Next Article in Journal
Improvement in Diabetic Retinopathy through Protection against Retinal Apoptosis in Spontaneously Diabetic Torii Rats Mediated by Ethanol Extract of Osteomeles schwerinae C.K. Schneid
Previous Article in Journal
Similar Weight Loss Induces Greater Improvements in Insulin Sensitivity and Liver Function among Individuals with NAFLD Compared to Individuals without NAFLD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Medicinal Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Elaeodendron transvaalense

by
Alfred Maroyi
1,* and
Sebua Silas Semenya
2
1
Medicinal Plants and Economic Development (MPED) Research Centre, Department of Botany, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa
2
Technology Transfer Office, Research Administration and Development Department, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2019, 11(3), 545; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030545
Submission received: 3 February 2019 / Revised: 23 February 2019 / Accepted: 27 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019

Abstract

:
Elaeodendron transvaalense is a plant species, which is in high demand as a herbal medicine in southern Africa. This study critically reviewed the medicinal applications, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities of E. transvaalense. The literature on medicinal applications, phytochemical, and pharmacological activities of E. transvaalense, was collected from multiple internet sources including Elsevier, Google Scholar, SciFinder, Web of Science, Pubmed, BMC, Science Direct, and Scopus. Complementary information was gathered from pre-electronic sources, such as books, book chapters, theses, scientific reports, and journal articles obtained from the University library. This study revealed that the species is used as herbal medicine in 62.5% of the countries where E. transvaalense is native in southern Africa. It is mainly used as herbal medicine for diarrhoea, menorrhagia, stomach aches, skin infections, inflammations, and rashes. Phytochemical compounds identified from the species, include flavonoids, peltogynoid, phenols, proanthocyanidins, tannin, and triterpenes. Ethnopharmacological research revealed that extracts and phytochemical constituents isolated from E. transvaalense have antibacterial, antifungal, anti-HIV, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiplasmodial, anti-protozoan, anti-pyretic, hypoglycaemic, larvicidal, cytotoxicity, and mutagenic activities. Elaeodendron transvalense should to be subjected to detailed phytochemical, pharmacological, and toxicological evaluations aimed at correlating the medicinal uses of the species with the ethnopharmacological properties of the species.

1. Introduction

Elaeodendron transvaalense (Burtt Davy) R. H. Archer is a shrub or small to medium-sized tree belonging to the Celastraceae family. The species is commonly known as anthill saffron or bushveld saffron. The synonyms of E. transvaalense include Cassine transvaalensis (Burtt Davy) Codd, Crocoxylon transvaalense (Burtt Davy) N. Robson, E. croceum (Thunb.) DC. var. heterophyllum Loes., Pseudocassine transvaalensis (Burtt Davy) Bredell and Salacia transvaalensis Burtt Davy [1,2]. The species has been recorded in deciduous woodland, along streams, rocky hillsides, and termite mounds in Botswana, Angola, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Zambia, and Swaziland [1,2]. Elaeodendron transvaalense is popular as a traditional medicine in southern Africa and in South Africa, Raimondo et al. [3] categorized the species as Near Threatened using the IUCN Red List of Categories and Criteria of threatened species. There is a steady decline in the wild population of E. transvaalense in South Africa, which is attributed to over-harvesting, destructive harvesting of the bark, marketing of the plant products, and land clearing for agricultural and urbanization purposes. Elaeodendron transvaalensis was identified by both rural and urban herbalists as one of 15 species that are becoming increasingly rare in the KwaZulu-Natal province in South Africa [4], and was ranked twelfth among the most frequently demanded medicinal species in the same province [5]. Elaeodendron transvaalense is sold in informal herbal medicine markets in five of the nine provinces (55.6%) in South Africa, that is, the Eastern Cape, KwaZulu Natal, Gauteng, Limpopo, and the Western Cape [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Research by Williams et al. [7] showed that E. transvaalense was available in 48% to 70% of herbal medicine informal markets in Johannesburg, Gauteng province, and about 11,155 kg to 27,771 kg of the species’ bark were traded per annum as a herbal medicine in 2001 in Gauteng province alone [15]. Due to the increasing demand for the species, E. transvaalense is managed in herbal medicine home gardens in the Limpopo and North West provinces in South Africa [16,17]. This study reviewed the medicinal applications, phytochemical, and pharmacological activities of E. transvaalense, based on its therapeutic potential as a herbal medicine in southern Africa. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide a detailed appraisal of the existing knowledge and literature on the medicinal uses, phytochemistry, biological activities, and pharmacological properties of E. transvaalense, in an attempt to create a database of information that can be used in future research aimed at exploring the therapeutic potential of the species.

2. Medicinal Uses of Elaeodendron transvaalense

Medicinal uses of the species have been recorded in Botswana, Swaziland, Namibia, Zimbabwe, and South Africa, accounting for 62.5% of the countries where E. transvaalense is native. The bark and root macerate of E. transvaalense are used as herbal medicines against several diseases in southern Africa, see Table 1. Elaeodendron transvaalense is used as herbal concoction for diarrhoea in South Africa and Swaziland [10,18,19,20,21,22,23], menorrhagia in Botswana, South Africa, and Zimbabwe [20,24,25], stomach aches in South Africa and Swaziland [19,20,21,22,23,26,27,28,29], skin infections, inflammations and rashes in Namibia, South Africa, and Swaziland [19,20,30,31,32]. The roots or root bark of E. transvaalense are mixed with the roots of Peltophorum africanum Sond. As a herbal medicine for female infertility [33] or mixed with roots of Ozoroa paniculosa (Sond.) R. Fern. & A. Fern. as a herbal medicine for high blood pressure [25]. The roots of E. transvaalense are mixed with Drimia elata Jacq. bulb, roots of Elephantorrhiza elephantina (Burch.) Skeels and Zanthoxylum capense (Thunb.) Harv., bark of Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. and Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R. Br. twigs as herbal medicines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) opportunistic infections [34] and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [35]. Bark and leaves of E. transvaalense are used as an ethnoveterinary medicine for diarrhoea and worms [36,37].

3. Phytochemical Constituents of Elaeodendron transvaalense

A wide range of minerals and phytochemicals (Table 2) have been isolated from the stem bark, leaves and the bark of E. transvaalense. Phytochemical screening of ethanol, hexane, and hexane: Ethyl acetate (80: 20) extracts of root and stem bark yielded carbohydrate, flavonoid, peltogynoid and triterpenes (Table 3; Figure 1). Drewes et al. [52] isolated canophyllal, (+)-11,11-dimethyl-1,3,8,10-trahydroxy-9-methoxypeltogynan, 6β-hydroxy-lup-20(30)-en-3-one, canophyllol and galactitol from the roots of E. transvaalense. Motlhanka et al. [39] isolated a flavonoid 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin from the aqueous root extract of E. transvaalense. Tshikalange and Hussein [53] isolated triterpenes lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one, β-sitosterol, Ψ-taraxastanonol and lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol and a flavonoid 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin from E. transvaalense bark ethanol extract. Mthethwa et al. [23] isolated triterpenoids, 3,28-dihydroxylbetuli-20(29)-ene and 3-oxo-28-hydroxylbetuli-20(29)-ene from the hexane: ethyl acetate (80: 20) bark extracts of E. transvaalense. Mamba et al. [46] isolated triterpenoids lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol and lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one, as well as a flavonoid 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin from E. transvaalense bark ethanol extract. Khumalo et al. [54] isolated triterpenes 30-hydroxylup-20(29)-ene-3-one, lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol and 6β-hydroxy-lup-20(29)-ene-3-one and a flavonoid 4′-O-methyl-epigallocatechin from aqueous and dichloromethane stem bark extracts of E. transvaalense.

4. Pharmacological Activities

4.1. Antibacterial Activities

McGaw et al. [58] evaluated the antibacterial activities of aqueous, ethanol, and hexane bark extracts of E. transvaalense against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus using the disc-diffusion and micro-dilution assays, with neomycin (5 μg) as the positive control (Table 4). Ethanol and water extracts were active with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranging from 0.1 mg/mL to 0.8 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus [58]. Samie et al. [59] evaluated the antibacterial activities of methanol root extracts of E. transvaalense against Aeromonas hydrophila, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pantoea agglomerans, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella cholerae-suis, Serratia marcescens, Shigella flexneri, and Staphylococcus aureus using the disc diffusion and the microdilution methods with gentamicin as a positive control. The extracts showed activities against most of the tested microbes with the exception of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, and Shigella flexneri with the zone of inhibition ranging from 8 mm to 10 mm (Table 4). The extracts showed activities against Aeromonas hydrophila, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Salmonella cholerae-suis, Serratia marcescens, and Staphylococcus aureus, with MIC values ranging from 6 mg/mL to >12 mg/mL [59]. Tshikalanga et al. [60] evaluated the antibacterial activities of aqueous and chloroform bark extracts of E. transvaalense against Bacillus cereus, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, and Staphylococcus aureus using the agar dilution method. The extracts were active against Bacillus cereus, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, and Staphylococcus aureus with MIC values ranging from 20 mg/mL to 50 mg/mL [60]. Steenkamp et al. [31] evaluated the antibacterial activities of methanol and water bark extracts of E. transvaalense against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using the plate-hole diffusion and broth microdilution methods with ampicillin as the positive control. The extracts were active against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis exhibiting MIC values ranging from 1.3 mg/mL to 17.2 mg/mL and the positive control exhibited MIC value of 0.2 mg/mL [31]. Mthethwa et al. [23] evaluated antibacterial activities of E. transvaalense bark extracts against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and micro-dilution techniques with cloxacillin and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as positive, and negative controls, respectively. The extracts exhibited activities with zones of inhibition ranging from 23 mm to 31 mm (Table 4). The MIC values ranged from 0.6 µg/mL to 0.02 µg/mL [23]. Okem et al. [55] evaluated the antibacterial activities of ethanol stem bark extracts of E. transvaalense against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, using the microdilution assay with neomycin as the positive control. The extracts exhibited activities with MIC values ranging from 0.8 mg/mL to 3.1 mg/mL [55]. Mamba et al. [46] evaluated the antibacterial activities of ethanol bark extracts of E. transvaalense and the compounds lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol, lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one and 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin isolated from the species against Gardnerella vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Oligella ureolytica using the serial broth microdilution assay with ciprofloxacin as a positive control. The extracts and compounds exhibited activities with MIC values ranging from 1.6 mg/mL to 12.5 mg/mL, while the control exhibited MIC value of 0.01 mg/mL [46]. Khumalo et al. [54] evaluated antibacterial activities of dichloromethane and methanol stem bark extracts of E. transvaalense and compounds lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol, 6β-hydroxy-lup-20(29)-ene-3-one, 30-hydroxylup-20(29)-ene-3-one and 4′-O-methylepigallocatechin isolated from the species against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella sonnei, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis using the micro-titre plate broth two-fold serial dilution assay with ciprofloxacin as the positive control. The extract and the compounds demonstrated moderate antibacterial activities with MIC values ranging from 0.1 mg/mL to 1.7 mg/mL [54]. These findings corroborate the traditional use of the species as a herbal medicine for diarrhoea [10,18,19,20,21,22,23], sexually transmitted infections [16,35,45,46,50], skin infections [19,20,30,31,32], sore throat [32], stomach aches [19,20,21,22,23,26,27,28,29], venereal diseases [22,38], and wounds [51].

4.2. Anti-Fungal Activities

Steenkamp et al. [61] evaluated the anti-fungal activities of methanol and the water bark extracts of E. transvaalense against Candida albicans standard strain (ATCC 10231), and five clinical isolates using the plate-hole diffusion and broth microdilution methods, with amphotericin B as the positive control (Table 4). Only the methanol extract was active against the standard strain (ATCC 10231) exhibiting an MIC value of 20.2 mg/mL, while the positive control amphotericin B inhibited growth of all strains tested with an MIC value of <10 μg/mL [61]. Samie et al. [22] evaluated the anti-fungal activities of acetone and hexane bark extracts of E. transvaalense against Candida albicans, Candida krusei, and Cryptococcus neoformans using the agar diffusion and the microdilution methods, with nystatin and flucytosine as positive controls. Only hexane extract exhibited activities with the zone of inhibition ranging from 8 mm to 16 mm in comparison to 22 mm exhibited by both nystatin and flucytosine, the two positive controls. The MIC values against tested pathogens ranged from 0.5 mg/mL to 1.9 mg/mL, while the positive controls, nystatin and flucytosine, exhibited MIC values of 0.2 µg/mL, and 1.9 µg/mL, respectively. The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values ranged from 1.9 mg/mL to 7.5 mg/mL (Table 4). The time-to-kill experiments indicated an intense time-dependent fungicidal effect of the hexane extract against Candida albicans, able to kill >90% of all the cells at a concentration of 1.9 mg/mL after a 10 hour incubation [22]. Mamba et al. [46] evaluated the antifungal activities of ethanol bark extracts of E. transvaalense and the compounds lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol, lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one and 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin, isolated from the species against Candida albicans, using the serial broth microdilution assay. The extracts and compounds exhibited activities with MIC values ranging from 3.1 mg/mL to <12.5 mg/mL [46]. These documented antifungal activities corroborate the use of the species as herbal medicine against candidiasis in South Africa [40], skin infections, and rashes [19,20,30,31,32].

4.3. Anti-HIV Activities

Morobe et al. [62] evaluated the anti-HIV activities of methanolic bark extracts of E. transvaalense, using the anti-HIV-1iiiB assay (Table 4). The extract exhibited the ability to inhibit HIV-1iiiB with half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values of 0.1 µg/mL and 0.2 µg/mL [62]. Bessong et al. [44] evaluated the anti-HIV activities of aqueous and methanol root extracts of E. transvaalense by assessing their inhibitory properties against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). The strongest inhibition was against the ribonuclease H (RNase H) activity of RT with methanol and aqueous extracts exhibiting half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 30.0 µg/mL, and 31.2 µg/mL, respectively, while the inhibitory on RNA-dependent-DNA polymerase (RDDP) activity of RT for aqueous and methanol extracts exhibited IC50 values of 80.0 µg/mL, and 131.0 µg/mL, respectively [44]. Tshikalange et al. [50] evaluated the anti-HIV activities of 70% acetone, chloroform and ethyl acetate stem bark extracts of E. transvaalense by assessing their inhibition against α-glycohydrolase, reverse transcriptase, and viral proteins (NF-ĸB and Tat), which play a significant role in the HIV life cycle with mesuol as a positive control. In the in vitro assay of α-glycohydrolase, the extracts showed no inhibition against α-glycohydrolase, but the chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts showed good inhibitory activities of 64%, and 76%, respectively at the lowest concentration tested (1 µg/mL) in the NF-ĸB assay (Table 4). At the highest concentration 1 µg/mL, 70% acetone extract exhibited an inhibition of 54%, chloroform (73%) and ethyl acetate (75%), which was comparable to 84% exhibited by mesuol, the positive control. Chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts showed a high Tat inhibitory activity of 73%, and 75%, respectively at 15 µg/mL, while 70% acetone extract demonstrated a lower activity of 43%. The extracts showed lower cell death percentages, ranging from 17.1% to 27.6% after 36 h at the highest concentration tested (15 µg/mL) [50]. Mthethwa et al. [23] evaluated anti-HIV activities of E. transvaalense bark extracts using the anti-HIV-1iiiB assay. The extract exhibited the ability to inhibit HIV-1iiiB with half the maximal effective concentration (EC50) value of 3.5 µg/mL [23]. Mamba et al. [46] evaluated anti-HIV activities of ethanol bark extracts of E. transvaalense and the compounds lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol, lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one, and 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin isolated from the species against recombinant HIV-1 enzyme, using non-radioactive HIV-RT colorimetric assay with doxorubicin as a positive control. The ethanol extract exhibited low inhibitory activity of 20%, 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin showed moderate activity of 63.7%, while the positive control doxorubicin showed 96.5% inhibitory activity [46]. Sigidi et al. [63] evaluated the anti-HIV activities of aqueous bark extract of E. transvaalense using the reverse transcriptase (RT) assay. The extract showed inhibition ranging from 25% to 40% [63]. These documented anti-HIV activities corroborate the use of the species as herbal medicine against HIV opportunistic infections in South Africa [16,34,35,44].

4.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activities

Motlhanka and Habtemariam [64] evaluated the anti-inflammatory activities of aqueous crude root bark extract of E. transvaalense, using the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition assay, with indomethacin as a positive control (Table 4). The extract (125 mg/mL) exhibited 90% PGE2 inhibition in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced RAW 264.7 macrophages, which is comparable to 100% PGE2 inhibition exhibited by indomethacin, the control drug [64]. Mamba et al. [46] evaluated the anti-inflammatory activities of ethanol bark extracts of E. transvaalense and the compounds lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol, lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one, and 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin isolated from the species by assessing the inhibitory effects on the pro-inflammatory enzyme, 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX), with quercetin as a positive control. The extracts and compounds exhibited activities with IC50 values, ranging from 31.4 µg/mL to 80.2 µg/mL, which was comparable to IC50 value of 48.9 µg/mL exhibited by quercetin, the control [46]. These findings support the traditional use of the species as herbal medicine for abdominal pains [24], body pains [20], skin inflammations [19,20,30,31,32], and wounds [51].

4.5. Antioxidant Activities

Motlhanka et al. [65] evaluated the antioxidant activities of water and ethanol root extracts of E. transvaalensis and a compound 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin, isolated from the species using the 2,2-dipheny-l-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging assay with quercetin, rutin, and ascorbic acid as positive controls. Above 100 µg/mL, the ethanolic extract showed an 80% scavenging activity, which was similar to the activities exhibited by the control antioxidant compounds quercetin, rutin, and ascorbic acid, and the water extract reached a similar of activity (80%) at 200 µg/mL (Table 4). Between 25.0 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL, the compound 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin exhibited a 65% scavenging activity, which was greater than the activities exhibited by both water and ethanol extracts. But at concentrations above 50 µg/mL, the scavenging activity of the ethanol extract exceeded that of the compound 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin [65]. Motlhanka et al. [39] evaluated the antioxidant activities of water and ethanol root extracts of E. transvaalensis and a compound 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin, isolated from the species, using the DPPH free radical scavenging assay with quercetin, rutin, and ascorbic acid as positive controls. Both the crude extract and the compound 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin showed activities, and at 100 µg/mL, the ethanolic extract showed 80% scavenging activity, which was similar to the activities exhibited by the control antioxidant compounds quercetin, rutin, and ascorbic acid; while the water extract reached a similar level at 100 µg/mL [39]. Nethengwe et al. [48] evaluated the antioxidant activities of methanolic bark extracts of E. transvaalense, using the DPPH free radical scavenging, 2,2’-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonate (ABTS), hydroxyl (OH) radical scavenging, super oxide (SO), nitric oxide (NO) radical scavenging, iron chelating property assays, total antioxidant capacity, and the sulphur hydryl (SH) content (Table 4). The IC50 values for the DPPH assay was 0.7 μg/mL, ABTS (4.1 μg/mL), iron chelating (3.9 μg/mL), OH (3.6 μg/mL), NO (3.6 μg/mL) and SO (1.6 μg/mL) [48]. Makhafola et al. [57] evaluated the antioxidant activities of methanolic leaf extracts of E. transvaalense, using the DPPH free radical scavenging assay with ascorbic acid as the positive control. The extract exhibited activities with EC50 value of 2.8 μg/mL, which was comparable to EC50 value of 2.3 μg/mL exhibited by ascorbic acid, the positive control [57]. The antioxidant activities exhibited by the crude extracts of E. transvaalense are probably due to flavonoids and phenolics, which have been isolated from the species [48,53,55,57].

4.6. Antiplasmodial Activities

Nethengwe et al. [48] evaluated the anti-plasmodial activities of aqueous, dichloromethane, and methanolic bark extracts of E. transvaalense against the chloroquine sensitive strain of Plasmodium falciparum (D10), using the parasite lactate dehydrogenase assay (Table 4). The other extracts were not active with the exception of dichloromethane, which exhibited IC50 value of 5.1 µg/mL [48]. These findings support the general view that E. transvaalense is a potential source of antimalarial agents and to some extent corroborate the traditional use of the species as herbal medicine against fever [10,20,21,23,26,29] and malaria [48].

4.7. Anti-Protozoan Activities

Fernandes et al. [66] evaluated the anti-protozoan activities of aqueous bark extract of E. transvaalense against Trichomonas vaginalis, using serial two-fold dilutions, with metronidazole as a positive control (Table 4). The extract showed activities with MIC value of 9.7 mg/mL while metronidazole exhibited MIC value of 0.5 µg/mL [66]. These findings corroborate the traditional use of the species as herbal medicine for sexually transmitted infections [16,35,45,46,50], skin infections [19,20,30,31,32], and venereal diseases [22,38].

4.8. Anti-pyretic Activities

Nethengwe et al. [48] evaluated the anti-pyretic activities of dichloromethane and methanolic bark extracts of E. transvaalense, using both female and male Sprague-Dawley rats with paracetamol as the reference drug (Table 4). The extracts exhibited the potential to reduce pyrexia in the induced rats and the activities were time- and concentration-dependent, with the extracts showing activity as early as 30 minutes, even at the lowest concentration of 100 mg/kg. The methanol extract showed significant activity that was comparable to paracetamol, the reference drug [48]. These findings corroborate the use of E. transvaalense as herbal medicine against fever [10,20,21,23,26,29].

4.9. Hypoglycaemic Activities

Deutschländer et al. [67] evaluated the hypoglycaemic activities of acetone stem bark extracts of E. transvaalense, by assessing their inhibiting effects on carbohydrate-hydrolising enzymes α-glucosidase and α-amylase. The acetone extracts were screened against C2C12 myocytes, 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and Chang liver cells by measuring their glucose uptake (Table 4). The in vitro assay in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes indicated that the extracts had potential of 138.6% to lower blood glucose levels at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. The α-glucosidase and α-amylase 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the extracts was found to be 50.6 µg/mL, and 1.1 µg/mL, respectively [67]. These results somehow support the usage of E. transvaalense as a herbal medicine against diabetes [66].

4.10. Larvicidal Activities

Nethengwe et al. [48] evaluated larvicidal activities of aqueous, dichloromethane, and methanolic bark extracts of E. transvaalense, using the mosquito larvicidal assay by the use of Culex quinquefascitus larvae. The results of the percentage mortality of the fourth instar larvae of Culex quinquefascitus showed that the aqueous extracts had least larvicidal activity of 35%, methanol (47%) and dichloromethane (60%) (Table 4). The IC50 values of methanol and dichloromethane extracts were 9.8 µg/mL and 18.2 µg/mL, respectively [48]. These findings corroborate the use of E. transvaalense as herbal medicine against malaria [48].

4.11. Cytotoxicity and Mutagenic Activities

Deutschländer et al. [67] evaluated the cytotoxic activities of stem bark extracts of E. transvaalense, by assessing its effects on preadipocytes and hepatocytes cell lines (Table 4). The extract exhibited cytotoxicity at 12.5 µg/mL to 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, and Chang liver cells [67]. Tshikalange and Hussein [53] evaluated the cytotoxicity activities of the crude ethanol extract and compounds lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol, lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-one, Ψ-taraxastanonol, β-sitosterol, and 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin isolated from E. transvaalense bark extract, using the XTT (sodium 3’-[1-(phenyl amino-carbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis-[4-methoxy-6-nitro] benzene sulfonic acid hydrate) colorimetric assay against Vero and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines, with doxorubicin and zelaralenone as positive controls. The cell lines were inhibited by all the compounds at the highest concentration tested (200 µg/mL), with the exception of crude extract and Ψ-taraxastanonol. The crude extract, Ψ-taraxastanonol and 4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin had little or no toxicity on Vero cells by exhibiting IC50 values greater than 100 µg/mL, while the crude extract and Ψ-taraxastanonol also exhibited IC50 values greater than 100 µg/mL in MCF-7 cell line. The IC50 values of other compounds in both Vero cells and MCF-7 cell line ranged from 19.4 µg/mL to 96.0 µg/mL [53]. Morobe et al. [62] evaluated the cytotoxic activities of methanolic and aqueous extracts of E. transvaalense against MAGI CCR5+ cells, using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The extracts exhibited activities with half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) value of 3.7 mg/mL [62]. Nethengwe et al. [48] evaluated the cytotoxic activities of aqueous, dichloromethane, and methanolic bark extracts of E. transvaalense, using the MTT cell proliferation assay against human embryonic kidney (HEK293) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. The other extracts were not active with the exception of dichloromethane, which exhibited the median lethal concentration (LC50) value of 512.0 µg/mL and 394.0 µg/mL against HEK293, and HepG2, respectively [48]. Mthethwa et al. [23] evaluated the cytotoxic activities of E. transvaalense bark extracts, using the MTT assay with berberine as a positive control. The CC50 value of the extract was 200.0 µg/mL, which was higher than 27 µg/mL exhibited by berberine, the control and a selective index (SI) value of 57.1 [23]. Sigidi et al. [63] evaluated the cytotoxicity activities of aqueous bark extract of E. transvaalense on U937, MeWo, and Vero cell lines, using the MTT cell proliferation assay. The extract exhibited activities in all the three human tumour cancer cell lines [63].
Makhafola et al. [57] evaluated mutagenicity activities of methanolic leaf extracts of E. transvaalense, using the Ames test on Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100. The authors also evaluated the antimutagenicity of the plant extracts against 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) using the Ames test. The extract did not exhibit any mutagenic activities, but showed weak antimutagenic activities (Table 4). The percentage inhibition of 4-NQO was 23.2% in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and 21.3% in strain TA100 at the assayed concentration of 5 mg/mL [57].

5. Conclusion

The present review summarizes the medicinal uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological properties E. transvaalense. The diverse pharmacological activities of E. transvaalense are somehow directly or indirectly involved in a range of physiological processes, which offer protection against both free radicals and harmful pathogens. In the past 30 years, E. transvaalense has been the subject of phytochemical and pharmacological research, but there is not yet enough data correlating the medicinal uses of the species with its phytochemical and pharmacological properties. Detailed studies on the pharmacokinetics, in vivo, and clinical research involving compounds isolated from E. transvaalense and extracts of the species are required. Therefore, future research should focus on the molecular modes or mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and physiological pathways for specific extracts of the species, including the identification of the bioactive compounds of the species and their associated pharmacological activities. These studies need to be complemented with experimental animal studies, randomized clinical trials, and target-organ toxicity studies. The bark of E. transvaalense is known to be poisonous and there is need to do detailed toxicological evaluations that strike a balance between the medicinal potential, and adverse and toxic effects on the species. There is very little information on the toxicological properties of E. transvaalense, whether it causes superficial discomfort when ingested as herbal medicine or serious poisoning. In the absence of such detailed toxicological evaluations, the intake of E. transvaalense as a herbal medicine should, therefore, be done with caution as the species has potential to cause long-term damage in patients. The wide usage of E. transvaalense as a herbal medicine in southern Africa has resulted in an increased collection of its bark from the wild. The species population is declining due to harvesting for the medicinal plant trade, and this calls for conservation strategies and mechanisms to ensure sustainable utilization of the species.

Author Contributions

A.M. wrote the main body of the review manuscript and S.S.S. reviewed and commented the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa and Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre (GMRDC), University of Fort Hare for their financial support of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Archer, R.H.; Van Wyk, A.E. A taxonomic revision of Elaeodendron Jacq. (Cassinoideae: Celastraceae) in Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 1998, 64, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Germishuizen, G.; Meyer, N.L.; Steenkamp, Y.; Keith, M. A Checklist of South African Plants; Southern African Botanical Diversity Network: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Raimondo, D.; Von Staden, L.; Foden, W.; Victor, J.E.; Helme, N.A.; Turner, R.C.; Kamundi, D.A. Red List of South African Plants; Strelitzia 25; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunningham, A.B. An Investigation of the Herbal Medicine Trade in KwaZulu Natal; Institute of Natural Resources Report 29; University of KwaZulu-Natal: Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mander, M. Marketing of Medicinal Plants in South Africa: A Case Study in KwaZulu-Natal; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham, A.B. African Medicinal Plants: Setting Priorities at the Interface between Conservation and Primary Health Care; People and Plants Working Paper 1; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  7. Williams, V.L.; Balkwill, K.; Witkowski, E.T.F. Unraveling the commercial market for medicinal plants and plant products on the Witwatersrand, South Africa. Econ. Bot. 2000, 54, 310–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Williams, V.L.; Balkwill, K.; Witkowski, E.T.F. A lexicon of plants traded in the Witwatersrand umuthi shops, South Africa. Bothalia 2001, 31, 71–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tshisikhawe, M.P. Trade of Indigenous Medicinal Plants in the Northern Province, Venda Region: Their Ethnobotanical Importance and Sustainable Use. Master’s Thesis, University of Venda for Science and Technology, Thohoyandou, South Africa, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ndawonde, B.G.; Zobolo, A.M.; Dlamini, E.T.; Siebert, S.J. A survey of plants sold by traders at Zululand muthi markets, with a view to selecting popular plant species for propagation in communal gardens. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 2007, 24, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Loundou, P.-M. Medicinal Plant Trade and Opportunities for Sustainable Management in the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Master’s Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. Moeng, T.E. An Investigation into the Trade of Medicinal Plants by Muthi Shops and Street Vendors in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Master’s Thesis, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tshisikhawe, M.P.; Van Rooyen, M.W.; Bhat, R.B. An evaluation of the extent and threat of bark harvesting of medicinal plant species in the Venda Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 81, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tshisikhawe, M.P.; Van Rooyen, M.W. Population biology of Elaeodendron transvaalense Jacq. in the presence of harvesting. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 82, 303–311. [Google Scholar]
  15. Williams, V.L.; Witkowski, E.T.F.; Balkwill, K. Volume and financial value of species traded in the medicinal plant markets of Gauteng, South Africa. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2007, 14, 584–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Semenya, S.S.; Potgieter, M.J. Medicinal plants cultivated in Bapedi traditional healers homegardens, Limpopo province, South Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 5, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cornelius, S.F. Health Clinic Gardens in North-West Province, South Africa, as Complex Social-Ecological Systems. Master’s Thesis, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pujol, J. Natur Africa: The Herbalist Handbook, African Flora, Medicinal Plants; Jean Pujol Natural Healers Foundation: Durban, South Africa, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  19. Long, C. Swaziland’s Flora: siSwati Names and Uses; Swaziland National Trust Commission: Mbambane, Swaziland, 2005; Available online: http://www.sntc.org.sz/index.asp (accessed on 1 February 2019).
  20. Van Wyk, B.-E.; Gericke, N. People’s Plants: A Guide to Useful Plants of Southern Africa; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Deutschländer, M.S.; Lall, N.; Van de Venter, M. Plant species used in the treatment of diabetes by South African traditional healers: An inventory. Pharm. Biol. 2009, 47, 348–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Samie, A.; Tambani, T.; Harshfield, E.; Green, E.; Ramalivhana, J.N.; Bessong, P.O. Antifungal activities of selected venda medicinal plants against Candida albicans, Candida krusei and Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from South African AIDS patients. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 2965–2976. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mthethwa, N.S.; Oyedeji, B.A.O.; Obi, L.C.; Aiyegoro, A. Anti-staphylococcal, anti-HIV and cytotoxicity studies of four South African medicinal plants and isolation of bioactive compounds from Cassine transvaalensis (Burtt. Davy) Codd. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gelfand, M.; Mavi, S.; Drummond, R.B.; Ndemera, B. The Traditional Medical Practitioners in Zimbabwe: His Principles of Practice and Pharmacopoeia; Mambo Press: Gweru, Zimbabwe, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  25. Motlhanka, D.; Nthoiwa, G.P. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants of Tswapong north, in eastern Botswana: A case of plants from Mosweu and Seolwane villages. Eur. J. Med. Plants 2013, 3, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gerstner, J. A preliminary checklist of Zulu names of plants. Bantu Stud. 1939, 13, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amusan, O.O.G.; Sukati, N.A.; Dlamini, P.S.; Sibandze, F.G. Some Swazi phytomedicines and their constituents. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chauke, M.A.; Shai, L.J.; Mogale, M.A.; Tshisikhawe, M.P.; Mokgotho, M.P. Medicinal plant use of villagers in the Mopani district, Limpopo province, South Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 12, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maema, L.P.; Mahlo, S.M.; Potgieter, M.J. Ethnomedicinal uses of indigenous plant species in Mogalakwena municipality of Waterberg district, Limpopo province, South Africa. Int. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2016, 1, 28–44. [Google Scholar]
  30. Von Koenen, E. Medicinal, Poisonous and Edible Plants in Namibia; Klaus Hess Publishers: Windhoek, Namibia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Steenkamp, V.; Fernandes, A.C.; Van Rensburg, C.E.J. Antibacterial activity of Venda medicinal plants. Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Van Wyk, B.-E.; Van Oudtshoorn, B.; Gericke, N. Medicinal Plants of South Africa; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  33. Semenya, S.S.; Maroyi, A.; Potgieter, M.J.; Erasmus, L.J.C. Herbal medicines used by Bapedi traditional healers to treat reproductive ailments in the Limpopo province, South Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 10, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Semenya, S.S.; Potgieter, M.J.; Erasmus, L.J.C. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by Bapedi traditional healers to manage HIV/AIDS in the Limpopo province, South Africa. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 434–441. [Google Scholar]
  35. Semenya, S.S.; Potgieter, M.J.; Erasmus, L.J.C. Bapedi phytomedicine and their use in the treatment of sexually transmitted infections in Limpopo province, South Africa. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 7, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van der Merwe, D.; Swan, G.E.; Botha, C.J. Use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in cattle by Setswana-speaking people in the Madikwe area of the North West Province of South Africa. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2001, 72, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kunene, N.; Wilson, R.A.C.; Myeni, N.P. The use of trees, shrubs and herbs in livestock production by communal farmers in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 2003, 20, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mabogo, D.E.N. The Ethnobotany of the Vhavenda. Master’s Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  39. Motlhanka, D.M.T.; Habtemariam, S.; Houghton, P. Free radical scavenging activity of crude extracts and 4′-O-methylepigallocatechin isolated from roots of Cassine Transvaalensis Burtt-Davy from Botswana. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 2008, 11, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Masevhe, N.A.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. The traditional use of plants to manage candidiasis and related infections in Venda, South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 168, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Semenya, S.S.; Maroyi, A. Ethnobotanical survey of plants used by Bapedi traditional healers to treat tuberculosis and its opportunistic infections in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Motlhanka, D.M.; Makhabu, S.W. Medicinal and edible wild fruit plants of Botswana as emerging new crop opportunities. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 1836–1842. [Google Scholar]
  43. Danley, K. Letters of the Bush: A Case Study of Traditional Setswana Herbal Medicine. Master’s Thesis, Carleton College, Northfield, MN, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bessong, P.O.; Obi, C.L.; Andreola, M.L.; Rojas, L.B.; Pousegu, L.; Igumbor, E.; Meyer, J.J.M.; Quideau, S.; Litvak, S. Evaluation of selected South African medicinal plants for inhibitory properties against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase and integrase. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 99, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Semenya, S.S.; Potgieter, M.J.; Erasmus, L.J.C. Indigenous plant species used by Bapedi healers to treat sexually transmitted infections: Their distribution, harvesting, conservation and threats. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 87, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mamba, P.; Adebayo, S.A.; Tshikalange, T.E. Anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity of selected South African plants used to treat sexually transmitted diseases. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2016, 8, 1870–1876. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tshikalange, T.E.; Mophuting, B.C.; Mahore, J.; Winterboer, S.; Lall, N. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in villages under Jongilanga Tribal council, Mpumalanga, South Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 13, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nethengwe, M.F.; Opoku, A.R.; Dludla, P.V.; Madida, K.T.; Shonhai, A.; Smith, P.; Singh, M. Larvicidal, antipyretic and antiplasmodial activity of some Zulu medicinal plants. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Van Wyk, P. Trees of the Kruger National Park; Purnell: Cape Town, South Africa, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tshikalange, T.E.; Meyer, J.J.M.; Lall, N.; Muñoz, E.; Sancho, R.; Van De Venter, M.; Oosthuizen, V. In vitro anti-HIV-1 properties of ethnobotanically selected South African plants used in the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 478–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Kasanda, C.D.; Kapenda, H.M. School learners’ knowledge and views of traditional medicinal plant use in two regions in Namibia. In Indigenous Knowledge of Namibia; Chinsembu, K.C., Cheikhyoussef, A., Mumbengegwi, D.R., Kandawa-Schulz, M., Kasandra, C.D., Kazembe, L., Eds.; University of Namibia Press: Windhoek, Namibia, 2015; pp. 135–156. [Google Scholar]
  52. Drewes, S.E.; Mashimbye, M.J.; Field, J.S.; Ramesar, N. 11,11-dimethyl-1,3,8,10-tetrahydroxy-9-methoxypeltogynan and three pentacyclic triterpenes from Cassine transvaalensis. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3490–3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tshikalange, T.E.; Hussein, A. Cytotoxicity activity of isolated compounds from Elaeodendron transvaalense ethanol extract. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 1695–1697. [Google Scholar]
  54. Khumalo, G.P.; Sadgrove, N.J.; Van Vuuren, S.F.; Van Wyk, B.-E. Antimicrobial lupenol triterpenes and a polyphenol from Elaeodendron transvaalense, a popular southern African medicinal bark. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Okem, A.; Southway, C.; Stirk, W.A.; Street, R.A.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Heavy metal contamination in South African medicinal plants: A cause for concern. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 93, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Würger, G.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. Tannin content of leaf extracts of 53 trees used traditionally to treat diarrhoea is an important criterion in selecting species for further work. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 90, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Makhafola, T.J.; Elgorashi, E.E.; McGaw, L.J.; Verschaeve, L.; Eloff, J.N. The correlation between antimutagenic activity and total phenolic content of extracts of 31 plant species with high antioxidant activity. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. McGaw, L.J.; Jäager, A.K.; van Staden, J. Antibacterial, anthelmintic and anti-amoebic activity in South African medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 72, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Samie, A.; Obi, C.L.; Bessong, P.O.; Namrita, L. Activity profiles of fourteen selected medicinal plants from rural Venda communities in South Africa against fifteen clinical bacterial species. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tshikalange, T.E.; Meyer, J.J.M.; Hussein, A.A. Antimicrobial activity, toxicity and the isolation of a bioactive compound from plants used to treat sexually transmitted diseases. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 96, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Steenkamp, V.; Fernandes, A.C.; Van Rensburg, C.E.J. Screening of Venda medicinal plants for antifungal activity against Candida albicans. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 256–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Morobe, I.C.; Mthethwa, N.S.; Bisi-Johnson, M.A.; Vasaikar, S.D.; Obi, C.L.; Oyedeji, A.O.; Kambizi, L.; Eloff, J.N.; Hattori, T. Cytotoxic effects and safety profiles of extracts of active medicinal plants from South Africa. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 2, 176–182. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sigidi, M.T.; Traore, A.N.; Boukandou, M.M.; Tshisikhawe, M.P.; Ntuli, S.S.; Potgieter, N. Anti-HIV, pro-inflammatory and cytotoxicity properties of selected Venda plants. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2017, 16, 545–552. [Google Scholar]
  64. Motlhanka, D.M.T.; Habtermariam, S. Prostaglandin E2 (PgE2) inhibition by crude extracts of selected medicinal plants from Botswana. Niger. J. Nat. Prod. Med. 2007, 11, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  65. Motlhanka, D.M.T.; Miljkovic-Brake, A.; Houghton, P.J.; Habtemarium, S.; Hylands, P.J. Antioxidant activity of water and ethanol extracts from roots of Cassine transvaalensis Burtt-Davy from Botswana. Planta Med. 2006, 72, P_057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fernandes, L.; Van Rensburg, C.E.J.; Hoosen, A.A.; Steenkamp, V. In vitro activity of medicinal plants of the Venda region, South Africa, against Trichomonas vaginalis. South. Afr. J. Epidemiol. Infect. 2008, 23, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Deutschländer, M.S.; Van de Venter, M.; Roux, S.; Louw, J.; Lall, N. Hypoglycaemic activity of four plant extracts traditionally used in South Africa for diabetes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds isolated from Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds isolated from Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Nutrients 11 00545 g001aNutrients 11 00545 g001b
Table 1. Medicinal uses of Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Table 1. Medicinal uses of Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Medicinal UseParts of the Plant UsedCountryReferences
Abdominal painsBark and rootsZimbabwe[24]
AnthelminticRoot barkSouth Africa[22,38]
ArthritisRoot barkBotswana[39]
BackacheRoot barkBotswana[25,39]
Bladder infectionsBarkSouth Africa[22]
Blood cleanserRootsSouth Africa[29]
Body painsBarkSouth Africa[20]
CandidiasisRootsSouth Africa[40]
Chest painsRoots mixed with bulb of Drimia elata Jacq.South Africa[41]
CoughBarkSouth Africa[22]
DiabetesBarkSouth Africa[21]
DiarrhoeaBarkSouth Africa and Swaziland[10,18,19,20,21,22,23]
EmeticStemSwaziland[19,27]
Female infertilityBark or roots mixed with Peltophorum africanum Sond. bark and decoction taken orallySouth Africa[33]
FeverBarkSouth Africa[10,20,21,23,26,29]
HaemorrhoidsRoot barkSouth Africa[22,38]
High blood pressureRoot bark mixed with roots of Ozoroa paniculosa (Sond.) R. Fern. & A. Fern.Botswana[42]
High blood pressureRootsBotswana[43]
HIV/AIDSRootsSouth Africa[16,44,45]
HIV/AIDSRoots mixed with Drimia elata Jacq. bulb, roots of Elephantorrhiza elephantina (Burch.) Skeels and Zanthoxylum capense (Thunb.) Harv., bark of Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. and Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R. Br. twigs South Africa[34]
Induce vomitingStem barkSouth Africa[46,47]
Intestinal crampsBarkSouth Africa[10,18,20,21]
Kidney infectionsBarkSouth Africa[22]
LaxativeBarkSouth Africa[22]
MalariaBarkSouth Africa[48]
MenorrhagiaRoot barkBotswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe[20,24,25,49]
Menstrual problemsRoot bark mixed with roots of Ozoroa paniculosaBotswana[42]
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs)Roots and stem barkSouth Africa[16,45,46,50]
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs)Roots mixed with Drimia elata bulb, roots of Elephantorrhiza elephantina and Zanthoxylum capense, bark of Sclerocarya birrea and Sarcostemma viminale twigsSouth Africa[35]
Skin infections, inflammations and rashesBarkNamibia, South Africa and Swaziland[19,20,30,31,32]
Sore throatLeavesSouth Africa[32]
Stomach achesBark and rootsSwaziland and South Africa[19,20,21,22,23,26,27,28,29]
Stomach cleanserBarkSouth Africa[10]
Venereal diseasesRoot barkSouth Africa[22,38]
WoundsBarkNamibia[51]
Ethnoveterinary Medicine
DiarrhoeaBark and leavesSouth Africa[36,37]
WormsLeavesSouth Africa[37]
Table 2. Mineral and phytochemical composition of Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Table 2. Mineral and phytochemical composition of Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Mineral and Phytochemical CompositionValuesPlant PartsReferences
Al (mg/kg dry weight (dw)26.5–41.6Stem bark[55]
As (mg/kg dw)0.06Stem bark[55]
Cr (mg/kg dw)4.8Stem bark[55]
Cu (mg/kg dw)2.8–3.5Stem bark[55]
Fe (mg/kg dw)59.0–206.0Stem bark[55]
Flavonoid (mg/catechin equivalents/g dw) 0.1–0.2Stem bark[48,55]
Hg (mg/kg dw)2.4–8.2Stem bark[55]
Mn (mg/kg dw)11.3–12.7Stem bark[55]
Ni (mg/kg dw)1.8–2.6Stem bark[55]
Pb (mg/kg dw)1.2Stem bark[55]
Proanthocyanidin (mg/g)0.25Bark[48]
Sn (mg/kg dw)40.2–42.1Stem bark[55]
Sulphur hydryl (µg/g)0.36Bark[48]
Tannin (mg/mL gallic acid equivalent)0.4–0.8Leaves[56]
Total phenolics (mg of gallic acid equivalent/g of extract)0.04–9.4Bark and leaves[48,55,57]
Zn (mg/kg dw)3.8–4.4Stem bark[55]
Table 3. Phytochemical composition of Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Table 3. Phytochemical composition of Elaeodendron transvaalense.
Phytochemical CompoundExtractPlant PartReferences
Carbohydrate
GalactitolEthanolRoot bark[52]
Flavonoid
4’-O-methyl-epigallocatechin Dichloromethane, ethanol and waterStem bark[39,53,54]
Peltogynoid
(+)-11,11-dimethyl-1,3,8,10-trahydroxy-9-methoxypeltogynanEthanolRoot bark[52]
Triterpenes
3-oxo-28-hydroxylbetuli-20(29)-ene Hexane: ethyl acetateBark[23]
3,28-dihydroxylbetuli-20(29)-ene Hexane: ethyl acetate Bark[23]
30-hydroxylup-20(29)-ene-3-one Dichloromethane and waterRoot bark[54]
6β-hydroxylup-20(29)-ene-3-one Dichloromethane and waterRoot bark[54]
6β-hydroxy-lup-20(30)-en-3-one Ethanol and hexaneRoot bark[52]
Canophyllal Ethanol and hexaneRoot bark[52]
Canophyllol Ethanol and hexaneRoot bark[52]
Lup-20(30)-ene-3α,29-diol Dichloromethane, ethanol and waterStem bark[46,53,54]
Lup-20(29)-ene-30-hydroxy-3-oneEthanolStem bark[46,53]
β-sitosterol EthanolStem bark[53]
Ψ-taraxastanonolEthanolStem bark[53]
Table 4. Summary of pharmacological activities of Elaeodendron transvaalense crude extracts.
Table 4. Summary of pharmacological activities of Elaeodendron transvaalense crude extracts.
Activity TestedExtractPlant PartModelEffectReference
AntibacterialMethanolBarkKirby-bauer disk diffusion Exhibited activities with zone of inhibition of 23 mm and 25 mm to 31 mm against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermis, respectively[23]
AntibacterialMethanolBarkMicro-dilution techniqueMinimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values varied between 0.6 μg/mL and 0.02 μg/mL and extracts inhibited 6% of Staphylococcus aureus and 2% Staphylococcus epidermidis at a minimum concentration of 0.02 μg/mL[23]
AntibacterialAqeousBarkPlate-hole diffusion and broth microdilution methodsExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 17.2 mg/mL against both Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus[31]
AntibacterialMethanolBarkPlate-hole diffusion and broth microdilution methodsExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 1.3 mg/mL and 2.5 mg/mL against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively[31]
AntibacterialEthanolBarkSerial broth microdilutionExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 12.5 mg/mL, 1.6 mg/mL and 3.1 mg/mL against Gardnerella vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Oligella ureolytica[46]
AntibacterialDichloromethanBarkMicro-titre plate broth two-fold serial dilution assayExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 0.4 mg/mL against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 0.5 mg/mL against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, (0.7 mg/mL), Shigella sonnei (0.8 mg/mL) and Salmonella typhimurium (1.0 mg/mL)[54]
AntibacterialMethanolBarkMicro-titre plate broth two-fold serial dilution assayExtracts exhibited activities with MIC value of 1.3 mg/mL against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium, 1.0 mg/mL against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Shigella sonnei, and Staphylococcus epidermidis (1.7 mg/mL)[54]
AntibacterialEthanolStem barkMicrodilution assayExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 3.1 mg/mL and 0.78 to 1.6 mg/mL against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively[55]
AntibacterialAqueousBarkMicrodilution assayExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 0.8 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively[58]
AntibacterialEthanolBarkMicrodilution assayExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively[58]
AntibacterialAqueousBarkDisc-diffusion assaysExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.3 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively[58]
AntibacterialEthanolBarkDisc-diffusion assaysExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.6 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively[58]
AntibacterialMethanolRootsDisc diffusion methodExhibited activities with zone of inhibition of 23 mm against Bacillus cereus, 8 mm against Bacillus pumilus, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus cloacae, Escherichia coli, Aeromonas hydrophila, Proteus mirabilis and Salmonella cholera-suis and 10 mm against Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Pantoea agglomerans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[59]
AntibacterialMethanolRootsMicrodilution methodExhibited activities with MIC values of 12 mg/mL against Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus cloacae and Escherichia coli, 6 mg/mL against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella cholera-suis >12 mg/mL against Aeromonas hydrophila, Proteus mirabilis and Serratia marcescens[59]
AntibacterialAqueousBarkAgar dilution methodExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 50.0 mg/mL against Bacillus cereus and Bacillus pumilus, 20.0 mg/mL against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus[60]
AntifungalMethanolBarkPlate-hole diffusion and broth microdilution methodsExtract exhibited activities with MIC value of 20.2 mg/mL[61]
AntifungalHexaneBarkAgar diffusion assayExhibited activities with zone of inhibition of 12 mm to 16 mm against Candida albicans, Candida krusei (8 mm to 14 mm) and Cryptococcus neoformans (14 mm to 16 mm)[22]
AntifungalHexaneBarkMicrodilution assayExhibited activities with MIC values of 0.5 mg/mL against Candida albicans and 1.9 mg/mL against both Candida krusei and Cryptococcus neoformans[22]
AntifungalHexaneBarkMicrodilution assayExhibited activities with minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values of 3.8 mg/mL against Candida albicans, Candida krusei (7.5 mg/mL) and Cryptococcus neoformans (1.9 mg/mL)[22]
AntifungalHexaneBarkTime-to-kill experiments Extract was able to kill >90% of all cells of Candida albicans at a concentration of 1.9 mg/mL after a 10 hour incubation[22]
AntifungalEthanolBarkSerial broth microdilutionExtracts exhibited activities with MIC values of 3.1 mg/mL against Candida albicans[46]
Anti-HIVAqueousRootRNA-dependent-DNA polymerase (RDDP) activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase Extracts exhibited activities with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 80.0 µg/mL[44]
Anti-HIVMethanolRootRNA-dependent-DNA polymerase (RDDP) activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase Extracts exhibited activities with IC50 value of 131.0 µg/mL[44]
Anti-HIVAqueousRootRNase H assayExtracts exhibited activities with IC50 value of 31.2 µg/mL[44]
Anti-HIVMethanolRootRNase H assayExtracts exhibited activities with IC50 value of 30.0 µg/mL[44]
Anti-HIV70% acetoneStem barkNF-ĸB assayExtracts showed inhibitory activities of 45% to 54%[50]
Anti-HIVChloroformStem barkNF-ĸB assayExtracts showed inhibitory activities of 57% to 73%[50]
Anti-HIVEthyl acetateStem barkNF-ĸB assayExtracts showed inhibitory activities of 72% to 76%[50]
Anti-HIV70% acetoneStem barkHeLa-Tat-Luc assayExtracts showed inhibitory activities of 22% to 43% [50]
Anti-HIVChloroformStem barkHeLa-Tat-Luc assayExtracts showed inhibitory activities of 28% to 76% [50]
Anti-HIVChloroformStem barkHeLa-Tat-Luc assayExtracts showed inhibitory activities of 63% to 75% [50]
Anti-HIVMethanolBarkAnti-HIV-1iiiB assayExhibited activities with half maximal effective concentration (EC50) value of 0.1µg/mL and 0.2µg/mL[62]
Anti-HIVMethanolBarkAnti-HIV-1iiiB assayExhibited activities with EC50 value of 3.5 µg/mL[23]
Anti-HIVEthanolBarkHIV-RT colorimetric assayExtract exhibited inhibitory activity of 20%[46]
Anti-HIVAqueousBarkReverse transcriptase (RT) assayExtract showed inhibition ranging from 25% to 40%[63]
Anti-inflammatoryAqueousRoot barkCyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition assayExtract exhibited 90% PGE2 inhibition in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced RAW 264.7 macrophages[64]
Anti-inflammatoryEthanolBarkLipoxygenase (15-LOX) inhibitory assayExtract exhibited activities with IC50 value of 80.2 µg/mL[46]
AntioxidantAqueousRoots2,2-dipheny-l-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging assayAbove 200 µg/mL, the extract showed 80% scavenging activity[65]
AntioxidantEthanolRootsDPPH free radical scavenging assayAbove 100 µg/mL, the extract showed 80% scavenging activity[65]
AntioxidantAqueousRootsDPPH free radical scavenging assayAbove 200 µg/mL, the extract showed 80% scavenging activity[39]
AntioxidantEthanolRootsDPPH free radical scavenging assayAbove 100 µg/mL, the extract showed 80% scavenging activity[39]
AntioxidantMethanolBarkHydroxyl (OH) radical scavenging assayExhibited activities with IC50 values of 3.6 mg/mL[48]
AntioxidantMethanolBarkSuper oxide (SO) assayExhibited activities with IC50 values of 1.6 mg/mL[48]
AntioxidantMethanolBarkNitric oxide (NO) radical scavenging assayExhibited activities with IC50 values of 3.6 mg/mL[48]
AntioxidantMethanolBarkIron chelating property assayExhibited activities with IC50 values of 3.9 mg/mL[48]
AntioxidantMethanolBarkDPPH free radical scavenging assayExhibited activities with IC50 values of 0.7 mg/mL[48]
AntioxidantMethanolBark2,2´-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging assaysExhibited activities with IC50 values of 4.1 mg/mL[48]
AntioxidantMethanolLeavesDPPH free radical scavenging assayExhibited activities with EC50 value of 2.8 mg/mL[57]
Antiplasmodial DichloromethaneBarkPlasmodium falciparum Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase assay Extract exhibited activities with IC50 value of 5.1 µg/mL[48]
Anti-protozoanAqueousBarkSerial two-fold dilutionExtract exhibited activities with MIC value of 9.7 mg/mL against Trichomonas vaginalis[66]
Anti-pyreticMethanolBarkIn vivo experiments using female and male Sprague-Dawley ratsExtracts exhibited potential to reduce pyrexia in the induced rats and activities were time and concentration dependent with extracts showing activity as early as from 30 minutes and even at the lowest concentration of 100 mg/kg[48]
Hypoglycaemic AcetoneStem barkIn vitro anti-diabetic and toxicity screening against murine C2C12 myoblasts, Chang liver cells and 3T3-L1 preadipocytesExtracts had potential of 138.6% to lower blood glucose levels at a concentration of 50 µg/mL against 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and 100% against both C2C12 myoblasts and Chang liver cells.[67]
HypoglycaemicAcetoneStem barkα-amylase inhibiting activityExtract exhibited activity with IC50 value of 1.1 µg/mL[67]
HypoglycaemicAcetoneStem barkα-glucosidase inhibiting activityExtract exhibited activity with IC50 value of 50.6 µg/mL[67]
LarvicidalDichloromethaneBarkLarvicidal assay on Culex quinquefascitus larvaeExtracts exhibited activities with 60% mortality and IC50 value of 18.2 µg/mL[48]
LarvicidalMethanolBarkLarvicidal assay on Culex quinquefascitus larvaeExtracts exhibited activities with 47% mortality and IC50 value of 9.8 µg/mL[48]
CytotoxicityEthanolStem bark3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) calorimetric assayExtracts exhibited activities at 12.5 µg/mL showing 90% and 40% of viable 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and Chang liver cells, respectively of the control[67]
CytotoxicityEthanolStem barkXTT (sodium 3’-[1-(phenyl amino-carbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis-[4-methoxy-6-nitro] benzene sulfonic acid hydrate) colorimetric assayExtracts exhibited activities with IC50 values >100.0 µg/mL in both Vero cells and MCF-7 cell line[53]
CytotoxicityMethanolStem bark3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assayExtracts exhibited activities with half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) value of 3.7 mg/mL[62]
CytotoxicityDichloromethane BarkMTT cell proliferation assayExtracts exhibited activities with the median lethal concentration (LC50) value of 512.0 µg/mL and 394.0 µg/mL against human embryonic kidney (HEK293) and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells, respectively[48]
CytotoxicityMethanolBark3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) calorimetric assayExtract exhibited activities with CC50 value of 200.0 µg/mL and selective index (SI) value of 57.1[23]
CytotoxicityAqueousBarkMTT cell proliferation assayExtracts exhibited activities in all the three human tumour cancer cell lines[63]
Cytotoxicity70% acetoneStem barkCytotoxicity assay on MT2 cellsExtracts showed cell death of 22.7% after 36 h at the highest concentration tested of 15 µg/mL[50]
CytotoxicityChloroformStem barkCytotoxicity assay on MT2 cellsExtracts showed cell death of 27.6% after 36 h at the highest concentration tested of 15 µg/mL[50]
CytotoxicityEthyl acetateStem barkCytotoxicity assay on MT2 cellsExtracts showed cell death of 17.1% after 36 h at the highest concentration tested of 15 µg/mL[50]
AntimutagenicityMethanolLeavesAmes testExtract exhibited weak antimutagenic activities with 23.2% inhibition of 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and 21.3% in strain TA100 at the assayed concentration of 5 mg/mL[57]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maroyi, A.; Semenya, S.S. Medicinal Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Elaeodendron transvaalense. Nutrients 2019, 11, 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030545

AMA Style

Maroyi A, Semenya SS. Medicinal Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Elaeodendron transvaalense. Nutrients. 2019; 11(3):545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maroyi, Alfred, and Sebua Silas Semenya. 2019. "Medicinal Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Elaeodendron transvaalense" Nutrients 11, no. 3: 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030545

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop