Next Article in Journal
Motion Control Method of Bionic Robot Dog Based on Vision and Navigation Information
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of a 12-Week Football Programme on Body Composition, Physical Condition, and Analysis of Physical Demands in Young Male Children
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Properties of Edible Flowers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aloysia citrodora Extracts Cultivated in Greece as Antioxidants and Potent Regulators of Food Microbiota

by
Vasileios K. Gkalpinos
1,
Vasiliki A. Anagnostou
1,
Gregoria Mitropoulou
2,
Vasiliki Kompoura
2,
Ioanna Karapantzou
2,
Christodoulos K. Fasoulis
1,
Efstathios P. Vasdekis
3,
Yiannis Kourkoutas
2,* and
Andreas G. Tzakos
1,4,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Section of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
2
Laboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
3
Directorate of Rural Economy, Region of Epirus, 45221 Ioannina, Greece
4
Institute of Materials Science and Computing, University Research Center of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 3663; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063663
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Revised: 6 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Properties of Edible Plants)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Recently, plant extracts have attracted scientific and industrial attention as growth stimulators of desired microbes (probiotics), although their antimicrobial properties are well-known. In our study, Aloysia citrodora extracts stimulated the growth of a wild-type and a commercial Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strain, while growth inhibitory activity against common food-spoilage and pathogenic microbes was documented. Thus, they may be considered potential candidates for functional regulation of food microbiota, provided that they are used at the optimum concentration in food systems.

Abstract

Plant extracts contain valuable sources of biologically active molecules and, lately, have attracted scientific and industrial interest as inhibitors of food-borne pathogens and growth stimulators of beneficial microbes. In this vein, the aim of this study was to explore and exploit the effect of Aloysia citrodora extracts as potent functional regulators of food microbiota by stimulating the growth of probiotic strains and by suppressing the evolution of common food-spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Aqueous and ethanolic extracts of A. citrodora, rich in polyphenols, were prepared and their phytochemical composition was unveiled by LC-triple quadruple and LC-QToF mass spectrometry. The growth stimulatory activity of a wild-type Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strain, along with L. rhamnosus GG, used as a control, was assessed by monitoring cell growth in the presence of sodium chloride, bile salts, thermal stress, and alcohol. We found that the aqueous extract stimulated the growth of probiotic strains at 0.5 mg/mL. At the same concentration, stimulatory activity was observed for the wild-type L. rhamnosus in the presence of bile salts and alcohol and for L. rhamnosus GG in the presence of NaCl and under thermal stress. The ethanolic extract of A. citrodora exhibited prebiotic activity at 0.25 mg/mL, but did not promote the growth of the strains under the stress conditions tested. In addition, minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) against food-spoilage and pathogenic microbes were determined. The strongest growth inhibitory activity of foodborne pathogens was noted by the A. citrodora ethanolic extract, while the aqueous A. citrodora extract had no effect against Escherichia coli. Importantly, the spoilage and pathogenic microbes tested were more sensitive to the extracts than the probiotic strains, indicating a significant contribution to the functional regulation of food microbiota, provided that they are used at the optimum concentration.

1. Introduction

An upsurge of interest in functional foods containing prebiotic ingredients and probiotic microorganisms is witnessed today because of the multiple associated effects. Probiotics have been described by the World Health Organization (WHO) as ‘live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host’ [1]. Prebiotics refer to dietary non-digestible fibers that have a stimulatory effect on beneficial microbes, such as bifidobacterial and lactobacilli and manipulate the microbiome of the gastrointestinal tract (GI) of the host [2,3,4].
Lately, polyphenols have already gained scientific and industrial interest as growth stimulators for probiotics. Polyphenols are present in significant amounts in medicinal plants and, along with polyphenols, are plant metabolites that have illustrated a variety of biological actions, making them strong candidates as dietary ingredients. Their activity toward humans is typically mediated through interaction with intestinal microorganisms because of their limited absorbability in the digestive tract. Therefore, they are characterized as a novel class of prebiotics [5]. In vitro studies indicated that they may have a dual beneficial effect by simultaneously inhibiting infections and promoting health-promoting bacteria.
Although there is a lack of evidence for the growth stimulatory effect of A. citrodora extracts on lactobacilli strains, similar experiments available in the literature demonstrate that the effect of herbal extracts varies and depends usually on the genus, species, and microbial strain, as well as on the extraction method [6]. Certain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have the ability to degrade certain phenolic compounds found in food, including those with high antioxidant activity [7,8], suggesting increased cell growth of probiotic bacteria in culture media supplemented with plant extracts.
Traditionally, medicinal plants have been consumed by humans for centuries, and plant-based therapies are among the most significant treatment modalities used in traditional medicine of diverse cultures. Plant extracts’ wide spectrum of biological activities could be generally linked to their chemical composition [9]. Moreover, as natural alternatives to synthetic food preservatives, plant extracts constitute a potential source of antimicrobial compounds [10].
Aloysia citrodora (common name lemon verbena), a plant from the family of Verbenaceae, is one of the well-known medicinal plants with a variety of therapeutic uses [11]. Several studies have shown that A. citrodora exhibits therapeutic properties with respect to insomnia, anxiety disorders, asthma, fever, diarrhea, and bloating [12]. The antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties of verbena infusion have also been noted [9,11,13,14,15].
Natural antioxidants included in medicinal herbs are responsible for inhibiting reactive oxygen species and lowering the negative effects of oxidative stress. Studies from several countries in the literature revealed the antioxidant activity of extracts from A. citrodora. For example, assessment of malondialdehyde (MDA) formation, ferric-reducing ability of plasma (FRAP), and superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) in the plasma samples after oral administration of A. citrodora extract in rats demonstrated the potent antioxidant activity of the plant [11].
The aim of the present work was to unveil the phytochemical profile of the plant extracts, the antioxidant activity, and the prebiotic potential of the A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts to promote the growth of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strains and suppress the evolution of common food-spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. The procedure followed for the identification of the compounds and the evaluation of the biological activity of the extracts is shown in Figure 1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Plant Material

The leaves of A. citrodοra were collected in March 2022 from the region of Epirus in western Greece. A voucher specimen of the plant was kept in the herbarium “EpirusHerbs” stored at the Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, with a voucher code of 0081.

2.2. Preparation of Plant Extracts

The collected leaves of A. citrodora were picked and then separated into three batches. The first batch was dried in the shade for two weeks, the second was dried in the oven at 60 °C, and the third underwent lyophilization at −85 °C (Telstar, LyoQuest). The first batch was selected for analysis. Then, the dry material was processed in a commercial blender to create a powder. The resultant powder was then mixed with solvent (10 mL/g of powder) before the resulting slurry was poured into a borosilicate bottle and immersed in an ultrasonic bath at 200 W and 30 °C for one hour. Every 15 min, the bottles were given a vigorous shake. A glass funnel with a sintered glass filter was used to filter the resultant suspension (porosity: 4). The solvent was removed, and the filtrate solution was collected. Then, the solution was frozen and lyophilized for the aqueous extract at 0.01 mbar at 30 °C. For the ethanolic extract, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator at 100 mbar and 30 °C (Labtech, EV400-V).

2.3. Analytical Procedures

2.3.1. Chemical Analysis

For the analysis, stock solutions of each extract (1 mg/mL) were prepared; 0.2 mg of dried ethanolic extract were diluted in 1 mL of pure ethanol, and, respectively, 0.2 mg of aqueous extract were diluted in 1 mL of distilled water. Each solution was sonicated for 30 min and filtered through a 0.2 μm RC filter before being analyzed.
To determine the phytochemical content of the plant extracts, we used both a Bruker EVOQ Elite triple quadrupole and a Xevo-G2-XS-QToF. The LC/MS analysis of the extract was performed on a Bruker EVOQ Elite triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in full-scan mode. Spray voltage (−) was set to 4 kV and (+) 3.5 kV, cone gas flow was set to 20 units, heated probe gas flow was set to 50 units, heated probe temperature was 350 °C, cone temperature was 200 °C, and nebulizer gas flow was set at 40 units. The LC-MS/QToF analysis of the extracts was performed on a Xevo-G2-XS-QToF coupled to a Waters UPLC I-Class Solvent Manager (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). The MS conditions were as follows: scan range was set at m/z 50–1200, and source voltage was 1 kV for negative mode and 0.8 kV for positive mode. The source temperature was 550 °C, the flow of desolvation gas (N2) was set to 1000 L/h, and cone gas flow was set to 20 L/h. For MS/MS, collision energy ramp was set from 25 eV to 45 eV, and the declustering potential was 40 V. The injection volume was 2 μL. For the post-processing and analysis of the acquisition data, the UNIFY software platform was used. For both methods, the eluent flow was set to 0.4 mL/min with H2O with 0.1% HCOOH on channel A and acetonitrile with 0.1% HCOOH on channel B. The eluent gradient was as follows: from 0 min to 0.07 min 1% B; from 0.07 min to 10 min the eluent composition linearly increased from 1% to 100% B; from 10 min to 12.67 min the composition was maintained at 100% B; from 12.67 min to 12.73 the composition returned to initial conditions of 1% B; from 12.73 min to 15 min the composition was maintained at 1% B, after which point the next sample was injected. The column used in both methods was the Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 1.8 μM.

2.3.2. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

Using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and a colorimetric test at 725 nm, the total phenol concentration of the extracts was determined: 480 μL of distilled water, 20 μL of plant extracts (1 mg/mL), and 50 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were combined; 100 μL of a saturated solution of Na2CO3 was added after 3 min, and 350 μL of that solution was then diluted with distilled water. Blank samples were created using 20 μL of ethanol. The absorption was observed at 725 nm after one hour. The same process was used to create the calibration curves, but instead of using plant extract, 20 μL of gallic acid solution was used. Gallic acid’s calibration curve required standard solutions with concentrations ranging from 50 to 250 mg/mL. The absorption of the samples was recorded after 1 h using a UV-Vis Spectrometer, DS5, Edinburg Instruments (University of Ioannina, Department of Chemistry, Ioannina, Greece).

2.4. Biological Evaluation

2.4.1. Microbial Strains

The commercial Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and the wild-type L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 isolated from Greek olives [16] were grown in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe broth (MRS, Condalab, Spain) at 37 °C for 24 h.
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica ser. Enteritidis FMCC B56 PT4 (kindly provided by Prof. Nychas G. J. E., Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica ser. Τyphimurium DSMZ 554, Listeria monocytogenes NCTC 10527 serotype 4b, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were grown in brain–heart infusion (BHI) broth at 37 °C for 24 h.

2.4.2. Growth Stimulatory Activity

The growth stimulatory activity of the plant extracts was assessed as described by Milutinović et al. [5]. Briefly, plant extracts were added to fresh MRS at various concentrations, ranging from 0.25–10 mg (dry matter)/mL. Then, the culture medium was inoculated with an overnight growth culture of L. rhamnosus GG or L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 to achieve a final concentration of 5 × 106 cfu/mL and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, samples were 10-fold diluted in one-quarter-strength Ringer’s solution, plated on MRS agar medium and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. MRS broths with no inoculum and inoculated MRS broths with no plant extract served as negative and positive controls, respectively. The effect of plant extracts on cell growth was determined by comparing the number of CFUs in the samples containing the plant extracts to the controls.

2.4.3. Prebiotic Index

The prebiotic index (Ipreb), defined as the ratio of probiotic growth with the addition of the prebiotic agent to probiotic growth in a control medium, expressed in CFU, was calculated as described by Palframan et al. [17] and Figueroa-Gonzalez et al. [18], according to the following equation:
I preb   = CFU   of   probiotic   cultured   with   the   prebiotic CFU   of   probiotics   on   standard   medium   without   the   prebiotic

2.4.4. Osmotic Stress Tolerance Assay

The ability of the lactobacilli strains to tolerate osmotic stress in the presence of plant extracts was tested using various concentrations of NaCl, according to Sampaio et al. [19], with slight modifications. In brief, MRS broth containing various NaCl concentrations (0%, 1%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% w/v) was supplemented with plant extract concentrations ranging from 0.25–10 mg (dry matter)/mL) and inoculated with an overnight growth culture of L. rhamnosus GG or L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 to achieve a final concentration of 5 × 106 cfu/mL. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, samples were 10-fold diluted in one-quarter-strength Ringer’s solution and plated on MRS agar medium and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Inoculated MRS broth without NaCl served as positive control, and inoculated MRS broths without plant extract served as negative controls.

2.4.5. Bile Salt Tolerance Assay

The bile salt tolerance of the lactobacilli in the presence of the plant extract was determined as described by Nath et al. [20], with slight modifications. In brief, plant extracts were added to MRS broth medium, which contained 0.3% w/v bile salts at various concentrations, ranging from 0.25–10 mg (dry matter)/mL. Then, the culture medium was inoculated with an overnight growth culture of L. rhamnosus GG or L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 to achieve a final concentration of 5 × 106 cfu/mL and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. Cell growth was monitored at different time intervals (0 h, 2 h, and 4 h), by plate counting in MRS agar. Inoculated MRS broth, with bile salts but no plant extract, served as a control.

2.4.6. Thermal Stress Assay

PBS solutions (pH 7), supplemented with the plant extracts at concentrations of (0.25–10 mg (dry matter)/mL) were inoculated with the lactobacilli cultures and incubated at 52 °C for 35 min. Samples were collected for enumeration at different intervals (0, 10, 20, and 30 min). Culture suspensions without the extracts incubated at 52 °C for 35 min served as controls [21]. All suspensions subjected to thermal stress were maintained in a water bath previously set at 52 °C, and the temperature was continuously monitored.

2.4.7. Alcohol Tolerance

Alcohol tolerance was tested in inoculated MRS broth (106 cfu/mL) supplemented with plant extracts at various concentrations (0.25–10 mg (dry matter)/mL) containing various alcohol concentrations (4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% v/v). After incubation at 37 °C for 12 h, samples were 10-fold diluted in one-quarter-strength Ringer’s solution and plated on MRS agar at 37 °C for 48 h. Inoculated MRS broths without alcohol served as positive controls, and inoculated MRS broths with no plant extract served as negative controls [22].

2.4.8. Antimicrobial Assays

Broth microdilution method was used to determine minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) [23,24]. In brief, bacterial suspensions in MRS or BHI broths supplemented with plant extracts (0.2–400 mg (dry matter)/mL) were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in a 96-well microplate. After incubation, the optical density was determined at 620 nm (EnSpire Multimode Plate Reader, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and MIC was defined as the lowest concentration at which no bacterial growth was observed. MRS broths or BHI broths with no inoculum and inoculated MRS broths or BHI broths with no plant extracts were used as controls.
Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined, as recently described by Mitropoulou et al. [24].

2.4.9. Antioxidant Activity: DPPH-Radical Scavenging Activity

The evaluation of the DPPH radical-scavenging impact is provided below. Each extract’s initial stock concentration (1.0 mg/mL) was diluted to final concentrations of 500, 250, 100, 50, and 10 μg/mL in methanol; 2.5 mL of sample solutions at various concentrations were combined with 1 mL of a 0.3 mM DPPH• methanolic solution, and the mixture was left to react at room temperature. The following equation was used to translate the absorbance (Ab) at 517 nm into the percentage antioxidant activity after 30 min:
Scavenging capacity % = 100 − [(Ab of sample − Ab of blank) × 100/Ab of control]
DPPH solution plus methanol was used as the control, while methanol (1 mL) and extract compound solution (2.5 mL) were utilized as the blank. The absorption of samples was recorded after 30 min of incubation, using a UV-Vis Spectrometer, DS5, Edinburg Instruments, (University of Ioannina, Department of Chemistry, Ioannina, Greece).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed at least in triplicate and the mean values ± SD are presented. The results were analyzed for statistical significance with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey test and independent t-test were used to determine significant differences. [Coefficients, ANOVA tables, and significance (p < 0.05) were computed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, v.24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Plant Extracts Preparation

A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts from plant samples originating from the Epirus region in northwest Greece were produced. Several techniques were taken into consideration to provide the optimum plant preparation and extraction conditions. Three techniques for drying plants were examined, starting with newly harvested plant material. The first approach involved natural drying in a temperature-controlled room at 30 °C; the second involved drying material in an oven at 60 °C; and the third involved lyophilization to remove water content. The finely ground material was sonicated with solvent for three days at room temperature, and the resulting extract was evaluated under these extraction conditions. We identified that for the specific plant material, the sonication procedure, followed by lyophilization, provided the optimal results for the specific medicinal plant. We found that lyophilization followed by sonication delivered, for the specific medicinal plants, the optimal phytochemical content as screened by 1D NMR.

3.2. Phytochemical Analysis

We utilized LC-MS to analyze the plant extracts. For the elucidation of the discovered ions, triple quadruple mass spectrometry employed internal libraries. Analysis using the LC-QToF was used to supplement compound characterization. Data from both techniques were cross-referenced to produce the final report. We decided to remove substances with minimal response factors for the sake of simplicity. It is interesting that the resulting, distinctive pieces (M+ − [C6O6H5]) were employed as validation for the anticipated molecules in the case of hexosides, such as glucosides, glucoronides, etc. Additionally, because analysis was performed in both the ethanolic and aqueous extracts, we were able to rule out false positives that might have occurred because of the makeup of any component.
In Figure 2a,b, we illustrate the LC-MS chromatographs (negative and positive mode) for A. citrodora ethanolic extract, while in Figure 2c,d, we illustrate the LC-MS chromatograph (negative and positive mode, respectively) for A. citrodora aqueous extract. The compounds identified in the A. citrodora extracts can be seen in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 in negative and positive ESI modes.
During our LC-MS-based analysis, several categories of phytochemicals have been identified. Various flavonoids have been determined in the ethanolic and aqueous plant extracts. Caffeoyl phenylpropanoid, known as acteoside or verbascoside, is extensively found in the plant kingdom, particularly in the Aloysia species [13]. Based on our analysis, both ethanolic and aqueous extracts are rich in acteoside. The second-most abundant compounds in the ethanolic extract were isoacteoside, eupatorin, pectolinarigenin, isorhamnetin, leucosceptoside A, cirsiliol, apigenin, narigenin, hispidulin, and kaempferol. In the aqueous extract, luteolin 7-O-diglucuronide was a major component, as were apigenin 7-O-diglucuronide, eupatorin, vicenin-2, eriocitrin, and geniposidic acid.
The majority of the identified compounds from the plant extracts have been reported to have significant biological activities. For example, verbascoside is a potent antioxidant agent. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assays revealed a protective effect on the ocular tissue and fluids against oxidative stress following oral administration of verbascoside to hares (maximum dose of 3 mg/day) [11]. Yan Liu et al. [25] reported that verbascoside alleviated experimental colitis in mice by regulating the gut microbiota. The outcomes demonstrated that in colitic mice, acteoside reduces intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, and nuclear factor-B (NF-B) activation. Additionally, acteoside partially reversed the dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in colitic mice, which was evident in the altered gut microbiome structure and the enrichment of helpful bacteria (Akkermansia muciniphila and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron) [25]. A hydroxycinnamic acid that has been identified in the extracts was isoacteoside, a compound that exhibited antioxidant activity by scavenging intracellular ROS, improving the effects of antioxidant enzymes and promoting cell survival. It also prevented H2O2-induced apoptosis [26]. Moreover, Gao et al. [27] demonstrated the anti-inflammatory activity of isoacteoside in vitro and in vivo. The underlying process might occur through modifications of the NF-kB and MAΡΚ pathways [27]. A derivative of acteoside, leucosceptoside A, also has a significant antioxidant activity, as indicated in the international literature [28].
Another compound, cirsiliol, a flavone with various biological activities, has been identified in the plant extracts. Hyung-Jin Lim et al. [29], investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of cirsiliol on IL-6-induced activity. The results showed that cirsiliol controls JAK2 phosphorylation to inhibit IL-6-induced cellular signaling and, therefore, can be used as a treatment for inflammatory illnesses linked to IL-6 [29].
During our analysis, an interesting bioactive flavonoid has been revealed: eupatorin, which has potent anti-inflammatory activities [30]. Moreover, eupatorin exhibits antioxidant activity against various oxidative modifications of endothelium and LDL [30]. In the ethanolic extract, isorhamnetin, an O-methylated flavonol from the class of flavonoids and a metabolite of quercetin, has been identified. Isorhamnetin has been reported to have various pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammation, antioxidation, and apoptosis modulation actions. In addition, it is a potent antioxidant and antiviral agent [31]. Li et al. [32] revealed the ability of isorhamnetin to prevent type 2 diabetes in rats by regulating their gut microbiome.
Geniposidic acid, which is classified as an iridoid glucoside, has been identified in our analysis. Wang et al. [33] have demonstrated that geniposidic acid regulates autophagy and oxidative stress. In addition, this compound has antiviral activity against white spot syndrome virus replication in red swamp crayfish [34].
Apigenin, a natural product belonging to the flavone class, is also present in both studied extracts. Apigenin has numerous health benefits, including antitumor activity, protection of biological organs (heart, brain, liver, and lung), lipid-lowering action, hypotension, hypoglycemia, antioxidation, anti-inflammation, anti-osteoporosis, and immune regulation, which is useful for understanding the health benefits of apigenin-rich foods. Moreover, Fu et al. (2022) have indicated that apigenin modifies the gut microbiota to treat ulcerative colitis [35]. Their study demonstrated that apigenin potentially improves the symptoms of ulcerative colitis (UC) by enhancing the intestine’s biological, mechanical, and immunological barriers in UC mice [35]. Another study showed that some gut bacteria can regulate the human body when apigenin or its glycosides are absorbed by breaking them down into smaller metabolites [36]. Additionally, apigenin itself is used as a potential functional food for the prevention and treatment of several associated ailments, although considerable research needs to be done to pinpoint its precise mechanisms. Future research is still needed to determine the safety of apigenin because a high dose may cause hepatotoxicity [37].
Naringenin is a flavonoid belonging to the flavanones. Several biological activities have been ascribed to this phytochemical, among them antioxidant, antitumor, antiviral, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-adipogenic, and cardioprotective effects [38]. Lin et al. [39] evaluated the inhibitory effects of naringenin on ovarian cancer, and the results showed that naringenin inhibits the expression of the PI3K pathway, improves gut microbiota, and suppresses epithelial ovarian cancer.
Luteolin, a common phytochemical, was found in A. citrodora’s extracts. Preclinical research has established a wide range of pharmacological properties for this flavone, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties. Li et al. [40] found that in UC rats, luteolin therapy may reduce colonic inflammation and injury. In the same study, results showed that after luteolin therapy, the diversity of the gut microbiota in UC rats changed. Luteolin could improve UC by controlling the structure and composition of the gut microbiota [40]. Another antimicrobial phytochemical is homoplantaginin. Li et al. [41] demonstrated the antimicrobial activity of this compound, which has been isolated from the leaves of Scrophularia ningpoensis.
Tectoridin, an isoflavone, is the 7-glucoside of tectorigenin, a phytochemical with multiple biological activities, which was found during the analysis. Niu X. et al. [42], exhibited the anti-platelet, anti-angiogenic, and anti-proliferative activities of tectoridin.
The chemical structures of the main identified compounds are shown in Figure 3.

3.3. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

The ethanol extract of A. citrodora revealed the highest gallic acid equivalent amount with a value of 69.10 ± 0.02 mg gallic acid/g dry extract and for the aqueous extract 60.70 ± 0.02 mg gallic acid/g dry extract.

3.4. Growth Stimulatory Activity

The Greek endemic plant extracts of A. citrodora were tested for their potential growth stimulatory effects on two lactobacilli strains. The results indicated significant (p < 0.05) growth stimulatory of L. rhamnosus GG and L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 strains at 0.5 mg (dry matter)/mL of the aqueous extract (Figure 4a). Furthermore, A. citrodora ethanolic extract stimulated the growth of both lactobacilli only at 0.25 mg (dry matter)/mL (p < 0.05), while no stimulatory activity was recorded at the other concentrations tested (p > 0.05, Figure 4b).
In addition, the prebiotic index ranged above 1 for both L. rhamnosus strains incubated with A. citrodora aqueous extract at all concentrations with a significantly increased value at 0.5 (dry matter)/mL (p < 0.05, Figure 5a). For the ethanolic extract, prebiotic index values ranged at lower levels, but a significantly increased prebiotic index was recorded at 0.25 mg (dry matter)/mL (p < 0.05, Figure 5b). A prebiotic index exceeding the value of 1 suggests a positive stimulatory effect on probiotic growth, while values below 1 indicate low effectiveness.
The results of the osmotic stress using NaCl at various concentrations demonstrated that A. citrodora aqueous extract significantly promoted the cell growth of L. rhamnosus GG at 0.5 mg (dry matter)/mL in NaCl-supplemented MRS (1–4% w/v, p < 0.05), while no significant growth was observed at 6–10% w/v NaCl (p > 0.05) (Figure 6a,b). On the contrary, A. citrodora aqueous extract reported no substantial contribution to L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 growth in the presence of NaCl (1–10% w/v, p > 0.05).
Bile salt tolerance assay showed an increased survival rate of L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 incubated with A. citrodora aqueous extract [0.5 mg (dry matter)/mL, p < 0.05] after 4 h (Figure 7b). Interestingly, no effect was observed for L. rhamnosus GG incubated with the A. citrodora aqueous extract (p > 0.05) (Figure 7a).
The results of the stimulatory activity of the aqueous A. citrodora extract [0.25–0.5 mg (dry matter)/mL] on the lactobacilli strains regarding their performance under thermal stress at 52 °C revealed that the plant extract had a positive effect on L. rhamnosus GG cell growth (p > 0.05) even after 30 min of exposure. On the other hand, no growth stimulatory effect was reported for L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 at 52 °C, since the final cell counts ranged at similar levels between the examined cases and the control (p > 0.05) (Figure 8a,b). The above mentioned result might suggest that L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 possibly possesses thermally resistant properties.
When subjected to alcohol stress, cell growth of L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1 was positively affected by A. citrodora aqueous extract at 0.5 and (dry matter)/mL (p < 0.05) compared to the controls, even at the highest alcohol concentration, 12% v/v (Figure 9b). A positive effect was also documented on L. rhamnosus GG (p > 0.05), only at 4% and 6% alcohol, where the addition of 0.5 (dry matter)/mL A. citrodora aqueous extract significantly promoted cell growth (p < 0.05, Figure 9a). No stimulatory activity was reported for L. rhamnosus GG in other alcohol concentrations.
Similar results regarding the stimulatory effect of plant extracts were observed in peonidin-based anthocyanins extracted from purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) [43], as well as in culinary spice extracts on various beneficial microbes, including L. rhamnosus strains [44]. Polysaccharides and phenolic compounds can increase the proportion of probiotic bacteria in the gut, regulate the intestinal microenvironment, and stimulate the innate immune system to fight infections by promoting macrophages and lymphocytes within the intestinal mucosa [2,45,46].
Recent studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of polyphenols in human and animal microbiota [47], as well as in the survival of various lactobacilli strains, such as L. johnsonii and L. rhamnosus GG [48]. Dietary fibers, plants, fruits, and secondary plant metabolites are the most common and richest sources of polyphenols (PP) and polysaccharides (PS) that serve as substrates for the probiotic strains. Hence, they effectively support bacterial growth. However, the level of this probiotic cell growth is dependent on the various components each plant extract possesses. Simply structured components, such as galactose, are more likely to be consumed as substrates by probiotic strains, while more complex compounds, such as pectin, are selectively processed by a small number of bacterial strains [8]. This finding is indicative of the various responses that bacteria have to different prebiotic substrates as a result of differential molecule and compound utilization. A recent study investigated the capacity of different ginseng berry extract components to support probiotic bacterial growth. The results revealed that galactose was the most-consumed substrate by L. plantarum, L. reuteri, B. longum subsp. Infantis, and B. longum, while pectin was utilized mostly by lactobacilli strains [8].
A. citrodora extracts had an overall beneficial and growth stimulatory effect on lactobacilli strains (L. rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus OLXAL-1). In addition, the aqueous extract of A. citrodora seems to be a valuable substrate, increasing the survival rate of the lactobacilli strain in various assays (osmotic, acid, thermal, and alcohol stress), indicating that it could be used as a prebiotic agent or even as a food preservative. Yet, not many studies exist evaluating plant extracts as prebiotic agents and their protective, supportive effects on probiotic strains. However, further research is required to validate their activity in food systems and provide more insights on their mode of action.

3.5. Antimicrobial Activity against Spoilage and Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria

A. citrodora is one of the well-known medicinal plants with therapeutic properties [11]. In our study, the antimicrobial activity of A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts against five common foodborne and spoilage pathogenic bacteria was evaluated, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) are shown in Table 5. Ιn order touse plant extracts in the food industry, it is very critical to determine precisely the MIC and MBC values for each extract and regulate the optimum amount of the antimicrobial agent to secure microbial safety. Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive than Gram-negative bacteria. The strongest antimicrobial activity was demonstrated by the ethanolic extract, whereas the aqueous extract had no effect on E. coli. However, MIC and MBC values were significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to gentamycin, which was used as a positive control [24].
A. citrodora ethanolic extract was rich in acteoside compared to the aqueous extract.
Acteoside is a glycoside, which, according to de Miera et al. [49], has the ability to interact with ionized phosphocholine or phosphoglyceride phosphate groups in phospholipid model membranes, an interaction that probably enhances the antimicrobial properties of acteoside [49]. Similar to our results, Mothana et al. [50] showed that S. aureus was sensitive (MIC 4 mg/mL) to the methanolic extract of A. citrodora, while E. coli was resistant, and Elgueta et al. [51] determined the MIC of the hydroethanolic extract at 9 ± 1.5 mg/mL against S. Enteritidis [51].
Importantly, the spoilage and pathogenic microbes tested were more sensitive to the extracts than the L. rhamnosus strains, as MIC and MBC values were significantly (p < 0.05) lower as shown in Table 6, in agreement with the literature [52,53].

3.6. Antioxidant Activity: DPPH-Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH-radical scavenging assay is a common in vitro test to determine the ability of plant extracts to scavenge free radicals. In the current study, this colorimetric method was used to evaluate the antioxidant activity of the extracts from A. citrodora leaves harvested in Greece. The results showed that the IC50 for the aqueous extract was 25.51 μg/mL and for the ethanolic extract the IC50 was 18.76 μg/mL. The aqueous extract of lemon verbena had lower antiradical activity than the ethanolic extract. The most effective scavengers of the DPPH radical were discovered to be ethanolic, followed by aqueous extracts. The quantity and identity of phenols and flavonoids in the ethanolic extract could be attributed to this result [54].

4. Conclusions

A. citrodora is a medicinal plant, known especially for its antioxidant activity. Herein, we first identified the phytochemical profile of the generated ethanolic and aqueous extracts using LCMS/MS and UPLC/MS Q-TOF. The richly identified phytochemical profile led us to further evaluate the potential health benefits of these plant extracts. Interestingly, we determined that both the aqueous and ethanolic extracts stimulated the growth of the probiotic strains, wild-type L. rhamnosus and L. rhamnosus GG. Furthermore, we reported growth inhibitory activity against several foodborne pathogens for both extracts. Importantly, we found that the spoilage and pathogenic microbes evaluated were more sensitive to the extracts than the probiotic strains. This further strengthens the potential of the studied A. citrodora extracts to adopt a beneficial role in the functional regulation of food microbiota, a relatively understudied area.
The results of the present study demonstrated for the first time that Aloysia citrodora extracts may stimulate the growth of probiotic strains even in a variety of tolerance assays, highlighting their potential as prebiotics in the food industry. However, further research is required to validate their activity in food systems and provide more insights on their mode of action.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.K. and A.G.T.; data curation, V.K.G., V.A.A., G.M., V.K., I.K., C.K.F., E.P.V., Y.K. and A.G.T.; formal analysis, V.K.G., V.A.A., G.M., V.K. and E.P.V.; funding acquisition, Y.K. and A.G.T.; investigation, V.K.G., V.A.A., G.M., I.K. and C.K.F.; methodology, V.K.G., V.A.A., G.M. and C.K.F.; project administration, Y.K. and A.G.T.; resources, V.K., Y.K. and A.G.T.; supervision, Y.K. and A.G.T.; validation, V.K.G., V.A.A., G.M., V.K., I.K., C.K.F., Y.K. and A.G.T.; visualization, Y.K. and A.G.T.; writing—original draft, V.K.G., V.A.A., G.M., V.K., I.K. and C.K.F.; writing—review and editing, Y.K. and A.G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project “Infrastructure of Microbiome Applications in Food Systems-FOODBIOMES” (MIS 5047291), which is implemented under the Action “Regional Excellence in R&D Infrastructures”, funded by the Operational Program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020), and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). The collection of the plant material was performed by the ‘’Department of Agricultural Economy’’ of Epirus.

Acknowledgments

The collection of the plant material was performed by the ‘’Department of Agricultural Economy’’ of Epirus. We would also like to acknowledge the Project “BEST—Addressing joint Agro- and Aqua-Biodiversity pressures Enhancing SuSTainable Rural Development” of the European Territorial Cooperation Program “Interreg Greece—Italy 2014–2020”, which was co-financed by the European Union for the UPLC-MS QTOF.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Probiotics in Food: Health and Nutritional Properties and Guidelines for Evaluation; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Health Organization (Eds.) FAO food and nutrition paper; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization: Italy, Rome, 2006; ISBN 978-92-5-105513-7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sanders, M.E.; Merenstein, D.J.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Rastall, R.A. Probiotics and Prebiotics in Intestinal Health and Disease: From Biology to the Clinic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Azad, M.A.K.; Sarker, M.; Li, T.; Yin, J. Probiotic Species in the Modulation of Gut Microbiota: An Overview. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, e9478630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Aarti, C.; Martina, C.; Khusro, A. Antimycobacterium, Anticancer, and Antiviral Properties of Probiotics: An Overview. Microbes Infect. Dis. 2021, 2, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Milutinović, M.; Dimitrijević-Branković, S.; Rajilić-Stojanović, M. Plant Extracts Rich in Polyphenols as Potent Modulators in the Growth of Probiotic and Pathogenic Intestinal Microorganisms. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 688843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ziarno, M.; Kozłowska, M.; Ścibisz, I.; Kowalczyk, M.; Pawelec, S.; Stochmal, A.; Szleszyński, B. The Effect of Selected Herbal Extracts on Lactic Acid Bacteria Activity. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Trejo Rodríguez, I.S.; Alcántara Quintana, L.E.; Algara Suarez, P.; Ruiz Cabrera, M.A.; Grajales Lagunes, A. Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Capacity, Prebiotic Activity and Anticancer Potential in Human Cells of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) Seed Flour. Molecules 2021, 26, 4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Giani, A.; Oldani, M.; Forcella, M.; Lasagni, M.; Fusi, P.; Di Gennaro, P. Synergistic Antioxidant Effect of Prebiotic Ginseng Berries Extract and Probiotic Strains on Healthy and Tumoral Colorectal Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oukerrou, M.A.; Tilaoui, M.; Mouse, H.A.; Leouifoudi, I.; Jaafari, A.; Zyad, A. Chemical Composition and Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Activities of the Essential Oil of Aloysia citriodora Palau Grown in Morocco. Adv. Pharmacol. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 2017, e7801924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Oulahal, N.; Degraeve, P. Phenolic-Rich Plant Extracts with Antimicrobial Activity: An Alternative to Food Preservatives and Biocides? Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 753518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bahramsoltani, R.; Rostamiasrabadi, P.; Shahpiri, Z.; Marques, A.M.; Rahimi, R.; Farzaei, M.H. Aloysia Citrodora Paláu (Lemon Verbena): A Review of Phytochemistry and Pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 222, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tohidi, B.; Rahimmalek, M.; Arzani, A. Essential Oil Composition, Total Phenolic, Flavonoid Contents, and Antioxidant Activity of Thymus Species Collected from Different Regions of Iran. Food Chem. 2017, 220, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tammar, S.; Salem, N.; Aidi Wannes, W.; Limam, H.; Bourgou, S.; Fares, N.; Dakhlaoui, S.; Hammami, M.; Khammassi, S.; Re, G.D.; et al. Chemometric Profiling and Bioactivity of Verbena (Aloysia citrodora) Methanolic Extract from Four Localities in Tunisia. Foods 2021, 10, 2912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Duarte, M.C.T.; Figueira, G.M.; Sartoratto, A.; Rehder, V.L.G.; Delarmelina, C. Anti-Candida Activity of Brazilian Medicinal Plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hashemi, S.M.B.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Koubaa, M.; Barba, F.J.; Abedi, E.; Niakousari, M.; Tavakoli, J. Extraction of Essential Oil from Aloysia citriodora Palau Leaves Using Continuous and Pulsed Ultrasound: Kinetics, Antioxidant Activity and Antimicrobial Properties. Process Biochem. 2018, 65, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nelios, G.; Santarmaki, V.; Pavlatou, C.; Dimitrellou, D.; Kourkoutas, Y. New Wild-Type Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Strains as Candidates to Manage Type 1 Diabetes. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Palframan, R.; Gibson, G.R.; Rastall, R.A. Development of a Quantitative Tool for the Comparison of the Prebiotic Effect of Dietary Oligosaccharides. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 37, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Figueroa-González, I.; Rodríguez-Serrano, G.; Gómez-Ruiz, L.; García-Garibay, M.; Cruz-Guerrero, A. Prebiotic Effect of Commercial Saccharides on Probiotic Bacteria Isolated from Commercial Products. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sampaio, K.B.; de Albuquerque, T.M.R.; Rodrigues, N.P.A.; de Oliveira, M.E.G.; de Souza, E.L. Selection of Lactic Acid Bacteria with In Vitro Probiotic-Related Characteristics from the Cactus Pilosocereus gounellei (A. Weber Ex. K. Schum.) Bly. Ex Rowl. Foods 2021, 10, 2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nath, S.; Sikidar, J.; Roy, M.; Deb, B. In Vitro Screening of Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus plantarum Isolated from Fermented Milk Product. Food Qual. Saf. 2020, 4, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferrando, V.; Quiberoni, A.; Reinhemer, J.; Suárez, V. Resistance of Functional Lactobacillus plantarum Strains against Food Stress Conditions. Food Microbiol. 2015, 48, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Lu, C.; Xu, Q.; Li, Z.; Song, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, T.; Luo, X. Bacterial Diversity and Lactic Acid Bacteria with High Alcohol Tolerance in the Fermented Grains of Soy Sauce Aroma Type Baijiu in North China. Foods 2022, 11, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Clsi 2017.Pdf. Available online: https://file.qums.ac.ir/repository/mmrc/clsi%202017.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  24. Mitropoulou, G.; Fitsiou, E.; Spyridopoulou, K.; Tiptiri-Kourpeti, A.; Bardouki, H.; Vamvakias, M.; Panas, P.; Chlichlia, K.; Pappa, A.; Kourkoutas, Y. Citrus Medica Essential Oil Exhibits Significant Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Activity. LWT 2017, 84, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, T.; Xiao, F.; Wang, Y.; Lu, B. Acteoside, the Main Bioactive Compound in Osmanthus fragrans Flowers, Palliates Experimental Colitis in Mice by Regulating the Gut Microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 1148–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chae, S.; Kim, J.S.; Kang, K.A.; Bu, H.D.; Lee, Y.; Seo, Y.R.; Hyun, J.W.; Kang, S.S. Antioxidant Activity of Isoacteoside from Clerodendron trichotomum. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2005, 68, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, H.; Cui, Y.; Kang, N.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; et al. Isoacteoside, a Dihydroxyphenylethyl Glycoside, Exhibits Anti-Inflammatory Effects through Blocking Toll-like Receptor 4 Dimerization. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 2880–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, K.; Wu, A.; Xie, H.; Guo, Q.; Xue, P.; Maleshibek, Y.; Zhao, W.; Guo, J.; et al. Antioxidation and Cytoprotection of Acteoside and Its Derivatives: Comparison and Mechanistic Chemistry. Molecules 2018, 23, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lim, H.J.; Jang, H.J.; Bak, S.G.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, K.M.; Lee, S.-J.; Rho, M.-C. In Vitro Inhibitory Effects of Cirsiliol on IL-6-Induced STAT3 Activation through Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1586–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patel, D.K. Medicinal Importance of Flavonoid “Eupatorin” in the Health Sectors: Therapeutic Benefit and Pharmacological Activities through Scientific Data Analysis. Curr. Chin. Sci. 2021, 1, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gong, G.; Guan, Y.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Rahman, K.; Wang, S.-J.; Zhou, S.; Luan, X.; Zhang, H. Isorhamnetin: A Review of Pharmacological Effects. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 128, 110301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, J.; Yuan, H.; Zhao, Z.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Zhu, L.; Wang, X.; Sun, P.; Xiao, Y. The Mitigative Effect of Isorhamnetin against Type 2 Diabetes via Gut Microbiota Regulation in Mice. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1070908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Disasa, D.; Akira, M.; Xiang, L.; Qi, J. A New Geniposidic Acid Derivative Exerts Antiaging Effects through Antioxidative Stress and Autophagy Induction. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, A.-G.; Tan, X.-P.; Cui, H.-B.; Qi, X.-Z.; Zhu, B.; Wang, G.-X. Antiviral Activity of Geniposidic Acid against White Spot Syndrome Virus Replication in Red Swamp Crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Aquaculture 2020, 528, 735533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, R.; Wang, L.; Meng, Y.; Xue, W.; Liang, J.; Peng, Z.; Meng, J.; Zhang, M. Apigenin Remodels the Gut Microbiota to Ameliorate Ulcerative Colitis. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1062961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, M.; Firrman, J.; Liu, L.; Yam, K. A Review on Flavonoid Apigenin: Dietary Intake, ADME, Antimicrobial Effects, and Interactions with Human Gut Microbiota. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, e7010467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, X.; Wang, F.; Zhou, R.; Song, X.; Xie, M. Apigenin: A Current Review on Its Beneficial Biological Activities. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Salehi, B.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Zucca, P.; Pezzani, R.; Martins, N.; Sharifi-Rad, J. The Therapeutic Potential of Naringenin: A Review of Clinical Trials. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Lin, C.; Zeng, Z.; Lin, Y.; Wang, P.; Cao, D.; Xie, K.; Luo, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, J.; Wang, W.; et al. Naringenin Suppresses Epithelial Ovarian Cancer by Inhibiting Proliferation and Modulating Gut Microbiota. Phytomedicine 2022, 106, 154401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, B.; Du, P.; Du, Y.; Zhao, D.; Cai, Y.; Yang, Q.; Guo, Z. Luteolin Alleviates Inflammation and Modulates Gut Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Rats. Life Sci. 2021, 269, 119008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, J.; Huang, X.; Du, X.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y. Study of Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Leaves and Roots of Scrophularia Ningpoensis. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Niu, X.; Song, H.; Xiao, X.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Yu, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.; Han, T.; Zhang, D.; et al. Tectoridin Ameliorates Proliferation and Inflammation in TNF-α-Induced HFLS-RA Cells via Suppressing the TLR4/NLRP3/NF-ΚB Signaling Pathway. Tissue Cell 2022, 77, 101826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, H.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, Y.; Lou, Q.; He, S. Antioxidant and Prebiotic Activity of Five Peonidin-Based Anthocyanins Extracted from Purple Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lu, Q.-Y.; Summanen, P.H.; Lee, R.-P.; Huang, J.; Henning, S.M.; Heber, D.; Finegold, S.M.; Li, Z. Prebiotic Potential and Chemical Composition of Seven Culinary Spice Extracts: Prebiotic Potential of Spice Extracts. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 1807–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Huang, X.; Nie, S.; Xie, M. Interaction between Gut Immunity and Polysaccharides. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2943–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, E.; Zhu, Q.; Pang, D.; Liu, F.; Liao, S.; Zou, Y. Analysis of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG in Mulberry Galacto-Oligosaccharide Medium by Comparative Transcriptomics and Metabolomics. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 853271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shimizu, C.; Wakita, Y.; Inoue, T.; Hiramitsu, M.; Okada, M.; Mitani, Y.; Segawa, S.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Nabeshima, T. Effects of Lifelong Intake of Lemon Polyphenols on Aging and Intestinal Microbiome in the Senescence-Accelerated Mouse Prone 1 (SAMP1). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cai, D.; Harrison, N.A.; Kling, D.N.; Gonzalez, C.F.; Lorca, G.L. Blueberries as an Additive to Increase the Survival of Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 to Lyophilisation. Benef. Microbes 2019, 10, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De Miera, L.S.; Rúa, J.; del Pilar del Valle, M.; Sanz, J.; Armesto, M.R.G. Synergistic Antimicrobial Effect of a Lippia citriodora Natural Extract with Vanillin against Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Refrigerated Piel de Sapo Melon Juice. J. Food Prot. 2022, 85, 1506–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mothana, R.A.A.; Abdo, S.A.A.; Hasson, S.; Althawab, F.M.N.; Alaghbari, S.A.Z.; Lindequist, U. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activities and Phytochemical Screening of Some Yemeni Medicinal Plants. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2010, 7, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Elgueta, E.; Mena, J.; Orihuela, P.A. Hydroethanolic Extracts of Haplopappus baylahuen Remy and Aloysia citriodora Palau Have Bactericide Activity and Inhibit the Ability of Salmonella Enteritidis to Form Biofilm and Adhere to Human Intestinal Cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, e3491831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Miller, A.B.; Cates, R.G.; Lawrence, M.; Soria, J.A.F.; Espinoza, L.V.; Martinez, J.V.; Arbizú, D.A. The Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of Essential Oils Extracted from Guatemalan Medicinal Plants. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Betancourt, L.; Phandanauvong, V.; Patino, R.; Ariza-Nieto, C.; Afanador-Téllez, G. Composition and Bactericidal Activity against Beneficial and Pathogenic Bacteria of Oregano Essential Oils from Four Chemotypes of Origanum and Lippia Genus. Rev. Fac. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2012, 59, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rashid, H.M.; Mahmod, A.I.; Afifi, F.U.; Talib, W.H. Antioxidant and Antiproliferation Activities of Lemon Verbena (Aloysia citrodora): An In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Plants 2022, 11, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the procedures followed to identify the components of the extracts and their biological activity.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the procedures followed to identify the components of the extracts and their biological activity.
Applsci 13 03663 g001
Figure 2. LC/MS chromatographs of the Aloysia citrodora ethanolic (a) negative mode and (b) positive mode and of the aqueous extracts (c) negative and (d) positive modes.
Figure 2. LC/MS chromatographs of the Aloysia citrodora ethanolic (a) negative mode and (b) positive mode and of the aqueous extracts (c) negative and (d) positive modes.
Applsci 13 03663 g002aApplsci 13 03663 g002b
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the main identified phytochemicals.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the main identified phytochemicals.
Applsci 13 03663 g003
Figure 4. Effect of (a) aqueous and (b)_ethanolic A. citrodora extracts [mg (dry matter)/mL] as growth stimulators of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth) is indicated with *.
Figure 4. Effect of (a) aqueous and (b)_ethanolic A. citrodora extracts [mg (dry matter)/mL] as growth stimulators of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth) is indicated with *.
Applsci 13 03663 g004
Figure 5. Prebiotic index values of (a) aqueous and (b) ethanolic A. citrodora extracts based on Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth) is indicated with *.
Figure 5. Prebiotic index values of (a) aqueous and (b) ethanolic A. citrodora extracts based on Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth) is indicated with *.
Applsci 13 03663 g005
Figure 6. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 in MRS supplemented with different NaCl concentrations. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth, 0% NaCl) is indicated with *.
Figure 6. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 in MRS supplemented with different NaCl concentrations. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth, 0% NaCl) is indicated with *.
Applsci 13 03663 g006
Figure 7. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 in MRS enriched with bile salts (0.3% w/v). Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth) is indicated with *.
Figure 7. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 in MRS enriched with bile salts (0.3% w/v). Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth) is indicated with *.
Applsci 13 03663 g007
Figure 8. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 under thermal stress (52 °C). Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (52 °C, without plant extract) is indicated with *.
Figure 8. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 under thermal stress (52 °C). Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (52 °C, without plant extract) is indicated with *.
Applsci 13 03663 g008
Figure 9. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 at different alcohol concentrations. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth, 0% alcohol concentration) is indicated with *.
Figure 9. Effect of aqueous A. citrodora extract (mg (dry matter)/mL) as growth stimulator of (a) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and (b) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1 at different alcohol concentrations. Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control (MRS broth, 0% alcohol concentration) is indicated with *.
Applsci 13 03663 g009
Table 1. Identified compounds in A. citrodora ethanolic extract- (ESI negative mode).
Table 1. Identified compounds in A. citrodora ethanolic extract- (ESI negative mode).
Aloysia citrodora EtOH Extract—Negative
Row No.Component NameObserved m/zMass Error (mDa)Response
1Acteoside623.19860.42,292,685
2Isoacteoside623.198201,882,823
3Cirsiliol329.06680.1963,036
4Hispidulin299.05620.1823,986
5Eupatorin343.0822−0.1591,793
6Pectolinarigenin313.0720.2387,648
7Isorhamnetin315.0510299,038
8Geniposidic-Acid373.1138−0.2295,613
9Leucosceptoside A637.2136−0.2208,446
10Apigenin269.04560.1132,449
11Naringenin271.0611−0.1123,043
12Luteolin285.0403−0.235,290
13Isorhamnetin 3-O-glucoside477.1037−0.127,382
14Homoplantaginin_Tectoridin461.1086−0.423,435
154-Hydroxybenzoic acid 4-O-glucoside299.0768−0.413,422
Table 2. Identified compounds in A. citrodora ethanolic extract- (ESI positive mode).
Table 2. Identified compounds in A. citrodora ethanolic extract- (ESI positive mode).
Aloysia citrodora EtOH Extract—Positive
Row No.Component NameObserved m/zMass Error (mDa)Response
1Acteoside647.1942−0.5797,019
2Isoacteoside647.19490.3498,939
3Cirsiliol331.0807−0.6486,000
4Eupatorin345.0961−0.7434,876
5Hispidulin301.07080.2354,196
6Geniposidic-Acid397.11−0.6287,194
7Dimethylmatairesinol409.1614−0.7165,605
8Pectolinarigenin315.0855−0.886,037
9Isorhamnetin317.0647−0.973,872
10Pinoresinol-4-O-Beta-Monoglycoside543.1831−0.558,992
11Leucosceptoside A661.2101−0.255,225
12Kaempferol286.0465−0.730,280
13Apigenin271.0594−0.716,561
14Naringenin273.0749−0.814,227
Table 3. Identified compounds in A. citrodora aqueous extract- (ESI negative mode).
Table 3. Identified compounds in A. citrodora aqueous extract- (ESI negative mode).
Aloysia citrodora H2O Extract—Negative
Row No.Component NameObserved m/zMass Error (mDa)Response
1Luteolin 7-O-diglucuronide637.104−0.61,157,953
2Acteoside623.198−0.2971,531
3Geniposidic-Acid373.11430.3399,595
4Isoacteoside623.19850.4269,646
5Malic acid133.01430.1223,063
6Apigenin 7-O-diglucuronide621.1094−0.3202,647
74-Hydroxybenzoic acid 4-O-glucoside299.0772054,020
8Eupatorin343.0819−0.533,223
9Leucosceptoside A637.2129−0.923,761
10Vicenin-2593.151−0.222,973
11Cirsiliol329.0665−0.214,545
12Pectolinarigenin313.0716−0.213,039
13Protocatechuic acid 4-O-glucoside315.07230.112,191
14Eriocitrin595.1663−0.611,704
15Coumaric acid (p-)163.0399−0.28432
Table 4. Identified compounds in A. citrodora aqueous extract- (ESI positive mode).
Table 4. Identified compounds in A. citrodora aqueous extract- (ESI positive mode).
Aloysia citrodora H2O Extract—Positive
Row No.Component NameObserved m/zMass Error (mDa)Response
1Luteolin 7-O-diglucuronide639.11970.5655,236
2Geniposidic-Acid397.1095−1380,211
3Acteoside647.19520.6236,018
4Apigenin 7-O-diglucuronide623.12460.3134,959
5Dimethylmatairesinol409.1614−0.8124,934
6Pinoresinol-4-O-Beta-Monoglycoside543.18420.541,603
7Isoacteoside647.1966237,067
84-Hydroxybenzoic acid 4-O-glucoside323.0729−0.834,696
9Eupatorin345.0958−1.117,851
10Leucosceptoside A661.21120.96345
11Coumaric acid-4’-O-glucoside349.0882−1.24471
12Herniarin177.0538−0.83055
13Cirsiliol331.0797−1.52977
14Apigenin-7-O-glucuronide447.09260.42594
15Vicenin-2617.1463−1.42533
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (mg/(dry matter)/mL) of A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts against common food-spoilage and pathogenic bacteria.
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (mg/(dry matter)/mL) of A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts against common food-spoilage and pathogenic bacteria.
Microbial SpeciesA. citrodora
(Aqueous)
A. citrodora
(Ethanolic)
MICMBCMICMBC
S. Enteritidis12.5506.2525
S. Typhimurium12.5506.2525
L. monocytogenes6.25251.566.25
E. coliNANA12.550
S. aureus6.25253.1212.5
NA: no activity.
Table 6. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (mg/(dry matter)/mL) of A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts against Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and wild-type Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1.
Table 6. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (mg/(dry matter)/mL) of A. citrodora aqueous and ethanolic extracts against Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and wild-type Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OLXAL-1.
Microbial SpeciesA. citrodora
(Aqueous)
A. citrodora
(Ethanolic)
MICMBCMICMBC
L. rhamnosus GG5020025100
L. rhamnosus OLXAL-110040050200
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gkalpinos, V.K.; Anagnostou, V.A.; Mitropoulou, G.; Kompoura, V.; Karapantzou, I.; Fasoulis, C.K.; Vasdekis, E.P.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Tzakos, A.G. Aloysia citrodora Extracts Cultivated in Greece as Antioxidants and Potent Regulators of Food Microbiota. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063663

AMA Style

Gkalpinos VK, Anagnostou VA, Mitropoulou G, Kompoura V, Karapantzou I, Fasoulis CK, Vasdekis EP, Kourkoutas Y, Tzakos AG. Aloysia citrodora Extracts Cultivated in Greece as Antioxidants and Potent Regulators of Food Microbiota. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(6):3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gkalpinos, Vasileios K., Vasiliki A. Anagnostou, Gregoria Mitropoulou, Vasiliki Kompoura, Ioanna Karapantzou, Christodoulos K. Fasoulis, Efstathios P. Vasdekis, Yiannis Kourkoutas, and Andreas G. Tzakos. 2023. "Aloysia citrodora Extracts Cultivated in Greece as Antioxidants and Potent Regulators of Food Microbiota" Applied Sciences 13, no. 6: 3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop