing shrubby vegetation, stimulating vegetative, and seed renewal of sod cereals and xerophytic mixed grasses [65]. Regulated burning of steppe herbage in protected and other natural areas (when an organization of regulated grazing or planned mowing is not possible) is one of the methods of managing steppe communities and preventing the occurrence of reservatogenic successions [66]. However, frequent and severe fires cause changes in the ratio of chemical elements in the matter-cycling system of the communities, increasing the temperature regime and reducing soil moisture. Bare soil surface, particularly on slopes, is more vulnerable to wind and water erosion because of the changes in its trophic levels and hydrothermal regime. This, accordingly, worsens the conditions for the existence of soil microorganisms and affects the restoration processes in above-ground plant parts and seed germination. In frequently burned areas, an expansion of pyrophytes (mostly annual ruderal and adventitious species) was observed, which maintain cenotic positions for a long time and inhibit the steppe herbage restoration. Regular fires dramatically negatively affect the development of shrub, moss, and lichen layers in plant communities.
On the gentle slopes of the left-bank in the upper part of the estuary valley, near the product pipeline, a strong fire occurred in autumn 2016 covering about 200 hectares. As a result of the fire, the above-ground plant phytomass and litter were burned completely. The year following the fire, communities of associations of Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis and Stipo ucrainicae-Agropyretum pectinati typical for zonal steppe generally restored their floral structure (Figure 23). However, the total projective cover of grass stands in these communities was 20–30% less than in areas not affected by fire. In addition, the patches of bare, later washed-out soil (30–40%) and the total absence of steppe litter, which reduces the soil water evaporation, were observed.
The strong thinning of the grass stand affected competitive relations between plant species. The released econishes were filled with vegetatively mobile species of the steppe complex that have a broad ecological amplitude (Galatella villosa, Elytrigia repens, E. intermedia, Carex praecox, Poa angustifolia, and others), and explerent (ruderal) species (Centaurea solstitialis, C. diffusa, Sisymbrium orientale, Falcaria vulgaris, and others). Single bushes of Crataegus monogyna and Rosa canina that grew in the study area had the remains of dead burnt skeletal branches and trunks, and the height of living ones reached only 50–80 cm. The projective cover of Caragana frutex did not exceed 1–5%, and the height of individual plants reached 15–20 cm. Vegetation of the left-bank slopes located opposite the Kovalivka village is also often affected by the pyrogenic factor. On the area of slopes below the power line, after the August and September fires in 2017, a total burnout of above-ground phytomass and steppe litter was observed, and a decrease in the area of living parts of sod cereals Festuca valesiaca, Stipa lessingiana, and S. capillata by 50% was observed. Restoration of the grass stand began with the appearance of young vegetative shoots of Phragmites australis (at the bottom of the slopes), Asparagus verticillatus, and leaf rosettes of taproot mixed grasses: Taraxacum bessarabicum, Limonium platyphyllum, Seseli campestre, Verbascum phoeniceum, Goniolimon tataricum, and others.
The left-bank slopes above the Novokubanskaya Balka were dominated by steppe communities with the predominance of Stipa lessingiana in 2009 [67]. Although sod grasses (which include the above-mentioned species) have a fairly high pyrogenic resistance, they could not withstand regular burning on poor and dry stony soils. Currently, due to frequent fires, feather grass communities have been replaced by digressive plant groups of semi-desert type with a dominance of Festuca valesiaca, Agropyron pectinatum, Kochia prostrata, and Ephedra distachya (Salvio nemorosae-Festucetum valesiacae var. Artemisia austriaca, Astero oleifolii-Ephedretum distachyae, Ephedra distachya comm.), and Elytrigia repens and E. intermedia (Salvio nemorosae-Elytrigietum intermediae) on erosive areas of slopes. Fires that occur on the left-bank loess slopes contribute to increased erosion and landslide processes. The combined effect of pyrogenic and geomorphogenic factors directs the succession of steppe vegetation in the slope areas of the estuary valleys towards the development of desertified erosiophilic communities, in which the cenotic role of steppe sod grasses is decreased, and the role of rhizomatous grasses is increased (in particular, Elytrigia repens, E. intermedia, Agropyron pectinatum). The phytodiversity and richness of the plant communities are generally reduced. Both rare and common species of steppe mixed herbaceous vegetation were removed from the composition of these communities. It was established that the current state of vegetation cover of steppe communities in the Kuyalnik Estuary valley (especially its left-bank slopes) is adversely affected not only by tree and shrubby communities, but also by grass ones.
The steppe communities developed on the slopes of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley are significantly vulnerable to the pyrogenic effect than the watershed ones since the conditions of the slope ecotopes (especially of the southern-, southwestern- and western-faced slopes) are significantly different from the watershed conditions and become similar to the deserted ones. The consequence of combined effect of geomorphogenic and anthropic factors is a change in zonal steppe communities (with the participation of Stipa pulcherrima and S. ucrainica) on derivative communities more resistant to many factors of anthropic influence: Stipa lessingiana and S. capillata, and the absence of shrubby steppes with the dominance of Amygdalus nana and a minor participation of Caragana frutex in steppe communities.
Changes in vegetation as a result of pasture impact on the territory of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley have both positive and negative effects. At all stages of the evolution of herbaceous plant communities, their vegetation cover served as a food reserve for many species of wild animals. Ungulates act as invariable components of the steppes [68]. Moderate livestock grazing maintains the species and cenotic diversity in grass ecosystems, while grazing of ungulates in protected steppes is an effective and natural way to manage plant communities [69]. Overgrazing has a profound destructive effect on steppe ecosystems [70]. The massive grazing of sheep and goats is especially harmful for grass communities of pastures, the sheep and goats destroy the sod plants with their sharp hooves and cause a greater negative impact than eating of aboveground plant parts (Figure 24). Direct, excessive livestock grazing affects the steppe vegetation negatively and causes the complete destruction of the native grass cover. It also affects it indirectly through soil compaction [71,72]. In addition, on the slopes of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, in stock driving roads, numerous trails are formed, which can be eroded by storm and meltwater thereby increasing soil erosion and landslide phenomena.
In the process of pasqual changes, zonal saline-meadow, and steppe communities are changed to derivatives ones that are at the different stages of degradation. This leads to a reduction in the area of natural grass vegetation, a destruction of many steppe plant species (primarily rare ones listed in the Red Book of Ukraine), an increase in the number of weeds, poisonous, and inedible species for livestock, and an increase in their cenotic role. Areas of the coast of the Kuyalnik Estuary, the lower gentle parts of the slopes, the bottoms, and the slopes of large gullies located near settlements are intensively used as pastures. In recent years, there has been an increase in the grazing pressure on plant communities due to an increase in the number of sheep and goats. Such pressure exceeds the production capabilities of herbaceous plant communities in the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, which causes their degradation and development of series of successive phytocenoses.
Cattle grazing, particularly in coastal areas occupied by groups of pioneer halophytes of the class Therosalicornietea, is conducted in the second half of summer and autumn. During this period, a seasonal reduction in the surface of the estuary water area and the emergence of substantial coastal areas occurs. Grazing animals partially consume the aboveground parts of plants, but more often they trample, compact the soil, and change the microrelief of pastures. It was established that livestock grazing in areas occupied by communities of associations Salicornietum prostratae and Bassietum hirsutae does not cause significant violations in their structure, since they are restored annually as soon as ecotope conditions make it possible. Animals contribute to the spread of seeds of these species and their colonization of newly formed land areas. For a replacement of the above-mentioned groupings, associations of Halimionetum pedunculatae or Salicornio perennantis-Suaedetum salsae are developed on the heavily compacted soils only in some areas where coastal pastures are intensively used.
Degradation of communities of saline-steppe and saline vegetation under the influence of grazing is characterized by an increase in the number of ruderal species, such as Atriplex prostrata, Melilotus albus, Grindelia squarrosa, Centaurea solstitialis, Lactuca tatarica, Consolida regalis, Bromus squarrosus, Lepidium ruderale, and others. Moderate grazing pressure resulted in the development of communities of Artemisietum santonicae var. Bromus japonicus. Pasture intensification and associated xerophitization of environmental conditions cause the formation of communities of Poo bulbosae-Artemisietum santonicae and Taraxaco bessarabicae-Artemisietum santonicae associations. In addition to representatives of saline-meadow vegetation, xerophytic synanthropic species Achillea setacea, Artemisia austriaca, Carduus acanthoides, Centaurea adpressa, Grindelia squarrosa, Lactuca tatarica, Taraxacum bessarabicum, and others take a significant part in the communities of the latter association.
In the floodplain of the Great Kuyalnik River valley, livestock grazing is conducted (as already mentioned) on the fallows, causing the development of low-productive digressive communities of Taraxaco bessarabicae-Artemisietum santonicae association with a substantial presence of Bassia sedoides and Grindelia squarrosa. Ruderal communities of Onopordetum acanthii, Carduo acanthoidis-Onopordetum acanthii, Hyoscyamo nigri-Conietum maculati are being formed in the sites of camps and sheepfolds. In areas of fallows subjected to intensive grazing, the herbage degrades and specific succession communities of Poo bulbosae-Artemisietum santonicae and Taraxaco bessarabicae-Artemisietum santonicae are developed. Poa sterilis, P. bulbosa and other cereals are resistant to grazing pressure predominated in these communities, which cover large territories in the floodplain part of the valley. In some areas around low aeolian hills, in conditions of sufficient flushing, processes of formation of columnar saline soil covered with tall thickets of Atriplex tatarica are observed.
It was established that the floral richness of steppe communities Is directly related to the grazing intensity and duration and decreases with the prolongation of the grazing duration. In the estuary valley, five stages of pasqual digression were identified using the example of steppe communities with the association Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis, which are also typical for other regions of the Northern Black Sea region [71,73]. At the first stage (weak grazing), communities in associations of Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis followed the typical structure: the projective cover is 80–90%, the herbage includes two or three sub-layers, and the maximal height of which reaches 80 cm. A sparse (0.2–0.3) layer of tall bushes with Crataegus monogyna and Rosa canina or low bushes with Caragana frutex is quite often observed. Stipa lessingiana and S. capillata dominated, S. ucrainica occasionally occurs; the floral composition of the communities includes 50–60 species. Plant communities on this stage are still floristically rich and quite high-productive. However, there is a certain decrease in their vitality, and sometimes a decrease in the number of coenopopulations of Stipa lessingiana and xeromesophytic mixed grass species.
At the second stage, along with an increase in grazing pressure or in the case of sheep and goat grazing, a change in the floristic composition of communities is manifested by a decrease in the number of mixed grass species (primarily legumes). Species of the genus Stipa degrade much more slowly. After grazing cessation, the steppe restores relatively quickly, up to 5 years. At the third stage of pasqual digression accompanied by prolonged grazing of significant livestock numbers, the dominant role passes to Agropyron pectinatum (gentle slopes with degraded chernozems) or Bothriochloa ischaemum (steeper slopes covered with washed-out gravel or clay soils). The role of annual cereals Bromus japonicus, B. squarrosus, Anisantha tectorum, and other species: Euphorbia seguieriana, Salvia nemorosa, Kochia prostrata, Koeleria cristata, Artemisia austriaca, and others is enhanced. Typical mixed grass steppe species (Salvia nutans, Astragalus albidus, A. austriacus, A. onobrychis, Phlomis pungens, and many others) fall from the grass stands. The total projective cover of communities is reduced. At this stage of digression, Salvio nemorosae-Festucetum valesiacae var. Artemisia austriaca communities (on degraded chernozems), Salvio nemorosae-Elytrigietum intermediae (on saline soils and landslide steep slopes), and Bothriochloetum ischaemi (on washed-out gravel soils) are developing on pastures [74]. A special feature of the 3rd-stage phytocenoses is their mosaic horizontal structure characterized by an appearance of different-sized patches formed by fragments of ruderal communities with a predominance of Polygonum aviculare, Trifolium campestre, Medicago minima, Erodium cicutarium, and others.
At the second and third stages of pasqual digression, steppe communities still retain the main characteristic of their structure, and a sufficient seed reserve. After the cessation or substantial reduction in the grazing pressure, the recovery of feather grass steppes occurs only after 5–8 years, as confirmed by long-term studies.
The fourth stage of excessive grazing pressure (extreme overstocking) is typical for the most intensively used areas. At this stage, sod grasses disappear from the herbage. Instead, annual and short-lived Roa bulbosa, Bromus japonicus, B. squarrosus, Anisantha tectorum, and Aegilops cylindrica dominate. Low-productive and floristically poor communities of Poo bulbosae-Artemisietum santonicae, Anisantho-Artemisietum austriacae, Aegilopsetum cylindricae, Artemisia absinthium-Bromus squarrosus comm., and other associations are formed. Only the most xerophytic species of steppe mixed grasses, such as Marrubium peregrinum, Euphorbia seguierana, Potentilla supina, Eryngium campestre, and Falcaria vulgaris, are still presented in the vegetation cover. Ruderal and poisonous plant species predominate. Restoration of the primary vegetation cover of poor pastures subjected to grazing cessation requires a longer time period: 9–15 years.
The fifth stage is represented by communities of ruderal species (Conium maculatum, Heliotropium europaeum, Onopordum acanthium, Chondrilla juncea, Grindelia squarrosa, Lactuca serriola, Carduus crispus, Xanthium albinum, Centaurea solstitialis, Polygonum aviculare, and annual and minor species of cereals). They are formed in places of massive and long-term stay of livestock near barns, farms, and watering holes. It was found that compaction of the surface soil horizon is a specific characteristic of intensively used pastures and sites of long-term livestock keeping. This causes an increase in its capillarity, deterioration of aeration and water permeability, and surface overheating in summer and overcooling in winter. Secondary salinization and, as a result, an increased risk of erosion are also observed. The grass cover of such areas is sparse. The vegetation of paddocks is practically not restored naturally and requires special remedial measures.
On the territory of the estuary valley, the strongest pasqual degradation of steppe vegetation is observed on the slopes of the valleys of the Novokubanska, Kubanska and Ilinska gullies, and on the main slopes of the estuary valley near the villages of Stara Emetivka, Kovalivka, Ilinka, Lativka, and Krasnosilka. The state of the steppe sites in these areas corresponds to the fourth and sometimes fifth stages of pasture digression. On the part of the slopes below the Novokubanska gully, in the direction of the Krasnosilka village, moderate livestock grazing takes place. The state of steppe areas corresponds to the second and third stages of pasture digression. A cattle drive through loess slopes intensifies erosion processes. An increase in the number of goats grazing on the territory of the locality of Glycyrrhiza glabra (species listed in the Red Book of Ukraine, unique in the region) poses, as already noted, a real threat of its complete destruction [75].
Mowing-induced vegetation changes depend on the mowing timing and frequency, the cutting height, and type of haymaking management measures. In the estuary valley, only some coastal territories are subjected to annual mowing, and areas of plateaus and gentle slopes near settlements with digressive-demutational steppe communities. Haymaking is not performed on the slopes.
Areas of fallows and abandoned pastures on the left-bank estuary valley are regularly mowed down. Their vegetation cover is represented by communities with a prevalence of Aegilops cylindrica, Anisantha tectorum, Bromus squarrosus, and other annual cereals. Haymaking of the areas is performed once a year, mechanically, in early summer, in the pre-seeding stage. This influence causes gradual positive changes in the structure of vegetation cover toward the formation of meadow-steppe and steppe communities. In some cases, the phenisicial factor, especially in combination with pyrogenic and pasqual factors, can have a catastrophic effect on vegetation. Research on the location of the rare species Glycyrrhiza glabra growth has shown that its cenopopulations tend to degrade as a result of annual mowing of these areas.
On the slopes of the left-bank estuary, on large areas of fallows, quasi-savanoid communities of Aegilopsetum cylindricae association develop (Figure 25). Along with a high projective cover (up to 80%), they are dominated by Aegilops cylindrica, and the floral composition is dominated by annual cereals (such as Hordeum murinum, Bromus squarrosus, B. japonicus, Anisantha tectorum) and ruderal, mostly annual or biennial species (such as Centaurea adpressa, Chenopodium urbicum, Cirsium setosum, Convolvulus arvensis, Crepis tectorum, Papaver rhoeas, Grindelia squarrosa, Lepidium ruderale, Melilotus officinalis, and others). Sod cereals (such as Stipa lessingiana, S. capillata, Festuca valesiaca, and Agropyron pectinatum), and steppe mixed grass species (such as Salvia nemorosa, S. nutans, Eryngium campestre, etc.) are presented sporadically. Their presence indicates the beginning of the development of demutational steppe communities on the next successive stage. Moderate anthropic influence (such as periodic mowing and burning) contributes to the increase in the role of steppe species, primarily sod cereals, as a result of which the demutation of steppe vegetation here occurs without the participation of rhizomatous cereals. This stage is typical for areas of recently abandoned fields that are not mowed or grazed, but only spontaneously burned.
Demutation of steppe vegetation occurs, according to the classical scheme, through the stages of ruderal vegetation and rhizomatous cereals. The ruderal stage is characterized by the formation of communities of Artemisietum annuae, Onopordetum acanthii associations, or non-ranking groupings dominated by tall species such as Descurainia sophia, Centaurea solstitialis, Melilotus albus, and so on. Over time the participation of rhizomatous cereals Elytrigia repens, Poa angustifolia, and Bromopsis riparia and types of steppe mixed grasses, such as Seseli campestre, Salvia nemorosa, Teucrium chamaedrys, Plantago lanceolata, Tragopogon major, and others, increases in herbage evidencing the beginning of the stage of rhizomatous cereals.
Regular frequent mowing of meadow and steppe plant communities causes negative changes in the composition and productivity of herbage species [71,76,77,78]. As a result of annual mowing, plant species that are in the state of flowering or budding during the mowing period fallout from the grass stands. Removal of substantial phytomass volumes leads to soil overheating and water evaporation resulting in xerization of ecotopes, and, subsequently, of plant communities. Frequent mowing of steppe vegetation leads to a decrease in its complexity and mosaicity, simplification of horizontal and vertical structures, and to floristic impoverishment.
Under the influence of recreation, vegetation dynamics are caused by mechanical disturbances of the vegetation cover, soil compaction, changes in its physical and chemical characteristics, water supply, and chemical and mechanical contamination (such as spent fuel, lubricants, waste products, food residues, and household waste). All these factors are associated with the presence of many people in natural ecosystems and spontaneous recreational activities.
In the southern part of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, there is a large sanatorium-resort complex “Kuyalnik”, which covers an area of about 18 hectares. On its territory, native vegetation is totally destroyed, and largely degraded on beaches and other recreation areas of coastal territories due to direct trampling. By trampling, the continuous vegetation cover is also divided into separate bio-groups by pathways and viewing platforms. The share of ruderal annual cereals (such as Bromus squarrosus, B. mollis, Anisantha tectorum, and Aegilops cylindrica) and adventitious species (such as Xeranthemum annum and Grindelia squarrosa) rises in the structure of communities. Demutations of native vegetation occur extremely slowly in areas of long-term stay of recreationists.
In the rest of the estuary valley, recreational activities are also limited to coastal and slope areas. During the summer period, annual extreme car rallies are performed on the coastal areas released from water. Their route passes through the coast of the estuary covered by halophytic vegetation. Other areas of the route pass along slopes with limestone outcrops occupied by petrophytic vegetation. The total rally distance is more than 100 km. The car wheels destroy and transform the vegetation cover, compact the soil, and leave deep ruts. Additionally, chemical soil contamination also occurs.
Unauthorized bike tracks laid on the right bank of the valley also pose a threat to the steppe and shrubby vegetation of the slopes. Annual autumn bicycle rallies with a length greater than 70 km gather annually about 1500 participants and fans. Deep bicycle tracks serve as channels for temporary watercourses of stormwater and meltwater, increasing erosion processes on the slopes.
Vegetation changes due to invasions of alien species occur throughout the estuary valley. A total of 87 adventive species are distributed here, which is 18% of the total floristic composition [79]. The expansion of these species causes changes in the structure, functioning, and stability of natural ecosystems, displacement of native plant species, and biological contamination of the gene pool due to the hybridization of close native and non-native taxa [80]. Especially harmful are transformer plants capable of transforming ecosystems that have overcome the phytocenotic barrier and become a part of the native flora. They radically change the structure, dynamics, and functions of native plant communities or create new cenoses that displace the aboriginal ones.
The most intense changes in vegetation cover due to adventization processes are observed in the coastal territories of the valley in a zone of saline-meadow and meadow-steppe communities. Currently, in territories where communities of alliance Plantagini salsae-Artemision santonicae should prevail, substantial areas are occupied by phytocenoses dominated by transformer species Elaeagnus angustifolia and E. commutata. The grass cover is dominated by archaeophytes and kenophytes: Bromus squarrosus, Grindelia squarrosa, Atriplex prostrata, Cichorium intybus, Carduus acanthoides, Anisantha tectorum, and A. sterilis, which displace the species of native flora. The source of their appearance and distribution within the region is primarily ruderal phytocenoses.
A total of 15 species have the highest invasive capacity: Anisantha tectorum, Echinochloa crusgalli, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Conyza canadensis, Bromus squarrosus, Centaurea diffusa, Carduus acanthoides, Grindelia squarrosa, Xanthium albinum, Elaeagnus angustifolia, Iva xanthiifolia, Brachyactis ciliata, Hordeum murinum, and Papaver rhoeas, and transformer species occur among them. Descurainia sophia, Portulaca oleracea, Onopordum acanthium, Artemisia absinthium, Atriplex prostrata, A. tatarica, Cichorium intybus, Lactuca serriola, Sclerochloa dura, Senecio vulgaris, Setaria viridis, Sonchus arvensis, S. oleraceus, Amaranthus blitoides, A. retroflexus show moderate activity.
A great hazard for the native communities of the valley is the spread of such transformer species as Elaeagnus angustifolia, E. commutata, and Cotinus coggygria. These species form a community with a gradually increasing area due to the transformation of grass steppe vegetation. These results are consistent with the results of studies conducted in native steppe reserves (“Streltsivsky steppe”, “Stone Grave”, etc.). A characteristic feature of modern processes associated with the increasing anthropogenic transformation of the vegetation cover in the steppe zone is the formation of thickets of foreign tree species at the early stages of succession (from 10 years), most often with the participation of Ulmus pumila, Fraxinus lanceolata, and Acer negundo [81,82]. The succession course typical of the steppe zone is observed only in areas where moderate grazing and/or haymaking is performed.
In the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, plantings of Celtis occidentalis inhibit the development of all other species, especially native flora due to the strong allelopathic effect. Rooting of individual plants of C. occidentalis to shrub groupings of Crataegus monogyna-Cotinus coggygria comm. and Crataegus monogyna-Rosa canina comm. located near their parent plantings was recorded. Cotinus coggygria has also demonstrated the tendency to spread on the right bank slopes of the valley. This species is well restored by seeds and forms thickets characterized by high crown closure and lack of grass cover. C. coggygria is an expansive species in the estuary valley and inhabits ecotopes occupied by native steppe and shrubby communities. Lycium barbarum is much less common, and it forms thickets mainly in disturbed areas in the vicinity of settlements and is not introduced into native groupings.
Identifying historical changes in vegetation cover, particularly caused by human activity, including quantifying their scales in space and time, is crucial for assessing long-term impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning [83]. Understanding the processes underlying historical responses will also contribute to the development of appropriate mitigation strategies to reduce the harmful effects of human activity on natural systems [84]. This is of particular importance for arid regions of the planet [85].
Multiple works were devoted to historical changes in the vegetation of the Black Sea region [71,86,87,88,89,90]. For thousands of years, changes in climatic conditions have caused corresponding historical transformations of plant communities. In the early Holocene, periglacial steppes were transformed into meadow, true, and desert steppes occupied most of the territory of modern Ukraine [86]. In the middle and late Holocene, substantial areas were covered by woody vegetation. It was at this time that the border of the steppe zone came as close as possible to the modern one, and the forests along the river valleys reached the Black Sea. The steppes of Ukraine 4–5 millennia ago were distinguished by a wide variety of herbage, substantial spatial differentiation, widely distributed shrubby communities, and greater afforestation than what currently there. The forests stretched into valleys of rivers, estuaries, and gullies. In some places, they reached the watershed areas [88].
With the development and intensification of economic activity, forests were almost totally destroyed, and steppe vegetation was changed toward its xerophytization. In the pre-agricultural period, in the lower part of the Great Kuyalnik River and in the estuary valley, the gentle slopes of the valley side and gullies were occupied by broad-leaved forests, and the steeper slopes were covered by thickets of mesoxerophilic bushes. Steppe and petrophytic-steppe communities were common in places with Pontic limestone outcrops or near-surface limestones, and on steep erosive slopes, the vegetation of which underwent cyclical geomorphogenic changes [89].
In the process of centuries-old development of the banks of estuaries, river valleys, gullies, and ravines with the retreat of coastal strips, due to landslide processes, the vegetation of newly formed watershed areas with zonal steppes formed on them migrated to the slopes and participated in the formation of the slope plant communities [34].
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, as previously noted, the active development of the estuary valley and surrounding territories continued. Kubanka, Emetivka, Severinivka, Ilinka, and other villages were built. As a result of intensive economic activity (such as deforestation, grazing, burning of shrubs, grass stands, and ploughing of watershed territories) by the beginning of the 20th century, the native woody vegetation was almost completely destroyed, and the grass vegetation underwent substantial changes in this area. At the end of the 19th century, P.S. Shesterikov noted that in the southwestern part of the then Odesa district “every convenient piece of land is used with special diligence” [32]. Ruderal communities created by members of the genera Euphorbia, Onopordum, Carduus, Cirsium, and others were formed around the settlements and in grazing sites. Native forests were destroyed, and thickets of shrubs with Euonymus europaea, Ligustrum vulgare, Cerasus mahaleb, Prunus spinosa, etc., remained on the slopes of the estuary, in the grass layer of which such relict forest elements as Corydalis solida, Gymnospermium odessanum, Anemone sylvestris, Pulsatilla nigricans, and others were preserved. Native vegetation has been preserved only in gullies, ravines, sands, and salt marshes, particularly in deep gullies between the Severinivka and Ilinka villages. As already noted, some negative changes have also taken place in the estuary valley over the past century. As already noted, a substantial share of the areas on the right-bank slopes was terraced and planted with trees and shrubs with a large participation of introducents, and the proportion of adventive species in the composition of grass communities increased.
A prediction of further changes in vegetation was made based on the analysis of the dynamic trends of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley. There are many publications and models in the literature that predict the response of plant communities related to global changes. These mainly include changes in ecological niches, population dynamics, species interactions, spatial disturbances, ecosystem processes, and plant functional responses [12]. The leading factors are anthropogenic, which slow down, accelerate, or change the natural processes of functioning of plant communities. Strengthening or weakening of this action (first and foremost, the elimination of any natural factor involved in the formation of plant communities) leads to a disruption of the system of external and internal relationships in vegetation cover and, ultimately, to its transformation.
If the intensity of anthropogenic factors is maintained, the vegetation cover of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley will be exposed to negative consequences. Intensive, debilitating use of natural resources in the Great Kuyalnik River valley, the estuary itself and small rivers within its basin, and watershed adjacent territories, construction and expansion of village areas, resort and recreational pressure will cause a reduction in the volume of river flow, an increasing topsoil wash-out along the valley slopes, an abrasion of the slopes and a secondary salinization of large territories.
Currently, the negative impact of human influence on the ecosystems of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley and adjacent territories is increasing because of global climate change. The water area of the estuary will continue to decrease, while the area of the dry bottom will increase, transforming it into a salt desert (Figure 26). Slope biotopes will undergo xerophytization and halophytization due to air transport of salts, and steppe communities will continue to change towards desertification. Salinization in the lower parts of the slopes will contribute to the further expansion of small-species halophilic-steppe communities (Galatella biflora, and others) which will occupy territories previously covered by steppe and shrubby communities. Frequent and severe fires will cause a sharp reduction in the area of shrubby vegetation and a degradation of steppe vegetation.
On the estuary coast and in the floodplain part of the Great Kuyalnik River valley the halophytization processes are intensified. Simultaneously with an increase in pasture load, this will cause a sharp decrease in the number of saline-meadow species and an increase in semi-desert ones (ephemera and ephemeroids), and species indicator of saline and salt marsh soils. The permanent nature of pyrogenic impact on steppe communities will cause even greater desertification and degradation, reducing the role of species of the genus Stipa, and the development of desert-steppe communities with a dominance of Elytrigia repens, Agropyron pectinatum, Kochia prostrata, and Artemisia austriaca. In general, all this can result in the degradation of the unique mega-geosystem of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley.

4. Conclusions

The multi-directional pattern of changes in the vegetation of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley revealed the influence of directed processes of the historical interaction between natural and anthropic factors on tree-shrubby, steppe, halophyte-meadow, saline, and salt marsh vegetation. In the context of global changes, the leading factors in the last 100 years are anthropogenic; they slow down, accelerate, or change the natural processes of development of plant communities. Intensification or weakening of their actions, and often eliminating natural factors involved in the formation of vegetation, leads to disruption of the system of external and internal interrelations of vegetation, and, ultimately, to its anthropic transformation.
On the Kuyalnik Estuary valley area, catastrophic changes in vegetation were recorded as a result of the construction of earthen dams in floodplains and channelization of riverbeds and a decrease in their flow, quarry extraction of building material, laying of transport routes, terracing and forest reclamation of valley slopes, and the occurrence of large-scale natural fires. It was established that the combined influence of pyrogenic and geomorphogenic factors directs the succession of steppe vegetation towards the development of desertified erosiophilic communities.
Changes in vegetation as a result of pasture exposure depend on its intensity. Moderate grazing maintains the species and cenotic diversity of steppe ecosystems, but excessive grazing results in halophytization and degradation of vegetation. Changes due to mowing in the estuary valley are still moderate, as it is conducted in relatively small areas once in early summer. Changes in vegetation cover under the influence of recreation were typical mainly for the lower reaches of the estuary, where a sanatorium-resort complex operates. Recreational activities in the form of annual car and bicycle rallies pose a threat to the halophytic, steppe and petrophytic vegetation on the coast and slopes. Transformational changes of phytocenoses result in the invasion of alien species. They cause disruption of the structure, functioning and stability of natural ecosystems, displacement of native plant species up to the displacement of native communities and their replacement with others.
In general, the negative impact of human influence on the vegetation of the study area was noted. Minor positive changes occur only during the passage of demutation processes of steppe vegetation, in small areas of the estuary valley.
Historical (age-related) changes in the vegetation cover of the steppe zone occurred as a result of the complex action of climatic, geomorphogenic and anthropogenic factors in the direction of a decrease in the area covered by woody and shrubby vegetation and, accordingly, an increase in the area occupied by grass communities. Grass steppe communities acquire xeric characteristics.
Modern changes in vegetation of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley are primarily related to the afforestation of the slopes and the spread of adventitious species. The consolidation of slopes through forest reclamation slows down the processes of their historical formation and substantially changes environmental conditions that do not positively contribute to the natural development of native flora and vegetation. The state of the tree and shrubby stands indicates the gradual elimination of plantings of non-native tree species and the gradual development of steppe communities different to the native communities.
The studied regularities of the course of modern dynamic processes in native and quasi-native plant communities in the estuary valley made it possible to predict their possible changes. It was revealed that if the intensity of human influence on natural ecosystems in the region is maintained, the processes of slope erosion and secondary salinization of large areas will increase. As a result of air transport of salts, fires, and overgrazing, slope biotopes will undergo xerophytization and halophytization. Steppe communities will continue to change in the direction of their desertification. There will be an impoverishment of their phytodiversity, especially rare ones. All these factors can result in the degradation of the unique Kuyalnik megageosystem.
In order to preserve and restore the remnant native vegetation in the Kuyalnik Estuary valley, and in the region as a whole, the best solution is to develop a newly created nature conservation structure throughout the valley—a National Nature Park with the organization of four functional zones: protected, regulated recreation, stationary recreation, and economic [28].
The pattern of changes in the vegetation cover of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley correlates with changes in the vegetation of other estuaries in the steppe zone of Ukraine, which allows the interpolation of the results of our research to the steppe zone of Ukraine and adjacent territories, and is our next the assignment for our very next scientific task.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V.D. and A.A.-A.E.; methodology, D.V.D. and L.P.V.; software, T.P.D.; validation, T.P.D., L.P.V., G.M.S., and H.M.K.; formal analysis, T.P.D. and L.P.V.; investigation, D.V.D., T.P.D., A.A.-A.E., G.M.S., H.M.K., and L.P.V.; resources, A.A.-A.E., G.M.S., and H.M.K.; data curation, D.V.D., A.A.-A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, D.V.D., T.P.D., and L.P.V.; writing—review and editing, D.V.D., T.P.D., L.P.V., G.M.S., and H.M.K.; visualization, D.V.D., G.M.S., and H.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the senior researchers of the Physicochemical Institute of Environmental and Human Protection of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, A.G. Firsov and Yu. Yu. Yurchenko for participation in geobotanical expeditions, provision of transportation to the steep slopes and taking care of the needs of expedition participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Willner, W.; Kuzemko, A.; Dengler, J.; Chytrý, M.; Bauer, N.; Becker, T.; Biţă-Nicolae, C.; Botta-Dukát, Z.; Čarni, A.; Csiky, J.; et al. A higher-level classifcation of the Pannonian and western Pontic steppe grasslands (Central and Eastern Europe). Appl. Veg. Sci. 2017, 20, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dubyna, D.V.; Movchan, Y.I. (Eds.) Econet of the Steppe Zone of Ukraine: Principles of Formation, Structure and Elements; LAT&K: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sukachev, V.N. Some general theoretical issues of phytocenology. Vopr. Bot. 1954, 1, 449–463. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexandrova, V.D. The dynamics of plant cover. In Field Geobotany; Nauka: Moscow, Russia; Leningrad, Russia, 1964; Volume 3, pp. 300–450. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blume, H.P.; Sukopp, H. Ökologische Bedeutung anthropogener Bodenveranderungen. Schr. Reihe Veg. 1976, 10, 75–89. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mirkin, B.M. Anthropogenic dynamics of vegetation. In Results of Science and Technology; Series: Botany; Volume 5. Geobotany; VINITI: Moscow, Russia, 1984; pp. 139–232. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mirkin, B.M.; Naumova, L.H. The Current State of the Basic Concepts of the Science of Vegetation; Gilem: Ufa, Russian, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Svirizhev, Y.M.; Lagofet, D.O. Sustainability of Biological Communities; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hrodzynskyi, M.D. Resistance of Geosystems to Anthropogenic Loads; Likey: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  10. Didukh, Y.P. Assessment of stability and risk of loss of ecosystems. Nauk. Res. Pap. 2014, 158, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  11. Didukh, Y. Current trends in vegetation cover changes and their investigations. Nauk. Res. Pap. 2011, 119, 40–45. Available online: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3635 (accessed on 30 October 2022).
  12. Franklin, J.; Serra-Diaz, J.M.; Syphard, A.D.; Regan, H.M. Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3725–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Anjos, L.J.S.; de Toledo, P.M. Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, S.; Huang, S.; Xie, Y.; Wang, H.; Huang, Q.; Leng, G.; Li, P.; Wang, L. Spatial-temporal changes in vegetation cover in a typical semi-humid and semi-arid region in China: Changing patterns, causes and implications. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 98, 462–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baltazar-Soares, M.; Brans, K.I.; Eizaguirre, C. Human-induced evolution: Signatures, processes and mechanisms underneath anthropogenic footprints on natural systems. Evol. Appl. 2021, 14, 2335–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guan, J.; Yao, J.; Li, M.; Zheng, J. Assessing the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Anthropogenic Impacts on Remotely Sensed Vegetation Dynamics in Xinjiang, China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vynokurov, D.S. Syndynamic conception of biodiversity conservation by example of steppe zone of Ukraine. In Proceedings of the Ist (XIIth) International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists, Lviv, Ukraine, 21–22 May 2015; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tkachenko, V.S. Steppes of Ukraine: Current state and perspectives. In Conservation of the Steppes of Ukraine, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Preservation of the Last Remnants of Steppe Vegetation in Ukraine by the Establishment of a Reserved Regime for Its Protection”, Khomutovo vil., Donetsk Region, 27–29 May 2002; Akademperiodyka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2002; pp. 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  19. Korotchenko, I.A. Synantropization of the steppe vegetation in the forest-steppe zone of Ukraine. In Proceedings of the IX International Conference Anthropization and Environment of Rural Settlements, Flora and Vegetation, Kamyanets-Podilskiy-Boyany, Ukraine, 29 June–1 July 2010; M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, NAS of Ukraine: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2010; p. 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vynokurov, D.S. Vegetation of the Ingul River Valley: Syntaxonomy, Dynamics, Conservation. Candidate Thesis in Biology; M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2016.
  21. Willner, W.; Roleček, J.; Korolyuk, A.; Jürgen Dengler, J.; Chytrý, M.; Janišová, M.; Lengyel, A.; Aćić, S.; Becker, T.; Ćuk, M.; et al. Formalized classification of semi-dry grasslands in central and eastern Europe. Preslia 2019, 91, 25–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Didukh, Y.P. (Ed.) Biotopes of Steppe Zone of Ukraine; DrukArt: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Konaikova, V.O.; Didukh, Y.P. The current state of vegetation cover of the Elanetsky Steppe Nature Reserve in Floral and cenotic diversity in the restoration, protection and preservation of the plant world. In Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kyiv, Ukraine, 23–25 April 2018; pp. 55–56. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tkachenko, V.S.; Genov, A.P.; Lysenko, G.M. Structural changes of the plant cover of the reserved meadow steppe “Mykhajlivska tsilyna” according to the large-scale botanical mapping in 2001. News Biosph. Reserve Askania Nova 2003, 5, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lysenko, H.M.; Kolomiychuk, V.P. Protected steppes: Strictly protected status or management of steppe ecosystems. Ecol. Sci. 2015, 8, 166–174. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hülber, K.; Moser, D.; Sauberer, N.; Maas, B.; Staudinger, M.; Grass, V.; Wrbka, T.; Willner, W. Plant species richness decreased in semi-natural grasslands in the Biosphere Reserve Wienerwald, Austria, over the past two decades, despite agri-environmental measures. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 243, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borovyk, L.P. Patterns of vegetation succession in abandoned fields in semiarid conditions. Biosyst. Divers. 2020, 28, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dubyna, D.V.; Ennan, A.A.-A.; Dziuba, T.P.; Vakarenko, L.P.; Shykhaleyeva, G.M.; Kiryushkina, A.M. Projected Kuialnytsky National Nature Park as a basis for optimization of the environment and sustainable development of the region. Ukr. Bot. J. 2018, 75, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ennan, A.; Dubyna, D.; Tsarenko, P.; Vakarenko, L.; Dziuba, T.; Shykhaleeva, H. How to restore the ecosystem of Kuyalnytskyi estuary? Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2018, 6, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ennan, A.A.; Shikhaleeva, G.N.; Babinets, S.K.; Chursina, O.D. Ecological state of the Kuyalnik Estuary. In State of the Natural Environment in the Odesa Region; TES: Odesa, Ukraine, 2009; Volume 111, pp. 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ennan, A.A.; Shikhaleev, I.I.; Shikhaleeva, G.N.; Adobovskiy, V.V.; Kiryushkina, A.N. Causes and consequences of the Kuyalnik Estuary degradation (North-Western Black Sea region, Ukraine). Bull. Odesa Natl. University. Ser. Chem. 2014, 19, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Shesterikov, L.S. Materials for the Flora of the South-Western Part of the Odesa County of the Kherson Province; Printing House, A. Schulze: Odesa, Ukraine, 1894. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shaposhnikova, L.A. Fragments of steppe vegetation on the slopes of the Black Sea estuaries. In Proceedings of the Study of Steppe Nature Intercollege Symposium, Odesa, Ukraine, 22–28 April 1968; pp. 151–152. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tkachenko, V.S.; Kostylev, A.V. Phytoecological Aspects of the Hydromelioration of the Northwestern Black Sea Region; Naukova Dumka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kostylov, O.V. Vegetation of the slopes of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley. Ukr. Bot. J. 1987, 44, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dubyna, D.V.; Ennan, A.A.; Vakarenko, L.P.; Dziuba, T.P.; Shykhaleeva, H.M. The territorial and ecologo-coenotic differentiation of the vegetation in Kuyalnytskyi estuary valley (Odesa region). Chornomors’k. Bot. Z. 2017, 13, 428–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. National Atlas of Ukraine; Kartografiya: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2007.
  38. Zhantalay, P.I.; Shykhaleeva, H.M.; Kiryushkina, H.M. Conditions of pedogenesis, soil and soil cover in the basin of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley. In Natural Resource Potential of the Kuyalnik and Khadzhibey Estuaries, Interlimane Area: Current State, Prospects for Development. Materials of All-Ukrainian Scientific Practical Conference, Odesa, Ukraine, 18–20 November 2015; TES: Odesa, Ukraine, 2015; pp. 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  39. Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd ed.; Springer: Wien, Austria, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  40. Roleček, J.; Tichý, L.; Zelený, D.; Chytrý, M. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster eterogeneity. J. Veget. Sci. 2009, 20, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Didukh, Y.P. The Ecological Scales for the Species of Ukrainian Flora and Their Use in Synphytoindication; Phytosociocentre: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mosyakin, S.L.; Fedoronchuk, M.M. Vascular Plants of Ukraine. A Nomenclatural Checklist; M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1999. [CrossRef]
  43. Dubyna, D.V.; Dziuba, T.P.; Iemelianova, S.M.; Bahrikova, N.O.; Borysova, O.V.; Borsukevych, L.M.; Vynokurov, D.S.; Gapon, S.V.; Gapon, Y.V.; Davydov, D.A.; et al. Prodrome of the Vegetation of Ukraine; Naukova Dumka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Loboda, N.S.; Hopchenko, E.D. (Eds.) Water Regime and Hydroecological Characteristics of Kuyalnytsky Estuary; TES: Odesa, Ukraine, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dzybov, D.S. The Agro-Steep Method: Accelerated Restoration of Native Vegetation; Nauchnaya Kniga: Saratov, Russia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bowman, D.M.; Balch, J.K.; Artaxo, P.; Bond, W.J.; Carlson, J.M.; Cochrane, M.A.; D’Antonio, C.M.; Defries, R.S.; Doyle, J.C.; Harrison, S.P.; et al. Fire in the Earth system. Science 2009, 324, 481–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bowman, D.M.J.S.; Kolden, C.A.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Johnston, F.H.; van der Werf, G.R.; Flannigan, M. Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 500–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abatzoglou, J.T.; Williams, A.P.; Boschetti, L.; Zubkova, M.; Kolden, C.A. Global patterns of interannual climate–fire relationships. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 5164–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Semenova-Tyan-Shanskaya, A.M. The Dynamics of Steppe Vegetation; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  50. Evans, E.W.; Briggs, J.M.; Finck, E.J.; Gibson, D.J.; James, S.W.; Kaufman, D.W.; Seastedt, T.R. Is Fire a Disturbance in Grasslands? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 37, 159–161. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/napcproceedings/37 (accessed on 30 October 2022).
  51. Tkachenko, V.S.; Didukh, Y.P.; Henov, A.P.; Dudka, I.A.; Vasser, S.P.; Boyko, M.F.; Vetrova, Z.I.; Navrotska, I.L.; Partyka, L.Y.; Helyuta, V.P.; et al. Ukrainian Steppe Nature Reserve: Flora; Phytosociocentre: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  52. Malysheva, G.S.; Malakhovskiy, P.D. Fires and their influence on vegetation of dry steppes. Bot. J. 2000, 85, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  53. Oparin, M.L.; Oparina, O.S. The influence of burns on the dynamics of steppe vegetation. Povolzhskii Ekol. Zhurn. 2003, 3, 158–171. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tkachenko, V.S. Energy losses on different aspects of steppe ecosystems exploitation and energetical bases of steppe succesional stability. Ukr. Phytosoc. Coll. 2007, 25, 4–18. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tkachenko, V.S. Problems of steppe pyrology. Nat. Reserve Manag. Ukr. 2009, 15, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  56. Shapoval, V.V.; Tkachenko, V.S. Post-pyrogenic structural and ecotopic changes in the vegetation cover of the “Staraya” area of the Askanian steppe. News Biosph. Reserve Askania Nova 2015, 17, 18–34. [Google Scholar]
  57. Milkov, F.N. Forest-Steppe of the Russian Plain. The Experience of Landscape Survey; Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences: Moscow, Russia, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rodin, L.E. Burning vegetation as a method of improving cereal-wormwood pastures. Sov. Bot. 1946, 14, 147–162. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rodin, L.E. Pyrogenic factor and vegetation of the arid zone. Bot. J. 1981, 66, 1673–1684. [Google Scholar]
  60. Osychnyuk, V.V.; Istomina, H.H. Effect of burning treatment on steppe vegetation. Ukr. Bot. J. 1970, 27, 284–290. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rabotnov, T.A. On the significance of the pyrogenic factor for the formation of vegetation cover. Bot. J. 1978, 63, 1605–1611. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lysenko, H.M. Pyrogenic aspects of the abiotic regulations of steppe reserve ecosystems. Ecol. Noospherology 2008, 19, 143–147. [Google Scholar]
  63. Timoshenkov, V.A.; Timoshenkova, V.V. Fires in the Khomutovskaya steppe: Causes, information, consequences. Steppe Bull. 2007, 23–24, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  64. Smelansky, I. Steppe Fires and Fire Management in Steppe Protected Areas: Environmental and Environmental Aspects. Analytical Review; Publishing House of the Center for Wildlife Protection: Moscow, Russia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  65. Donovan, V.M.; Wonkka, C.L.; Twidwell, D. Surging wildfire activity in a grassland biome. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 5986–5993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kolden, C.A. We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the Western United States to mitigate wildfire risk. Fire 2019, 2, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Vakarenko, L.P.; Dubyna, D.V. Kuyalnitsky regional landscape park: Prospects of creation and aspects of functioning. In Falz-Fein Readings: Coll. of Scientific Papers. Proceedings of VI International Conference; PP Vyshemirsky: Kherson, Ukraine, 2009; pp. 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  68. Alekhin, V.V. Central Chernozem Steppes; Kommuna: Voronezh, Russia, 1934. [Google Scholar]
  69. Heluta, V.; Genov, A.P.; Tkachenko, V.S.; Minter, D.W. The «Khomutovski Steppe» Nature Reserve. Management Plan; Akademperiodyka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kolomiychuk, V.P.; Domnich, A.V. Change of phytomass of accumulation ecosystems of Priazov’ya spits influenced and uninfluenced by ungulates. Chornomors’k. Bot. Z. 2014, 10, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Osychnyuk, V.V. Changes in vegetation steppe. In Vegetation of the USSR. Steppe, Rocky Outcrops, Sand; Naukova Dumka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1973; pp. 246–315. [Google Scholar]
  72. Shabanova, G.A.; Izverskaya, T.D.; Gendov, V.S. Flora and Vegetation of the Budjak Steppes of the Republic of Moldova; ECO-TIRAS: Chisinau, Moldova, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  73. Pachoskiy, I.K. Description of the Kherson Province Vegetation. II. Steppes; 2 State Printing House: Kherson, Ukraine, 1917. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lazu, Ș.; Titica, G.; Miron, A.; Teleuța, A.; Talmaci, L.; Guțu, A.I.; Dziuba, T. Syntaxonomy of steppe semi-savanoid with Chrysopogon gryllus (L.) Trin. and Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng. from the Eurasian Area. Rom. J. Grassl. Forage Crops 2021, 23, 13–41. [Google Scholar]
  75. Dubyna, D.V.; Ennan, A.A.; Vakarenko, L.P.; Dziuba, T.P.; Shykhaleeva, H.M. A new find of Glycyrrhiza glabra (Fabaceae) in Odesa Region. Ukr. Bot. J. 2017, 74, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Semenova-Tyan-Shanskaya, A.M. Regime of plant cover protection in protected areas. Bot. J. 1981, 66, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tkachenko, V.S. Reserve shifts and security regime in the steppe reserves of Ukraine. In Steppes of Eurasia: Conservation and Restoration Challenges; Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences: St. Petersburg-Moscow, Russia, 1993; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  78. Tkachenko, V.S. Environmental management of the reserved meadow steppe “Mykhajlivska tsilyna” in Sumy region. In Nature Reserve Management in Ukraine at the Turn of the Millennium; Ukrainian Phytosociocentre: Kaniv, Ukraine, 1999; pp. 85–97. [Google Scholar]
  79. Vasylyeva, T.V.; Ennan, A.A.-A.; Shykhaleeva, H.M. Vascular Plants of the Coastal Areas Encyclopedia of the Kuyalnik Estuary Valley; Ennan, A.A.-A., Ed.; Osvita Ukrainy: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2018; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  80. Protopopova, V.V.; Mosyakin, S.L.; Shevera, M.V. Plant Invasions in Ukraine as a Threat to Biodiversity: The Present Situation and Tasks for the Future; M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2002.
  81. Borovyk, L.P. Results of long-term phytocoenotic monitoring in the Striltsivsky steppe (the Luhansk Nature Reserve). In Nature Reserve Management in the Steppe Zone of Ukraine (Dedicated to the 90th Anniversary of the Creation of Supra-Sea Nature Reserves). Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference, NPP “Meotida”, the village of Urzuf, Donetsk Region, Ukraine, 14–15 March 2017; Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  82. Borovyk, L.P. Reserve regime of the Striltsivsky Steppe (the Luhansk Nature Reserve): History and current state. In Nature Reserve Management in the Steppe Zone of Ukraine (to the 50th Anniversary of the Creation of the Luhansk Nature Reserve, the 70th Anniversary of the Striltsivsky Steppe, the 10th Anniversary of the Triohizbensky Steppe and the 90th Anniversary of the Provalsky Steppe); Ser. «Conservation Biology in Ukraine»; Publisher Bykhun, V.Yu.: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2018; Issue 10, pp. 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lambert, M.R.; Donihue, C.M. Urban biodiversity management using evolutionary tools. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 4, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ottenburghs, J. The genic view of hybridization in the Anthropocene. Evol. Appl. 2021, 14, 2342–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. Anthropogenic contributions dominate trends of vegetation cover change over the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 95, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lavrenko, E.M. The periglacial steppes. Bot. J. 1981, 66, 313–327. [Google Scholar]
  87. Kritskaya, L.I. The main features of flora of the steppes and limestone outcrops Right-Bank Cereal Step (north-western Black Sea region). Proc. Natl. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2010, 8, 89–98. Available online: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/30348 (accessed on 30 October 2022).
  88. Ananova, E.N. Palynological data on the question about the origin of steppe on the south of European plain. Bot. J. 1954, 39, 343–356. [Google Scholar]
  89. Artyushenko, A.T. Steppe and Forest-Steppe Vegetation of Ukraine in Quaternary Period (According to Spore/Pollen Analysis); Naukova Dumka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  90. Dinesman, L.G. Biogeocenoses of Steppes in the Holocene; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1977. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Location of Kuyalnik Estuary on the territory of Ukraine: 1—Map of Ukraine; 2—Kuyalnik Estuary on the map of Ukraine.
Figure 1. Location of Kuyalnik Estuary on the territory of Ukraine: 1—Map of Ukraine; 2—Kuyalnik Estuary on the map of Ukraine.
Diversity 14 01115 g001
Figure 2. Plant communities on the slope of the left bank of the Kuyalnik Estuary. A fragment of the community Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis with an aspect of Linum hirsutum, and L. flavum is in the foreground (surroundings of Novokubanka village).
Figure 2. Plant communities on the slope of the left bank of the Kuyalnik Estuary. A fragment of the community Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis with an aspect of Linum hirsutum, and L. flavum is in the foreground (surroundings of Novokubanka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g002
Figure 3. The right bank and the terraced slope of Kuyalnik Estuary (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Figure 3. The right bank and the terraced slope of Kuyalnik Estuary (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g003
Figure 4. The left bank and the slope of Kuyalnik Estuary (surroundings of Illinka village).
Figure 4. The left bank and the slope of Kuyalnik Estuary (surroundings of Illinka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g004
Figure 5. General view of the gully (opposite of Stara Emetivka village).
Figure 5. General view of the gully (opposite of Stara Emetivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g005
Figure 6. Schematic map of vegetation plots of the research area.
Figure 6. Schematic map of vegetation plots of the research area.
Diversity 14 01115 g006
Figure 7. The ordination matrix of the distribution of syntaxons according to the factors of the water regime and the content of mineral nitrogen in the soil (Hd–Nt): Diversity 14 01115 i001Lemnetea, Diversity 14 01115 i002Potamogetonetea, Diversity 14 01115 i003Phragmito-Magnocaricetea; Diversity 14 01115 i004Bolboschoenetea maritimi, Diversity 14 01115 i005Therosalicornietea, Diversity 14 01115 i006Juncetea maritimi, Diversity 14 01115 i007Festuco-Puccinellietea; Diversity 14 01115 i008Festuco-Brometea, Diversity 14 01115 i009Sedo-Scleranthetea; Diversity 14 01115 i010Salicetea purpureae, Diversity 14 01115 i011Robinietea, Diversity 14 01115 i012Crataego-Prunetea; Diversity 14 01115 i013Stellarietea mediae, Diversity 14 01115 i014Artemisietea vulgaris, Diversity 14 01115 i015Polygono-Poetea annuae.
Figure 7. The ordination matrix of the distribution of syntaxons according to the factors of the water regime and the content of mineral nitrogen in the soil (Hd–Nt): Diversity 14 01115 i001Lemnetea, Diversity 14 01115 i002Potamogetonetea, Diversity 14 01115 i003Phragmito-Magnocaricetea; Diversity 14 01115 i004Bolboschoenetea maritimi, Diversity 14 01115 i005Therosalicornietea, Diversity 14 01115 i006Juncetea maritimi, Diversity 14 01115 i007Festuco-Puccinellietea; Diversity 14 01115 i008Festuco-Brometea, Diversity 14 01115 i009Sedo-Scleranthetea; Diversity 14 01115 i010Salicetea purpureae, Diversity 14 01115 i011Robinietea, Diversity 14 01115 i012Crataego-Prunetea; Diversity 14 01115 i013Stellarietea mediae, Diversity 14 01115 i014Artemisietea vulgaris, Diversity 14 01115 i015Polygono-Poetea annuae.
Diversity 14 01115 g007
Figure 8. The Dam of the canalized riverbed of Great Kuyalnik River (surroundings of Severynivka village).
Figure 8. The Dam of the canalized riverbed of Great Kuyalnik River (surroundings of Severynivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g008
Figure 9. The reclaimed area of the floodplain, which was plowed in the past and is currently used as a pasture (surroundings of Severynivka village). An invasion of Grindelia squarrosa (Artemisietum santonicae association) is in the foreground.
Figure 9. The reclaimed area of the floodplain, which was plowed in the past and is currently used as a pasture (surroundings of Severynivka village). An invasion of Grindelia squarrosa (Artemisietum santonicae association) is in the foreground.
Diversity 14 01115 g009
Figure 10. Product pipeline and adjacent protective hydrostructures (surroundings of Severynivka village).
Figure 10. Product pipeline and adjacent protective hydrostructures (surroundings of Severynivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g010
Figure 11. The sand quarry site (surroundings of Illinka village).
Figure 11. The sand quarry site (surroundings of Illinka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g011
Figure 12. The coquina quarry site (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Figure 12. The coquina quarry site (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g012
Figure 13. The water-filled sand quarry in which an overgrowing of higher aquatic and coastal vegetation began (surroundings of Adamivka village).
Figure 13. The water-filled sand quarry in which an overgrowing of higher aquatic and coastal vegetation began (surroundings of Adamivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g013
Figure 14. The built-up (the village of Kotovskyi (Odesa)) and meliorated (artificial ponds) part of the lower valley of Kuyalnik Estuary.
Figure 14. The built-up (the village of Kotovskyi (Odesa)) and meliorated (artificial ponds) part of the lower valley of Kuyalnik Estuary.
Diversity 14 01115 g014
Figure 15. The Vegetation of near dam areas of ponds. Atriplicetum hastatae community is in the foreground (southern part of the Estuary).
Figure 15. The Vegetation of near dam areas of ponds. Atriplicetum hastatae community is in the foreground (southern part of the Estuary).
Diversity 14 01115 g015
Figure 16. Seasonal roads on the coastal areas of Kuyalnik Estuary (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Figure 16. Seasonal roads on the coastal areas of Kuyalnik Estuary (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g016
Figure 17. Artificial terraces on the left bank of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Figure 17. Artificial terraces on the left bank of the Kuyalnik Estuary valley (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g017
Figure 18. A fragment of the Berberis vulgaris-Cerasus mahaleb comm. on the artificial terrace (surroundings of Illinka village).
Figure 18. A fragment of the Berberis vulgaris-Cerasus mahaleb comm. on the artificial terrace (surroundings of Illinka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g018
Figure 19. Plantations of Pinus pallasiana on artificial terraces (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Figure 19. Plantations of Pinus pallasiana on artificial terraces (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g019
Figure 20. Restoration of steppe vegetation on artificial terraces. Stipa ucrainica is in the foreground (surroundings of Stara Emetivka village).
Figure 20. Restoration of steppe vegetation on artificial terraces. Stipa ucrainica is in the foreground (surroundings of Stara Emetivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g020
Figure 21. A fragment of the communities of Salvio nemorosae-Festucetum valesiacae association on artificial terraces (surroundings of Ilinka village).
Figure 21. A fragment of the communities of Salvio nemorosae-Festucetum valesiacae association on artificial terraces (surroundings of Ilinka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g021
Figure 22. Restoration of Asparagus verticillatus in areas, that have undergone spontaneous burning out (surroundings of Novokubanka village).
Figure 22. Restoration of Asparagus verticillatus in areas, that have undergone spontaneous burning out (surroundings of Novokubanka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g022
Figure 23. A fragment of the zonal steppe community of Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis association in the second year after autumn–winter burning of the herbage (surroundings of Novokubanka village).
Figure 23. A fragment of the zonal steppe community of Stipo lessingianae-Salvietum nutantis association in the second year after autumn–winter burning of the herbage (surroundings of Novokubanka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g023
Figure 24. Pasture degradation of vegetation (surroundings of Kubanka village).
Figure 24. Pasture degradation of vegetation (surroundings of Kubanka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g024
Figure 25. A fragment of the quasi-savanoid community of Aegilopsetum cylindricae association (surroundings of Kubanka village).
Figure 25. A fragment of the quasi-savanoid community of Aegilopsetum cylindricae association (surroundings of Kubanka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g025
Figure 26. The water-free territory of the Kuyalnik Estuary in the summer-autumn period (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Figure 26. The water-free territory of the Kuyalnik Estuary in the summer-autumn period (surroundings of Kovalivka village).
Diversity 14 01115 g026
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dubyna, D.V.; Ennan, A.A.-A.; Dziuba, T.P.; Vakarenko, L.P.; Shykhaleyeva, G.M.; Kiryushkina, H.M. Anthropogenic Transformations of Vegetation in the Kuyalnik Estuary Valley (Ukraine, Odesa District). Diversity 2022, 14, 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121115

AMA Style

Dubyna DV, Ennan AA-A, Dziuba TP, Vakarenko LP, Shykhaleyeva GM, Kiryushkina HM. Anthropogenic Transformations of Vegetation in the Kuyalnik Estuary Valley (Ukraine, Odesa District). Diversity. 2022; 14(12):1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dubyna, Dmytro V., Alim A.-A. Ennan, Tetiana P. Dziuba, Lyudmyla P. Vakarenko, Galyna M. Shykhaleyeva, and Hanna M. Kiryushkina. 2022. "Anthropogenic Transformations of Vegetation in the Kuyalnik Estuary Valley (Ukraine, Odesa District)" Diversity 14, no. 12: 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop