08.12.2012 Views

2 Otjikoto Final EIA Report 5MB - Asecnam.com

2 Otjikoto Final EIA Report 5MB - Asecnam.com

2 Otjikoto Final EIA Report 5MB - Asecnam.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold<br />

Mine Project<br />

SLR Project No.: 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> VOLUME 1<br />

July 2012<br />

Auryx Gold Namibia


<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold<br />

Mine Project<br />

SLR Project No.: 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.: 1<br />

July 2012


DOCUMENT INFORMATION<br />

Title <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Project Manager Werner Petrick and assisted by Alex Speiser<br />

Project Manager e-mail werner@biwac.<strong>com</strong><br />

Author Chris Herbert<br />

Reviewer Alex Pheiffer<br />

Client Auryx Gold Namibia<br />

Date last printed 2012/07/17 06:08:00 PM<br />

Date last saved 2012/07/17 06:08:00 PM<br />

Comments<br />

Keywords <strong>EIA</strong>, EMP, <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold mine<br />

Project Number SLR Ref<br />

<strong>Report</strong> Number 1<br />

Status <strong>Final</strong><br />

Issue Date July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page i<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED OTJIKOTO<br />

GOLD MINE PROJECT<br />

CONTENTS<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I<br />

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1-1<br />

1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT.................................................................................... 1-1<br />

1.2 PROJECT MOTIVATION (NEED AND DESIRABILITY) ............................................................................. 1-2<br />

1.3 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................... 1-4<br />

1.3.1 <strong>EIA</strong> APPROACH AND PROCESS .................................................................................................................... 1-7<br />

1.3.2 <strong>EIA</strong> TEAM ................................................................................................................................................ 1-8<br />

1.3.3 CONTACT DETAILS FOR RESPONSIBLE AURYX GOLD PARTIES......................................................................... 1-9<br />

2 ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND POLICIES ...................................................................................... 2-1<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 2-1<br />

2.2 SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE ACTS ..................................................................................................... 2-1<br />

2.2.1 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA (1990) ............................................................................ 2-1<br />

2.2.2 MINERALS (PROSPECTING AND MINING) ACT NO. 33 OF 1992 ...................................................................... 2-2<br />

2.2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, NO. 7 OF 2007 .................................................................................. 2-3<br />

2.2.4 WATER AMENDMENT ACT, NO. 54 OF 1956 ................................................................................................ 2-3<br />

2.2.5 NATURE CONSERVATION ORDINANCE, NO. 4 OF 1975 ................................................................................. 2-4<br />

2.2.6 NATIONAL HERITAGE ACT, NO. 27 OF 2004 ................................................................................................ 2-4<br />

2.2.7 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND ENERGY ACT, NO. 13 OF 1990 ........................................................................ 2-4<br />

2.2.8 NAMIBIAN WATER CORPORATION ACT, NO. 12 OF 1997 ............................................................................... 2-5<br />

2.2.9 FOREST ACT, NO. 12 OF 2001 .................................................................................................................. 2-5<br />

2.2.10 ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION PREVENTION ORDINANCE, NO. 11 OF 1976 .......................................................... 2-5<br />

2.2.11 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ORDINANCE, NO. 14 OF 1974 ............................................................................... 2-5<br />

2.2.12 EXPLOSIVE ACT, NO. 26 OF 1956 .............................................................................................................. 2-5<br />

2.2.13 THE REGIONAL COUNCILS ACT (NO. 22 OF 1992) ....................................................................................... 2-5<br />

2.2.14 LABOUR ACT, NO. 11 OF 2007 .................................................................................................................. 2-6<br />

2.3 OVERALL PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (SAIEA) ................................................. 2-6<br />

2.4 NAMIBIAN POLICIES ........................................................................................................................ 2-7<br />

2.4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION<br />

(1994) .................................................................................................................................................... 2-7<br />

2.4.2 MINERALS POLICY OF NAMIBIA (2004) ........................................................................................................ 2-7<br />

2.4.3 POLICY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIOTIC DIVERSITY AND HABITAT PROTECTION (1994) .............................. 2-7<br />

2.5 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND PROTOCOLS ..................................................................................... 2-7<br />

2.6 WORLD BANK STANDARDS ............................................................................................................. 2-8<br />

2.6.1 IFC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ................................................................................................................ 2-8<br />

2.7 EQUATOR PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................................... 2-9<br />

2.8 NAMIBIA’S DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2-11<br />

2.8.1 VISION 2030 .......................................................................................................................................... 2-11<br />

2.8.2 NAMIBIA’S MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS (MDGS) ............................................................................. 2-12<br />

2.8.3 THE FOURTH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2012- 2017 ......................................................................... 2-12<br />

3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ................................................................................................................. 3-1<br />

3.1 INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES (IAPS) .................................................................................. 3-1<br />

3.2 THE SCOPING PHASE ..................................................................................................................... 3-2<br />

3.2.1 SCOPING REPORT .................................................................................................................................... 3-2<br />

3.2.2 ADVERTISEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 3-3<br />

3.2.3 PUBLIC MEETINGS .................................................................................................................................... 3-3<br />

3.2.4 ISSUES RAISED DURING THE SCOPING PHASE PUBLIC MEETINGS ..................................................................... 3-3<br />

3.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND REVIEW OF DRAFT <strong>EIA</strong> REPORT ............................................................ 3-5<br />

3.3.1 PUBLIC OPEN DAYS .................................................................................................................................. 3-6<br />

3.3.2 MEETING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY AND NAMWATER ................................. 3-6<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page ii<br />

4 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................... 4-1<br />

4.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4-1<br />

4.2 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................ 4-1<br />

4.2.1 SYNOPTIC CLIMATOLOGY........................................................................................................................... 4-1<br />

4.2.2 REGIONAL METEOROLOGY......................................................................................................................... 4-2<br />

4.2.3 OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE SITE ....................................................................................................................... 4-4<br />

4.3 GEOLOGY AND SURFACE WATER FLOW AND TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................ 4-14<br />

4.3.1 GEOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. 4-14<br />

4.3.2 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................ 4-15<br />

4.4 GROUNDWATER ........................................................................................................................... 4-17<br />

4.4.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4-17<br />

4.4.2 HYDROCENSUS ...................................................................................................................................... 4-17<br />

4.4.3 AQUIFER CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................................................................ 4-19<br />

4.4.4 HYDROGEOLOGY AND CONCEPTUAL MODEL .............................................................................................. 4-19<br />

4.4.5 WATER QUALITY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 4-19<br />

4.5 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................................ 4-20<br />

4.5.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4-20<br />

4.5.2 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY AND MIXING DEPTH ............................................................................................ 4-20<br />

4.5.3 EXISTING SOURCES OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION IN THE PROJECT AREA ...................................................... 4-22<br />

4.5.4 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STATUS QUO ......................................................................................................... 4-23<br />

4.5.5 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4-28<br />

4.6 BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................................. 4-29<br />

4.6.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4-29<br />

4.6.2 REGIONAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................ 4-30<br />

4.6.3 VEGETATION .......................................................................................................................................... 4-30<br />

4.6.4 AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES AND MAMMALS ..................................................................................................... 4-35<br />

4.6.5 ENTOMOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 4-38<br />

4.6.6 ARACHNIDA ............................................................................................................................................ 4-43<br />

4.6.7 PAN INVERTEBRATE SPECIALIST STUDY .................................................................................................... 4-46<br />

4.6.8 AVIFAUNA .............................................................................................................................................. 4-48<br />

4.7 ECONOMY ................................................................................................................................... 4-51<br />

4.7.1 NATIONAL ECONOMIC SETTING ................................................................................................................. 4-51<br />

4.7.2 CURRENT LAND USES .............................................................................................................................. 4-54<br />

4.8 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................. 4-56<br />

4.8.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4-56<br />

4.8.2 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................................... 4-56<br />

4.8.3 THE AFFECTED COMMUNITY .................................................................................................................... 4-57<br />

4.8.4 LABOUR AND INCOME .............................................................................................................................. 4-63<br />

4.8.5 BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING ..................................................................................................... 4-65<br />

4.8.6 HEALTH ................................................................................................................................................. 4-66<br />

4.8.7 HIV/AIDS ............................................................................................................................................. 4-67<br />

4.8.8 EDUCATION ............................................................................................................................................ 4-68<br />

4.9 ARCHAEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 4-70<br />

4.9.1 THE PROJECT AREA ............................................................................................................................... 4-71<br />

4.9.2 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................... 4-71<br />

4.9.3 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4-74<br />

4.10 VISUAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 4-74<br />

4.10.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4-74<br />

4.10.2 VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE .................................................................................................................. 4-74<br />

4.10.3 VIEWSHED ............................................................................................................................................. 4-77<br />

4.10.4 PHYSIOGRAPHIC RATING UNITS ............................................................................................................... 4-78<br />

4.10.5 SCENIC QUALITY .................................................................................................................................... 4-79<br />

4.10.6 KEY OBSERVATION POINTS ..................................................................................................................... 4-83<br />

4.10.7 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4-83<br />

4.11 NOISE ......................................................................................................................................... 4-83<br />

4.11.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4-83<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page iii<br />

4.11.2 NOISE SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................................... 4-84<br />

4.11.3 CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SOUND CHARACTER ....................................................................................... 4-84<br />

4.11.4 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 4-86<br />

5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 5-1<br />

5.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 5-1<br />

5.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE .................................................................................................................. 5-1<br />

5.2.1 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES ........................................................................................................................ 5-1<br />

5.2.2 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................................... 5-4<br />

5.2.3 TOPSOIL MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 5-4<br />

5.2.4 CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT ..................................................................................................................... 5-4<br />

5.2.5 EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ...................................................................................................................... 5-9<br />

5.2.6 WATER SUPPLY FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 5-9<br />

5.2.7 POWER SUPPLY FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 5-9<br />

5.2.8 SANITATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5-9<br />

5.2.9 MEDICAL SERVICE .................................................................................................................................... 5-9<br />

5.2.10 FIRE PROTECTION .................................................................................................................................. 5-10<br />

5.2.11 NON-MINERALIZED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION ................................................................... 5-10<br />

5.2.12 CONCURRENT MINING OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................... 5-11<br />

5.3 OPERATIONAL PHASE ................................................................................................................... 5-11<br />

5.3.1 SITE FACILITIES FOR OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 5-11<br />

5.3.2 OPERATION PHASE ACTIVITIES – MINING .................................................................................................. 5-13<br />

5.3.3 OPERATION PHASE ACTIVITIES – MINERAL PROCESSING ............................................................................ 5-14<br />

5.3.4 MINERALIZED WASTE FACILITIES .............................................................................................................. 5-21<br />

5.3.5 WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES ............................................................................................................ 5-30<br />

5.3.6 POWER SUPPLY FOR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 5-34<br />

5.3.7 AIR REQUIREMENTS – PROCESS PLANT .................................................................................................... 5-34<br />

5.3.8 FUEL SUPPLY ......................................................................................................................................... 5-34<br />

5.3.9 EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING .................................................................................................................... 5-35<br />

5.3.10 SEWERAGE COLLECTION AND TREATMENT ................................................................................................ 5-35<br />

5.3.11 NON-MINERALISED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR THE OPERATION PHASE .......................................................... 5-35<br />

5.3.12 ADDITIONAL SITE FACILITIES ..................................................................................................................... 5-37<br />

5.3.13 TIME TABLE ............................................................................................................................................ 5-42<br />

5.4 DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE ...................................................................................... 5-42<br />

5.4.1 CLOSURE OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................. 5-42<br />

5.4.2 DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 5-43<br />

5.4.3 CLOSURE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................... 5-44<br />

6 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................................ 6-1<br />

6.1 CURRENT AND FUTURE LAND USED ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................... 6-1<br />

6.2 THE “NO PROJECT OPTION LINKED TO NEED AND DESIRABILITY ....................................................... 6-1<br />

6.3 TECHNICAL ALTERNATIVES FOR MILLING ......................................................................................... 6-1<br />

6.4 POWER REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................. 6-2<br />

7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 7-1<br />

7.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7-1<br />

7.2 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................ 7-4<br />

7.2.1 ISSUE: SURFACE EXCAVATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................. 7-4<br />

7.3 SURFACE WATER ........................................................................................................................... 7-6<br />

7.3.1 ISSUE: ALTERING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ........................................................................................................ 7-6<br />

7.3.2 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................. 7-6<br />

7.4 GROUNDWATER ............................................................................................................................. 7-9<br />

7.4.1 ISSUE: DEWATERING OF MINE PIT AND WATER SUPPLY ................................................................................... 7-9<br />

7.4.2 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY ............................................................................................. 7-12<br />

7.5 AIR .............................................................................................................................................. 7-15<br />

7.5.1 ISSUE: AIR POLLUTION ............................................................................................................................. 7-15<br />

7.6 NOISE AND VIBRATION .................................................................................................................. 7-19<br />

7.6.1 ISSUE: NOISE POLLUTION ......................................................................................................................... 7-19<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page iv<br />

7.6.2 ISSUE: BLASTING HAZARDS ...................................................................................................................... 7-22<br />

7.7 BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................................. 7-24<br />

7.7.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 7-24<br />

7.7.2 ISSUE: PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................. 7-24<br />

7.7.3 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON WATER RESOURCES AS AN ECOLOGICAL DRIVER ............................................................. 7-27<br />

7.7.4 ISSUE: GENERAL DISTURBANCE OF BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................ 7-30<br />

7.8 VISUAL ........................................................................................................................................ 7-34<br />

7.8.1 ISSUE: VISUAL IMPACT ............................................................................................................................. 7-34<br />

7.9 ARCHAEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 7-37<br />

7.9.1 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND LANDSCAPES .......................................................... 7-37<br />

7.10 TRAFFIC ...................................................................................................................................... 7-39<br />

7.10.1 ISSUE: TRAFFIC IMPACT ........................................................................................................................... 7-39<br />

7.11 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ................................................................................................................ 7-41<br />

7.11.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 7-41<br />

7.11.2 ISSUE: ECONOMIC IMPACT ....................................................................................................................... 7-42<br />

7.11.3 ISSUE: CHANGE OF LAND USE AND NEIGHBOURING COMMUNITY.................................................................... 7-44<br />

7.11.4 ISSUE: IN MIGRATION AND COMMUNITY HEALTH/SAFETY AND SECURITY ......................................................... 7-46<br />

8 KEY ASSUMPTIONS, UNCERTAINTIES AND LIMITATIONS ......................................................... 8-1<br />

8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LIMIT .............................................................................................. 8-1<br />

8.2 PREDICTIVE MODELS IN GENERAL................................................................................................... 8-1<br />

8.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE WATER .............................................................................................. 8-1<br />

8.4 GROUNDWATER ............................................................................................................................. 8-1<br />

8.5 AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................................................. 8-1<br />

8.6 NOISE AND VIBRATION .................................................................................................................... 8-3<br />

8.7 BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................................................................ 8-3<br />

8.8 VISUAL .......................................................................................................................................... 8-3<br />

8.9 ARCHAEOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 8-3<br />

8.10 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC .................................................................................................................. 8-3<br />

8.11 TRAFFIC ........................................................................................................................................ 8-3<br />

9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................. 9-1<br />

10 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 10-1<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

FIGURE 1-1: REGIONAL SETTING .......................................................................................................................... 1-3<br />

FIGURE 1-2: LOCAL SETTING OF THE PROPOSED OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE PROJECT .................................... 1-4<br />

FIGURE 1-3: THE <strong>EIA</strong> PROCESS ............................................................................................................................. 1-8<br />

FIGURE 4-1: WEATHER STATION ........................................................................................................................... 4-4<br />

FIGURE 4-2: COMPARISON OF MEASURED WEATHER DATA AT OTJIKOTO AND THE MM5 DATA FOR THE<br />

PERIOD 2008 AND 2009. .................................................................................................................................. 4-7<br />

FIGURE 4-3: PERIOD, DAY-TIME, NIGHT-TIME AND YEARLY WIND ROSES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD<br />

PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011. ............................................................... 4-9<br />

FIGURE 4-4: PERIOD WIND ROSES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO<br />

NOVEMBER 2011. ........................................................................................................................................... 4-10<br />

FIGURE 4-5: MONTHLY WIND ROSES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007<br />

TO NOVEMBER 2011. ..................................................................................................................................... 4-11<br />

FIGURE 4-6: AVERAGE WIND FREQUENCY AND VELOCITY OVER THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER<br />

2011. ................................................................................................................................................................ 4-12<br />

FIGURE 4-7: MONTHLY AVERAGE TEMPERATURES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD<br />

8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011. .............................................................................................................. 4-13<br />

FIGURE 4-8: TOTAL MONTHLY RAINFALL AS RECORDED AT OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8<br />

JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011. ................................................................................................................. 4-14<br />

FIGURE 4-9: OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE: OVERVIEW ON THE LOCATION OF THE MINE SITE WITHIN THE<br />

REGIONAL CATCHMENTS (DATA SOURCE: ATLAS OF NAMIBIA) AND DETAIL VIEW ON THE MINE SITE<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page v<br />

AND THE SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION AS WELL AS THE LOCAL WATER DIVIDE (BASED ON<br />

LIDAR DATA) ................................................................................................................................................... 4-16<br />

FIGURE 4-10: OTJIKOTO DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS HYDROCENSUS (1996) .................................. 4-18<br />

FIGURE 4-11: LOCATION OF THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT MONITORING NETWORK AND NEAREST<br />

POTENTIAL SENSITIVE RECEPTORS. ......................................................................................................... 4-25<br />

FIGURE 4-12: PM10 AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR THE PERIOD 20 APRIL TO 12 OCTOBER 2011. ..... 4-27<br />

FIGURE 4-13: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF SPECIALIST STUDIES, JULY 2007 ............................................... 4-31<br />

FIGURE 4-14: MONECHMA DIVARICATUM IS COMMONLY FOUND UNDER TREES AND SHRUBS IN SANDY<br />

THICKET AREAS. ............................................................................................................................................ 4-33<br />

FIGURE 4-15: BLEPHARIS OBMITRATA, CHARACTERISTIC OF THE CALCRETE ROCKY AREAS. ................ 4-34<br />

FIGURE 4-16: THE PAN SOUTH OF THE GAME PROOF FENCE BETWEEN FARM OTJIKOTO AND FARM<br />

GERHARDSHAUSEN. ..................................................................................................................................... 4-34<br />

FIGURE 4-17: LEONOTIS OCYMIFOLIA, CHARACTERISTIC OF THE PAN HABITAT. ....................................... 4-35<br />

FIGURE 4-18: SPOTTED RUBBER FROG (PHRYNOMATIS AFFINIS). ................................................................ 4-36<br />

FIGURE 4-19: VELD LEGUAAN AND SOUTHERN AFRICAN PYTHON. ............................................................... 4-37<br />

FIGURE 4-20: AARDWOLF (PROTELES CRISTATUS), HONEY BADGER (MELLIVORA CAPENSIS), CAPE FOX<br />

(VULPES CHAMA) AND CHEETAH (ACINONYX JUBATUS). ........................................................................ 4-38<br />

FIGURE 4-21: FINDINGS OF ARACHNIDA RECORDS FROM LITERATURE RESEARCH .................................. 4-45<br />

FIGURE 4-22: VIEW FROM A RIDGE OVER THE PROJECT AREA FROM NORTH-WEST TO NORTH-EAST,<br />

THICKETS OF ACACIA MELIFERA – SUCH BUSH THICKETS DOMINATE IN THE AREA, WITH A FEW<br />

COPSES OF TALLER TREES – MAINLY ACACIA REFICIENS AND TERMINALIA PRUNOIDES THE LAST<br />

BEING FAVOURED NESTING TREES OF VULTURES. ................................................................................ 4-49<br />

FIGURE 4-23: RECORDED AND PREDICTED NATIONAL INCOME CONTRIBUTIONS (AS MEASURED<br />

THROUGH GDP) FOR MINING, LIVESTOCK, AND TOURISM IN NAMIBIA BETWEEN 2005 AND 2012 .... 4-53<br />

FIGURE 4-24: LOCATION OF EPL AND MINE FARMS ......................................................................................... 4-57<br />

FIGURE 4-25: ESTIMATES OF MEDIAN ANNUAL EXPENDITURE PER PERSON IN THE WIDER PROJECT<br />

AREA. .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-65<br />

FIGURE 4-26: CAIRNS IN THE OTJIKOTO AREA. ................................................................................................. 4-72<br />

FIGURE 4-27: GRAVES FOUND NEAR FARM OTJIKOTO. ................................................................................... 4-73<br />

FIGURE 4-28: SITE TOPOGRAPHIC AND RIDGE MAP ........................................................................................ 4-75<br />

FIGURE 4-29: GPS 3 SHOWING LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF EXISTING CATTLE FARM ............................. 4-76<br />

FIGURE 4-30: GPS1 VIEW NORTH-WEST TOWARDS PROPOSED SITE ........................................................... 4-76<br />

FIGURE 4-31: VIEWSHED MAP. ............................................................................................................................. 4-78<br />

FIGURE 4-32: PHYSIOGRAPHIC RATING UNITS (PRU). ..................................................................................... 4-79<br />

FIGURE 4-33: MONITORING POINTS SELECTED NEAR THE PROPOSED SITE (MARKED AS BLUES<br />

SQUARES) ...................................................................................................................................................... 4-85<br />

FIGURE 5-1: PROPOSED MINE LAYOUT ................................................................................................................ 5-3<br />

FIGURE 5-2: BLOCK FLOW DIAGRAM OF THE METALLURGICAL PROCESSING ROUTE ............................... 5-16<br />

FIGURE 5-3: MONTHLY AVERAGE DEMAND AND MAKE-UP ............................................................................. 5-28<br />

FIGURE 5-4: NON-EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF MAKE-UP DEMAND ............................... 5-29<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

TABLE 2-1: EQUATOR PRINCIPLES ........................................................................................................................ 2-9<br />

TABLE 3-1: SUMMARY OF INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES ................................................................... 3-1<br />

TABLE 3-2: FIRST PUBLIC MEETINGS .................................................................................................................... 3-3<br />

TABLE 3-3: SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION PROCESS FOR THE DRAFT <strong>EIA</strong> AND EMP .................................. 3-5<br />

TABLE 3-4: NUMBERS ATTENDING PUBLIC OPEN DAYS JUNE 2012 ................................................................. 3-6<br />

TABLE 4-1: DATA AVAILABILITY OF METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS RECORDED AT THE OTJIKOTO GOLD<br />

PROJECT SITE. ................................................................................................................................................ 4-7<br />

TABLE 4-2: MINIMUM, MAXIMUM AND AVERAGE TEMPERATURES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR<br />

THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011. ........................................................................................ 4-13<br />

TABLE 4-3: TOTAL MONTHLY RAINFALL FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE<br />

2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011. ............................................................................................................................ 4-14<br />

TABLE 4-4: ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASSES. .............................................................................................. 4-21<br />

TABLE 4-5: KEY POLLUTION SOURCES IN THE VICINITY OF THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT AND<br />

ASSOCIATED CRITERIA POLLUTANTS. ....................................................................................................... 4-22<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page vi<br />

TABLE 4-6: DUST FALLOUT RATES FROM THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT MONITORING NETWORK<br />

(NOVEMBER 2010 TO JANUARY 2012). ........................................................................................................ 4-26<br />

TABLE 4-7: DAILY PM10 CONCENTRATIONS AS MEASURED AT THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT. ............. 4-28<br />

TABLE 4-8: PROTECTED, ENDEMIC AND NEAR-ENDEMIC SPECIES THAT OCCUR ON THE OTJIKOTO<br />

PROJECT AREA. ............................................................................................................................................. 4-32<br />

TABLE 4-9: SPIDER, SCORPION AND SOLIFUGID DIVERSITY OF THE THORNBUSH SAVANNA IN RELATION<br />

TO THEIR NAMIBIAN DIVERSITY. ................................................................................................................. 4-44<br />

TABLE 4-10: GDP AND SELECTED COMPONENT ACTIVITIES - N$ MILLION, 2012 CONSTANT PRICES ....... 4-53<br />

TABLE 4-11: FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAND USES OTJIKOTO MINING<br />

AREA (N$, 2012) ............................................................................................................................................. 4-55<br />

TABLE 4-12: ANALYSIS OF THE REGION’S KEY CHALLENGES AND THEIR ROOT CAUSES ......................... 4-60<br />

TABLE 4-13: HIV PREVALENCE RATES FOR YOUTH AND ADULTS IN SELECTED SITES, 2004 - 2010 ......... 4-67<br />

TABLE 4-14: RESULTS OF AMBIENT SOUND LEVEL MONITORING (DATUM TYPE: UTM, ZONE 33 SOUTH) 4-85<br />

TABLE 5-1: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 5-5<br />

TABLE 5-2: WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE ................................................................... 5-10<br />

TABLE 5-3: TDF AND WASTE ROCK DUMP - GENERAL DIMENSIONS .............................................................. 5-22<br />

TABLE 5-4: CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS....................................................................................................... 5-27<br />

TABLE 5-5: NON MINERALISED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR OPERATIONS .................................................. 5-36<br />

TABLE 7-1: CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING IMPACTS ................................................................................................ 7-3<br />

TABLE 7-2: SURFACE EXCAVATIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE - LINK TO PROJECT PHASES & ACTIVITIES ..... 7-4<br />

TABLE 7-3: SURFACE WATER POLLUTION SOURCES–LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ........... 7-6<br />

TABLE 7-4: LOWERING OF GROUNDWATER LEVELS – LINK PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ................ 7-9<br />

TABLE 7-5: IMPACTS ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY –PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ......................... 7-12<br />

TABLE 7-6: AIR POLLUTION – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES .................................................. 7-16<br />

TABLE 7-7: NOISE POLLUTION – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ............................................. 7-20<br />

TABLE 7-8: BLASTING HAZARDS– LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ........................................... 7-22<br />

TABLE 7-9: PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY - LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ........... 7-25<br />

TABLE 7-10: IMPACT ON WATER RESOURCES AS AN ECOLOGICAL DRIVER – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES<br />

AND ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................. 7-28<br />

TABLE 7-11: GENERAL DISTURBANCE OF BIODIVERSITY – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES 7-30<br />

TABLE 7-12: VISUAL IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES .............................................. 7-34<br />

TABLE 7-13: ARCHAEOLOGY IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ............................... 7-37<br />

TABLE 7-14: TRAFFIC IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ............................................ 7-39<br />

TABLE 7-15: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES ................ 7-41<br />

TABLE 9-1: SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED MINING PROJECT... 9-1<br />

LIST OF APPENDICES<br />

APPENDIX A: PROJECT TEAM CVS ........................................................................................................................... A<br />

APPENDIX B: INFORMATION SHARING RECORD .................................................................................................... B<br />

APPENDIX C: IAP DATABASE.....................................................................................................................................C<br />

APPENDIX D: ISSUES TABLE .....................................................................................................................................D<br />

APPENDIX E: GROUNDWATER STUDIES ................................................................................................................. E<br />

APPENDIX F: AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................... F<br />

APPENDIX G: NOISE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... G<br />

APPENDIX H: BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................H<br />

APPENDIX I: CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................. I<br />

APPENDIX J: VISUAL ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... J<br />

APPENDIX K: SOCIAL ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................ K<br />

APPENDIX L: ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. L<br />

APPENDIX M: OTJIKOTO EMP .................................................................................................................................. M<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS<br />

Below a list of acronyms and abbreviations used in this report.<br />

Page vii<br />

Acronyms /<br />

Abbreviations<br />

Definition<br />

ART Anti-retroviral treatment<br />

ASEC Alex Speiser Environmental Consultant<br />

CH4 Methane<br />

CITES Convention on International Trade and Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and<br />

Flora<br />

CO Carbon monoxide<br />

CO2 Carbon dioxide<br />

DEA Directorate of Environmental Affairs<br />

DLEU Drug Law Enforcement Unit<br />

DPW Directorate of Parks and Wildlife<br />

EAP Environmental Assessment Practitioner<br />

EAPSA Certification Board for Environmental Assessment Practitioners of South Africa<br />

EHS Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines<br />

<strong>EIA</strong> Environmental impact assessment<br />

EMIS Education and Management Information System<br />

EPL Exclusive prospecting license<br />

GDP Gross Domestic Product<br />

GLC Ground level concentration<br />

HCs Hydrocarbons<br />

HP high pressure<br />

IAPs Interested and Affected Parties<br />

IEMA Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment<br />

IFC International Finance Corporation<br />

ITCZ Inter-tropical Convergence Zone<br />

LA Local Authority<br />

LFPR Labour force participation rate<br />

LoM Life of Mine<br />

MAWF Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry<br />

MDGs Millennium Development Goals<br />

MET Ministry of Environment and Tourism<br />

MGECW Ministry of Gender and Child Welfare<br />

mg/m²/day Milligram per square metre per day<br />

MHSS Ministry of Health and Social Services<br />

MLSW Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare<br />

MME Ministry of Mines and Energy<br />

MoE Ministry of Education<br />

MRLGHRD Ministry of Regional Local Government Housing and Rural Development(add<br />

Ministry to first mention)<br />

m/s Metres per second<br />

MWT Ministry of Works and Transport<br />

NDP3 Third National Development Plan<br />

NDP4 Fourth National Development Plan<br />

NEEEF New Equitable Economic Empowerment Framework<br />

NGOs Non-government organisations<br />

NHE Namibia Housing Enterprise<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Acronyms /<br />

Abbreviations<br />

Definition<br />

NPC National Planning Commission<br />

NOx Nitrogen oxides<br />

O3 Ozone<br />

OMA Otjiwarongo Marble Aquifer<br />

PDN Previously disadvantaged Namibians<br />

PPPs Public Private partnerships<br />

RA Roads Authority<br />

RoM Run of Mine<br />

sA southern African<br />

SAIEA South African Institute for Environmental Assessment<br />

SANS South African national Standard<br />

SDFN Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia<br />

S<strong>EIA</strong> Social and Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

SMEs Small and medium enterprises<br />

SO2 Sulphur dioxide<br />

TB Tuberculosis<br />

TESEF Transformational Economic and Social Empowerment Framework<br />

TDF Tailings Disposal Facility<br />

µg/m³ Micrograms per cubic metre<br />

WRD Waste rock dump<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page viii<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

1. Introduction<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page i<br />

Avdale (currently owned by Auryx Gold Namibia (Auryx Gold)), an exploration and mining <strong>com</strong>pany,<br />

holds four Exclusive Prospecting Licences (EPL) within the Otavi Exploration Area. This exploration area<br />

is located in the northern central part of Namibia, approximately 50 km south of Otavi, 70 km north of<br />

Otjiwarongo and 2 – 3 km east of the National Road B1 (see Figure 1). It is proposed to develop an open<br />

pit gold mine within this exploration area, referred to as the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project. The proposed<br />

mining licence area lies exclusively on <strong>com</strong>mercial land owned by the <strong>com</strong>pany and extends over a<br />

number of farms. In 2010 Auryx Gold Inc Canada took over the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine project and later<br />

(December 2011) <strong>com</strong>bined operations with B2Gold (a Vancouver based mining <strong>com</strong>pany).<br />

Figure 1 – Site Location<br />

The gold was discovered in 1997 when airborne magnetic surveys were followed up by exploration and<br />

subsequent drilling. By February 2008, Teal Exploration & Mining Inc, then owning the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold<br />

Mine project had drilled 430 boreholes and had identified eight mineralised zones. These have been<br />

geologically modelled based on vein intensity and vein mineralogy, using a 0.4g/t gold cut-off grade.<br />

Inferred gold resources are approximately 1.92 million ounces with the resource grade of 1.26g/t.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page ii<br />

The proposed mine will consist of a single open pit (approximately 2060m long by 635m wide and 245m<br />

deep), RoM pad and stockpiles, processing plant and smelter, waste rock dumps (WRD), low grade ore<br />

dump, tailings disposal facility (TDF) and other ancillary development including access roads, support<br />

facilities, and soil stockpiles.<br />

2. Project Motivation<br />

The motivation for the proposed project is economic in nature. Auryx Gold has conducted an extensive<br />

drilling programme over portions of EPL2410 and found there is an economic mineral resource that can<br />

be mined and processed. The proposed project has the potential to benefit the country, society and the<br />

surrounding <strong>com</strong>munities both directly and indirectly. Direct economic benefits will be derived from<br />

wages, taxes, technology transfer, capacity development, and profits. Indirect economic benefits will be<br />

derived from the procurement of goods and services and the increased spending power of employees<br />

through the creation of new jobs at the mine.<br />

3. Environmental impact assessment process<br />

The <strong>com</strong>mencement of the Environmental Management Act, List of Activities that may not be undertaken<br />

without Environmental Clearance Certificate and Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations:<br />

Environmental Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) were promulgated on 6 February<br />

2012. In accordance with this legal framework the <strong>EIA</strong> approach included the following:<br />

� The scoping process was conducted to identify the environmental issues associated with the<br />

proposed projects and to define the terms of reference for the required specialist studies and the <strong>EIA</strong>;<br />

� Specialist studies were <strong>com</strong>missioned in accordance with the relevant terms of reference;<br />

� The specialists were selected on the basis of their expertise and knowledge of the project area;<br />

� The <strong>EIA</strong> report was <strong>com</strong>piled on the basis of the findings of the specialist studies;<br />

� The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP was prepared to elaborate on the mitigation objectives and include additional<br />

actions that were described in the <strong>EIA</strong> report; and<br />

� A project specific public participation process was conducted. As part of this process the regulatory<br />

authorities and interested and affected parties (IAPs) were given the opportunity to attend information<br />

sharing meetings, submit questions and <strong>com</strong>ments to the project team, and review the background<br />

information document and scoping report. All questions and <strong>com</strong>ments that were raised by the<br />

authorities and IAPs have been included and addressed in the <strong>EIA</strong> report. Similarly, IAPs have had<br />

the opportunity to review the <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and provide additional <strong>com</strong>ments before it was finalised.<br />

Public open days were arranged to present the findings of the <strong>EIA</strong> to IAPs.<br />

� All the people on the Auryx Gold IAP database were notified about the review period. A total of more<br />

than 700 people attended the Open Days that were held in Windhoek, Otavi and Otjiwarongo. The<br />

major issues discussed at the various open days related to the potential impact on groundwater on<br />

neighbouring farms and towns. There were many job seekers and discussions regarding job<br />

opportunities, recruitment policies and how recruitment should be conducted. The potential negative<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page iii<br />

social issues resulting from a construction camp on site was also a major concern to neighbouring<br />

farmers as was the devaluation of their land as a result of the mine.<br />

� As part of the <strong>EIA</strong> review process, the department of Water Affairs and NamWater requested a<br />

meeting with SLR and Auryx Gold to discuss relevant matters on the groundwater model of the<br />

proposed mine. The issues discussed during the meeting related, amongst others, to the relevant<br />

permitting and associated groundwater monitoring requirements.<br />

� All <strong>com</strong>ments and issues raised during the <strong>EIA</strong> review period are included in the Issues and<br />

Reponses <strong>Report</strong> (Appendix D).<br />

The initial baseline specialist studies for the ESIA were conducted between April 2007 and February<br />

2008. In August 2008 the <strong>EIA</strong> scoping report was finalised and submitted to the Ministry of Environment<br />

and Tourism. After Teal Mining was taken over by Auryx Gold (Namibia) Pty Ltd. work resumed in July<br />

2010. After the <strong>com</strong>pletion of the Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the<br />

proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project’ (ASEC, September 2010) a number of outstanding specialist<br />

studies identified during the preliminary ESIA report were conducted between December 2010 and<br />

December 2011.<br />

4. Project Description<br />

The purpose of the construction phase is primarily to establish the infrastructure and activities required<br />

for the operational phase. The construction phase will <strong>com</strong>mence in Q1 2013 and last for approximately<br />

two years.<br />

The fence around the construction site will be the final fencing required for the plant. It will be 2.4 m high,<br />

with barbed wire at the top. Site access will be controlled via a boomed entrance, which will also be<br />

locked outside of normal working hours. These areas will be fenced and will incorporate some or all of<br />

the facilities described below:<br />

� Workshop and maintenance areas;<br />

� Contractors lay-down areas;<br />

� Mobile site offices;<br />

� Temporary first aid station;<br />

� Explosive magazines;<br />

� Temporary ac<strong>com</strong>modation camp;<br />

� Waste collection and storage areas;<br />

� Wash bay for washing equipment and vehicles;<br />

� Parking area for cars and equipment;<br />

� Change houses;<br />

� Clean water reservoir;<br />

� Canteen;<br />

� Ablution facilities;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Temporary power and water supply infrastructure;<br />

� Storage yard for Capital and First Fill items; and,<br />

� Fire fighting station.<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page iv<br />

The operational phase will consist of the following on-site facilities (some of these facilities are indicated<br />

on Figure 2):<br />

� Single open pit;<br />

� RoM stockpiles;<br />

� RoM pad<br />

� Processing plant;<br />

� Mine dewatering settling ponds<br />

� Access roads and haul roads;<br />

� Mineralised waste disposal facilities (Waste rock dump, Low grade dump, and a high sulphide<br />

tailings facility)<br />

� Offices and ablution facilities;<br />

� Explosives magazine;<br />

� Soil stockpiles;<br />

� Conveyors (in the plant, between plant and RoM <strong>com</strong>plex);<br />

� Workshops;<br />

� Wash bay for washing equipment and vehicles;<br />

� Tyre bay for changing tyres on vehicles;<br />

� Refuelling areas;<br />

� Hazardous substances storages areas;<br />

� Salvage yard and temporary non mineralised waste handling facilities;<br />

� Stores (Plant and mine <strong>com</strong>plexes);<br />

� On site water supply infrastructure;<br />

� Compressed air supply station;<br />

� Storm water management facilities;<br />

� Water treatment facility;<br />

� Clean and dirty water holding facilities;<br />

� On site power supply infrastructure;<br />

� Change houses;<br />

� Ablution facilities;<br />

� Medical First Aid station facilities;<br />

� Sewage treatment plant;<br />

� Weighbridge;<br />

� Loading and off-loading areas;<br />

� Administration offices;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Figure 2 – Proposed Mine Layout<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page v<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Parking areas;<br />

� Security infrastructure;<br />

� Laboratory;<br />

� Communication infrastructure; and,<br />

� Lighting infrastructure.<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page vi<br />

The mine methodology of conventional open pit mining (that is, drill and blast followed by load and haul)<br />

will be employed at the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project. Mine production has been scheduled at 2.4 million tonnes per<br />

annum (mtpa). Actual mining will take place up to year 10 after which the low grade material will be<br />

reclaimed from the low grade dump and will be processed in years 11 and 12. The stripping ratio<br />

increases gradually from 7.19 to 9.37 over the LoM with the average stripping ratio over the LoM being<br />

7.32. Maximum tonnes moved over the LoM will be 28 mtpa.<br />

Drilling and blasting would be performed on 5 m high benches in the mineralised zones and a 110 tonne<br />

hydraulic excavator will be employed to load the 5 m high flitches. The waste benches will be mined in a<br />

bulk mining approach where drilling and blasting will be performed on 10 m high benches and a 190<br />

tonne hydraulic face shovel be utilised to load the full 10 m bench. In both cases 100 tonne capacity off-<br />

highway dump trucks will be used and standard open-cut drilling and auxiliary equipment be required.<br />

The ultimate pit will have two ramp systems in the north which will be used for ore and waste hauling.<br />

The dimensions of the pit are as follows:<br />

Length 2 060 m;<br />

Width 635 m;<br />

Depth 245 m;<br />

Area 931 057 m 2 (93.10 ha).<br />

At a conceptual level, de<strong>com</strong>missioning can be considered a reverse of the construction phase with the<br />

demolition and removal of the majority of infrastructure and activities very similar to those described with<br />

respect to the construction phase. The closure phase occurs as soon as possible on the waste stockpile<br />

and the TDF and then after the cessation of all de<strong>com</strong>missioning activities. Relevant closure activities<br />

are those related to the after care and maintenance of remaining structures.<br />

The planning stage for de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure has <strong>com</strong>menced and in broad terms the main<br />

objective will be to remove as much infrastructure as possible and rehabilitate what remains to resemble<br />

the pre project land state as closely as possible. At this stage, the proposed post closure land use will be<br />

a <strong>com</strong>bination of conservation and wilderness. The following objectives have been set:<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page vii<br />

� Disturbed areas other than those <strong>com</strong>prising the open pit and mineralised waste facilities will be<br />

returned to as close to their original state as practicable.<br />

� Permanent visible features such as the mineralised waste facilities and related environmental<br />

bunds as well as safety bunds around the open pit will be left in a form that blends with the<br />

surrounds.<br />

� Contamination beyond the mine site by wind, surface runoff or groundwater movement will be<br />

prevented through appropriate erosion resistant covers, containment bunds and drainage to the<br />

open pit.<br />

� Linear infrastructure <strong>com</strong>prising roads, pipelines, power lines, conveyors and related <strong>com</strong>ponents<br />

will be removed and the disturbed land rehabilitated to blend with the surrounding natural<br />

environment.<br />

� Socio-economic impacts (including the loss of employment) will be minimised through careful<br />

planning and preparation for closure beginning three to five years before closure takes place.<br />

The above principles and concepts will be refined as part of ongoing detailed closure planning and<br />

costing during the life of mine.<br />

5. Environmental Impact Assessment Findings<br />

Topography – The project area is approximately 2-3km east of the B1 National Road and it is not<br />

impossible that third parties may access the site by mistake or out of curiosity. In the unmitigated<br />

scenario, it is possible that the surface excavations and infrastructure present a risk to unac<strong>com</strong>panied<br />

third parties during all phases.<br />

The proposed mitigation measures will focus on infrastructure safety and on limiting access to third<br />

parties and animals which reduces the probability of the impact occurring.<br />

Surface Water - In the unmitigated scenario, surface water may collect contaminants (hydrocarbons,<br />

salts, chemicals, metals, etc.) from numerous sources. At elevated pollution concentrations these<br />

contaminants can be harmful to humans if ingested directly or indirectly through contaminated vegetation,<br />

vertebrates and invertebrates. Therefore the precautionary approach has been applied with the result that<br />

contaminated surface water from the mine will be contained, re-used and/or treated.<br />

Despite this precaution one can assume that due to the site specific climatic and hydrological conditions,<br />

if a surface run-off occurs, a large fraction of the surface water seeps into the ground water alluvium.<br />

Therefore mitigation measures are based on the principle of containing dirty water and diverting clean<br />

water as far as possible, so the drainage scheme will ensure that clean surface water flow is directed<br />

around structures such as the waste rock dumps and tailings disposal facility.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page viii<br />

In the mitigated scenario, most surface water run-off should be relatively clean and the potential impact<br />

reduces to low because:<br />

� by implementing a system where the dirty areas will be isolated from clean run-off and dirty water is<br />

contained and reused wherever possible rather than discharged into the environment, and<br />

� by implementing dust control measures the fallout of dust that can be collected and pollute surface<br />

water should also have been managed to acceptable levels.<br />

Groundwater – Dewatering of the pit and borehole abstraction has the potential to reduce local<br />

groundwater levels and there are a range of sources/activities that have the potential to contaminate<br />

groundwater in all phases of the project, as follows:<br />

� Damage to water supply pipeline from vandalism or flood/storm water.<br />

� Potential for pipeline to impact on water quality through corrosion/algae growth.<br />

� Potential for <strong>com</strong>munities to cause pollution in the vicinity of abstraction boreholes.<br />

� Water losses through leaks, transmission and evaporation.<br />

� Depletion in water levels in boreholes due to over pumping.<br />

� Lower of water levels due to seepage into the open pit.<br />

� Depletion of <strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes.<br />

� Permanent radius of influence due to mine dewatering.<br />

� Recovery of water levels in Karibib Marbles<br />

� Seepage from mineralised waste facilities (TDF and WRD);<br />

� Formation of acid drainage from the TDF;<br />

� Sulphate, metal, arsenic and nitrate leaching from the TDF<br />

� Seepage of dirty water into the aquifer;<br />

� Seepage into/flooding of mine pit;<br />

� Pollution from spillages of chemicals/fuel and sanitation facilities.<br />

The proposed mitigation therefore focuses on containing pollution at source and/or preventing the off-site<br />

migration of pollution and preventing unacceptable groundwater pollution related to seepage and<br />

groundwater flow disruption impacts. In addition it is proposed to manage the local water supply and to<br />

monitor and mitigate if required.<br />

According to the groundwater model and hydrogeological investigations, no major impact is expected.<br />

Auryx Gold will ensure that if <strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes are dewatered, they will be provided with an<br />

alternative water source (Section 7.4). Groundwater levels should be monitored at all pumping wells and<br />

monitoring boreholes as well as the nearest <strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes, as per the monitoring<br />

programme included in the EMP. The groundwater flow model should be updated within one year after<br />

approval of the project (if approved) and every two years subsequently.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page ix<br />

Air - The air quality assessment focused on airborne particulates (PM10 emissions and total suspended<br />

particles). Gaseous pollutants (such as sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide etc.)<br />

deriving from mine vehicles and equipment and from the gold smelting operations could not be assessed<br />

but were regarded by the specialist as potentially negligible in <strong>com</strong>parison to particulate emissions.<br />

The main contributing sources to both the unmitigated and mitigated PM10 predicted impacts are firstly<br />

the unpaved roads specifically between the open-pit and the waste rock dump, and secondly the<br />

materials handling operations and over the short term windblown dust from the TDF. In the unmitigated<br />

scenarios the PM10 ground level concentrations exceed the WHO-IT3 limit at all sensitive receptors.<br />

With mitigation these exceedances can be reduced and the impact area be<strong>com</strong>es much smaller. Some<br />

exceedances are still predicted, regarding the WHO-IT3 daily limit. The annualWHO-IT3 limits for PM10<br />

ground level concentration are not exceeded at any potential receptor areas in the mitigated scenario.<br />

A number of uncertainties are associated with the calculation and simulation of fugitive dust from<br />

unpaved roads and windblown dust resulting in expected conservative ground level concentrations<br />

(GLCs). This is in addition to the inherent model uncertainty of -50% to 200%. Therefore, with effective<br />

mitigation the impacts reduce significantly and can be limited to on-site only as indicated by the annual<br />

average GLCs.<br />

The proposed mitigation measures therefore focus on the use of water sprays, vegetation cover at<br />

relevant areas and suppressants to achieve certain control efficiencies and monitoring the effectiveness<br />

of these measures.<br />

Noise - Excluding one noise sensitive development (NSD01), the severity of the noise impact is<br />

considered to be low for all potentially noise-sensitive developments. Considering a worse-case scenario<br />

the severity of the potential noise impact could be a medium on NSD01. It should be noted that the<br />

unmitigated medium severity is based on the fact that there is the potential that the operation of the mine<br />

will increase the ambient sound levels at night by more than 7 dBA at this one property. As such, it is<br />

possible that the receptor (NSD01) will detect the change in ambient sound level, yet is it is unlikely that<br />

the receptor may <strong>com</strong>plain, as the total cumulative night-time noise level is still predicted to be less than<br />

35 dBA (a level determined to be the level where rural <strong>com</strong>munities may start to <strong>com</strong>plain about the<br />

increased noise levels). NSD01 (farm house), however, belongs to the developer, hence the<br />

implementation of mitigation measures can include no permanent occupation of the farm house during<br />

operations.<br />

Blasting - In the unmitigated scenario, the probability of blasting hazards resulting in either damage<br />

and/or creating a nuisance is low due to the location of the project site and limited third party<br />

infrastructure in the vicinity of the open pit. In addition, as the pit deepens, the blast will be contained<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page x<br />

within the pit. With mitigation the low probability is reduced even more because access to the fly rock<br />

zone will be controlled and proper blast design will be adhered to thereby minimising vibrations.<br />

Biodiversity – In the unmitigated scenario, biodiversity will be disturbed in the following ways:<br />

� Firewood collection can lead to loss of woody plants and their key role as a nutrient source;<br />

� Illegal poaching of game, game birds, reptiles and other animals;<br />

� Illegal collection and loss of seeds and plants;<br />

� Deposition of dust on plant <strong>com</strong>munities and impact on plant vitality;<br />

� Introduction of invasive plant species;<br />

� Interference with movement of large game;<br />

� Habitat fragmentation isolates organisms from wider populations;<br />

� The presence of vehicles in the area can cause road kills especially if drivers speed;<br />

� White light attracts large numbers of invertebrates which be<strong>com</strong>e easy prey for predators - this can<br />

upset the invertebrate population balances;<br />

� Noise and vibration pollution may scare off vertebrates and invertebrates and influence migration<br />

paths;<br />

� The presence of open pits and water dams may lead to the death/injury of animals; and<br />

� Pollution emissions, residues from the mining activities and general litter may impact on the survival<br />

of individual plants, vertebrates and invertebrates.<br />

In addition periodic surface water run-off and the existence of near-surface water resources are<br />

understood to be key ecological drivers for vegetation, vertebrates and invertebrates within and<br />

downstream of the proposed project site because it recharges the moisture content of the aquifer. This in<br />

turn supports a range of vegetation, in particular larger trees which in turn support a range of<br />

invertebrates and vertebrates. In addition, water points on farms, on which wild mammals and birds also<br />

depend, may be<strong>com</strong>e more difficult to replenish.<br />

However the project is located in an area of low biodiversity sensitivity and there are extensive areas of<br />

similar habitat in the surrounding area. Therefore, the potential significance is considered to be medium<br />

which would reduce to between medium and low with the successful implementation of the mitigation<br />

measures.<br />

Visual – The severity of visual impacts is determined by assessing the change to the visual landscape as<br />

a result of mine related infrastructure and activities. The most visible aspect of the proposed mining<br />

project will be the proposed waste rock dump which, at 40m high, is considered to have a high visual<br />

impact without mitigation. Other elements of the mine including the processing plant, open pit and TDF<br />

are all lower in height and benefit from the screening provided by surrounding vegetation.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page xi<br />

Overall because of the impacts of the waste rock dump, in particular views from the B1, the potential<br />

impact is considered to be high in the unmitigated scenario but reduces to medium with mitigation.<br />

Key mitigation measures therefore include:<br />

� Special attention needs to be given to the entrance to the B1, as well as to the eastern section where<br />

the new road diverges from the old. At these locations, a 2.5 meter natural looking berm needs to be<br />

raised to act as a screening wall. The berms need to be planted with local endemic plants to ensure<br />

that the views down the old road are screened;<br />

� All painted surfaces should blend into the natural surroundings.<br />

� Rehabilitation of all the faces of the WRD to grass / scrub bushes and some trees;<br />

� Reduce the angle of the WRD slope if not suitable for rehabilitation;<br />

� An agreement needs to be reached with the local municipality to ensure that the trees between the<br />

railway line and the road are not removed; and<br />

� For the closure phase:<br />

o Auryx Gold will establish a mechanism to ensure that the rehabilitation of the mine is properly<br />

funded to ensure that sufficient funds are available to implement the rehabilitation and mitigations<br />

required for closure.<br />

o All <strong>com</strong>ponents of the infrastructure used during operation, apart from the WRD and TDF, must<br />

be removed. The site must be visually ‘cleaned up’ so as to portray an uncluttered landscape.<br />

o The ground where processing plants were located must be decontaminated and then covered by<br />

the earth used for the berm and landscaped into a natural form in alignment with the natural<br />

hydrological patterns.<br />

Archaeology – The nature of the likely impacts on the archaeological sites include the direct impacts of<br />

earthmoving activities and the indirect impacts of accelerated soil erosion caused by the clearance of<br />

vegetation, and potential damage from blasting activities. Given the sensitive nature of the<br />

archaeological sites and when taking into account existing impacts from on-site exploration activities, the<br />

significance of these impacts without mitigation is high, but this could be reduced to low/medium with<br />

mitigation, as follows:<br />

� The sites identified by the specialist will be marked and protected, and the area within cleared of all<br />

encroaching bush. In the case of QRS 83/ 1 & 2, if the cutline running past the site will be used in the<br />

future, it should be re-routed to provide a 20m buffer around the site.<br />

� A formal “No-Go Area” policy, as set out in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP, will be developed and implemented.<br />

� All workers (temporary and permanent) will be educated about the archaeological sites that may be<br />

encountered and appropriate training will be provided.<br />

� In the event that mining activities will unavoidably encroach on the sites, the <strong>com</strong>pany is legally<br />

obliged to take all necessary steps either to protect the sites, or to re-locate the burials according to<br />

official directives. In the case of QRS 83/1 & 2, it may be appropriate to approach the National<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page xii<br />

Heritage Council for a permit to be issued under Part V (Sections 48 and 52) of the National Heritage<br />

Act. In the case of QRS 83/3, the site would also fall under the protection of the Burial Places<br />

Ordinance (27 of 1966).<br />

If there are any chance finds of archaeological sites that have not been identified and described in the<br />

specialist report, Auryx Gold will follow its chance find procedure. The key <strong>com</strong>ponent of which is to<br />

ensure that the site remains undisturbed until a specialist has assessed the site, assessed the potential<br />

damage, advised on the necessary management steps and advised on the requirements for stakeholder<br />

consultation and permitting.<br />

Traffic – The mine will have access off the main B1 road which is designed to carry traffic of this nature.<br />

Mine related traffic will travel from both the Otavi and Otjwarongo directions on a daily basis with all traffic<br />

using the B1 from which the re-routed D2808 will provide the site access. Traffic on the B1would be a<br />

<strong>com</strong>bination of Auryx Gold, other mining and businesses together with private and tourism related traffic.<br />

The highest levels of traffic would be likely to be experienced during the construction phase which is<br />

relatively short term. Levels over the operational life of the mine would be lower and traffic in the<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning phase will reduce to the extent that production related traffic ceases. In the closure<br />

phase traffic will be limited to just occasional trips for monitoring and aftercare activities.<br />

The proposed re-routing of the D2808 does not form part of the scope of this <strong>EIA</strong> and will be addressed<br />

in a separate <strong>EIA</strong> process. It is anticipated that this separate <strong>EIA</strong> will consider issues associated with<br />

road capacity and road design as they relate to an increase in traffic from the mine’s operation. In this<br />

regard, the assessment below therefore focuses on the safety of road users in general based on<br />

experience with similar type mining projects and assuming that the current level of service is retained<br />

and/or upgraded (if required).<br />

Economic – The life of mine (LoM) is characterised by an 18 month intensive construction phase<br />

involving the capital investment of some US$136 million, followed by operations lasting some ten years,<br />

merging into a de<strong>com</strong>missioning phase, followed by mine closure after 14 years. Clearly investment<br />

costs, operational costs and in<strong>com</strong>e will vary over the 14 year LoM, but the average direct contribution to<br />

Gross Namibian In<strong>com</strong>e (GNI) of the mine during LoM will be between US$ 58 million and US$ 60 million<br />

which is very significant in local terms and would amount to around 0.6% of the total national GNI of<br />

Namibia. Further, due to the value added or in<strong>com</strong>e multiplier effect, this direct impact will induce some<br />

US$ 103 million in additional GNI within the broader economy.<br />

The whole mining and processing operation will create an average of 454 jobs which will peak to 491 jobs<br />

in 2020. Studies have calculated that for every job created by a mine, a further additional 1.5 job<br />

opportunities are created by suppliers and contractors, which would result in a further 680 jobs created by<br />

suppliers, contractors and service providers.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page xiii<br />

Through employment and skills development, the proposed mine will contribute to the three national<br />

development goals of – reducing in<strong>com</strong>e inequality, increasing job creation and economic growth. It will<br />

also contribute to the Otjozondjupa Regional Council’s strategic objective “to improve regional economic<br />

development and employment”.<br />

The economic spin-offs from the mine’s construction and operations will create empowerment opportunities<br />

in a range of skills and activities. Employment provides in<strong>com</strong>es to the employees, their immediate<br />

household members and to others living elsewhere in Namibia who depend on cash remittances. Thus the<br />

assessment of this impact can be summarised as having a high beneficial effect. The work experience<br />

and skills gained through the opportunities that the mine brings will have lasting benefits for all employees,<br />

nationally.<br />

The negative land and natural resource use costs which are estimated to happen over the LoM have<br />

been measured at being just over 3% of the positive contribution of the mine. So the economic benefits<br />

clearly outweigh the negative economic impacts that may occur and the impact has a positive high<br />

severity both with and without mitigation.<br />

The other potential negative economic impact is concerned with mine closure. This is something which is<br />

<strong>com</strong>mon to all mines and must be planned for and mitigation provided because the major economic<br />

benefits that the increase in mining will bring to the country cannot be realised without the eventual<br />

impact of closure.<br />

Social - In the local context, Otavi has suffered out-migration and now has half the population it recorded<br />

ten years ago. By contrast, Otjiwarongo has grown by 10,000 people. Otjiwarongo’s capacity to meet the<br />

needs of the project, in terms of available goods and services, is good. Therefore it would be sensible for<br />

the two towns to anticipate and plan for substantial in-migration of around 7 000 people, shared between<br />

the two towns.<br />

In-ward migration can have positive and negative impacts such as:<br />

� Stimulating the local economy and <strong>com</strong>munity organization. Mineworkers will require housing<br />

and this will stimulate the construction of housing in both Otavi and Otjiwarongo. Wages and<br />

salaries will be injected into the local economy where they live.<br />

� Developing informal settlements which increase demand/ need for basic infrastructure –housing,<br />

clean water supplies, sanitation, electricity and waste management systems.<br />

� Increasing pressure on government services such as health and education facilities, their staffing<br />

and running cost requirements.<br />

� Increasing incidence of social ills including alcoholism, drug abuse, prostitution, gambling &<br />

criminality. Alcohol abuse is part of the accepted social norm in Namibia and is often stimulated<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page xiv<br />

by cash earnings which increase the likelihood of domestic violence (usually against women and<br />

children), unprotected sex and the spread of HIV. The influx of job seekers may increase over-<br />

crowding, which increase the spread of TB.<br />

In addition neighbouring farms are concerned about their security and safety, particularly during<br />

construction when up to 800 people will be housed on site for over a year. During public consultations,<br />

neighbours re<strong>com</strong>mended that the construction camp should be in Otavi or Otjiwarongo. Although this<br />

would bring economic benefits to the towns, it could cause a huge increase in social ills and health risks<br />

such as sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies. Experienced mine managers believe<br />

that it will be easier to restrict construction workers in a camp on the site and enforce tighter security than<br />

if it were in town. Auryx Gold will ensure strict control to prevent off-duty workers and friends entering<br />

and leaving the site at any time.<br />

Unmitigated, these social ills can have severe consequences which last beyond the life of mine but a<br />

number of policies and actions can be taken which can mitigate the impact and reduce its severity.<br />

However these efforts must be carefully co-ordinated with those of local government and the <strong>com</strong>munity,<br />

through planned engagement and public-private partnerships.<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the inward migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health/safety and security issue is<br />

therefore predicted to have a high potential impact and in the mitigated scenario this could be reduced<br />

but the challenge is significant because it will involve a focussed and <strong>com</strong>bined effort from the<br />

<strong>com</strong>mercial and Government sectors.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

The potential negative impacts associated with the proposed project are expected to be of mainly low to<br />

medium significance apart from air quality and some social impacts and therefore provided that the<br />

relevant mitigation measures are successfully implemented there is no environmental reason why the<br />

proposed project should not be approved. A tabulated summary of the potential impacts is presented in<br />

the table below.<br />

In addition the project will have significant positive economic impacts of benefit to the local, regional and<br />

national economy of Namibia.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED OTJIKOTO MINING<br />

PROJECT<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page xv<br />

Section Potential impact Significance of the impact<br />

(the ratings are negative unless<br />

otherwise specified)<br />

Topography Injury to people from hazardous excavations and<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Biodiversity Physical destruction of biodiversity from clearing land<br />

and placing infrastructure.<br />

Loss of biodiversity from the reduction of water<br />

resources as an ecological driver.<br />

General disturbance of biodiversity through a range of<br />

aspects including dust, noise, vibration, pollution,<br />

lighting, firewood collection, poaching, and vehicle<br />

movement.<br />

Unmitigated Mitigated<br />

High Medium<br />

Medium Medium<br />

Medium Low<br />

Medium Medium<br />

Surface water Pollution of surface water Medium Low<br />

Groundwater Dewatering and mine supply. Medium Medium to Low<br />

Groundwater contamination. High Medium to Low<br />

Air quality Air pollution High Medium to<br />

High<br />

Noise Noise pollution in the context of noise sensitive<br />

developments.<br />

Medium to Low Low<br />

Vibration Blast injury to third parties or damage to structures. Medium Medium to Low<br />

Archaeology Damage to archaeological sites. High Low<br />

Visual impacts Visual impact from key viewpoints. High Medium<br />

Socioeconomic<br />

impacts<br />

Economic impact including the positive impacts on<br />

regional and national economies<br />

High+ High+<br />

Impacts on land use and neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munities, Medium Medium<br />

In migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health and safety High Medium to<br />

High<br />

Traffic impacts Traffic impacts on users of the B1. Medium Low<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE <strong>EIA</strong> REPORT<br />

Page 1-1<br />

Avdale, an exploration and mining <strong>com</strong>pany, holds four Exclusive Prospecting Licences (EPL) within the<br />

Otavi Exploration Area. This exploration area is located in the northern central part of Namibia,<br />

approximately 50 km south of Otavi, 70 km north of Otjiwarongo and 2 – 3 km east of the National Road<br />

B1 (Figure 1-1). It is proposed to develop an open pit gold mine within this exploration area, referred to as<br />

the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project. The proposed mining licence area lies exclusively on <strong>com</strong>mercial land<br />

owned by the <strong>com</strong>pany and extends over a number of farms. In 2010 Auryx Gold Inc Canada took over<br />

the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine project and later (December 2011) <strong>com</strong>bined operations with B2Gold (a<br />

Vancouver based mining <strong>com</strong>pany).<br />

The gold was discovered in 1997 when airborne magnetic surveys were followed up by exploration and<br />

subsequent drilling. By February 2008, Teal Exploration & Mining Inc, then owning the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold<br />

Mine project had drilled 430 boreholes and had identified eight mineralised zones. These have been<br />

geologically modelled based on vein intensity and vein mineralogy, using a 0.4g/t gold cut-off grade.<br />

Inferred gold resources are approximately 1.92 million ounces with the resource grade of 1.26g/t.<br />

The proposed mine will consist of a single open pit (approximately 2060m long by 635m wide and 245m<br />

deep), RoM pad and stockpiles, processing plant and smelter, waste rock dumps (WRD), low grade ore<br />

dump, tailings disposal facility (TDF) and other ancillary development including access roads, support<br />

facilities, and soil stockpiles. A <strong>com</strong>prehensive description of the proposed development is provided in<br />

Chapter 5.<br />

Mining will be by conventional drill and blast methods followed by load and haul. Actual mining will take<br />

place up to year ten of the project after which the stockpiled low grade ore will be reclaimed and<br />

processed through the plant in years 11 and 12.<br />

The regional and local settings of the mine project area are shown in Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2<br />

respectively.<br />

The following operations and facilities are excluded from the scope of this <strong>EIA</strong> report:<br />

� Exploration drilling on the EPL (exploration activities have been covered by separate<br />

Environmental Management Plans since 2005).<br />

� NamPower power line and substation.<br />

� The proposed re-routing of the D2808.<br />

� Possible rail-spur line and siding if applicable.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-2<br />

The <strong>EIA</strong>s for these supporting services have not yet been conducted as negotiations are ongoing with<br />

relevant service providers. The <strong>EIA</strong> reports will however be submitted to the relevant ministries once<br />

they are <strong>com</strong>plete.<br />

1.2 PROJECT MOTIVATION (NEED AND DESIRABILITY)<br />

The motivation for the proposed project is economic in nature. Auryx Gold has conducted an extensive<br />

drilling programme over portions of EPL2410 and found there is an economic mineral resource that can<br />

be mined and processed. The proposed project has the potential to benefit the country, society and the<br />

surrounding <strong>com</strong>munities both directly and indirectly. Direct economic benefits will be derived from<br />

wages, taxes, technology transfer, capacity development, and profits. Indirect economic benefits will be<br />

derived from the procurement of goods and services and the increased spending power of employees<br />

through the creation of new jobs at the mine.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 1-1: REGIONAL SETTING<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-3<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 1-2: LOCAL SETTING OF THE PROPOSED OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE PROJECT<br />

1.3 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-4<br />

Prior to implementing the proposed project, environmental clearance is required on the basis of an<br />

approved <strong>EIA</strong> report and Environmental Management Plan (EMP).<br />

The overall task of the <strong>EIA</strong> process is to ensure that the criteria of sustainable development are met and<br />

TDF & waste<br />

that all identified and potential environmental and social impacts have been addressed and mitigated<br />

rock dumps<br />

where necessary. The term <strong>EIA</strong>, as interpreted in the Namibian Environmental Management Act 7 of<br />

2007, includes the “<strong>com</strong>plex of natural and anthropogenic factors and elements that are mutually<br />

interrelated and affect the ecological equilibrium and the quality of life, and includes:<br />

(a) the natural environment that is the land, water and air, all organic and inorganic material and<br />

all living organisms; and<br />

(b) the human environment that is the landscape and natural, cultural, historical, aesthetic,<br />

economic and social heritage and values.”<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-5<br />

The <strong>com</strong>mencement of the Environmental Management Act, List of Activities that may not be undertaken<br />

without Environmental Clearance Certificate and Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations:<br />

Environmental Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) were promulgated on 6 February<br />

2012.<br />

The required <strong>com</strong>ponents of the <strong>EIA</strong> report are included in Table 1-1 below:<br />

TABLE 1-1: REQUIREMENTS FOR <strong>EIA</strong> REPORTS<br />

<strong>EIA</strong> Regulation requirement Policy requirements Reference in the <strong>EIA</strong> report<br />

Details of the environmental assessment<br />

practitioner (EAP) that <strong>com</strong>piled the<br />

report and the expertise of the EAP to<br />

carry out the <strong>EIA</strong>, including CVs.<br />

Detailed description of the proposed<br />

activity.<br />

Description of the environment that may<br />

be affected by the activity.<br />

Details of public participation process:<br />

List of persons, organisations and<br />

organs of state that were registered as<br />

interested and affected parties (IAPs).<br />

A summary of <strong>com</strong>ments received from<br />

and a summary of issues raised by<br />

IAPs, the date of receipt of these<br />

<strong>com</strong>ments and the response of the EAP<br />

to the <strong>com</strong>ments.<br />

Copies of any representations,<br />

objections and <strong>com</strong>ments received from<br />

IAPs.<br />

Description of need and desirability of<br />

proposed activity and identified potential<br />

alternatives to the proposed activity,<br />

including advantages and<br />

disadvantages that the proposed activity<br />

or alternatives may have on the<br />

environment and the <strong>com</strong>munity that<br />

may be affected by the activity.<br />

Indication of methodology used in<br />

determining the significance of potential<br />

impacts.<br />

A description and <strong>com</strong>parative<br />

assessment of all alternatives identified<br />

during the environmental impact<br />

assessment process.<br />

A description of all environmental issues<br />

that were identified during the<br />

environmental impact assessment<br />

process, an assessment of the<br />

significance of each issue and an<br />

indication of the extent to which the<br />

issue could be addressed by the<br />

adoption of mitigation measures.<br />

List of <strong>com</strong>pilers. Section 1.3.2 and Appendix<br />

A<br />

Project proposal. Section 5<br />

The affected environment. Section 4<br />

Section 3 and Appendix B,<br />

Appendix C and Appendix D<br />

Section 1.2 and 6<br />

Section 7<br />

Section 6<br />

Section 7<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref.733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-6<br />

<strong>EIA</strong> Regulation requirement Policy requirements Reference in the <strong>EIA</strong> report<br />

An assessment of each identified The assessment and Section 7<br />

potentially significant impact, including -<br />

� cumulative impacts;<br />

� the nature of the impact;<br />

� the extent and duration of the<br />

impact;<br />

evaluation.<br />

� the probability of the impact<br />

occurring;<br />

� the degree to which the impact can<br />

be reversed;<br />

� the degree to which the impact may<br />

cause irreplaceable loss of<br />

resources; and<br />

� the degree to which the impact can<br />

be mitigated;<br />

A description of any assumptions, Assumptions and<br />

Section 8<br />

uncertainties and gaps in knowledge; limitations.<br />

In<strong>com</strong>plete or unavailable<br />

information.<br />

An opinion as to whether the activity Conclusions and<br />

Section 9<br />

should or should not be authorised, and<br />

if the opinion is that it should be<br />

authorised, any conditions that should<br />

be made in respect of that authorisation.<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mendations.<br />

An environmental impact statement<br />

Section 9<br />

which contains:<br />

Executive Summary<br />

� a summary of the key findings of the<br />

environmental impact assessment;<br />

and<br />

� a <strong>com</strong>parative assessment of the<br />

positive and negative implications of<br />

the proposed activity and identified<br />

alternatives; and<br />

� any specific information that may be<br />

required in terms of the Act.<br />

Management plan<br />

Monitoring programme<br />

Audit proposal.<br />

Appendix M<br />

Executive summary<br />

Contents page<br />

Introduction.<br />

See above<br />

Terms of reference. Appendix B<br />

Approach to study. Section 1.3.1<br />

Administrative, legal and<br />

Policy requirements.<br />

Section 2<br />

Environmental contract. To be issued by MET.<br />

Definitions of technical<br />

terms.<br />

See above.<br />

Acknowledgements.<br />

Appendices. See end of report.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

1.3.1 <strong>EIA</strong> APPROACH AND PROCESS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-7<br />

A summary of the approach and key steps in the <strong>EIA</strong> process to be <strong>com</strong>pleted for this project and<br />

corresponding activities are outlined in Table 1-2.<br />

TABLE 1-2: <strong>EIA</strong> PROCESS<br />

Objectives Corresponding activities<br />

� Provide a detailed description of<br />

the potentially affected<br />

environment.<br />

� Assessment of potential<br />

environmental impacts.<br />

� Design requirements and<br />

management and mitigation<br />

measures.<br />

� Receive feedback on <strong>EIA</strong> and<br />

EMP.<br />

<strong>EIA</strong>/EMP phase (April 2012 – July 2012)<br />

� Completion of investigations by technical project team and<br />

appointed specialists, in line with the terms of reference in<br />

the scoping report.<br />

� Compilation of <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP reports.<br />

� Distribute <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP reports to authorities and IAPs for<br />

review (June 2012).<br />

� Forward <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP reports and IAPs <strong>com</strong>ments to<br />

MET for review (July 2012).<br />

� Receive and circulate MET decision<br />

The <strong>EIA</strong> will meet the requirements of Namibian legislation including Acts and Bills and as well as Auryx<br />

Gold corporate standards and guidelines, which have been influenced by the Equator Principles 1 and by<br />

the International Finance Corporation (IFC).<br />

The <strong>EIA</strong> process as set out in the Environmental Management Act (No. 7 of 2007) is explained<br />

diagrammatically in Figure 1-3.<br />

1 http://www.equator-principles.<strong>com</strong>/principles.shtml<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 1-3: THE <strong>EIA</strong> PROCESS<br />

1.3.2 <strong>EIA</strong> TEAM<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Scoping Phase & report<br />

Public<br />

Participation<br />

(Introducing scope<br />

of <strong>EIA</strong>, key issues<br />

of concern &<br />

inviting <strong>com</strong>ments<br />

Submission of final Scoping report to MET<br />

Draft <strong>EIA</strong> & EMP<br />

Public<br />

Participation<br />

(Introducing<br />

baseline,<br />

assessment and<br />

mitigation<br />

Submission of final <strong>EIA</strong> & EMP to MET<br />

Review by MET<br />

Implementation of <strong>EIA</strong><br />

mitigation through EMP<br />

Page 1-8<br />

SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd (SLR) is the independent firm of consultants that has been appointed by Auryx<br />

Gold to undertake the environmental impact assessment and related processes. Werner Petrick (project<br />

manager) has sixteen years of relevant experience in Environmental Management and Impact<br />

Assessments. He was assisted in the management of the project by Alex Speiser and Chris Herbert.<br />

Alex Speiser has 12 years of experience of <strong>EIA</strong> preparation in Namibia and is an Associated Member<br />

(AIEMA) of the Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment, UK. She is also a member of the<br />

Southern African Institute of Ecologists and Environmental Scientists and a member of the Chamber of<br />

Mines (Namibia). Chris Herbert has approximately 20 years of experience and is a member of the British<br />

Royal Town Planning Institute. Alex Pheiffer, also from SLR, was the reviewer for the project. The<br />

relevant curriculum vitae documentation is attached in Appendix A.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

The environmental project team is outlined in Table 1-3.<br />

TABLE 1-3: ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT TEAM<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 1-9<br />

Team Name Designation Tasks and roles Company<br />

<strong>EIA</strong> project Werner Petrick Project manager Responsible for the SLR<br />

leader<br />

interface between Auryx<br />

Gold and the<br />

environmental team, and<br />

for ensuring<br />

implementation of the <strong>EIA</strong><br />

out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

<strong>EIA</strong> Project Alex Speiser Project<br />

Management of the <strong>EIA</strong> SLR<br />

management<br />

assistant/review process, team members<br />

Chris Herbert Project assistant and other stakeholders.<br />

<strong>Report</strong> <strong>com</strong>pilation<br />

Alex Pheiffer Project review <strong>Report</strong> and process review.<br />

Specialist Hanlie<br />

Air quality Air quality impact<br />

Airshed Planning<br />

investigations Liebenberg-Enslin<br />

assessment<br />

Professionals<br />

Morne de Jager Noise Noise impact assessment M2ENCO<br />

Stephen Stead Visual specialist Visual impact assessment Visual Resource<br />

Management<br />

John Kinahan Archaeologist Heritage resource<br />

assessment<br />

Quaternary<br />

Research Services<br />

Auriol Ashby Social specialist Social impact assessment Ashby Associates<br />

Jon Barnes Economic specialist Economic impact<br />

assessment<br />

Independent<br />

consultant<br />

Joh Henschel Biodiversity Project leader/ecologist GobabebDesert<br />

Research<br />

Foundation<br />

Coleen<br />

Mannheimer<br />

Vegetation assessment Independent<br />

consultant<br />

Michael Griffin Fauna assessment Independent<br />

Eugene Marais,<br />

Entomology and arachnid<br />

consultants<br />

Peter Hawkes &<br />

Tharina Bird<br />

assessment<br />

Dr Chris Brown Avifauna assessment Independent<br />

consultant<br />

WJ Meyer<br />

&Arnold Bittner<br />

Water scientist Groundwater assessment AGES &SLR<br />

1.3.3 CONTACT DETAILS FOR RESPONSIBLE AURYX GOLD PARTIES<br />

The Auryx Gold contact details for the project are included in Table 1-4.<br />

TABLE 1-4: AURYX GOLD CONTACT DETAILS<br />

Title Managing Director<br />

Name Bill Lytle<br />

Postal address PO Box 80363, Olympia, Windhoek<br />

Telephone number 061 416450<br />

Facsimile number 061 416499<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

2 ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND POLICIES<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-1<br />

The management and regulation of mining activities falls within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Mines and<br />

Energy (MME), with environmental regulations guided and implemented by the Directorate of Environmental<br />

Affairs (DEA) within the Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET).<br />

2.2 SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE ACTS<br />

Please note that the order of discussing the Acts does not necessarily imply their significance.<br />

2.2.1 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA (1990)<br />

Article 91 defines the function of the Ombudsman and 91 (c) describes the duty to investigate<br />

<strong>com</strong>plaints concerning the over-utilisation of living natural resources, the irrational exploitation of non-<br />

renewable resources, the degradation and destruction of the ecosystem and failure to protect the beauty<br />

and character of Namibia.<br />

Article 95 (l) states that ‘the State shall actively promote and maintain the welfare of the people by<br />

adopting, inter alia, policies aimed at … maintenance of ecosystems, essential ecological processes and<br />

biological diversity of Namibia and utilization of natural resources on a sustainable basis for the benefit of<br />

all Namibians both present and future; in particular the Government shall provide measures against the<br />

dumping or recycling of foreign nuclear and toxic waste on Namibian Territory.’<br />

Article 100 states that ‘the land, water and natural resources below and above the surface of the land …<br />

shall belong to the State if they are not otherwise lawfully owned.’<br />

Article 101 further states that the principles embodied within the Constitution ‘shall not of and by<br />

themselves be legally enforceable by any court, but shall nevertheless guide the Government in making<br />

and applying laws. … The courts are entitled to have regard to the said principles in interpreting any laws<br />

based on them.’<br />

Article 144 states that the general rules of international law and international agreements are binding to<br />

Namibia under the Constitution and shall form part of the law of Namibia. A list of the ratified international<br />

treaties and protocols is given in Chapter 5.6.<br />

The management and regulation of mining activities falls within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Mines and<br />

Energy (MME), with environmental regulations guided and implemented by the Directorate of Environmental<br />

Affairs (DEA) within the Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

2.2.2 MINERALS (PROSPECTING AND MINING) ACT NO. 33 OF 1992<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Mines and Energy<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-2<br />

The Minerals (Prospecting and Mining) Act, No. 33 of 1992 regulates the rights in relation to minerals,<br />

reconnaissance, prospecting and mining of minerals. Various license types and their implications are<br />

stipulated. The Act details reporting requirements for monitoring of activities and <strong>com</strong>pliance with<br />

environmental performance, such as disposal methods and rehabilitation. The Mining Commissioner,<br />

appointed by the Minister, is responsible for implementing these regulations and co-operates with other<br />

ministries.<br />

Subject to any right conferred under any provision of this Act, any right in relation to the reconnaissance<br />

or prospecting for, and the mining and sale or disposal of, and the exercise of control over, any mineral or<br />

group of minerals rests, notwithstanding any right of ownership of any person in relation to any land in, on<br />

or under which any such mineral or group of minerals is found, in the State.<br />

Section 50 (f) stipulates how to apply for a license and reads: ‘In addition to any term and condition<br />

contained in a mineral agreement and any term and condition contained in any mineral license, it shall be<br />

a term and condition of any mineral license that the holder of such mineral license shall:<br />

(f) prepare in such form as may be determined in writing by the Commissioner for the approval of the<br />

Commissioner;<br />

(i) an environmental impact assessment indicating the extent of any pollution of the environment before<br />

any prospecting operations or mining operations are being carried out and an estimate of any pollution, if<br />

any, likely to be caused by such prospecting operations or mining operations;<br />

(ii) if any pollution is likely to be so caused, an environmental management plan indicating the proposed<br />

steps to be taken in order to minimize or prevent to the satisfaction of the Commissioner any pollution of<br />

the environment in consequence of any prospecting operations or mining operations carried on by virtue<br />

of such mineral license.’<br />

Section 91 (f) sets out the particulars to be provided to the Ministry regarding any potential<br />

environmental aspects:<br />

‘(i) the condition of, and any existing damage to, the environment in the area to which the application<br />

relates;<br />

(ii) an estimate of the effect which the proposed prospecting operations and mining operations may have<br />

on the environment and the proposed steps to be taken in order to minimize or prevent any such effect;<br />

and<br />

(iii) the manner in which it is intended to prevent pollution, to deal with any waste, to safeguard the<br />

mineral resources, to reclaim and rehabilitate land disturbed by way of the prospecting operations and<br />

mining operations and to minimize the effect of such operations on land adjoining the mining area.’<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-3<br />

Section 128 sets out the removal of property and the remedying of damage caused to the surface of the<br />

land situated in those areas and the environment.<br />

Any person who fails to <strong>com</strong>ply with the direction issued by the Minister under this section shall be guilty<br />

of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding N$100 000, to imprisonment for a period not<br />

exceeding five years, or to both such fine and imprisonment.<br />

2.2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, NO. 7 OF 2007<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Environment and Tourism<br />

The Act was gazetted on 27 December 2007 (Government Gazette No. 3966) and the Commencement<br />

of the Environmental Management Act, List of Activities that may not be undertaken without<br />

Environmental Clearance Certificate and Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations: Environmental<br />

Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) were promulgated on 6 February 2012.<br />

Section 10 (1) (General Obligations) states that: ‘An Environmental Assessment <strong>Report</strong> shall contain, as<br />

a minimum:<br />

(I) where appropriate, an outline for monitoring and management programmes and any plans for post-<br />

project analysis;<br />

(j) a description of measures to be employed for de<strong>com</strong>missioning and restoration.’<br />

Further, Section 20 deals with the transitional provisions of existing environmental contracts granted<br />

under the current existing policy.<br />

2.2.4 WATER AMENDMENT ACT, NO. 54 OF 1956<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry<br />

(Note: the Water Resource Management Act (2004) has been promulgated but not yet implemented as<br />

the regulations are still being drafted. However, the Act describes procedures and stipulations which are<br />

much more stringent than those contained in the current Water Act.)<br />

Notwithstanding what is stated in the Constitution, the ownership of water is subject to some controversy.<br />

It would appear that as a general rule the question of water would depend on the form which the<br />

underground water resource takes. In terms of the current legislation, permission is needed from the<br />

Minister to extract water from a declared subterranean area. However, the water is then only subject to<br />

the control of the State, but is not, as a consequence of such control, the property of the State. The Act<br />

stipulates, inter alia, the most important procedures and requirements – to obtain the purification of waste<br />

water and discharge (Section 21 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)), the use of public water for industrial purposes<br />

(Section 11 (1)-(7)), the requirements to obtain a permit to use public water for industrial purposes<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-4<br />

(Section 12 (1)- (9)) and the steps required to obtain a water abstraction permit (Section 13 (2)).<br />

Section 23 of the Act requires environmental rehabilitation after closure of the mine, focusing on the<br />

potential of groundwater pollution and potential pollution caused by runoff.<br />

2.2.5 NATURE CONSERVATION ORDINANCE, NO. 4 OF 1975<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Environment and Tourism<br />

Nature Conservation Ordinance, 1975 (the Ordinance) establishes a guiding framework for habitat and<br />

species conservation, including wildlife management and utilisation. Important habitats are offered<br />

protection under national and private parks, or reserves. The rationale is to establish areas for the<br />

protection, preservation, propagation and study of wildlife, plants, landforms and cultural resources. The<br />

Government Gazette No. 240 provides the regulation relating to section 84 of the Nature Conservation<br />

Ordinance. These regulations clearly set out what is allowed and what is not allowed in the different<br />

existing National Parks.<br />

Relevant to the mining activities is that care should be taken to ensure that protected plant species and<br />

eggs of protected and game bird species are not disturbed or destroyed. If disturbance or destruction is<br />

inevitable, a permit must be obtained from MET.<br />

The regulations published under GN 240 (GG 2256 of 125, August 1976) state that a permit is needed<br />

from MET should a nursery be operated to propagate indigenous plant species for rehabilitation<br />

purposes.<br />

2.2.6 NATIONAL HERITAGE ACT, NO. 27 OF 2004<br />

Line Body: National Heritage Council<br />

The Act provides for the protection and conservation of places and objects of heritage significance and<br />

the registration of such places and objects. It also makes provision for archaeological ‘impact<br />

assessments’ (Part V: Permits, paragraphs 51 and 52).<br />

If applicable, the relevant permits must be obtained before disturbing or destroying a heritage site as set<br />

out in the Act.<br />

2.2.7 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND ENERGY ACT, NO. 13 OF 1990<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Mines and Energy<br />

The Act stipulates how to conduct the business in respect of petroleum products, including the application<br />

of health, hygiene, safety and environmental standards and requirements, including: ‘The duties of a<br />

person in respect of the protection of the health of others and in the avoidance of environmental harm,<br />

the precautions in respect of the keeping, handling, conveying, using and disposing of petroleum<br />

products and in respect of underground leaks or other spillages of petroleum products.’<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

2.2.8 NAMIBIAN WATER CORPORATION ACT, NO. 12 OF 1997<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-5<br />

This Act contains several explicit references to the environment and its protection. It provides for<br />

environmental impact assessments, for rehabilitation of prospecting and mining areas, and for minimising<br />

or preventing pollution. The Act describes the procedures for water providers. However, as an end user,<br />

the client should ensure that all stipulations are followed.<br />

2.2.9 FOREST ACT, NO. 12 OF 2001<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry<br />

Section 22(1) states that ‘it is unlawful for any person to cut, destroy or remove<br />

any living tree, bush or shrub growing within 100 m of a river, stream or water course.’<br />

Should this be unavoidable, a permit needs to be obtained.<br />

2.2.10 ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION PREVENTION ORDINANCE, NO. 11 OF 1976<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Health and Social Services<br />

A number of sections (5 (1), 7, 8 (1), 11 (1) (2) (3), 12 (1), 13 (1) (2) (4) (5) (6), 24 (1), 25 (1) (2) and 25<br />

(1) (2)) relate to ‘Air pollution control certification’, dust control, closure certificate, etc. At present, the<br />

Ministry does not grant any certificates as no procedures or guidelines exist. The best practice would be<br />

to notify the Ministry of the anticipated emissions.<br />

2.2.11 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ORDINANCE, NO. 14 OF 1974<br />

Line Ministry: Drug Law Enforcement Unit (DLEU) of the Namibian Police, within the Ministry of Safety<br />

and Security<br />

The Act regulates the validity of licences or registration referred to in Section 5. It deals with hazardous<br />

substances of Groups I to IV. However, while environmental aspects are not really explicitly stated,<br />

guidelines for the importing, storage, handling, etc. of hazardous substances are set out.<br />

2.2.12 EXPLOSIVE ACT, NO. 26 OF 1956<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Mines and Energy<br />

All explosives magazines are to be registered with MME as accessory works. Section 22 stipulates that a<br />

licence is required prior to erection of an explosive magazine.<br />

2.2.13 THE REGIONAL COUNCILS ACT (NO. 22 OF 1992)<br />

Line Ministry: Regional Local Government Housing and Rural Development (MRLGHRD)<br />

The Regional Councils are responsible for the planning and coordination of regional policies and<br />

priorities. Under Article 28, the powers, duties, functions, rights and obligations of regional councils<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-6<br />

include overseeing the general implementation of regional development activities. They have the power<br />

“to undertake, with due regard to the powers, duties and functions of the National Planning<br />

Commission…the planning of the development of the region for which it has been established”, bearing<br />

in mind:<br />

the natural and other resources and the economic potential of such regions,<br />

the general land utilisation pattern, and<br />

the sensitivity of the natural environment.<br />

2.2.14 LABOUR ACT, NO. 11 OF 2007<br />

Line Ministry: Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare<br />

The Act aims to “promote and maintain the welfare of the people and ..to further a policy of labour relations<br />

conducive to economic growth, stability and productivity”. It details basic conditions of employment, and<br />

health, safety and welfare requirements of employers.<br />

2.3 OVERALL PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (SAIEA)<br />

In addition, any proposed and existing mining project also has to adhere to the following 13 Principles of<br />

Environmental Management (SAIEA, 2003):<br />

� renewable resources shall be utilised on a sustainable basis for the benefit of current and future<br />

generations of Namibians;<br />

� <strong>com</strong>munity involvement in natural resource management and sharing in the benefits arising there<br />

from shall be promoted and facilitated;<br />

� public participation in decision-making affecting the environment shall be promoted;<br />

� fair and equitable access to natural resources shall be promoted;<br />

� equitable access to sufficient water of acceptable quality and adequate sanitation shall be<br />

promoted and the water needs of ecological systems shall be fulfilled to ensure the sustainability<br />

of such systems;<br />

� the precautionary principle and the principle of preventative action shall be applied;<br />

� there shall be prior environmental assessment of projects and proposals which may significantly<br />

affect the environment or use of natural resources;<br />

� sustainable development shall be promoted in land-use planning;<br />

� Namibia’s movable and immovable cultural and natural heritage including its biodiversity shall be<br />

protected and respected for the benefit of current and future generations;<br />

� generators of waste and polluting substances shall adopt the best practicable environmental<br />

option to reduce such generation at source;<br />

� the polluter pays principle shall be applied;<br />

� reduction, re-use and recycling shall be promoted; and<br />

� there shall be no importation of waste into Namibia.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

2.4 NAMIBIAN POLICIES<br />

2.4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

CONSERVATION (1994)<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-7<br />

Namibia’s Environmental Assessment Policy is legislated through the Environmental Management Act.<br />

The regulations have been promulgated on 6 February 2012 and are currently implemented.<br />

2.4.2 MINERALS POLICY OF NAMIBIA (2004)<br />

The main chapters deal with Mine Closure/Integrated Mine Use, Social Responsibility of Mining<br />

Companies, Environmental Rehabilitation and Waste Management. Of special significance to the mine<br />

are the following statements in the policy:<br />

� In order to reconcile the objectives of mineral exploitation and environmental protection, it is<br />

essential that the negative impacts of prospecting or mining activities on the environment be<br />

avoided, minimised and mitigated in accordance with national policy and legislation, and<br />

international best practice.<br />

� While mining forms a very important part of the Namibian economy, it also has contributed to major<br />

environmental degradation. With respect to current and future operations, there is a need for<br />

appropriate legislation to regulate the environment in mining.<br />

2.4.3 POLICY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIOTIC DIVERSITY AND HABITAT PROTECTION (1994)<br />

The Policy of the Conservation of Biotic Diversity and Habitat Protection was drafted by MET to ensure<br />

adequate protection of all species and subspecies, of ecosystems, and of natural life-support processes.<br />

This should be achieved by:<br />

� creating inventories, monitoring and appropriate research;<br />

� education and extension;<br />

� managing, assisting and advising the management of land and natural resources in Namibia;<br />

� legislation; and<br />

� co-operation with local, national, regional and international organisations working for biotic<br />

diversity and habitat protection.<br />

2.5 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND PROTOCOLS<br />

The following International treaties and protocols have been ratified by the Namibian Government:<br />

� Convention on International Trade and Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)<br />

(1973)<br />

� Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1985)<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987)<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-8<br />

� Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste and their<br />

Disposal (1989)<br />

� Convention on Biological Diversity (1992)<br />

� United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992)<br />

� Kyoto Protocol on the Framework Convention on Climate Change (1998)<br />

� World Heritage Convention (1972)<br />

� Convention to Combat Desertification (1994)<br />

� Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (2001)<br />

2.6 WORLD BANK STANDARDS<br />

2.6.1 IFC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS<br />

The International Finance Corporation (IFC) is a member of the World Bank Group and is the largest<br />

global development institution focussing on the private sector in developing countries. Its standards have<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e a global benchmark for environmental and social performance. They form the basis for the<br />

Equator Principles, a voluntary environmental and social risk-management framework used by 71<br />

financial institutions worldwide.<br />

The updated 2012 edition of IFC’s Sustainability Framework applies to all investment and advisory clients<br />

whose projects go through IFC’s initial credit review process after January 1, 2012. With this update, IFC<br />

expects to increase and better <strong>com</strong>municate its development impact; help client <strong>com</strong>panies <strong>com</strong>pete in a<br />

fast-changing, global economy; improve transparency and accountability; and better engage with<br />

<strong>com</strong>munities who are affected by their projects. The IFC’s Performance Standards define clients’<br />

responsibilities for managing their environmental and social risks as follows:<br />

� Performance Standard 1 – Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and<br />

Impacts;<br />

� Performance Standard 2 – Labour and Working Conditions;<br />

� Performance Standard 3 – Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention;<br />

� Performance Standard 4 – Community Health, Safety and Security;<br />

� Performance Standard 5 – Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement; and<br />

� Performance Standard 6 – Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living<br />

Natural resources.<br />

The Performance Standards require clients to engage with affected <strong>com</strong>munities through disclosure of<br />

information, consultation, and informed participation, in a manner <strong>com</strong>mensurate with the risks to and<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-9<br />

impacts on the affected <strong>com</strong>munities. Community engagement should ensure the “free, prior, and informed<br />

consultation of affected <strong>com</strong>munities, leading to broad <strong>com</strong>munity support 2 for the project” 3 .<br />

2.7 EQUATOR PRINCIPLES<br />

The Equator Principles are further international benchmarks and are based on the IFC’s Performance<br />

Standards and on the World Bank Group Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines (EHS<br />

Guidelines). The Equator Principles 4 are a framework and set of guidelines for evaluating social and<br />

environmental risks in project finance activities (table 2-1). They apply to all new projects with a total<br />

capital cost of US$10 million or more, no matter what industry sectors, without geographic requirement, and<br />

not specific to mining.<br />

TABLE 2-1: EQUATOR PRINCIPLES<br />

High level description of Principles Comments in relation to the proposed<br />

project.<br />

Equator Principle 1: Review and Categorisation<br />

All projects are categorised based on the magnitude of<br />

their potential environmental and social risks and impacts.<br />

Category A projects have potential significant adverse<br />

social or environmental impacts that are diverse,<br />

irreversible, or unprecedented. Category B projects have<br />

limited adverse social or environmental impacts, which are<br />

site-specific and largely reversible, while Category C<br />

The proposed project is considered to be<br />

a category A project.<br />

projects have minimal social or environmental impacts.<br />

Equator Principle 2: Social and Environmental Assessment<br />

A social and environmental impact assessment (S<strong>EIA</strong>) The <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP reports address most<br />

process, relevant to the nature and scale of the project, of the related issues as set out in Exhibit ii<br />

must be undertaken to address the potential social of Principle 2. Some aspects not covered<br />

environmental risks and impacts of the project, in the <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP report will be covered<br />

incorporating specialist studies where necessary. The as part of ongoing environmental, health,<br />

assessment is also required to propose relevant mitigation<br />

and management measures.<br />

safety and social management.<br />

Equator Principle 3: Applicable Social and Environmental Standards<br />

For projects located in non-OECD* countries, the While the <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP cover many of the<br />

assessment will refer to the IFC** Performance Standards applicable aspects of these performance<br />

(1-8) and the applicable industry-specific Environment, standards, some will be covered through<br />

Health and Safety Guidelines. The performance standards the proposed on site management<br />

address Social and Environmental Assessment and<br />

Management Systems, Labour and Working Conditions,<br />

Pollution Prevention and Abatement, Community Health,<br />

Safety and Security, Land Acquisition and Involuntary<br />

Resettlement, Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable<br />

Natural Resource Management, Indigenous Peoples and<br />

Cultural Heritage. The relevant EHS Guidelines include:<br />

General EHS Guidelines (environment, occupational<br />

systems and procedures.<br />

2 Broad <strong>com</strong>munity support is a collection of expressions by the affected <strong>com</strong>munities, through individuals<br />

or their recognised representatives, in support of the project. There may be broad support even if some<br />

individuals or groups object to the project.<br />

3 IFC Policy on Social and Environmental Sustainability (paragraph 20).<br />

4 www.equator-principles.<strong>com</strong><br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-10<br />

High level description of Principles Comments in relation to the proposed<br />

project.<br />

health and safety, <strong>com</strong>munity health and safety,<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure) and EHS Guidelines for<br />

Mining.<br />

The S<strong>EIA</strong> must also address <strong>com</strong>pliance with relevant<br />

host country laws, regulations, and permits that pertain to<br />

social and environmental matters.<br />

Equator Principle 4: Action Plan and Management System<br />

An action plan, the level of which must be appropriate to<br />

the nature and scale of the project, which describes and<br />

prioritises the actions needed to implement the mitigation<br />

measures, corrective action and monitoring measures<br />

necessary to manage the social and environmental risks<br />

and impacts identified in the S<strong>EIA</strong> must be <strong>com</strong>piled. A<br />

social and environmental management system must be<br />

established and maintained to implement the action plan<br />

and corrective actions required to <strong>com</strong>ply with host<br />

country laws and regulations as well as the requirements<br />

of the IFC performance standards and guidelines.<br />

Equator Principle 5: Consultation and Disclosure<br />

Projects which may have a significant adverse impact on<br />

local <strong>com</strong>munities are required to undertake a<br />

consultation process. The consultation process must<br />

ensure the <strong>com</strong>munity’s free, prior, and informed<br />

consultation, and it must be demonstrated that the project<br />

has adequately incorporated the <strong>com</strong>munity’s concerns.<br />

Equator Principle 6: Grievance Mechanism<br />

Consultation, disclosure and <strong>com</strong>munity engagement<br />

must continue through the construction and operational<br />

phases of a project. A grievance mechanism must be<br />

established as part of the management system in order to<br />

receive and facilitate the resolution of concerns and<br />

grievances raised by those affected by the project. The<br />

affected <strong>com</strong>munities must be informed about the<br />

grievance mechanism process, which must address all<br />

concerns promptly and transparently, in a culturally<br />

appropriate manner, and must be accessible to all<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity members.<br />

Equator Principle 7: Independent Review<br />

Equator Principle <strong>com</strong>pliance of the S<strong>EIA</strong>, action plan and<br />

public consultation process must be assessed by an<br />

independent social or environmental expert, who is not<br />

directly related to the borrower, on behalf of the lending<br />

institution<br />

Equator Principle 8: Covenants<br />

Covenants must be incorporated into the financing<br />

documentation whereby the borrower is <strong>com</strong>mitted to<br />

<strong>com</strong>ply with relevant host country environmental legal<br />

requirements, <strong>com</strong>ply with the action plan, to provide<br />

periodic reports as required by the financial institution to<br />

document <strong>com</strong>pliance with the action plan and host<br />

country environmental and social laws, regulations and<br />

permits, and to de<strong>com</strong>mission the facilities in accordance<br />

with an agreed de<strong>com</strong>missioning plan.<br />

Equator Principle 9: Independent Monitoring and <strong>Report</strong>ing<br />

The project is required to appoint an independent<br />

environmental and/or social expert, or to retain qualified<br />

The management re<strong>com</strong>mendations in<br />

the <strong>EIA</strong> and the plans in the EMP will be<br />

integrated into the formal EMS.<br />

A <strong>com</strong>prehensive disclosure and<br />

consultation process will be followed as<br />

part of the <strong>EIA</strong> process.<br />

Objectives and actions in this regard have<br />

been included in the <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP<br />

reports.<br />

This has not yet been done<br />

Auryx Gold is <strong>com</strong>mitted to these<br />

covenants.<br />

Auryx Gold will implement this as<br />

required/ when relevant.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-11<br />

High level description of Principles Comments in relation to the proposed<br />

project.<br />

and experienced external experts to verify monitoring<br />

information which is reported to the financial institution.<br />

Equator Principle 10<br />

Financial institutions which are signatories to the Equator<br />

Principles are required to report publically at least<br />

annually about their Equator Principle implementation<br />

processes and experience. The reports typically include,<br />

as a minimum, the number of transactions, project<br />

categorisation, and the implementation process.<br />

*Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development<br />

**International Finance Corporation<br />

2.8 NAMIBIA’S DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT<br />

This principle is relevant to financial<br />

institutions (banks) which are signatories<br />

to the Equator Principles.<br />

The following section describes Namibia’s long-terms strategic framework for developing the country as<br />

well as the development strategies and plans of the Region.<br />

2.8.1 VISION 2030<br />

Namibia’s Vision 2030 5 has been developed as a long-term planning framework for the country. It is built<br />

on a set of development objectives, which integrate economic, social and environmental dimensions<br />

underpinned by key concerns identified amongst the Namibian people. Its Vision statement is “a<br />

prosperous and industrialised Namibia, developed by her human resources, enjoying peace, harmony<br />

and political stability”. It provides the long-term policy framework for the Third National Development Plan<br />

(NDP3) 2007/08 - 2011/12, the up-<strong>com</strong>ing NDP4 and all other local and regional development plans.<br />

The eight major objectives of Vision are to:<br />

� Ensure that Namibia is a fair, gender responsive, caring and <strong>com</strong>mitted nation, in which all<br />

citizens are able to realise their full potential, in a safe and decent living environment.<br />

� Create and consolidate a legitimate, effective and democratic political system (under the<br />

Constitution), and an equitable, tolerant and free society, that is characterised by sustainable and<br />

equitable development and effective institutions, which guarantee peace and political stability.<br />

� Develop a diversified, <strong>com</strong>petent and highly productive human resources and institutions, fully<br />

utilising human potential, and achieving efficient and effective delivery of customer-focused<br />

services which are <strong>com</strong>petitive not only nationally, but also regionally and internationally.<br />

� Transform Namibia into an industrialised country of equal opportunities, which is globally<br />

<strong>com</strong>petitive, realising its maximum growth potential on a sustainable basis, with improved quality<br />

of life for all Namibians.<br />

� Ensure a healthy, food-secured and breastfeeding nation, in which all preventable, infectious and<br />

parasitic diseases are under secure control, and in which people enjoy a high standard of living,<br />

5 www.npc.gov.na/vision/vision_2030bgd.htm<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-12<br />

with access to quality education, health and other vital services, in an atmosphere of sustainable<br />

population growth and development.<br />

� Ensure the development of Namibia’s ‘natural capital’ and its sustainable utilization, for the<br />

benefit of the country’s social, economic and ecological well-being.<br />

� Ac<strong>com</strong>plish the transformation of Namibia into a knowledge-based, highly <strong>com</strong>petitive,<br />

industrialised and eco-friendly nation, with sustainable economic growth and a high quality of life.<br />

� Achieve stability, full regional integration and democratised international relations; the<br />

transformation from an aid-recipient country to that of a provider of development assistance.<br />

Achieving Objective (vi.) forms the crux of this project as the natural capital is both the gold underground<br />

and the productive land around it. Both should be developed for the well-being of the country.<br />

2.8.2 NAMIBIA’S MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS (MDGS)<br />

Namibia has been making variable progress towards the eight MDGs it set itself in 2004:<br />

� Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger<br />

� Achieve universal primary education<br />

� Promote gender equality and empower women<br />

� Reduce child mortality<br />

� Improve maternal health<br />

� Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis (TB)<br />

� Ensure environmental sustainability<br />

� Develop a global partnership for development<br />

The mine will make a contribution to these development goals through its contribution to the economy<br />

and any social upliftment programmes that it chooses to support. Its biggest contribution is expected to<br />

be towards the first goal, provided that it does not mine to the detriment of farming in the surrounding<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity and long term environmental sustainability of the area.<br />

2.8.3 THE FOURTH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2012- 2017<br />

The Fourth National Development Plan 2012- 2017 will be<strong>com</strong>e effective from 1 st April 2012. The<br />

overarching goals of NDP4, directly adopted from Vision 2030 are:<br />

� High and sustainable growth<br />

� Employment creation and<br />

� Increase in in<strong>com</strong>e equality.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

The strategy areas publicised so far include:<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 2-13<br />

� Basic Enablers – the institutional environment, education and skills, health and public<br />

infrastructure. The desired out<strong>com</strong>e is to have cleared the backlog of critical economic and social<br />

infrastructures and to have established the appropriate balance between maintenance and<br />

expansion of new infrastructures;<br />

� Economic priorities – the services and manufacturing sectors where Namibia has a clear<br />

<strong>com</strong>parative advantage notably logistics (focused on the port of Walvis Bay), tourism and<br />

manufacturing.<br />

� Social priorities – extreme poverty reduction and creation of 1000s of short-term job opportunities<br />

to increase the employability of unskilled youth.<br />

NDP4 intends to put in place a funding mechanism, including a Public-Private-Partnership framework and<br />

guidelines for concessions, including partial and full privatisation, to ensure delivery of infrastructure,<br />

while at the same time maintaining macroeconomic stability.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 3-1<br />

The Public Consultation process aims to ensure that all persons or organisations that may be affected or<br />

interested in the project are informed of the issues and can register their views and concerns. Building<br />

from there, the process provides opportunities to influence the project design so that its benefits can be<br />

maximised and potential negative impacts be minimised.<br />

The current best practice model is to engage in a process of continuous dialogue with the <strong>com</strong>munity and<br />

other stakeholders as plans for the project evolve and the <strong>EIA</strong> is prepared. A high level of interaction is<br />

maintained, potential and real social and environmental impacts are identified, and <strong>com</strong>munity needs and<br />

concerns are discussed and wherever possible built into the mine development plan, including decision-<br />

making and management practices. Good consultation helps foster genuine relationships with mutual<br />

respect, shared concerns and objectives between the <strong>com</strong>pany pursuing the development and the<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity (Joyce and McFarlane, 2001).<br />

The public participation facilitator’s role is to facilitate that process of dialogue to ensure there is<br />

transparency and accountability in decision-making and public confidence in the proposed project and its<br />

management.<br />

3.1 INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES (IAPS)<br />

At the beginning of the <strong>EIA</strong> process, ASEC drew up a list of stakeholders who needed to be informed<br />

about the proposed project. As the public participation process evolved, this list of Interested and<br />

Affected Parties (IAPs) has grown. table 3-1 below gives a summary of the current status of the list of<br />

IAPs which can be found in Appendix C. A total of 369 people were informed about the draft <strong>EIA</strong> by email<br />

and an additional 588 people registered their names at the Otavi and Otjiwarongo public meetings. They<br />

were presumably informed through the newspaper adverts, the posters and by word of mouth.<br />

TABLE 3-1: SUMMARY OF INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES<br />

Local and regional<br />

government –<br />

councillors and key<br />

officers<br />

Otjozondjupa Regional<br />

Council<br />

Otavi Village Council<br />

Otjiwarongo Town<br />

Council<br />

Ministries and<br />

parastatals – key<br />

officers<br />

Ministry of Mines and<br />

Energy<br />

Ministry of Environment<br />

and Tourism<br />

Ministry of Works,<br />

Transport and<br />

Communication<br />

Ministry of Agriculture,<br />

Water and Forestry<br />

Special interest groups Other IAPs<br />

Neighbouring farm owners<br />

and Tourism Lodges<br />

Otjiwarongo NCCI<br />

members<br />

Attendees of public<br />

meetings during <strong>Otjikoto</strong><br />

Scoping Phase PPP<br />

Relevant workers’ Unions<br />

Mining <strong>com</strong>panies<br />

Chamber of Mines<br />

Environmental NGOs e.g.<br />

Earthlife Namibia; Wildlife<br />

Society of Namibia; Namibian<br />

Nature Foundation<br />

IAPs who registered<br />

(see Appendix C)<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Local and regional<br />

government –<br />

councillors and key<br />

officers<br />

3.2 THE SCOPING PHASE<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Ministries and<br />

parastatals – key<br />

officers<br />

Department of Water<br />

Affairs<br />

Special interest groups Other IAPs<br />

Individual specialists<br />

Ministry of Education Press / Media<br />

Ministry of Trade and<br />

Industry<br />

NamWater<br />

NamPower<br />

TransNamib<br />

Namport<br />

Roads Authority<br />

Page 3-2<br />

Avdale <strong>com</strong>menced the pre-feasibility study and scoping phase of the environmental impact assessment<br />

for its <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project in August 2008. IAPs were invited to register and <strong>com</strong>ment on the project by way of<br />

advertisements in newspapers, through public meetings and by submitting <strong>com</strong>ments to ASEC. This is<br />

reported in Appendix B.<br />

3.2.1 SCOPING REPORT<br />

The ESIA scoping report, <strong>com</strong>prising the project outline and a number of specialist studies, was placed<br />

for public review at libraries in Otavi, Otjiwarongo and Windhoek prior to the public meetings held during<br />

the week of 8-10 July 2008. Additionally, meetings with Regional and Local Councils, key ministries and<br />

parastatals were held prior to the public meetings.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

3.2.2 ADVERTISEMENTS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 3-3<br />

Advertisements for the four public meetings, including a brief summary of the project, were placed in the<br />

following national newspapers (Appendix B):<br />

� The Namibian;<br />

� Die Republikein; and<br />

� Allgemeine Zeitung.<br />

Additionally posters (Appendix B) were placed at strategic points in Otavi and Otjiwarongo inviting the<br />

public to the meetings.<br />

3.2.3 PUBLIC MEETINGS<br />

Three public meetings were held as follows and were well attended (see table 3-2):<br />

TABLE 3-2: FIRST PUBLIC MEETINGS<br />

Venue and date Number of participants<br />

Otavi: 08 July 2008 101<br />

Otjiwarongo: 09 July 2008 34<br />

Windhoek: 10 July 2008 32<br />

Total attendance 167<br />

At each of the public meetings, a presentation was given by Teal Exploration & Mining Inc. and by ASEC<br />

giving an outline of the project and the main findings of the scoping report to date. A summary was<br />

translated into Afrikaans at the Otavi meeting. The audience was invited to give <strong>com</strong>ments, either<br />

verbally during the meeting or written on paper provided to each participant. They were also encouraged<br />

to send <strong>com</strong>ments later by fax or e-mail.<br />

Minutes of those meetings were e-mailed to all those registered interested and affected parties who had<br />

e-mail addresses in August 2008 and can be found in Appendix B<br />

3.2.4 ISSUES RAISED DURING THE SCOPING PHASE PUBLIC MEETINGS<br />

A summary of the issues raised at the public meeting are listed below. The issues will be carried forward<br />

and addressed during the current <strong>EIA</strong> process.<br />

Social Issues<br />

� The Company has made no decision on final site of plant, pit or where to make its base<br />

� What does Otavi need to do to attract development?<br />

� How can the <strong>com</strong>munity expect to benefit?<br />

� Will there be employment opportunities; training?<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� What are the employment opportunities for local people?<br />

� Health & safety aspects of the mine.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 3-4<br />

� What are the Mine Closure plans and what assurance can be given that they will be<br />

implemented?<br />

� Need for improved <strong>com</strong>munications with stakeholders<br />

� Need to avoid informal settlement be<strong>com</strong>ing established at the site.<br />

Environmental Issues<br />

� Over-high water consumption estimates.<br />

� Current calculations of 5% ground water recharge level is too high, unless invader bush is<br />

cleared<br />

� Monitoring groundwater<br />

� Preventing Cyanide pollution<br />

� Addressing accident spillage<br />

� Compensation for pollution<br />

� Who has the right to close the mine, (the “Watchdog role” of MET, DWA and MME)<br />

� Where will the waste be dumped?<br />

� A short mining lifespan should not jeopardize long-term farming in the wider area<br />

� Intended use of the remaining farmland, not used by the mine<br />

� Check new guidelines for the new Environmental Management Act<br />

� Mine closure – e.g. “proposed rehabilitation measures, what will be done to the tailings?”<br />

Infrastructure and resource needs<br />

� Re-routing the D2808<br />

� Up-grading rail passenger services<br />

� Do not harm groundwater levels for other users – rather get water from Kombat mine or the<br />

Eastern Water Carrier.<br />

� The mine should pay for any increased water prices caused by the additional demand.<br />

� Consider alternative power supplies<br />

� Be careful to avoid locating plant on solid calcrete.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

3.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND REVIEW OF DRAFT <strong>EIA</strong> REPORT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 3-5<br />

Following the Environmental Management Act of 2007 regulations, public consultations to review the<br />

draft <strong>EIA</strong> report was announced on the 12 th of June and ran to 11 July 2012. Table 3-3 describes the<br />

steps taken to inform IAPs and Authorities.<br />

TABLE 3-3: SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION PROCESS FOR THE DRAFT <strong>EIA</strong> AND EMP<br />

TASK DESCRIPTION DATE<br />

Notification - regulatory authorities and IAPs<br />

Notification of IAPs An invitation letter to <strong>com</strong>ment on the draft <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP reports<br />

were advertised and the summary <strong>EIA</strong> report was distributed to<br />

IAPs and Government bodies as listed in Appendix C.<br />

Site notice A site notice was placed at a prominent place at the proposed mine<br />

site boundary (Appendix B).<br />

Posters Posters, the same as the site notice but smaller, were placed in<br />

various public places in both Otavi and Otjiwarongo.<br />

Newspaper<br />

advertisements<br />

Review of <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP <strong>Report</strong>s<br />

Block advertisements were placed in three national newspapers<br />

over two consecutive weeks in The Namibian, The Republikein<br />

and The Allgemeine Zeitung.<br />

Copies of the advertisements are attached in Appendix B.<br />

12 June 2012<br />

From 12 June<br />

2012<br />

From 12 June<br />

2012<br />

12 and 18<br />

June 2012<br />

Review period The review period was publicised as from 12 June to 11 July. 12 June –<br />

<strong>Report</strong> availability Hard copies of the <strong>EIA</strong> report and EMP were made available for<br />

review at the following places: MET library in Windhoek,<br />

Otjiwarongo and Otavi public libraries, as detailed in the<br />

advertisements and IAP letters.<br />

Electronic copies of the <strong>EIA</strong> and EMP reports and all the specialist<br />

reports were available on request (on a CD) and were available at<br />

the Open Days.<br />

Summaries of the <strong>EIA</strong> report were distributed to all relevant<br />

authorities and IAPs that were registered on the project’s public<br />

involvement database via e-mail.<br />

The full reports and appendices were also available on the<br />

www.asecnam.<strong>com</strong> website.<br />

Public Open Days Public Open Days were held in:<br />

� Otavi;<br />

� Otjiwarongo; and<br />

� Windhoek.<br />

Neighbouring farmers were offered a special focus group meeting<br />

through the local Farmers Association, but there was no interest<br />

11 July 2012<br />

From 12 June<br />

2012<br />

19-21 June<br />

2012<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

TASK DESCRIPTION DATE<br />

Submission of<br />

<strong>com</strong>ments<br />

MET review of <strong>EIA</strong><br />

report<br />

3.3.1 PUBLIC OPEN DAYS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

and individuals attended the Open Days.<br />

Eighteen posters were displayed describing the project and<br />

showing the findings of the <strong>EIA</strong>. Personnel from SLR Consulting,<br />

the mine’s designer and from AuryxGold were present to answer<br />

questions and respond to <strong>com</strong>ments.<br />

Comments received in writing are attached in full in Appendix B<br />

together with copies of 22 SMSes received. A list of all issues<br />

raised during the <strong>EIA</strong> Public Open Days as well as the Scoping<br />

Phase is given in Appendix D.<br />

A copy of the final <strong>EIA</strong> report, including authority and IAP review<br />

<strong>com</strong>ments, was forwarded to MET on <strong>com</strong>pletion of the public<br />

review process.<br />

The Public Open Days to review the draft <strong>EIA</strong> were very well attended, as shown in Table 3-4.<br />

TABLE 3-4: NUMBERS ATTENDING PUBLIC OPEN DAYS JUNE 2012<br />

Venue Number of people<br />

Windhoek Open Day, 19 June 2012 21<br />

Otavi Open Day, 20 June 2012 564<br />

Otjiwarongo Open Day, 21 June 2012 123<br />

Total attending 708<br />

Page 3-6<br />

16 July 2012<br />

Many people studied the posters and asked questions of clarification. Comments and issues relating to<br />

the <strong>EIA</strong> were recorded and have been summarised in Appendix D. The major issues discussed at the<br />

various open days related to the potential impact on groundwater of neighbouring farms and towns.<br />

There were many job seekers and discussion regarding job opportunities, recruitment policies and how<br />

recruitment should be conducted. The potential negative social issues resulting from a construction<br />

camp on site was also a concern to neighbouring farmers as was the devaluation of their land as a result<br />

of the mine.<br />

3.3.2 MEETING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY AND NAMWATER<br />

As part of the <strong>EIA</strong> review process, DWAF and NamWater requested a meeting with SLR and Auryx Gold<br />

to discuss relevant matters on the groundwater model of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold mine. A meeting<br />

therefore held on the 10 th of July 2012. The minutes of the meeting is attached in Appendix B and the<br />

<strong>com</strong>ments and issues raised during the meeting are included in the Issues and Reponses <strong>Report</strong><br />

(Appendix D). The issues discussed during the meeting related, amongst others, to the relevant<br />

permitting- and associated groundwater monitoring requirements.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT ENVIRONMENT<br />

4.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-1<br />

The initial baseline specialist studies for the ESIA were conducted between April 2007 and February<br />

2008. In August 2008 the <strong>EIA</strong> scoping report was finalised and submitted to the Ministry of<br />

Environment and Tourism. After Teal Mining was taken over by Auryx Gold (Namibia) Pty Ltd. work<br />

resumed in July 2010. After the <strong>com</strong>pletion of the Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact<br />

Assessment of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project’ (ASEC, September 2010) a number of<br />

outstanding specialist studies identified during the preliminary ESIA report were conducted between<br />

December 2010 and December 2011.<br />

This Chapter describes the existing biophysical and human environment taking the findings of the<br />

various studies into account. Copies of the specialist studies are included as appendices to this report<br />

and referenced at the start of each section.<br />

4.2 CLIMATE<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project is located approximately 300 km inland from the west coast of<br />

Namibia. The area is characterized by low rainfall with extreme temperature ranges and unique<br />

climatic factors influencing the natural environment and biodiversity.<br />

This section describes the main climatic parameters within the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project area.<br />

4.2.1 SYNOPTIC CLIMATOLOGY<br />

The synoptic scale circulation of the region is largely the result of its location between the South<br />

Atlantic and Indian Ocean subtropical high-pressure cells. The high pressure (HP) belt acts as a buffer<br />

against the travelling depressions and anticyclones of the middle latitudes, as a result these systems<br />

are only able to exert an indirect influence on the local weather. The presence of the HP belt is also<br />

responsible for the <strong>com</strong>parative persistence of the plateau-level pressure distribution patterns despite<br />

considerable changes in upper air flow patterns and frequent marked changes in the weather. Due to<br />

its location to the north of the HP belt, the region is also accessible to the tropical cyclones of the<br />

southwest Indian Ocean, the effects of which may vary from drought in some areas to floods in others,<br />

depending on the proximity of the cyclone’s core (Torrance, 1972).<br />

During winter months, the HP belt shifts northward resulting in the prevalence of the generally dry<br />

southeast trade winds and the occurrence of enhanced anticyclonic subsidence and fine conditions.<br />

North-easterly and northerly winds gain prominence during summer months. The air mass properties<br />

and weather associated with such north-easterly and northerly winds depend largely on their path. Air<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-2<br />

masses moving overland via East Africa are dry with lapse rates steep enough to give rise to<br />

afternoon thunderstorms. Air masses with an oceanic track are much moister producing more general<br />

thunderstorms. The rainy season reaches a peak during January and February with the location of the<br />

Inter-tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) over the northern half Zimbabwe. The ITCZ represents the<br />

zone of convergence of the north-eastern monsoons (moist or dry according to its recent track), the<br />

southeast trades (generally dry) and the very moist Congo north-westerly airflow. The rainy season<br />

usually ends in March as the south-easterly airstream to the south of the ITCZ strengthens in<br />

accordance with the movements of the high pressure systems along the southern African coast. The<br />

drier air limits the rainfall to thunderstorms and showers, which gradually be<strong>com</strong>e more infrequent<br />

(Torrance, 1972).<br />

Coastal lows originate along the west coast and follow the coastline towards the southeast coast. The<br />

temperature and wind shifts associated with coastal lows resemble those of cold fronts are ore often<br />

mistaken as such. The coastal low is heralded by the onset of the southerly buster (cool, onshore<br />

airflow behind the coastal low) during which time temperature drops rapidly and pressure begins to<br />

rise. Although coastal lows frequently produce greater surface cooling than cold fronts, these systems<br />

are usually shallow (seldom deeper than 1 500 m) and seldom produce any precipitation other than<br />

mist and drizzle. The passage of coastal lows over coastal regions results in average to below<br />

average surface pressures and the occurrence of cool, very moist conditions and fair to strong winds<br />

with a distinctly southerly <strong>com</strong>ponent at and below the 900 hPa level. The coastal low system is most<br />

frequently capped by drier and warmer NNW airflow which arises from the dominant anticyclonic<br />

circulation (Preston-Whyte and Tyson, 1989).<br />

4.2.2 REGIONAL METEOROLOGY<br />

Meteorological mechanisms govern the dispersion, transformation, and eventual removal of pollutants<br />

from the atmosphere. The analysis of hourly average meteorological data is necessary to facilitate a<br />

<strong>com</strong>prehensive understanding of the ventilation potential of the site. The vertical dispersion of pollution<br />

is largely a function of the wind field. The wind speed determines both the distance of downward<br />

transport and the rate of dilution of pollutants. The generation of mechanical turbulence is similarly a<br />

function of the wind speed, in <strong>com</strong>bination with the surface roughness.<br />

Air temperature is an important parameter for the development of the mixing and inversion layers. It<br />

also determines the effect of plume buoyancy as the larger the temperature difference between<br />

ambient air and the plume, the higher the plume will rise. This in turn will affect the rate of dissipation<br />

of pollutants before it reaches ground level. In<strong>com</strong>ing solar radiation also determines the rate of<br />

development and dissipation of the mixing layer. Relative humidity is an inverse function of ambient air<br />

temperature, increasing as ambient air temperature decreases.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-3<br />

Precipitation represents an effective removal mechanism of atmospheric pollutants and is therefore<br />

frequently considered during air pollution studies. Evaporation is a function of ambient temperature,<br />

wind and the saturation deficit of the air. Evaporation rates have important implications for the design<br />

and implementation of effective dust control programmes.<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project falls within the central northern part of Namibia. Historical<br />

meteorological data are limited, with only short-term hourly data available since June 2007 from the<br />

on-site weather station. Regional data on temperature, rainfall, humidity and evaporation were<br />

obtained from the Atlas of Namibia (Mendelsohn et.al., 2009).<br />

4.2.2.1 Regional Precipitation and Evaporation<br />

Otjiwarongo falls within the higher rainfall band of Namibia, with annual average rainfall ranging<br />

between 350 mm and 450 mm. Rainfall is higher at Otjiwarongo decreasing towards Outjo, which lies<br />

west of the project area.<br />

Namibia has high evaporation rates, in general. Evaporation rates at Otjowarongo is between 1 960-<br />

2 100 mm per year increasing towards Outjo where it ranges between 2 100-2 240 mm.<br />

4.2.2.2 Ambient Air Temperature<br />

Maximum temperatures within the Otjiwarongo region range between 34-36 °C and occur mainly<br />

between December and February. The lowest temperatures are between 4-6 °C during the months of<br />

June to July.<br />

Frost is associated with the region but is only likely to occur for 1-5 days per year.<br />

The number of sunshine hours in the region is around 9-10 hours per day (Mendelsohn et.al., 2009).<br />

4.2.2.3 Solar Radiation<br />

In<strong>com</strong>ing solar radiation increases from sunrise (06:00) to reach a maximum at midday (12:00 –<br />

13:00) and then decreases till sunset (19:00). Within the Otjiwarongo and Outjo area, solar radiation is<br />

on average between 6.2-6.4 kWhr per m² per day. This is the highest solar radiation area within<br />

Namibia.<br />

4.2.2.4 Relative Humidity<br />

Relative humidity for the region, based on Grootfontein statistics, varies between 10% to 20% during<br />

winter months to between ~50-85% during summer months. The highest humidity in the central<br />

northern and central regions is in March as progressively more moisture feeds southwards from the<br />

Intertropical Convergence Zone.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.2.2.5 Regional Wind<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-4<br />

The wind field of the region represents a <strong>com</strong>bination of the synoptic-scale circulation and the local<br />

land-sea breeze circulation. Wind data for Outjo indicate high wind speeds in general ranging between<br />

~2-10 km/hr (7.2-36 m/s) (Mendelsohn et.al., 2009).<br />

4.2.3 OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE SITE<br />

4.2.3.1 <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Meteorological Station<br />

A Davis Vantage Pro-2 Plus Weather Station and a data receiver console with a data logger were<br />

installed at the project site during June 2007. The console is located inside a <strong>com</strong>plete system shelter<br />

that can be locked (see figure 4-1).<br />

Weather<br />

Station<br />

FIGURE 4-1: WEATHER STATION<br />

The station uses a wireless integrated sensor suite that runs on solar power. A Lithium battery<br />

provides backup at night and during cloudy days. The battery on the station needs to be replaced at<br />

least every eight months. The station can transmit data up to 300 metres in line of sight to the console.<br />

The console currently runs on alkaline batteries but it can be connected to a 220V electricity supply. It<br />

is expected that the batteries on the console will require replacement every three months if it is not<br />

connected to electricity. It is also re<strong>com</strong>mended that once permanent structures with 220V electricity<br />

are erected in a 300 metres line-of-site radius from the station, the console be relocated to these<br />

structures to ensure access to electricity and the security of data on the data logger. The data is<br />

logged at 30-minute intervals.<br />

Receiver<br />

console with<br />

data logger<br />

Wind speed and direction as recorded by the on-site weather station were verified by purchasing<br />

weather data from the United States MM5 database for the years 2008 and 2009. The MM5 data were<br />

extracted for the same location as where the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> weather station is.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-5<br />

The MM5 and on-site weather data show similar prevailing wind directions to be from the east and<br />

east-south-east with occasional airflow from the north-east and south-east. MM5 wind speeds are<br />

much higher in general than the on-site data, ranging primarily between above 4 m/s whereas the on-<br />

site data have wind speeds primarily below 5 m/s.<br />

Measured data are preferred above simulated meteorological data and since the prevailing wind<br />

directions are mainly similar between the two datasets, the on-site weather data can be regarded as<br />

representative of the on-site conditions.<br />

Period<br />

2008<br />

Period<br />

2009<br />

Measured Onsite Data MM5 Data<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Day<br />

2008<br />

Day<br />

2009<br />

Night<br />

2008<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Measured Onsite Data MM5 Data<br />

Page 4-6<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Night<br />

2009<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Measured Onsite Data MM5 Data<br />

Page 4-7<br />

FIGURE 4-2: COMPARISON OF MEASURED WEATHER DATA AT OTJIKOTO AND THE MM5 DATA<br />

FOR THE PERIOD 2008 AND 2009.<br />

4.2.3.2 Study Area – Meso-scale Dispersion Potential<br />

The analysis of meteorological data observed for the site provides the basis for the parameterisation<br />

of the meso-scale ventilation potential of the site, and to provide the input requirements for the<br />

dispersion simulations. Parameters that need to be taken into account in the characterisation of meso-<br />

scale ventilation potentials include wind speed, wind direction, extent of atmospheric turbulence,<br />

ambient air temperature and mixing depth. A <strong>com</strong>prehensive data set for at least one year of site-<br />

specific hourly average wind speed, wind direction and temperature data are needed for the<br />

dispersion simulations.<br />

On-site weather data for the period 8 June 2007 to 30 November 2011 were available. Data<br />

availability for the parameters used in the assessment are provided in Table 4-1. Data availability<br />

should be more than 90% (Hall & Spanton, 1999). The meteorological dataset from the <strong>Otjikoto</strong><br />

weather station has on average 76% data availability. For year 2007, the data only start in June but<br />

during 2008 only 21% data are available with the period February to October missing. The following<br />

years show good data recovery of 92% (2009), 91% (2010) and 88% (2011).<br />

TABLE 4-1: DATA AVAILABILITY OF METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS RECORDED AT THE<br />

OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT SITE.<br />

Data Period: 8 June 2007 to 30 November 2011<br />

Parameter Availability<br />

Wind Speed 76%<br />

Wind Direction 75%<br />

Temperature 76%<br />

Relative Humidity 76%<br />

Pressure 76%<br />

Rainfall 76%<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.2.3.3 Surface Wind Field<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-8<br />

The vertical dispersion of pollution is largely a function of the wind field. The wind speed determines<br />

both the distance of downward transport and the rate of dilution of pollutants. The generation of<br />

mechanical turbulence is similarly a function of the wind speed, in <strong>com</strong>bination with the surface<br />

roughness.<br />

Period, daytime and night-time wind roses for the period 8 June 2007 to 30 November 2011 are<br />

provided in Figure 4-3. Yearly wind roses for 2007 to 2011 are also shown in Figure 4-3 with the<br />

monthly wind roses.<br />

The prevailing wind field is from the east and east-south-east with a frequency of occurrence of over<br />

22%. Less frequent winds occur from the westerly sector. During the day, more frequent winds<br />

associated with high wind speeds occur from the east, east-south-east, south-east and north-east with<br />

almost 18% calm conditions. Night-time airflow shows similar patterns but with less frequent winds<br />

from the north-east and at lower wind speeds. The percentage calm conditions increase to 35%.<br />

The data reflect very little variation in the wind field between the various years. The year 2007 only<br />

reflects wind flow for part of the year with 2008 only at 21% data availability. The <strong>com</strong>parison between<br />

the years should therefore be limited to 2009, 2010 and 2011. All three years show dominant airflow<br />

from the east and east-south-east with some variance in the frequency of occurrence and wind<br />

speeds. During 2008, more frequent winds were recorded from the east-south-east than from the east<br />

with very few exceeding 6 m/s. The year 2009 has an increased frequent airflow from the east and<br />

stronger winds from the east-south-east. Winds from the east-south-east dominate during 2011 with<br />

high wind speeds, exceeding 6m/s, recorded from the east-south-east.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-9<br />

FIGURE 4-3: PERIOD, DAY-TIME, NIGHT-TIME AND YEARLY WIND ROSES FOR THE OTJIKOTO<br />

GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

The variance in wind fields and wind strength in January reflects the average prevailing wind direction<br />

from the east to the south-east but also frequent winds from the south-west. Between February and<br />

April, easterly and east-south-easterly airflow increase with also more frequent winds from the north-<br />

east. During the months of May and June the prevailing wind direction changes slightly to have more<br />

frequent flow from the east-south-east. This dominance is east-south-easterly flow continues<br />

throughout July and August but with increased flow also from the east. August months are associated<br />

with higher wind speeds as reflected in figure 4-4. Similar wind flow is reflected in the September and<br />

October wind roses with higher wind speeds in October. More frequent airflow from the south-west<br />

also starts in October and is carried through to November where the frequency of the south-easterly<br />

and easterly winds subside. Easterly winds dominate during December with less frequent airflow from<br />

the other directions. Wind speeds are again much lower than in the preceding months.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-10<br />

FIGURE 4-4: PERIOD WIND ROSES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE<br />

2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-11<br />

FIGURE 4-5: MONTHLY WIND ROSES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-12<br />

Frequency distribution of wind speeds provides an indication of the percentage time the wind speed<br />

exceeds certain thresholds. From figure 4-6 it is evident that the wind speeds are primarily below<br />

5 m/s with strong winds of more than 6 m/s occurring for less than 0.1% of the time. Wind speeds<br />

required to lift particulates are given as 5.4 m/s and occurred for 0.5% of the time. Moderate wind<br />

speeds between 2 m/s and 4 m/s occur for 26.8% with those between 1 m/s and 2 m/s occurring for<br />

24.5%.<br />

FIGURE 4-6: AVERAGE WIND FREQUENCY AND VELOCITY OVER THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO<br />

NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

4.2.3.4 Temperature<br />

Air temperature is important, both for determining the effect of plume buoyancy (the larger the<br />

temperature difference between the plume and the ambient air, the higher the plume is able to rise),<br />

and determining the development of the mixing and inversion layers. The minimum, maximum and<br />

mean temperatures recorded on-site are shown in table 4-2. Monthly average diurnal temperatures for<br />

the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> site are provided in figure 4-7.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-13<br />

TABLE 4-2: MINIMUM, MAXIMUM AND AVERAGE TEMPERATURES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD<br />

PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec<br />

Maximum 36.7 34.1 33.8 29.9 29.8 28.6 27.7 31.5 34.8 37.4 37.9 37.4<br />

Minimum 9.8 9.6 7.6 7.8 0.6 -5 -1.6 -2.1 0.1 1.4 5.6 7.8<br />

Average 22.0 21.3 20.6 19.4 16.9 13.9 14.1 17.9 22.4 23.4 23.2 23.4<br />

FIGURE 4-7: MONTHLY AVERAGE TEMPERATURES FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE<br />

PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

4.2.3.5 Rainfall<br />

Rainfall represents an effective removal mechanism of atmospheric pollutants and is therefore<br />

frequently considered during air pollution studies. The total rainfall for the project area is shown in<br />

Table 4-3and figure 4-8. Annual rainfall trends indicate summer rainfall (December to March) and dry<br />

winter months (June to August). The highest rainfall was recorded in 2011 with 215.5 mm for January,<br />

133.2 mm for February, 129.8 mm for March and 150.4 mm for April. The year 2010 reflects a different<br />

pattern with the highest rainfall recorded during December (88.6 mm). Over the three years (with<br />

<strong>com</strong>plete datasets), the highest total rainfall recorded was in 2011 (652.4 mm) with 556.8 mm<br />

recorded in 2010 and 318.2 mm in 2009.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-14<br />

TABLE 4-3: TOTAL MONTHLY RAINFALL FOR THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE PERIOD 8<br />

JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total<br />

2007 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 0 0 0 0 12.8 14.8 8.2 35.8<br />

2008 85.40 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 8 1 95.0<br />

2009 9.8 8.2 51.4 11.8 18.4 0.4 0 0 10.6 61.4 57.6 88.6 318.2<br />

2010 168.4 82.2 120.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 91.8 556.8<br />

2011 215.2 133.2 129.8 150.4 1.2 0 0 0 0.2 6.2 16.2 0 652.4<br />

FIGURE 4-8: TOTAL MONTHLY RAINFALL AS RECORDED AT OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT FOR THE<br />

PERIOD 8 JUNE 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011.<br />

4.3 GEOLOGY AND SURFACE WATER FLOW AND TOPOGRAPHY<br />

4.3.1 GEOLOGY<br />

The project area is underlain by Damara Supergroup intracratonic sediments deposited between 830-<br />

760 Ma. Swakop Subgroup strata underlie the project area <strong>com</strong>prising Okonguarri Formation, marble<br />

of the Karibib Formation intruded by Salem Suite granites. The mica schist both overlies and<br />

underlies the marble. No outcrops are seen in the project area and lithological details are derived from<br />

drilling data. Its mineral <strong>com</strong>position is predominantly quartz-biotite with calcareous and quartzitic<br />

intercalations. The marble formation is coarse grained, light grey to white with occasional graphite,<br />

biotite and calc-silicate layers and minor dolomitic horizons. Themarble-schist contact zones as shown<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-15<br />

in published geology maps are not accurate enough for detailed groundwater exploration work due to<br />

the 1:1 000 000 scale of the maps.<br />

The occurrence of Salem Suite granite outcrops or sub-outcrops in the area are erratic. These<br />

represent pegmatitic phase of the Salem Suite granitic intrusions to the south of the project area. The<br />

granites have an intrusive relationship with the Swakop Subgroup rocks in the area. In addition to the<br />

above lithologies, superficial deposits in the form of thick (up to30m) calcrete deposits occur in the<br />

project area. These formed by dissolution of carbonates at depth and precipitation at surface due to<br />

evaporation of discharged groundwater. The superficial cover is expected to enhance recharge<br />

potential in the project area (Seimons, W., 1990) but may also conceal structural features of interest.<br />

(Avdale preliminary study report, Groundwater resource assessment).<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> deposit occurs approximately 1 km to the northwest of the lower contact of the “Main<br />

Marble Marker” of the Karibib Formation. This marble unit represents a useful marker horizon and, to a<br />

large extent, represents the only outcrop in the region (Discovery of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> gold deposit in<br />

Namibia, J. Wilton, P.J.A. Lombaard, H.G.Philpot, Anglovaal).<br />

4.3.2 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND TOPOGRAPHY<br />

The project area is located in the most eastern parts of the Ugab catchment, an ephemeral river<br />

catchment draining westwards into the Atlantic Sea. The regional surface water divide to the<br />

neighbouring Etosha and Omatako catchments is located towards the east and north of the farm<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong>, see Figure 4-9.<br />

The main surface water flow in the vicinity of the mine site is in a north-western direction, following the<br />

gradient towards the Platveld basin (see blue arrows in Figure 4-9). There are no clearly defined<br />

channels found on aerial photographs or satellite images. Figure 4-9 shows the poorly developed<br />

drainage system which was digitized from the 1:50 000 and 1:250 000topographic maps. The planned<br />

mine pit is situated close to the local surface water divide which was calculated based on a<br />

<strong>com</strong>bination of LIDAR and SRTM data. Surface water flow in this region occurs as overland flow<br />

accumulating in pans and depressions from where it infiltrates or evaporates.<br />

The local topography is flat with a gentle slope towards the north-west with freely draining soils. The<br />

site is located at an elevation of 1500-1510 mamsl, just north of a local surface water divide. There<br />

are no well defined surface water drainage features on the site and no major surface water flow or<br />

defined channel flow is expected other than local events after heavy rainfall. No baseline surface<br />

water quality data is available for the site.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-16<br />

FIGURE 4-9: OTJIKOTO GOLD MINE: OVERVIEW ON THE LOCATION OF THE MINE SITE WITHIN<br />

THE REGIONAL CATCHMENTS (DATA SOURCE: ATLAS OF NAMIBIA) AND DETAIL VIEW ON THE<br />

MINE SITE AND THE SURFACE WATER FLOW DIRECTION AS WELL AS THE LOCAL WATER<br />

DIVIDE (BASED ON LIDAR DATA)<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.4 GROUNDWATER<br />

4.4.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-17<br />

AGES was appointed to conduct a baseline hydrogeological assessment of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine<br />

Project in Namibia. The purpose of this investigation was to qualify the requirements for mine water<br />

supply, mine dewatering and environmental impacts that could be associated with the proposed mine<br />

development. The focus area was on the farm <strong>Otjikoto</strong> and the surrounding environment which might<br />

be affected by the development. Additional work, such as water quality analysis, a detailed<br />

geohydrological model, water quantity and recharge models, was conducted by SLR and the reports<br />

are contained in Appendix E.<br />

4.4.2 HYDROCENSUS<br />

AGES worked with two sets of groundwater data, i.e. data from the hydrocensus conducted by Carr<br />

Barbour & Associates (February – April 1996) and from the onsite survey conducted by AGES in<br />

September 2007.<br />

During the 1996 hydrocensus water levels (see Figure 4-10) were measured at seven boreholes<br />

showing an average depth of 29 m, with the shallowest hole at 17 m and the deepest water level at 48<br />

m. The average yield of measured boreholes (16 in total) recorded in the DWA database was72 m 3 /d,<br />

with a lowest yield of9.6 m 3 /d and a highest yield of 326 m 3 /d.<br />

During September 2007 a further hydrocensus was conducted for the proposed project. A total of 40<br />

boreholes were surveyed. The majority of these boreholes are on-site exploration boreholes, and only<br />

one of these boreholes was reported to have a submergible pump installed.<br />

The project area is situated within a groundwater control area managed by Namwater (BIWAC, 2007).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-10: OTJIKOTO DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS HYDROCENSUS (1996)<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-18<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.4.3 AQUIFER CLASSIFICATION<br />

4.4.3.1 Marble Aquifer to the South<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-19<br />

The Otjiwarongo Marble Aquifer (OMA) is situated approximately 10 km to the south-west of the site<br />

and supplies water to the Omarassa-Otjiwarongo Water Scheme that supplies water to the town of<br />

Otjiwarongo.<br />

The total re<strong>com</strong>mended abstraction from this aquifer is 2.8 Mm 3 /a (7600 m 3 /d) (Seimons, 1989). This<br />

aquifer is classified as a sole source aquifer.<br />

4.4.3.2 Platveld Basin<br />

The mine area is situated on the eastern margin of the Platveld Basin of which the dominant geology<br />

consists of quarts-biotite schists, calcitic and dolimitic marble. This aquifer is also a sole source<br />

groundwater unit as groundwater is the only option for farmers. The approximate average yield of<br />

boreholes in the study area is 175 m 3 /d (Seimons, 1989).<br />

4.4.4 HYDROGEOLOGY AND CONCEPTUAL MODEL<br />

The geological formations form a number of hydraulic zones:<br />

� Calcrete forms the upper layer, which would enhance groundwater recharge. The calcrete is<br />

too shallow to form an aquifer but is expected to be permeable and would allow seepage from<br />

mineralised stockpiles.<br />

� The regional marble formations form a major aquifer that strikes south-east to north-west. The<br />

marble forms a fractured porous aquifer with a high permeability and storativity. Underground<br />

solution channels occur in the marble aquifers.<br />

� The schist formations in which the mine is located form a minor aquifer with permeable zones<br />

formed by faulting.<br />

� Regional fault zones link the marble and schist aquifers and form conduits for groundwater<br />

flow.<br />

The general direction of groundwater flow is from the Marble Aquifer in the south-east to the Schist<br />

and Platveld Aquifer in the north-west, following the topographic gradient.<br />

4.4.5 WATER QUALITY SUMMARY<br />

During October 2007 water samples were taken for 10 of the boreholes intersected in the September<br />

2007 hydrocensus. These samples were taken to determine macro and micro chemical analysis, and<br />

evaluated against South African water quality guidelines.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-20<br />

According to these guidelines the water is classified as water of marginal water quality (Class 2) for<br />

domestic water quality. This means that the water is only conditionally acceptable for potable<br />

requirements and disinfection and softening would be required to make the water suitable for potable<br />

and mine water supply.<br />

4.5 AIR QUALITY<br />

The information provided in this baseline description is taken from the ‘Air Quality Baseline for the<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project in Namibia’ by Airshed Planning Professionals (2012) (Appendix F). The<br />

nearest potential sensitive receptors are shown in Figure 4-11.<br />

4.5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In order to understand the baseline situation, on-site meteorology was obtained from the on site<br />

weather station and analysed (see section4.2). Meteorological characteristics of a site govern the<br />

dispersion, transformation and eventual removal of pollutants from the atmosphere. Pollution<br />

concentration levels fluctuate in response to changes in atmospheric stability, to concurrent variations<br />

in the mixing depth, and to shifts in the wind field. Spatial variations, and diurnal and seasonal<br />

changes, in the wind field and stability regime are functions of atmospheric processes operating at<br />

various temporal and spatial scales. Hourly average wind speed, wind direction, temperature and<br />

rainfall data measured over the period June 2007 to November 2011 were used to inform the local<br />

dispersion potential of the site.<br />

For a <strong>com</strong>prehensive baseline assessment ambient monitoring data are required. <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold<br />

Project installed eight single dust fallout buckets and a PM10 minivol sampler in November 2010. This<br />

served to measure background dust deposition and PM10 ambient concentrations, respectively. More<br />

than one year of data is included in this study to provide an indication of the background dust fallout<br />

rates and PM10 concentrations prior to the <strong>com</strong>mencement of mining operations.<br />

In addition, all existing sources of air pollution in the region were identified and qualitatively described<br />

based on the associated pollutants and potential to contribute to the background ambient<br />

concentrations and dust fallout levels at the project area.<br />

4.5.2 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY AND MIXING DEPTH<br />

The vertical <strong>com</strong>ponent of dispersion is a function of the extent of thermal turbulence and the depth of<br />

the surface mixing layer. Unfortunately, the mixing layer is not easily measured, and must therefore<br />

often be estimated using prognostic models that derive the depth from some of the other parameters<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-21<br />

that are routinely measured, e.g. solar radiation and temperature. During the daytime, the atmospheric<br />

boundary layer is characterised by thermal turbulence due to the heating of the earth’s surface and the<br />

extension of the mixing layer to the lowest elevated inversion. Radiative flux divergence during the<br />

night usually results in the establishment of ground based inversions and the erosion of the mixing<br />

layer. The mixing layer ranges in depth from ground level (i.e. only a stable or neutral layer exists)<br />

during night-times to the base of the lowest-level elevated inversion during unstable, day-time<br />

conditions.<br />

Atmospheric stability is frequently categorised into one of six stability classes. These are briefly<br />

described in table 4-4.<br />

TABLE 4-4: ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASSES.<br />

A very unstable calm wind, clear skies, hot daytime conditions<br />

B moderately unstable clear skies, daytime conditions<br />

C Unstable moderate wind, slightly overcast daytime conditions<br />

D Neutral high winds or cloudy days and nights<br />

E Stable moderate wind, slightly overcast night-time conditions<br />

F very stable low winds, clear skies, cold night-time conditions<br />

The atmospheric boundary layer is normally unstable during the day as a result of the turbulence due<br />

to the sun's heating effect on the earth's surface. The thickness of this mixing layer depends<br />

predominantly on the extent of solar radiation, growing gradually from sunrise to reach a maximum at<br />

about 5-6 hours after sunrise. This situation is more pronounced during the winter months due to<br />

strong night-time inversions and a slower developing mixing layer. During the night a stable layer, with<br />

limited vertical mixing, exists. During windy and/or cloudy conditions, the atmosphere is normally<br />

neutral.<br />

For elevated releases such as stack emissions, the highest ground level concentrations will occur<br />

during unstable, daytime conditions. Ground level concentrations depend on a <strong>com</strong>bination of wind<br />

speed and plume buoyancy. If the plume is considerably buoyant (high exit gas velocity and<br />

temperature) together with a low wind, the plume will reach the ground relatively far downwind. With<br />

stronger wind speeds, on the other hand, the plume may reach the ground closer, but due to the<br />

increased ventilation, it will be more diluted. A wind speed between these extremes will therefore be<br />

responsible for the highest ground level concentrations. In contrast, the highest concentrations for<br />

ground level, or near-ground level releases from non-wind dependent sources will occur during weak<br />

wind speeds and stable (night-time) atmospheric conditions.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.5.3 EXISTING SOURCES OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION IN THE PROJECT AREA<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-22<br />

The main activity around the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project is feedstock farming. The B1 national<br />

road is approximately 2 km west of the proposed mine with a few unpaved farm roads surrounding the<br />

site. These activities are likely to result in particulate emissions at a localised scale whereas SO2 and<br />

NOx are likely to result from biomass burning (veld fires). Traffic on the national road will add to both<br />

the particulate and gaseous emissions whereas windblown dust from exposed tilled land could be a<br />

significant source of particulate emissions.<br />

Table 4-5 lists all the criteria pollutants and the likely sources resulting in these pollutants within the<br />

vicinity of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project.<br />

TABLE 4-5: KEY POLLUTION SOURCES IN THE VICINITY OF THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT AND<br />

ASSOCIATED CRITERIA POLLUTANTS.<br />

PM10 and PM2.5 Mining operations<br />

Transport<br />

Dust entrainment on sand and gravel roads<br />

Agriculture (land clearing and controlled burning)<br />

Biomass burning<br />

Sulphur dioxide Mining operations<br />

Oxides of Nitrogen<br />

Carbon monoxide<br />

Ozone<br />

Windblown dust from exposed agricultural land<br />

Transport (vehicles and trucks moving along the B1 national road)<br />

Biomass burning<br />

Benzene Transport (vehicles and trucks moving along the B1 national road)<br />

Biomass burning<br />

Lead Transport (vehicles and trucks moving along the B1 national road)<br />

The contribution of various sources of emission to ambient particulate concentrations within the region<br />

is of interest given that elevated concentrations having been recorded. The most significant sources<br />

located within the region include:<br />

� Fugitive emissions from quarrying and mining operations - <strong>com</strong>prising mainly dust releases,<br />

with small amounts of NOx, CO, SO2, methane, CO2 being released during blasting<br />

operations. Currently there are no mines located near the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project.<br />

There may however be a few quarries in the region but this needs to be confirmed. Emissions<br />

from such small-scale quarry operations are likely to be very low and would result in negligible<br />

cumulative impacts.<br />

� Agriculture is a dominant land-use within the area surrounding the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project. The<br />

farming activities in the area <strong>com</strong>prise mainly of cattle and other feedstock farming. Particulate<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-23<br />

matter is the main pollutant of concern from agricultural activities as particulate emissions are<br />

derived from windblown dust, burning crop residue, and dust entrainment as a result of<br />

vehicles travelling along dirt roads. In addition, pollen grains, mould spores and plant and<br />

insect parts from agricultural activities all contribute to the particulate load 6 . As far as can be<br />

ascertained, no chemicals are used for crop spraying. These chemicals typically result in<br />

odiferous emissions. Crop residue burning is an additional source of particulate emissions and<br />

other toxins. Due to the small scale of farming activities these are regarded to have an<br />

insignificant cumulative impact.<br />

� Biomass burning - aerosols, black carbon and hydrocarbons are associated with biomass<br />

burning. Biomass burning is also a significant source of greenhouse gases, especially CO2<br />

and methane (CH4), black carbon and photochemical gases (NOx, CO and hydrocarbons) that<br />

lead to the production of tropospheric ozone (O3). The extent of NOx emissions depend on<br />

<strong>com</strong>bustion temperatures, with minor sulphur oxides being released. Burning crop residue<br />

may be a significant source of atmospheric emissions within the area.<br />

� Vehicle tailpipe emissions - significant primary pollutants emitted by motor vehicles include<br />

CO2, CO, hydrocarbons (HCs), SO2, NOx, particulate matter and lead. The main road<br />

between Otjiwarongo and Otavi are likely to make a minor contribution to the ambient air<br />

quality with in the vicinity of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project.<br />

4.5.4 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STATUS QUO<br />

A dust monitoring network <strong>com</strong>prising of eight single dust fallout buckets and one PM10 minivol<br />

sampler was installed at the end of November 2010 and is still operational. The location of the dust<br />

fallout buckets and PM10 sampler are shown in Figure 4-11.<br />

Eight single dust fallout buckets (following the American Society for Testing and Materials standard<br />

method (ASTM D1739-98)) were purchased by the mine. One of the onsite personnel was trained in<br />

exchanging the dust fallout buckets. The buckets are exposed for a period of one month (30 days ±2<br />

days). The exposed buckets are rinsed out with de-ionised water and poured into plastic bottles that<br />

are couriered to the Analytical Laboratory in Windhoek for analysis. The results are reported to the<br />

mine on a monthly basis.<br />

The mine is renting a PM10 minivol sampler on a monthly basis. The sampler was installed at the<br />

mine in November 2010. On-site personnel were trained in exchanging the PM10 filters. The filters are<br />

collected and replaced every six days. The filters are marked and sealed within containers provided<br />

with a log sheet that is kept up to date (including the date and duration of sampling and the flow rate of<br />

the sampler). The filters are then couriered to the Airshed offices in South Africa where they are sent<br />

for analysis.<br />

6 World Health Organization, 2000<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.5.4.1 Dust fallout for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-24<br />

A total of eight dust buckets were located close to potential future sources of particulates such as the<br />

proposed unpaved roads, tailings dam, pit area and waste rock dump. In addition, some of the single<br />

dust buckets were located in close proximity to sensitive receptor areas located in close proximity to<br />

the proposed project site.<br />

The monitored dust fallout results for the period November 2010 to January 2012 are shown in table<br />

4-6.<br />

From the data collected over the 15 months, dust fallout rates were in general low and well below the<br />

South African National Standard (SANS) limit for residential areas of 600 mg/m²/day except during<br />

September 2011 at OM1 (831 mg/m²/day). This dust fallout unit is located to the east of the proposed<br />

mining operations. It is likely, that since such high dust fallout was only collected for one month, it was<br />

due to localised activities near OM1.<br />

In general, OM2, has the lowest dust fallout rates ranging between 7 and 91 mg/m²/day. This dust<br />

fallout unit is located next to the B2, away from main dust generating activities.<br />

Since August 2011 to January 2012, OM3 collected the highest dust fallout ranging between 130 to<br />

280 mg/m²/day. OM3 is located next to the entrance to the mine property and collected dust fallout is<br />

due to dust generation on the unpaved access roads associated with the on-site prospecting activities.<br />

A decrease at OM3 was observed during September and December 2011 which may be due to a<br />

decrease in on-site activities. However these results do not represent baseline for this location<br />

because of the influence of the on-site activities.<br />

OM8, located next to the weather station on-site, collected average dust fallout rates between 2 and<br />

298 mg/m²/day.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-25<br />

FIGURE 4-11: LOCATION OF THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT MONITORING NETWORK AND NEAREST POTENTIAL SENSITIVE RECEPTORS.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-26<br />

TABLE 4-6: DUST FALLOUT RATES FROM THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT MONITORING NETWORK (NOVEMBER 2010 TO JANUARY 2012).<br />

Bucket<br />

Number<br />

Dust fallout rate (mg/m²/day)<br />

Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12<br />

OM 01 137 57 18 18 42 60 11 N.D. N.D. 353 831 4 33 59 115<br />

OM 02 51 91 26 13 53 24 33 N.D. N.D. 35 11 7 75 9 75<br />

OM 03 320 168 7 22 44 29 66 N.D. N.D. 231 57 130 271 75 280<br />

OM 04 124 119 7 35 90 26 13 N.D. N.D. 2 60 22 9 37 29<br />

OM 05 104 102 13 18 190 16 9 N.D. N.D. 88 7 16 44 13 7<br />

OM 06 104 102 38 13 79 9 29 N.D. N.D. 15 37 121 95 20 209<br />

OM 07 27 563 27 22 73 38 9 N.D. N.D. 174 35 37 77 18 190<br />

OM 08 298 249 16 75 44 62 15 N.D. N.D. 2 115 146 112 59 227<br />

Note: N.D. – No data.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.5.4.2 PM10 results for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-27<br />

The position of the PM10 monitor in relation to the proposed project site is shown in Figure 4-11. The<br />

PM10 monitor is located at the on-site weather station, almost in the centre of the proposed mine area.<br />

Sampled daily PM10 results for the period 20 April to 12 October 2010 are shown in figure 4-12 with the<br />

averages shown in Table 5-1. Missing data from the first three months was due to technical problems with<br />

the latest data from October 2010 to January 2011 awaiting delivery and analysis. A total of 17 samples<br />

were analysed, resulting in a 53% data recovery.<br />

Measured PM10 daily concentrations are moderate in general, not exceeding the WHO_IT3 guideline.<br />

The more stringent WHO guideline was however exceeded on six occasions, mostly within the winter<br />

month of June. It should be noted however that the data record is very limited and the general<br />

background PM10 may be higher.<br />

FIGURE 4-12: PM10 AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR THE PERIOD 20 APRIL TO 12 OCTOBER 2011.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-28<br />

TABLE 4-7: DAILY PM10 CONCENTRATIONS AS MEASURED AT THE OTJIKOTO GOLD PROJECT.<br />

Filter description Date taken to field PM10 24-hour Concentrations (µg/m³)<br />

A26 not known 41.67<br />

A27 not known Damaged filter<br />

A28 not known 55.56<br />

A29 not known Damaged filter<br />

A30 not known 27.78<br />

A31 20/04/2011 10.58<br />

A32 27/04/2011 55.56<br />

A33 04/05/2011 69.44<br />

A34 11/05/2011 Damaged filter<br />

A35 18/05/2011 41.67<br />

A36 24/05/2011 27.78<br />

A37 01/06/2011 55.56<br />

A38 08/06/2011 55.56<br />

A39 17/06/2011 Damaged filter<br />

A40 22/06/2011 69.44<br />

A41 28/06/2011 13.89<br />

A42 06/07/2011 27.78<br />

A43 13/07/2011 Damaged filter<br />

A44 20/07/2011 Damaged filter<br />

A45 27/07/2011 Damaged filter<br />

A46 03/08/2011 13.89<br />

A47 10/08/2011 Damaged filter<br />

A48 17/08/2011 N.D.<br />

A49 24/08/2011 N.D.<br />

A50 30/08/2011 N.D.<br />

A51 05/09/2011 N.D.<br />

A52 11/09/2011 N.D.<br />

A53 17/09/2011 N.D.<br />

A54 23/09/2011 N.D.<br />

A55 29/09/2011 N.D.<br />

A56 05/10/2011 27.78<br />

A57 11/10/2011 41.67<br />

A58 17/10/2011 41.67<br />

Maximum 69.44<br />

Average 39.84<br />

Notes: N.D. – no data;<br />

WHO IT-3 guideline of 75 µg/m³ and Ambient Air Quality Guideline of 50 µg/m³ for highest daily<br />

average concentrations.<br />

WHO IT-3 guideline of 30 µg/m³ and Ambient Air Quality Guideline of 20 µg/m³ for annual<br />

average concentrations.<br />

4.5.5 SUMMARY<br />

The main findings from the air quality baseline characterisation are:<br />

� The prevailing wind field is from the east-south-east and east, with occasional airflow from the<br />

south-east, the north-east and the south-west. Wind speeds are generally low, with 68.5% of the<br />

time where wind speeds are below 2 m/s. Calm conditions (i.e. wind speeds of less than 1 m/s)<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-29<br />

occurred for 44% of the time. Strong winds (i.e. >5.4 m/s) required to lift and disperse particulates<br />

were recorded for 0.5% of the time. Data recovery for 2007and 2008 were poor but the last three<br />

years were good, ranging between 88% and 92%.<br />

� Annual rainfall trends indicate summer rainfall (November to February) and dry winter months<br />

(June and August). The total rainfall measured at the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project site was318.2 mm in<br />

2009, 556.8 mm in 2010 and 652.4 mm in 2011.<br />

� Data from the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project dust fallout monitoring network indicate dust fallout rates<br />

generally below the SANS residential limit of 600 mg/m²/day. The highest dust fallout collected<br />

was during September 2011 at OM1, exceeding the SANS residential limit. OM1 serves as a<br />

background unit and it is suspected that this was due to localised dust generating activities near<br />

the unit. On average, OM3 located next to the entrance to the mine property, collected the<br />

highest dust fallout and this is due to dust generation on the unpaved access roads.<br />

� The PM10 sampler located at the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> weather station recorded moderate PM10<br />

concentrations not exceeding the WHO-IT3 limit. The highest concentration measured was 69.4<br />

µg/m³ with an average of 39.8 µg/m³. The data retrieval is however poor at 53%.<br />

4.6 BIODIVERSITY<br />

4.6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Biological diversity is a term that was coined at the 1992 Earth summit in Rio de Janeiro. It can be<br />

described as the variability amongst living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial,<br />

marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological <strong>com</strong>plexities of which they are a part; this<br />

includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems.<br />

To understand biodiversity one must appreciate all its <strong>com</strong>ponents. Biodiversity includes:<br />

� Biodiversity patterns – the species of plants and animals and the different habitats in which they<br />

live.<br />

� Ecosystem processes – the <strong>com</strong>plex interactions (events, reactions or operations) among biotic<br />

and abiotic elements of ecosystems that lead to a definite result. These processes include energy<br />

cycles, nutrient cycles, oxygen cycles and water cycles and fluxes (Wallace 2007).<br />

� Ecosystem services – the aspects of ecosystems utilised (actively or passively) to produce<br />

human wellbeing. Ecosystem services include ecosystem organisation or structure as well as<br />

processes/functions if they are utilised by humanity either directly or indirectly (Fisher et al.,<br />

2009).<br />

This chapter consolidates the results from the vegetation, invertebrate, vertebrate and terrestrial ecology<br />

studies into one integrated chapter. The individual reports can be found in Appendix H.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.6.2 REGIONAL CONTEXT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-30<br />

The area falls within the semi-arid Thornbush Shrubland vegetation type of the Acacia Tree-and-shrub<br />

Savanna Biome. The area receives a mean annual rainfall of about 450 mm, with a coefficient of<br />

variation of about 30%, meaning that rainfall is fairly unpredictable. The mean annual evaporation rate is<br />

about 2,000 mm. The landscape is characterized by dense tree and bush savanna, dominated by Acacia<br />

species and annual and perennial grasses. Bush density and grass <strong>com</strong>position are largely determined<br />

by micro-habitat conditions and rangeland management practices. Throughout the focal areas the<br />

vegetation is dense (difficult to walk through) and highly bush-encroached. Between April 2007 and<br />

February 2008 a number of specialist studies were conducted. The findings and re<strong>com</strong>mendations of<br />

each study are summarised below. Figure 4-13 summarises the findings of the specialist studies to date.<br />

4.6.3 VEGETATION<br />

Two site visits were conducted to investigate the flora of the proposed project area. The first one was<br />

carried out in April 2007 during the dry season focusing on the general vegetation of the area; while the<br />

second visit was conducted beginning of February 2008 after good rains had been received in the area<br />

investigating specifically geophytes which often are only be seen early in the rainy season. Vegetation in<br />

seasonally wet areas also varies with the degree of water logging. Many Namibian geophytes are under-<br />

collected and little-known, and they are very often neglected in studies such as these due to time<br />

constraints.<br />

The greater part of the project area falls within the Tree and Shrub savanna zone, which is listed as the<br />

dominant vegetation type in central Namibia. It is characterised predominantly by Acacia spp., including<br />

A. reficiens, A. hebeclada subsp. hebeclada, A. mellifera subsp. detinens, A. fleckii, A. erubescens and<br />

several others. Other <strong>com</strong>mon tree species include Philenoptera nelsii and Peltophorum africanum in<br />

sandy areas, Combretum apiculatum subsp. apiculatum on limestone and rocky outcrops, and Ziziphus<br />

mucronata in various habitats. In 1971 Giess first noted a tendency towards bush encroachment in the<br />

zone by A. mellifera subsp. detinens in particular.<br />

The specific area affected by the proposed mine includes two habitat types. On the farms <strong>Otjikoto</strong> and<br />

Gerhardshausen there is a large ephemeral pan surrounded by woody species, and the rest of the area is<br />

<strong>com</strong>posed of thornbush thicket. The latter includes both sandy areas and calcrete-rocky areas, including<br />

a prominent ridge (see Figure 4-13). Vegetation differs considerably between the pan and the thicket, but<br />

the rocky and sandy areas of the thicket vegetation tend to grade into one another, with many species<br />

(particularly trees and shrubs) <strong>com</strong>mon to both. Vegetation in these zones is discussed in more detail in<br />

the sections below.<br />

Diversity was slightly higher in the thicket habitat (65 vs 61 species), although overall it was quite low,<br />

most probably due to the highly bush-encroached nature of the site. The riparian vegetation of the pan<br />

supports a slightly higher concentration of protected tree species.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-13: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF SPECIALIST STUDIES, JULY 2007<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-31<br />

In all, 107 plant species (including infraspecific taxa) were found on the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> study site (Appendix H<br />

provides the full plant species list including conservation status and voucher numbers). Sixty-two voucher<br />

specimens were collected and will be lodged at the National Herbarium in Windhoek. Appendix H lists the<br />

species that have been collected or recorded for the whole of the four quarter-degree squares within<br />

which the mine falls. No red data species have been recorded for the area. However, eight endemic,<br />

seven near-endemic and thirteen protected species appear in this list. Those of these that were observed<br />

in the project area during this visit are listed in table 4-8, with <strong>com</strong>ments on their conservation status<br />

provided.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-32<br />

The species of most concern is Combretum imberbe, which is be<strong>com</strong>ing threatened by illegal harvesting<br />

for charcoal and timber. The rest of the protected and endemic species are neither highly restricted nor<br />

very un<strong>com</strong>mon or rare where they occur. In fact most of them are <strong>com</strong>mon and widespread.<br />

It is highly likely that Aloe littoralis, a protected succulent, occurs on site even though it has not been<br />

recorded.<br />

TABLE 4-8: PROTECTED, ENDEMIC AND NEAR-ENDEMIC SPECIES THAT OCCUR ON THE OTJIKOTO<br />

PROJECT AREA.<br />

Species Status<br />

Occurrence<br />

Thicket Pan<br />

Comment<br />

Acacia erioloba Protected (Forestry Act) X X Very few seen, very wide<br />

(camel-thorn)<br />

distribution in Namibia<br />

Acrotome fleckii Endemic Annual, widespread, <strong>com</strong>mon<br />

Albizia anthelmintica Protected (Forestry Act) X Very few seen, reasonably wide<br />

(worm-cure albizia)<br />

distribution in Namibia<br />

Albuca rautanenii Endemic Reasonably widespread, rarely<br />

seen or collected due to<br />

ephemeral aerial parts but usually<br />

<strong>com</strong>mon where it is found<br />

Avonia dinteri Protected (Forestry Act)<br />

Boscia albitrunca Protected (Forestry Act) X Very few seen, very wide<br />

(Sheperd’s tree,<br />

witgat)<br />

distribution in Namibia<br />

Combretum imberbe Protected (Forestry Act) X Widespread, under increasing<br />

(Leadwood,<br />

threat in places due to<br />

omumborongbonga)<br />

uncontrolled harvesting for<br />

charcoal and other uses. Found<br />

here in the vicinity of the pan.<br />

Cyphostemma juttae Protected (Forestry Act),<br />

(Bastard cobas) near-endemic<br />

Cyphostemma uter Protected (Forestry Act),<br />

near-endemic<br />

Dactyliandra<br />

welwitschii<br />

Near-endemic<br />

Eragrostis<br />

omahekensis<br />

Endemic<br />

Eriospermum<br />

roseum<br />

Near-endemic Widespread, <strong>com</strong>mon<br />

Erythrina decora Protected (Forestry Act),<br />

(Namibkoraalboom) endemic<br />

Ficus cordata Thunb.<br />

subsp. Cordata<br />

(Namaqua fig)<br />

Protected (Forestry Act)<br />

Heteromorpha Endemic Related to Heteromorpha trifoliate<br />

papillosa<br />

(Parsley tree), occurs in Namibia<br />

as a shrub<br />

Hiernia angolensis Near-endemic X Widespread, <strong>com</strong>mon<br />

Indigofera<br />

hochstetteri Baker<br />

subsp. Streyana<br />

Endemic<br />

Lantana dinteri Near-endemic<br />

Leucas pechuelii Near-endemic X Widespread, <strong>com</strong>mon<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Species Status<br />

Maerua schinzii<br />

(Ringwood tree)<br />

Megalochlamys<br />

marlothii<br />

Ornithoglossum<br />

calcicola<br />

Peltophorum<br />

africanum<br />

(huilboom,<br />

muparara)<br />

Peltophorum<br />

africanum<br />

(Weeping wattle)<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Protected (Forestry Act)<br />

Near-endemic<br />

Occurrence<br />

Thicket Pan<br />

Comment<br />

Page 4-33<br />

Endemic Reasonably widespread, appears<br />

to be limited to calcareous<br />

substrates<br />

Protected (Forestry Act) X Very few seen, widespread in<br />

north of Namibia, <strong>com</strong>mon<br />

Protected (Forestry Act) Very few seen, reasonably wide<br />

distribution in Namibia<br />

Petalidium rautanenii Endemic<br />

Philenoptera nelsii Protected (Forestry Act) Very few seen, widespread and<br />

(appelblaar)<br />

<strong>com</strong>mon in Namibia<br />

Rennera eenii Endemic<br />

Stapelia schinzii Protected (Forestry Act),<br />

endemic<br />

Stigmatorhynchus<br />

hereroensis<br />

Endemic<br />

4.6.3.1 Thornbush Thicket<br />

This is, by far, the dominant habitat in the greater area as well as the area to be affected by the mine. It<br />

is predominantly characterised by Acacia spp., and a considerable part of the habitat is quite severely<br />

bush-encroached. Large woody species seen include Acacia erioloba, Philenoptera nelsii, Peltophorum<br />

africanum and Boscia albitrunca. All these occurred in very low numbers. Common shrubs included<br />

various Acacia species and Croton gratissimus var. subgratissimus, the latter particularly <strong>com</strong>mon in the<br />

calcrete areas. Characteristic herbs included Monechma divaricatum (figure 4-14), Leucas pechuelii,<br />

Seddera suffruticosa, Eriocephalus luederitzianus, Melhania virescens, Kalanchoe brachyloba and Felicia<br />

clavipilosa subsp. clavipilosa. Blepharis obmitrata (Figure 4-15) was characteristic of and <strong>com</strong>mon in the<br />

calcrete areas.<br />

FIGURE 4-14: MONECHMA DIVARICATUM IS COMMONLY FOUND UNDER TREES AND SHRUBS IN<br />

SANDY THICKET AREAS.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-15: BLEPHARIS OBMITRATA, CHARACTERISTIC OF THE CALCRETE ROCKY AREAS.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-34<br />

Although a number of protected tree species and three near-endemic species were present in this habitat<br />

they are all of quite wide distribution in Namibia and are present here in very low numbers. Within a<br />

restricted zone this habitat has already been heavily impacted by exploration tracks, however due to the<br />

lack of plant species of real conservation concern this is not considered to be a sensitive habitat in the<br />

project area.<br />

4.6.3.2 Ephemeral Pan<br />

The ephemeral pan, including the marginal vegetation, covers a relatively small proportion of the overall<br />

project area and will not be directly affected by the proposed mine development, but it ac<strong>com</strong>modates a<br />

diverse species <strong>com</strong>position. It is characterised by a number of robust grasses, including Andropogon<br />

gayanus var. polycladus, Urochloa brachyura and Eragrostis superba as well as Leonotis ocymifolia var.<br />

schinzii (figure 4-16 and Figure 4-17). The pan margin is characterised by woody species such as<br />

Ziziphus mucronata, Combretum imberbe and Acacia spp. Several of these trees are protected species,<br />

as discussed later.<br />

FIGURE 4-16: THE PAN SOUTH OF THE GAME PROOF FENCE BETWEEN FARM OTJIKOTO AND FARM<br />

GERHARDSHAUSEN.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-17: LEONOTIS OCYMIFOLIA, CHARACTERISTIC OF THE PAN HABITAT.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-35<br />

This habitat is heavily grazed in the smaller, northern section where cattle are carried. On the farm<br />

Gerhardshausen, south of the game proof fence, it appears to be grazed very little and appears relatively<br />

pristine (figure 4-16). Further South the pan apparently has previously been used to grow crops (pers.<br />

Comm., A. Lombard).<br />

Several of the grasses that occur are very palatable grazing species (e.g. Urochloa brachyura, Eragrostis<br />

superba), potentially making this important pasture in an area that carries so much dense thicket. This<br />

notwithstanding, it appears that game farming predominates in the pan habitat, and most game are<br />

browsers or facultative browsers, and not critically dependent on grazing from the pan habitat.<br />

Due to the lack of species of conservation concern, this habitat cannot be regarded as carrying any<br />

sensitive vegetation. However, pans in general carry other species when they are wet, and at that time<br />

they are also an important resource for migrating birds, wild mammals and invertebrates.<br />

4.6.3.3 Summary<br />

There are no plant species of sufficient conservation concern in any of the above habitats and due to the<br />

relatively low sensitivity of the vegetation present no special mitigation measures are necessary. A permit<br />

should be obtained from the Directorate of Forestry for removal/destruction of the protected tree species.<br />

4.6.4 AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES AND MAMMALS<br />

The specialist report is based on available information, own experience and knowledge and field work<br />

conducted during 3 to 10 April 2007.<br />

An annotated checklist of amphibians, reptiles and mammals occurring within the project area is included<br />

in Appendix H. Fourteen (14) species of amphibians, seventy-eight (78) species of reptiles and seventy-<br />

eight (78) species of mammals are known or expected to occur within the project area. To a greater or<br />

lesser extent, most of these species can be expected to interface with the proposed mine.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.6.4.1 Amphibians<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-36<br />

Since there is a lack of permanent free water in the region, this frog fauna (of 14 species) is adapted to<br />

opportunistic breeding in temporary pans and rainwater pools. These breeding opportunities exist, more<br />

or less uniformly throughout the project area, with a large population expected to be at the large pan to<br />

the east of the proposed mining site. Therefore, the loss of breeding habitat and living habitat would be<br />

expected to be limited to the actual footprint of the mine development, which represents only a small<br />

proportion of the project area and a very small proportion of the national habitats available for each of<br />

those species.<br />

The only species of conservation concern is the Spotted Rubber Frog (Phrynomatis affinis) (figure 4-18).<br />

Although this species undoubtedly occurs in the project area, the population in this area would be<br />

relatively small in <strong>com</strong>parison to the national range. The loss of this species on the footprint as well as in<br />

the extended mine area (worst case scenario) would not have a significant impact on this species'<br />

national conservation status.<br />

FIGURE 4-18: SPOTTED RUBBER FROG (PHRYNOMATIS AFFINIS).<br />

The Dombe Dwarf Toad (Bufo dombensis) is a Namibian endemic and is not expected to be unduly<br />

influenced by the development of this project.<br />

4.6.4.2 Reptiles<br />

The seventy-eight (78) species of reptiles expected to occur in the wider project area, can also be<br />

expected to occur throughout the immediate mine footprint. However, as the footprint is a very small<br />

proportion of the wider project area, which is itself a minor proportion of the various species' national<br />

ranges, the reptile fauna should not be affected enough to alter the national conservation status of any<br />

species. Four species of reptiles are Protected Game under the Nature Conservation Ordinance no. 4 of<br />

1975, as follows:<br />

� Leopard Tortoise (Geochelone pardalis),<br />

� Kalahari Tent Tortoise (Psammobates oculiferus),<br />

� Veld Leguaan (Varanus albigularis) (figure 4-19), and<br />

� Southern African Python (Python natalis) (figure 4-19).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-19: VELD LEGUAAN AND SOUTHERN AFRICAN PYTHON.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-37<br />

The Namibian Dwarf Gecko (Lygodactylus bradfieldi), Western Whip Snake (Psammophis trigrammus),<br />

Leopard Whip Snake (Psammophis leopardinus) and the Zebra Snake (Naja nigricincta) are Namibian<br />

endemics. During a survey in 2011, two Kalahari purple-glossed snakes (Amblyodipsas ventrimaculata)<br />

were observed on the calcrete ridge west of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> pan; one specimen was collected and sent to Dr<br />

Graham Alexander (Wits University) for identification and will be deposited at the Transvaal Museum as a<br />

voucher. This species was previously listed as potentially occurring marginally in the area, so finding two<br />

specimens within a few metres of each other may be of some significance. 7<br />

However, overall, reptiles are not expected to be unduly influenced by the development of this project, as<br />

significant populations occur outside the project area.<br />

4.6.4.3 Mammals<br />

The seventy-eight (78) species of mammals expected to occur within the immediate mine footprint can<br />

also be expected to occur throughout the wider project area. As the footprint is a very small proportion of<br />

the wider mine area, which is itself a minor proportion of the various species' national ranges, the<br />

mammal fauna should not be affected enough, under any circumstances, to alter the national<br />

conservation status of any species. Sixteen (16) species of mammals are listed as Protected Game<br />

under the Nature Conservation Ordnance no. 4 of 1975 (see figure 4-20):<br />

� Aardwolf (Proteles cristatus),<br />

� Bat-eared Fox (Otocyon megalotis),<br />

� Cape Fox (Vulpes chama),<br />

� Leopard (Panthera pardus),<br />

� Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus),<br />

� Honey Badger (Mellivora capensis),<br />

� Aardvark (Orycteropus afer),<br />

� Pangolin (Manis temminckii),<br />

� Hedgehog (Atelerix frontalis),<br />

� Bushbaby (Galago moholi),<br />

� Damara Dik-Dik (Madoqua damarensis),<br />

7 <strong>Report</strong> prepared for A. Speiser Environmental Consultants cc.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Blue Wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus),<br />

� Duiker (Sylvicapra grimmia),<br />

� Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus),<br />

� Steenbok (Raphicerus campestris), and<br />

� Eland (Tragelaphus oryx)<br />

No Namibian endemic mammals occur in the project area.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-38<br />

FIGURE 4-20: AARDWOLF (PROTELES CRISTATUS), HONEY BADGER (MELLIVORA CAPENSIS), CAPE<br />

FOX (VULPES CHAMA) AND CHEETAH (ACINONYX JUBATUS).<br />

The project area en<strong>com</strong>passes a large section of land within what is considered the core area of the<br />

Namibian cheetah population - which is the largest population of cheetah in the world. As proposed, the<br />

mine as such will disrupt the home ranges of only a few animals.<br />

4.6.4.4 Summary<br />

Fourteen (14) species of amphibians, seventy-eight (78) species of reptiles and seventy-eight (78)<br />

species of indigenous Namibian mammals are expected to interface with the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine project.<br />

No species are expected to be affected to the extent that their regional or national conservation status will<br />

be degraded.<br />

4.6.5 ENTOMOLOGY<br />

Insects are the dominant life form (54% of all living organisms) in almost all parts of the Namibian<br />

territory, and their taxonomic and ecological diversity require consideration of a wide range of<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-39<br />

environmental conditions 8 . Due to the small size of insect individuals and their <strong>com</strong>plex life cycles, which<br />

may require very specific conditions and an almost stationary way of life, any profile of insect population<br />

needs to be considered at both micro and macro environmental levels 9 . The area was evaluated with<br />

these aspects in mind. The investigation was therefore designed to provide a working profile of the<br />

insects occurring in the area, as very little information on this fauna was available. The study did not aim<br />

to provide a <strong>com</strong>prehensive account of all resident insect species, or to delineate the probable ecological<br />

effect of mining operations on particular insect <strong>com</strong>munities. Both the latter experimental designs would<br />

have necessitated longer-term studies, and the relevancy of such studies in the particular area is<br />

doubtful. The entomological faunistic profile was then evaluated to provide environmental management<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mendations.<br />

The study was approached as follows:<br />

� Review of published reports, maps, and other relevant information;<br />

� Consultation of published and unpublished databases providing distribution records of Namibian<br />

insects, with specific reference to endemic and rare species;<br />

� Site visit and environmental examination;<br />

� Deployment of traps and sampling regimes for rapid assessment of specific faunal elements;<br />

� Gathering of species-specific information where necessary, e.g. range, host, or habitat profiles.<br />

A rapid assessment procedural framework 10 , adapted to the time frame for the study, was adopted for a<br />

field survey (04-06 May 2007) 11 and definitive identification of all the material has not been carried out.<br />

All material collected during the course of this investigation were deposited in the collections of the<br />

National Museum of Namibia for future reference.<br />

4.6.5.1 Potential Sensitive Communities<br />

Well-known ecological groups were selected as possible indicators to determine whether areas sensitive<br />

to disturbance may occur. The groups were selected for known, relevant habitat or ecological specificity<br />

and where taxonomical information for the majority of taxa would be readily available. Unusual results or<br />

patterns would suggest that more intensive sampling, potentially <strong>com</strong>bined with ecological<br />

experimentation, may have been needed to clarify potential environmental impacts.<br />

8 May, R.M. 1978.The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas. 188 - 204. In Mound, L.A. & Waloff, N.<br />

Diversity of insect faunas. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.<br />

9 Samways, M.J. 1993. A spatial and process sub-regional framework for insect and biodiversity<br />

conservation research and management. In Gaston, K.J., New, T.R. & Samways, M.J. Perspectives on<br />

insect conservation. Intercept, Andover.<br />

10 Magurran, A.E. 2004.Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.<br />

10Sutherland, W.J. 2000. The Conservation Handbook: Research, Management and Policy. Blackwell<br />

Science, Oxford.<br />

11 Sutherland, W.J. 2000. The Conservation Handbook: Research, Management and Policy. Blackwell<br />

Science, Oxford.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Soil Organisms<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-40<br />

Various tropical soil taxa are highly evolved in savannas and are essential for the maintenance of<br />

productivity in these soils, whether for aeration, drainage, nutrient recycling, etc. Some of these are<br />

occasionally restricted to very small distributional ranges, though then the ranges are usually defined by<br />

specific barriers such as drainage systems or linear rock outcrops, vegetation, or geological weathering.<br />

No such barriers can be defined in the project area. In Namibia, likely taxa for attention include<br />

saprophytic organisms such as dung beetles (Scarabaeidae); detritivores such as darkling beetles<br />

(Tenebrionidae) and termites; as well as a range of predators such as ants (Formicidae) and ground<br />

beetles (Carabidae).<br />

In no places did the thin sand cover seem deep enough to host a unique psammophilous fauna. Areas<br />

covered with sand are therefore unlikely to harbour any species whose survival may be directly or<br />

indirectly threatened.<br />

In exposed clay depressions, the deep cracks forming during the dry season provides a refuge for some<br />

very interesting beetles (Carabidae, Scarabaeidae) that are relatively rare in Namibia due to the<br />

dominance of sandy soils throughout the country. It can be expected that a number of Namibian<br />

endemics will occur or may be discovered in the project area. However, these clayey soils are<br />

widespread in the southern part of the Grootfontein district and eastern parts of the Outjo district. Thus it<br />

is extremely unlikely that the proposed mining area will have any significant impact on such potential<br />

endemics.<br />

Herbivorous Insects<br />

Savanna biomes are dominated by trees (phanerophytes), and to a lesser degree annuals (therophytes),<br />

i.e. herbs and grasses12. Herbivore and saprophytic (to break down woody material) insect taxa,<br />

together with their associated predators and parasites, can therefore be expected to be dominant groups<br />

in savanna ecosystems. Indicator organisms, though highly diverse and specific, are not suitable for<br />

evaluating broad ecological processes in large ecosystems 13 . When assessing the conservation status of<br />

large ecosystems it is therefore more productive to prioritize ecological processes by evaluating keystone<br />

taxa 14 . Considering that it was the end of the wet season, the study did evaluate some taxa such as<br />

butterflies (host-specific herbivores), moths (host specific herbivores), jewel beetles (saprophytic), and<br />

micro bee-flies (pollinator), <strong>com</strong>bined with general observations on vegetation. The primary goal was to<br />

search for unexpected organisms, or vegetation units that are atypical for fine-leaved savanna, as such<br />

organisms may indicate unusual ecological conditions. Insect sampling included yellow pan traps (for<br />

Buprestidae [jewel beetles]; Mytho<strong>com</strong>yidae [micro-bee flies]; Tephritidae [fruit flies]); light traps (for<br />

12 Scholes, R.J. 1997. Savanna, pp. 258-277. In: Cowling, R.M., Richardson, D.M. & Pierce, S.M.<br />

Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.<br />

13 Magurran, A.E. 2004.Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.<br />

14 Sutherland, W.J. 2000. The Conservation Handbook: Research, Management and Policy. Blackwell<br />

Science, Oxford.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-41<br />

moths; Cerambycidae [longhorn beetles]); transects (for butterflies), examining social spider Stegodyphus<br />

nests and more general observations.<br />

No unusual vegetation or taxa were observed. The project area is unlikely to host any species whose<br />

survival may be directly or indirectly threatened.<br />

Saprophytic Insects<br />

Saprophytic taxa that are primarily associated with the de<strong>com</strong>position of wood in savanna ecosystems,<br />

with particular reference to longhorn beetles (Cerambycidae), shothole borers (Bostrychidae), and click<br />

beetles (Elateridae), were considered under the previous section. However, since the diversity of larger<br />

herbivores, with specific reference to game animals and cattle, are a renowned feature of African<br />

savannas, and the saprophytic insects ensuring the de<strong>com</strong>position and recycling of their dung, e.g. dung<br />

beetles (Scarabaeidae) and termites (Isoptera), are particularly important for the maintenance of soil<br />

fertility in savanna ecosystems, they were also considered as a primary group for evaluating the potential<br />

impact of the proposed development. However, the movement of large game is severely restricted. The<br />

area is primarily farmland with cattle being the dominant mammalian herbivores, though some free-<br />

ranging game species, e.g. kudu, and a fenced area with more exotic game also occur. Unfortunately it<br />

was too late in the season to make direct observations about dung beetle diversity. For example, over<br />

two nights only 11 specimens of two taxa of Aphodiinae (miniature dung chafers) were recorded at light.<br />

However, the single collecting record at the National Museum for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> area, in December 1999,<br />

indicated that large numbers of dung beetles were recorded, with at least 3 species of Heliocopris, 2<br />

species of Scarabaeus, and numerous Onthophagus, Aphodiinae, and other smaller Scarabaeinae.<br />

Given the relatively low diversity of game, the 1999 National Museum record of dung beetle diversity is<br />

probably a good reflection of what can be expected.<br />

It is unlikely that the area will harbour saprophytic <strong>com</strong>munities of special conservation interest or<br />

concern.<br />

Semi-aquatic and Aquatic Taxa<br />

Only ubiquitous aquatic fauna can be expected due to the lack of natural open water, which was<br />

confirmed through light trapping and examination of farm dams, drinking troughs, and spill-over pools.15<br />

Primary aquatic orders such as Plecoptera, Trichoptera and Odonata are mainly absent, except for some<br />

wide-spread and vagile elements of the latter two orders16. During the rainy season, temporary pools<br />

forming in shallow clay pits would result in rapid population build-ups of some species, with specific<br />

reference to Culicidae (mosquitoes), Tabanidae (horse-flies), and other biting and nuisance flies.<br />

15 Suhling, F & Martens, A. 2007.Dragonflies and damselflies of Namibia. Gamsberg Macmillan,<br />

Windhoek.<br />

16 Mey, W. 2001. Observations of the caddisfly fauna (Insecta: Trichoptera) of three perennial rivers in<br />

northern Namibia. Cimbebasia 17: 229-236.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-42<br />

Surprisingly at least three species of Lampyridae (firefly-beetles) arrived at light traps. The unexpected<br />

occurrence of so many firefly species (only one species is formally recorded for Namibia) does not<br />

indicate unique environmental attributes, but rather the poor state of general knowledge about Namibia’s<br />

insect fauna. It was, however, significant that all Lampyridae morphospecies were most <strong>com</strong>mon at the<br />

edge (20.01565�S 17.11255�E) of a large natural pan. Aerial and topographic maps confirmed that<br />

natural pans such as these are very rare in the wider area, thus these pans forms ‘islands’ of open<br />

vegetation, covered with dense perennial grasses of various life-forms, tree species such as Acacia<br />

hebeclada, and probably containing extensive shallow water areas during the rainy season. The study<br />

did not allow closer examination of the fauna of this pan as it is not directly affected by the proposed<br />

mining development, though judging from the ant species observed on the pan surface, and the diversity<br />

of species arriving at the light, the pan is considered to be the most unique habitat in the area.<br />

Some of the pan fauna are likely to occur or may spread into newly debushed areas, e.g. note that<br />

Lampyridae were found at least 12 km away. Lampyridae are predatory beetles, and though their larvae<br />

require semi-aquatic conditions, the adult males may range quite widely in search of mating partners or<br />

food. It is extremely unlikely, however, that the full diversity of pan species will be found elsewhere, either<br />

as a species <strong>com</strong>plex or as individual <strong>com</strong>ponents in other species <strong>com</strong>plexes, as the unique set of<br />

environmental conditions found at the pan are unlikely to be duplicated elsewhere.<br />

4.6.5.2 Further Field Collection<br />

The bycatch in the subsequent fieldwork by EduVenture supplemented the above data (for methods, see<br />

Appendix H). The sample was dominated by a single huge collection of >1000 Collembola. Collembolans<br />

are not normally abundant in Namibia, but can experience population explosions under favourable<br />

conditions. The abundant rain during the collecting period probably provided the trigger for this unusual<br />

event. Collembola are not expected to be a significant <strong>com</strong>ponent of the fauna at the project area during<br />

normal years.<br />

The bulk of the catch was made up by a few very <strong>com</strong>mon species, and there were many un<strong>com</strong>mon<br />

species, indicative of a <strong>com</strong>plex, thriving <strong>com</strong>munity. The pugnacious ant, Anoplolepis sp., made up<br />

almost half of collected specimens. Other particular <strong>com</strong>mon taxa were other ants, Alydidae bugs,<br />

weevils, crickets and aphodiine dung beetles. Besides the Collembola, 1467 insect specimens were<br />

collected, <strong>com</strong>prising 12 orders and at least 51 families.<br />

No species were found that were of particular vulnerability or uniqueness. Most recorded taxa are<br />

widespread in northern Namibia. Some of the Adesmiines, as well as the Gryllacridids, are typical of the<br />

Otavi Mountainland. Their presence at <strong>Otjikoto</strong> is probably restricted to the hill on <strong>Otjikoto</strong>, which has<br />

biogeographical affinities with the Otavi Mountains further north. Contrary to expected, collection at the<br />

waterlogged pan did not deliver any fauna of special interest.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.6.5.3 Summary<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-43<br />

The general area in which the proposed development will take place is likely to contain some endemic<br />

and rare species, though none have been definitively recorded. The possible presence of endemic or<br />

rare taxa does not indicate ecological sensitivity. Only the insect <strong>com</strong>munity at the pan (20.01565�S<br />

17.11255�E) may be wholly unique for the area. No endangered insect species are presently known to<br />

occur in the project area.<br />

At present only a few established alien insects occur. Undoubtedly cosmopolitan, anthropophilous alien<br />

insects will be<strong>com</strong>e established together with the development activity, and can only be excluded through<br />

extraordinary measures. At this stage no alien insect species are known that should be excluded through<br />

strict quarantine or other managerial steps. Once mining activities cease and the area is rehabilitated,<br />

any established alien insects will either die out or will be absorbed into the overall <strong>com</strong>munity structure,<br />

probably without undue effect on ecological processes. If particular alien insect species need to be<br />

excluded or controlled in future, government departments responsible for such control are responsible to<br />

inform stakeholders.<br />

The intended sites for major disturbance (open pit, plant area, etc.) are all situated on savanna plain<br />

habitat, which is considered to be of low sensitivity for insect <strong>com</strong>munities.<br />

At present only the natural pan to the east of the proposed mining site, its northern end at 20.0156�S<br />

17.1125�E, is identified as being of medium sensitivity for insect <strong>com</strong>munities.<br />

4.6.6 ARACHNIDA<br />

This specialist report was <strong>com</strong>piled using existing publications and lists (where possible) of the main<br />

arachnofauna <strong>com</strong>ponents of the Thornbush Savanna. The value of the Thornbush Savanna for arachnid<br />

diversity and threats were evaluated. Endemic species were identified and individual species were<br />

evaluated for their potential importance. Further collecting records in the vicinity of the proposed mining<br />

area were evaluated from the respective Natural History collection databases of the National Museum of<br />

Namibia. This method was used to:<br />

� form an idea what baseline data, if any, already exists for the area; and<br />

� if possible, to narrow down the list of Thornbush Savanna species to potential species to be<br />

found on the actual proposed mining area and immediate vicinity. Unfortunately these databases<br />

do not give an accurate view of an area’s collecting history neither do they have the same level of<br />

reliance as data from publications. However, they provide a good indication of the level of data<br />

existing from the area.<br />

The following protocol was followed: Farms with a radius of 25km from the proposed mining site were<br />

selected, and all data from that area was extracted from the databases. All farms selected fall within the<br />

Thornbush Savanna, and are relatively homogenous concerning elevation (1300-1700 m) and geology<br />

(with two main substrate types namely sand and calcrete to the west and schist and dolomite to the east).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Appendix H of the specialist report provides the findings of the literature research.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-44<br />

Little information is still available for Namibia’s arachnofauna. Especially the smaller arachnid orders<br />

occurring in Namibia – pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones), harvestmen (Opiliones) and whipscorpions<br />

(Amblypygi) – are not well studied and collected and where information does exist it is too patchy for any<br />

<strong>com</strong>parative and evaluative purposes. The study therefore focused mainly on the arachnid groups best<br />

studied in Namibia, namely the spiders (Araneae), scorpions (Scorpiones) and solifugids (Solifugae).<br />

For the database searches, the smaller orders as well as the Myriapoda (centipedes and millipedes) and<br />

aquatic invertebrate databases were also incorporated. (Although not closely related to arachnids, the<br />

myriapods and aquatic invertebrates are curated together with the arachnology collections, hence their<br />

inclusion here).<br />

For spiders and solifugids, vegetation provides the substrate on and under which they hide and hunt and<br />

the suitable microclimates for their survival. In addition, vegetation provides the structures on which<br />

spiders build their webs and retreats. There is thus a high correlation between the vegetation type of an<br />

area and the spiders and solifugids found in the area. Likewise, the scorpion fauna of an area is<br />

intricately associated with its geology and geological substrate, the latter which also influences<br />

vegetation. Vegetation type is thus <strong>com</strong>monly used as an indication of species expected to occur in an<br />

area. 17 The proposed mining site can be classed as thornbush thicket, falling within the Thornbush<br />

Savanna 18 .<br />

4.6.6.1 Findings of Spiders, Scorpions and Solifugids<br />

Data currently available indicates that the Thornbush Savanna vegetation type is not exceptional - neither<br />

in its species diversity nor endemism of the arachnofauna (see table 4-9). Although areas are threatened<br />

by bush-encroachment and/or intense agricultural pressures, it is not under large scale threat of<br />

development projects. There is still sufficient habitat left to serve as species refugia.<br />

TABLE 4-9: SPIDER, SCORPION AND SOLIFUGID DIVERSITY OF THE THORNBUSH SAVANNA IN<br />

RELATION TO THEIR NAMIBIAN DIVERSITY.<br />

Spiders 1 Scorpions 2 Solifugids 1<br />

Namibia 587 85 127<br />

Thornbush Savanna 36 0 14<br />

% of Namibian fauna 5 0 6<br />

1 Griffin (1998)<br />

2 National scorpion collection database; Prendini (unpublished data)<br />

Note: Thornbush Savanna covers 5% of Namibia’s land surface.<br />

17 Griffin, E. & Dippenaar-Schoeman, A.S. 1991.A checklist of, and references to, the Namibian sppider<br />

fauna (Arachnida, Araneae). Cimbebasia 13: 115-183.<br />

18 Giess, W. 1971, 1998.A preliminary vegetation map of Namibia Dinteria 4.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-45<br />

The vegetation of the proposed mining site is relatively homogenous (C. Mannheimer, pers. <strong>com</strong>m.).<br />

Except for the pan to the east of the site, there are no geographic features, e.g. mountains, which could<br />

provide for a diversity of habitats. The area is not pristine (C. Mannheimer, pers. <strong>com</strong>m.) with quite a high<br />

level of bush encroachment. Sensitive or extreme habitat specific species are thus already expected to<br />

be locally extinct.<br />

Except for six (6) records (all spiders, collected in 1973, <strong>Otjikoto</strong>) (see figure 4-21; the blue star indicates<br />

the collecting locality) no data concerning the non-acarine arachnids, myriapods and aquatic<br />

invertebrates exists for the area with a 25 km radius from the proposed mining site.<br />

FIGURE 4-21: FINDINGS OF ARACHNIDA RECORDS FROM LITERATURE RESEARCH<br />

4.6.6.2 Field Collection<br />

EduVentures conducted a brief baseline study of arachnids during February 2008 (see full report in<br />

Appendix H). The survey focused on arachnids, but there was a large insect by-catch, reported above.<br />

Five collecting methods were employed at each of four different study sites.<br />

Approximately 2800 invertebrate specimens were collected in total: 317 arachnid specimens <strong>com</strong>prising<br />

27 families and 66 species, 30 myriapod specimens <strong>com</strong>prising two orders, eight and two specimens of<br />

crustaceans and molluscs respectively with one species each.<br />

Although a relative large diversity in spiders was found (66 species), these are mostly groups expected in<br />

a savannah. Only a few were abundant, and the occurrence of numerous un<strong>com</strong>mon species is indicative<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-46<br />

of a thriving <strong>com</strong>munity. The most <strong>com</strong>mon ground dwelling spiders were the Gnaphosidae (mouse<br />

spiders) while the most <strong>com</strong>mon plant dwelling spiders were the Oxypidae (lynx spiders). The<br />

Gnaphosidae, Salticidae and Thomisidae were the most diverse groups. At least one species, Palfuria sp.<br />

(Zodariidae), are not known from the area and is likely to be an undescribed species. Some species<br />

recorded from the site are relatively widespread in Namibia, but contains listed species in other southern<br />

African countries. An example is the baboon spiders (Theraphosidae) which have the potential to be<strong>com</strong>e<br />

vulnerable due to them being slow breeders highly susceptible to disturbance (once removed from<br />

burrow, mortality is near 100%). Other <strong>com</strong>mon large species that were collected were huntsman spiders,<br />

Sparassidae. Six scorpion species were collected, all being relatively <strong>com</strong>mon and widespread species.<br />

No solifuge males, necessary to identify to species or sometimes to genera or family, were collected, so<br />

further interpretation other than four species collected, is not possible.<br />

4.6.6.3 Summary<br />

From the data currently available for the groups discussed here it seems unlikely that there would be<br />

species at the proposed direct mining site and immediate vicinity that would be identified as of particular<br />

vulnerability or uniqueness.<br />

4.6.7 PAN INVERTEBRATE SPECIALIST STUDY<br />

The above studies of invertebrates of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> site indicated the need for a more focussed survey of<br />

the pan and its immediate surrounds, specifically to assess the significance of the pan for aquatic<br />

invertebrates and to investigate the possibility that unique <strong>com</strong>munities of ants and scorpions might<br />

inhabit the pan and its fringes.<br />

A brief survey of the pan and surrounding areas was carried out by Peter Hawkes & Jonathan Fisher<br />

(AfriBugs CC) from 21-23 June 2011, approximately six weeks after the end of one of the wettest rainy<br />

seasons in recorded history. The pan and surrounding areas at <strong>Otjikoto</strong> were searched for 1) evidence<br />

that the pan might be of significance for aquatic invertebrates, 2) scorpion species and 3) ant species.<br />

Approximately equal amounts of time were spent searching the central pan area, the pan surroundings<br />

and the calcrete outcrops to the west of the pan; during these searches, representatives of as many ant<br />

species as possible were collected; these were later identified as far as possible using currently available<br />

identification keys. Surveys for scorpions were focussed mainly on searching for specimens of or habitat<br />

suitable for the very restricted bothriurid species Lisposoma josehermana, which was previously recorded<br />

in the general vicinity of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> site. A summary of the findings are included below with further detail<br />

available in the specialist report in Appendix H.<br />

In general, the central pan area was very dry and dusty and no surface water was found anywhere on the<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> site, despite the very heavy rains that had occurred during the previous few months; even digging<br />

into the soil at depths of close to one metre in the entrances to warthog burrows within the central portion<br />

of the pan area did not reveal soil that was more than slightly damp. Excavation (to a depth of about 30<br />

cm) of a Camponotus mayri nest in more wooded vegetation about 900 metres north of this area (but well<br />

within the pan boundaries) again indicated that no significant soil moisture remained, confirming that<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-47<br />

infiltration rates are fairly high and especially in years of normal to low rainfall, the pan cannot be<br />

expected to be more than ephemeral in nature. In the past, the area was used for crop production and the<br />

central pan area should now be considered transformed and of low conservation value.<br />

Observations of the site and information provided on the farm’s history, suggested that the central pan<br />

area had been cleared of trees and most shrubs and bushes through many years of ploughing and maize<br />

cultivation. The low vegetation diversity and depauperate ant <strong>com</strong>munity (characterised by domination by<br />

a few species favoured by disturbance) tended to support this viewpoint and the conclusion that the pan<br />

might be of lower, rather than higher, conservation significance than its surroundings.<br />

However, inspection of satellite imagery, supported by analysis of elevation data, indicates that while the<br />

central portion of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> pan does show residual linear disturbance indicative of cultivation, the<br />

depression within which this area lies is far greater in extent than the previously cultivated portion and<br />

that there are several other pans in the region with similarly treeless central portions. In only one of these<br />

other pans (and only in one section of the treeless portion) was there visible evidence of ploughing. In<br />

each case the central treeless portion is approximately equivalent to the modelled deepest region of the<br />

pan (bearing in mind the limitations of the accuracy of the SRTM dataset), leading to the conclusion that<br />

the treeless nature of these areas is most likely a natural consequence of frequent water-logging of the<br />

soil leading to the death of any trees that might otherwise have established. The presence of disturbance-<br />

resistant ant species and a reduced ant and plant diversity in the central pan region at <strong>Otjikoto</strong> may thus<br />

also be at least in part a natural result of frequent flooding and this argues against considering the central<br />

pan as transformed and of low conservation value. The central pan portion was thus probably chosen for<br />

cultivation because of its treeless nature (in conjunction with naturally higher water levels), rather than the<br />

lack of trees being a consequence of agricultural practices; the pan depression as a whole (covering<br />

some 8 times the area of the cultivated portion) is unlikely to have been artificially created.<br />

Cultivation has however almost certainly contributed to further lowering of ant and plant diversity and<br />

increased dominance by disturbance-resistant species in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> pan; this view is supported by the<br />

apparently higher structural diversity of the plant <strong>com</strong>munities in the central pan areas (at <strong>Otjikoto</strong> as well<br />

as at the neighbouring pan areas) that do not show evidence of ploughing. The logical conclusion is thus<br />

that while lower plant and ant <strong>com</strong>munity diversity (and hence most likely lower diversity of many other<br />

taxa) within the central pan areas is natural, it has been exaggerated at <strong>Otjikoto</strong> by disturbance from<br />

cultivation and this pan is probably less natural and at present of lower conservation value than its<br />

neighbouring counterparts. The normal disturbance patterns in the pan areas and the consequent non-<br />

climax form of the natural plant and animal <strong>com</strong>munities inhabiting them will however most likely favour a<br />

fairly rapid return to the natural state if cultivation is ceased and natural rehabilitation allowed.<br />

The presence of several pans with similar characteristics and probably a very similar invertebrate fauna<br />

within distances of 10-30 km of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> site indicates that the habitat type is not unique in the region<br />

and thus the pan at <strong>Otjikoto</strong> probably does not represent a highly conservation-significant habitat for<br />

terrestrial or aquatic invertebrates.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-48<br />

In conclusion, the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> pan, while partially transformed by agriculture, is clearly of natural origin and<br />

represents a habitat type that is relatively rare in the region. It is also likely to return to its equilibrium<br />

state fairly rapidly in <strong>com</strong>parison to other habitats in arid environments, and it is therefore re<strong>com</strong>mended<br />

that this portion of the site be preserved and allowed to rehabilitate naturally.<br />

The high permeability of the soils in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> pan areas, as evidenced by the rapid drying out of the<br />

pan even during a period of cool weather, suggest that transmission of surface contaminants to the<br />

ground water would be rapid, and it must be re<strong>com</strong>mended that great care is taken to prevent any<br />

possible contamination of the environment especially in the vicinity of the pan.<br />

4.6.8 AVIFAUNA<br />

The area falls within the semi-arid Thornbush Shrubland vegetation type of the Acacia Tree-and-shrub<br />

Savanna Biome, which is characterised by fairly unpredictable and erratic rainfall pattern. Because of the<br />

semi-arid character and variable rainfall, many bird species found in the project area (as in other parts of<br />

Namibia) are highly nomadic, moving from place to place in search of appropriate conditions. This differs<br />

from migratory species that undertake fixed annual movements, usually from north of the equator to the<br />

southern hemisphere and back. Nomadic species by contrast generally remain within Namibia or<br />

adjacent parts of the southern African subregion, but move around widely and in no fixed pattern, to<br />

exploit patchy and unpredictable food, water and other ecosystem resources. Thus a number of nomadic<br />

species that occur in the area may not be present at certain times of the year or in some years, and their<br />

abundance may differ dramatically over time.<br />

4.6.8.1 Methods<br />

The study consisted of two parts, first a desk study to:<br />

� Determine which bird species are known and likely to occur in the focal area<br />

� Identify endemic and Red Data species occurring in the area<br />

� List migrating species recorded in the area<br />

� Identify any likely important habitats and sites special to birds from aerial photographs<br />

� Check whether there are any likely critical factors from the avifaunal perspective likely to<br />

jeopardize the Project and that may require further investigation and/or assessment.<br />

This desk study draws on (a) the National Avifaunal database that holds all available information from the<br />

national bird atlas project, road counts, breeding records and all museum specimens, (b) published<br />

information in both research publications and reports, and (c) Dr. Ch. Brown has over 25 years of<br />

experience of working on birds in Namibia.<br />

The second part of the study consisted of a short field visit to the project site to:<br />

� gather general bird sightings across the area, to strengthen the existing list and ensure that no<br />

key species had been overlooked;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-49<br />

� search likely areas for nest sites of Whitebacked and Lappetfaced Vultures and Tawny,<br />

Wahlberg’s, Martial and Bateleur Eagles; and<br />

� check that there are no important microhabitats for birds that have not shown up clearly on the<br />

aerial photographs, including the pan on the southeastern side of the farm <strong>Otjikoto</strong>, depressions<br />

and drainage lines.<br />

The project area was systematically covered by vehicle and on foot. A total of some 86 km was travelled<br />

in, and around the periphery of the project area. Particular attention was paid to the proposed pit area, as<br />

well as to the possible tailings and plant sites as provided in 2007.<br />

A vantage point from a low ridge on the southern boundary of the farm <strong>Otjikoto</strong> was used to find the<br />

locations of higher copses of trees above the bush thicket (see Figure 6.26). These groups of larger trees<br />

could be potential breeding sites for red data birds that were highlighted in the desk study as requiring<br />

field verification. Each of these locations were visited and checked for nests. The results are presented<br />

below.<br />

North west view North view North east view<br />

Thicket of Acacia melifera Clump of larger Acacia trees<br />

FIGURE 4-22: VIEW FROM A RIDGE OVER THE PROJECT AREA FROM NORTH-WEST TO NORTH-<br />

EAST, THICKETS OF ACACIA MELIFERA – SUCH BUSH THICKETS DOMINATE IN THE AREA, WITH A<br />

FEW COPSES OF TALLER TREES – MAINLY ACACIA REFICIENS AND TERMINALIA PRUNOIDES THE<br />

LAST BEING FAVOURED NESTING TREES OF VULTURES.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.6.8.2 Bird Diversity of the Project Area<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-50<br />

A total of 127 bird species were recorded in the avifaunal database for the two ¼ degree squares across<br />

which the project area falls. During the field visit, a total of 66 species was recorded, 14 of which were<br />

new for the focal squares, bringing to 141 the recorded bird diversity of the area (see Appendix H).<br />

These records were derived from some 26 visits to the respective squares. They represent about 70% of<br />

the total number of species that would be expected in that area. It is mainly the un<strong>com</strong>mon and rare<br />

species that are not listed.<br />

Thirteen species are Palaearctic migrants and ten are intra-African migrants, all visiting Namibia during<br />

the summer months. None of the Palaearctic species breed in Namibia. They mostly move around in<br />

nomadic fashion in search of good foraging areas, often following rainfall events. All intra-African<br />

migrants, but one, breed in Namibia (the exception being Abdim’s Stork). Yellowbilled Kites have been<br />

recorded breeding only in northern Namibia, the cuckoos are all parasitic and lay in other birds’ nests,<br />

and the nightjars are all ground breeders. All these species have large widespread populations and their<br />

conservation status will not be significantly impacted by habitat loss as a result of an open pit mine and<br />

related infrastructure. The one possible exception is Wahlberg’s Eagle which, though not on the Red<br />

Data list, has shown significant declines in Namibia and South Africa in recent years. The status of this<br />

tree-nesting species in the project area was checked during the field visit, with specific reference to<br />

nesting there.<br />

4.6.8.3 Endemic and Red Data Species<br />

No birds endemic to Namibia were recorded within the proposed project area, nor are any expected to<br />

occur there. Thirty-five (35) birds endemic to the southern African (sA) subregion were recorded (sA<br />

endemics in table, see Appendix 8). The conservation status of these species is considered to be<br />

“secure”, i.e. not threatened in any way.<br />

The Red Data listing is an approach based on probabilities of extinction. Six Red Data species have<br />

been recorded in the project area. All are birds of prey and they are listed below:<br />

� Booted Eagel;<br />

� Whitebacked Vulture;<br />

� Lappetfaced Vulture;<br />

� Tawny Eagle;<br />

� Martial Eagle; and<br />

� Bateleur.<br />

4.6.8.4 Field Findings<br />

The proposed open pit mining area, the likely tailings site and that of the plant facilities, as well as the<br />

larger surrounding area are all fairly uniform, bush thicket with a few copses of larger trees rising about<br />

the surrounding bush. There is little habitat diversity in the project area. No significant ecological<br />

features or important micro habitats were found. No red data species were seen during the field visit. No<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-51<br />

nests of red data bird of prey species were found in the copses of taller trees – the only likely sites that<br />

they would select for breeding.<br />

4.6.8.5 Summary<br />

The project area supports a typical avifaunal assemblage of thorn tree and thorn bush savanna species.<br />

Some 141 bird species have been recorded for the two ¼ degree squares in which the project falls<br />

(1917Cc & 2017Aa), some 70% of the expected avifaunal diversity, and generally representing the more<br />

<strong>com</strong>monly occurring species in that area. The project area does not fall within Namibia’s endemic zone<br />

and there are no endemic birds to Namibia in the project area. While a number of species recorded are<br />

endemic to the southern African sub-region (typically the “south-west arid” zoogeographic zone), these<br />

species all have large ranges in southern Africa and none are considered to be threatened in any way.<br />

Six species recorded for the project area are listed in Namibia’s Red Data Book: Whitebacked Vulture<br />

listed as Near Threatened; Lappetfaced Vulture listed as Vulnerable; and Tawny, Booted, Martial and<br />

Bateleur Eagles all listed as Endangered. For all these species the main impact in the focal area would<br />

have been breeding disturbance and loss of breeding sites. A careful search of the most likely breeding<br />

sites (copses of taller trees) revealed no sign of nests.<br />

Based on the above, it is concluded that the loss of habitat resulting from the proposed mining and<br />

processing developments in the project area poses no significant conservation risk to the avifauna in the<br />

area.<br />

4.7 ECONOMY<br />

Dr Jon Barnes provided the economic background and baseline information of the wider project setting, as<br />

well as the local land uses that will be displaced or modified by mine development. His full report is included at<br />

Appendix L.<br />

4.7.1 NATIONAL ECONOMIC SETTING<br />

Namibia has one of the healthiest economies in southern Africa. Its small population, significant natural<br />

resources, sound governance, and human capital have allowed peace and prosperity to prevail in the<br />

twenty years since independence. Low rainfall and poor soils mean that agricultural potential is low,<br />

restricting most agricultural development to the extensive use of rangelands for livestock production. The<br />

use of minerals has been the backbone of the natural resource-based economy 19 and economic rents from<br />

minerals have to a certain extent been reinvested with the aim of ensuring sustainable growth and<br />

development. The tourism sector has also performed well with a significant nature-based tourism<br />

<strong>com</strong>ponent showing good growth.<br />

19 Lange, G-M. 2003. National wealth, natural capital and sustainable development in Namibia. Research<br />

Discussion Paper No 54, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism,<br />

Windhoek, Namibia. 15pp.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-52<br />

The Namibian economy is closely linked to the much larger South African economy, which has also been<br />

growing well in the last decade. Namibian per capita in<strong>com</strong>e is among the highest in southern Africa and<br />

Africa as a whole, which belies marked inequalities in wealth. Significant growth in mineral in<strong>com</strong>e is<br />

expected in Namibia in the next few years, as a result of major investments in new mining projects.<br />

Along with many other developing countries, Namibian economic growth was affected negatively by the<br />

global financial crisis of 2008, with sharp cuts in demand for most of the natural resource products it<br />

produces. This crisis affected the industrialised countries in particular, and their economies have been<br />

slow in regaining momentum, weighed down by the excessive borrowing needed to finance stimulus<br />

programmes. Essentially, the world economy was prevented from entering into a prolonged depression,<br />

by strong growth prevalent in emerging economies, notably China. This growth has been the driver of a<br />

general global economic recovery, which began in earnest in 2010. Namibia benefitted from this.<br />

Table 4-10 shows the recorded measures for Namibia's national in<strong>com</strong>e, measured here as gross<br />

domestic product (GDP), between 2005 and 2010. Estimated anticipated GDP for the years 2011 and<br />

2012 is also shown. Data and estimates are derived from the United Nations Statistical Division<br />

Database 20 , and predictions are made based on a detailed analysis of Namibia's macro-economic outlook<br />

made by Investment House Namibia 21 as well as insights gleaned from Sherbourne 22 .<br />

figure 4-23 further shows the recorded and expected contributions made by the mining sector, the<br />

livestock sector and the tourism sector to the GDP as a whole. These data show that the mining sector,<br />

dominated by diamonds, was severely affected in 2009 as a result of the Global financial crisis and<br />

resultant failed demand. Growth has since resumed, and it is predicted that it will continue. Also affected,<br />

in part, by the world economic downturn, growth in livestock production and tourism has been slow over<br />

the period. These activities and the factors affecting them are discussed below.<br />

20 UNSD/United Nations Statistical Division. 2012. National accounts main aggregates database<br />

downloads. United Nations Statistical Division, New York, USA.<br />

[Accessed at: < http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnlList.asp >]<br />

21 Van Wyk, J.D., van Rensburg, B. & van Rensburg, A. 2011.Namibian economic research: Namibia<br />

macro-economic outlook 2011-2012. Investment House Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia. 54pp.<br />

22 Sherbourne, R. 2010. Guide to the Namibian economy 2010. Institute for Public Policy Research,<br />

Windhoek, Namibia. 410pp.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-53<br />

The Otjozondjupa Region is occupied by semi-arid savanna vegetation types, with <strong>com</strong>mercial farmland<br />

on the west, and <strong>com</strong>munal land on the east. The dominant land uses make use of the natural<br />

rangelands for extensive grazing with livestock and wildlife. Only in limited areas is crop production<br />

possible. Mining is important in a few localities, and essentially dominates the economy of Otjozondjupa<br />

Region. The Otjozondjupa Region hosts the Okorusu Fluorspar mine, the Ohorongo cement mine, and the<br />

Otjozondjupa and Purity manganese mines. The small urban centers of Otjiwarongo, Otavi, Grootfontein<br />

and others, provide services for these activities.<br />

TABLE 4-10: GDP AND SELECTED COMPONENT ACTIVITIES - N$ MILLION, 2012 CONSTANT PRICES<br />

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E* 2012E*<br />

GDP 61,039 65,357 68,869 71,804 71,289 74,411 77,717 81,169<br />

Real growth rate % 7.1% 5.4% 4.3% -0.7% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4%<br />

Mining 4,887 6,237 6,268 6,088 3,347 3,728 3,624 3,834<br />

Real growth rate % 27.6% 0.5% -2.9% -45.0% 11.4% -2.8% 5.8%<br />

% of total GDP 8.0% 9.5% 9.1% 8.5% 4.7% 5.0% 4.7% 4.7%<br />

Livestock 2,123 2,204 2,102 2,161 2,155 2,226 2,304 2,391<br />

Real growth rate % 3.8% -4.6% 2.8% -0.3% 3.3% 3.5% 3.8%<br />

% of total GDP 3.5% 3.4% 3.1% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.9%<br />

Tourism 1,814 1,948 2,154 2,212 2,321 2,442 2,578 2,728<br />

Real growth rate % 7.4% 10.6% 2.7% 4.9% 5.2% 5.6% 5.8%<br />

% of total GDP 3.0% 3.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4%<br />

* Estimate<br />

FIGURE 4-23: RECORDED AND PREDICTED NATIONAL INCOME CONTRIBUTIONS (AS MEASURED<br />

THROUGH GDP) FOR MINING, LIVESTOCK, AND TOURISM IN NAMIBIA BETWEEN 2005 AND 2012<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.7.2 CURRENT LAND USES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-54<br />

Current land use in the project area is typical of that in semi-arid <strong>com</strong>mercial land where the thorn-veld<br />

savanna vegetation type predominates. This involves livestock production on medium to large scale<br />

fenced ranches using cattle, and wildlife-based tourism on these properties, either in <strong>com</strong>bination with<br />

livestock or replacing it.<br />

Cattle are bred and grown out for slaughter, or purchased and finished for slaughter, using natural<br />

rangelands as fodder. Although the arid conditions mean that stock carrying capacities are low and<br />

variable, the sweet nature of the grazing means that animal growth is possible throughout the year.<br />

Capital investments are high relative to returns and employment is low per unit of land. Some enterprises<br />

are fully <strong>com</strong>mercial in that they aim primarily to produce beef and beef cattle. These can be termed<br />

'<strong>com</strong>mercial' systems. Others are less <strong>com</strong>mercially orientated and, while also producing beef and stock,<br />

they also serve a role of storing value in the herd. These tend to be less intensive, and are found in some<br />

resettlement farms. These can be termed 'cattle post' enterprises.<br />

Tourism has be<strong>com</strong>e important first as a supplementary activity to livestock and <strong>com</strong>monly replacing it as<br />

game numbers increase. Supplementary activities involve safari hunting and guest farm tourism, and<br />

pure wildlife use involves wildlife viewing lodge development and some safari hunting. Barnes & Jones 23<br />

described the development of wildlife use for tourism in <strong>com</strong>mercial land. The enterprises where the<br />

intention is to have significant investment in wildlife stocks and the full development of wildlife viewing<br />

activities tend to be of larger scale and can be termed 'high value' tourism enterprises. Where<br />

investments in wildlife are smaller, tourism is less intensive and of lower value and these may be termed<br />

'low value' tourism enterprises.<br />

Empirical data have been used here to develop financial and economic models of the typical livestock<br />

and tourism land uses which take place in the immediate vicinity of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> mine. These are<br />

annualized budget and dynamic cost-benefit models which provide details of financial and economic<br />

values associated with different types of investment in livestock and wildlife-based tourism in the area.<br />

They follow the approach and methods used by Barnes et al. (2010), and Turpie et al. (2010). These<br />

models and their values are to form the baseline for analysis of the impacts of mining on current<br />

economic activities. Details on the methods and assumptions used are described in the specialist report.<br />

Table 4-11 shows the primary values associated with the current land uses.<br />

Generally it can be seen that land use in the northern savanna is not highly attractive for the investor, with<br />

low financial profitability and returns on investment. Tourism may be slightly more financially attractive,<br />

and this might explain the tendency for wildlife use to expand at the expense of livestock in this setting. In<br />

terms of economic contribution (contribution to the national in<strong>com</strong>e) tourism is distinctly more efficient<br />

than livestock production. Several forces affect the relative values for land uses in this setting. Bush<br />

23 Barnes, J. & Jones, B. 2009.Game ranching in Namibia. In: Suich, H., Child, B. with Spenceley, A.<br />

(Eds.). Evolution and innovation in wildlife conservation: From parks and game ranches to transfrontier<br />

conservation areas. Earthscan, London, UK. 113-126.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-55<br />

encroachment has reduced the suitability of rangeland in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> mine area for both livestock and<br />

tourism. Use of invader bush for <strong>com</strong>mercial production of fuel can provide a financially and economically<br />

viable way of ameliorating this problem.<br />

Poor terms of trade have affected extensive livestock production while rapidly growing demand for<br />

tourism allows for the generation of higher economic rents. Climate change is expected to reduce<br />

stocking rates in the Namibian savanna and will generally affect livestock in<strong>com</strong>es more than tourism<br />

in<strong>com</strong>es. 24 Economic analysis has shown however, that improved rangeland management can<br />

significantly enhance livestock in<strong>com</strong>es 25 , and this can offset other negative influences. Growth in tourism<br />

demand and in<strong>com</strong>e has in recent years been low, partly due to the global downturn, but analysis shows<br />

that tourism development and investment can significantly enhance in<strong>com</strong>es. 26<br />

TABLE 4-11: FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAND USES OTJIKOTO<br />

MINING AREA (N$, 2012)<br />

Land use<br />

Livestock<br />

Commercial<br />

Livestock<br />

Cattle post<br />

Tourism<br />

High value<br />

Tourism<br />

Low value<br />

Financial data<br />

Initial capital 4,443,800 1,365,800 14,030,800 9,429,200<br />

At stability<br />

Gross turnover 1,110,500 502,400 18,512,800 11,313,50<br />

0<br />

Variable financial costs 484,500 299,500 14,111,200 8,623,600<br />

Fixed financial costs 570,300 108,400 2,988,600 2,647,800<br />

Entrepreneur net in<strong>com</strong>e 55,600 94,600 1,413,000 42,100<br />

Local in<strong>com</strong>e 83,600 130,800 597,800 495,700<br />

Overall return<br />

Financial IRR*** (10 years) 6.6% 8.3% 21.0% 9.1%<br />

Financial NPV**** (10 years @ 10%) -853,800 -181,500 6,111,400 -398,400<br />

Wage bill 139,300 36,200 1,321,400 504,000<br />

Economic data<br />

Initial capital 4,111,600 1,199,100 12,183,500 8,068,300<br />

Gross output 902,300 571,400 16,834,600 10,577,90<br />

0<br />

Economic costs 782,700 343,200 12,653,600 8,411,100<br />

Incremental contribution to GNI* 119,600 228,200 4,181,000 2,166,800<br />

Incremental contribution to NNI** -63,600 197,000 3,850,300 1,925,400<br />

Economic IRR (10 years) 6.81% 10.86% 63.09% 43.18%<br />

Economic NPV (10years @ 10%) -671,500 75,600 22,318,200 10,569,40<br />

0<br />

Number of jobs 7 4 41 15<br />

Incremental contribution to GNI/ha 8.93 24.1 385 321<br />

Incremental contribution to NNI/ha -4.75 20.4 355 285<br />

Local in<strong>com</strong>e/ha 6.24 8.12 55.1 73.4<br />

Entrepreneur net cash In<strong>com</strong>e/ha 4.15 7.03 130 6.23<br />

Initial economic capital/ha 307 140 1,122 1,195<br />

Economic gross output/ha 67.3 66.6 1,551 1,567<br />

24 Turpie, J. et al. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment for Namibia's biodiversity and<br />

protected area system. Strengthening the Protected Area Network (SPAN) Project, Ministry of<br />

Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia. 248pp.<br />

25 Humavindu, M., Barnes, J., Nott, C., de Klerk, N. & Kruger, B. 2011.Economic valuation of good rangeland<br />

management and incentives for efficient implementation of the National Rangeland Strategy.Country Pilot Partnership<br />

Programme, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia. 53pp.<br />

26 Barnes, J. & Alberts, M. 2012.Assessment of peoples' engagement in sustainable use activities on the coastal zone<br />

of Namibia.Namibian Coast Conservation and Management (NACOMA) Project, Ministry of Environment and<br />

Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia. 47pp.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

* GNI = Gross national in<strong>com</strong>e, a measure of the national in<strong>com</strong>e similar to GDP<br />

** NNI = Net national in<strong>com</strong>e, gross national in<strong>com</strong>e less asset depreciation<br />

*** IRR = Internal rate of return over 10 years<br />

**** NPV = Net present value over 10 years at a 10% discount rate<br />

4.8 Social Environment<br />

4.8.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-56<br />

Ms Auriol Ashby <strong>com</strong>piled the social baseline and the social impact variables that may influence or be<br />

affected by the proposed mining development. Social baseline information was obtained from numerous<br />

government documents, key informant meetings held with the Otjozondjupa Regional Council, the Otavi<br />

and Otjiwarongo Town Councils and neighbouring mines, and from issues raised during the scoping<br />

phase public consultation. The full social assessment report is included at Appendix K.<br />

4.8.2 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project is situated in the large, central Otjozondjupa Region. The region is the fifth largest<br />

region in Namibia, 105 460 sq. km, with a total population of 142 400 people, giving a population density<br />

of 1.4 persons/sqkm 27 . 63% of the population is over 15 years of age and there are slightly more males<br />

than females 28 .<br />

The main languages spoken at home are Otjiherero (28%), Nama/Damara (22%) and Oshiwambo (20%),<br />

Afrikaans (11%), Kavango (8%), San (5.3%), German (1.6%) and English (1%). For the region as a<br />

whole, the literacy rate is 75% for all persons over 15 years of age. Many people are literate in more than<br />

one language: literacy in English is 52%, 48% in Afrikaans, 24% in Otjiherero, 23% in Oshiwambo and<br />

2% in German.<br />

The Otjozondjupa Region is divided into seven constituencies and the proposed mine is situated on the<br />

main road between the Otavi and Otjiwarongo Constituencies. The 2011 census shows a decrease in<br />

Otavi constituency’s population from 12 387 in 2001 to 11 800 in 2011, of which 5 200 live in the<br />

municipality of Otavi. By contrast, the more populated and economically active Otjiwarongo Constituency<br />

had grown from 23 412 people in 2001 to 30 400 in 2011, of which 28 000 inhabitants lived in the town of<br />

Otjiwarongo. Both town councils have greatly over estimated the growth of their towns. 25% of<br />

households in Otavi constituency are headed by women whereas in Otjiwarongo 42% are female headed<br />

households. The average household size in the region has dropped from 4.6 in 2001 to 4.1 in 2011 and<br />

in Otavi constituency it has dropped from 4 to 3.7 people per household.<br />

The 2001 Population census found there were 1,351 households in Otjozondjupa Region whose main<br />

language is San, equivalent to 5.3% of the region’s population. The eastern part of the region is part of<br />

27 NPC. 2012. Namibia 2011 Population and Housing Census Preliminary Results<br />

28 NPC. 2005. 2001 Population and Housing Census: Otjozondjupa <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-57<br />

the traditional homeland of the Ju/’hoansi San 29 and Tsumkwe is the administrative centre of the<br />

Ju/hoansi San <strong>com</strong>munity. The Nyae Nyae Conservancy is home to approximately 2,500 San while<br />

approximately 7,000 Ju/’hoansi live in the N≠Jaqna Conservancy 30 . Some Indigenous People, such as<br />

the Ju/’hoansi San, may live and be employed on neighbouring farms and in Otavi. No evidence has been<br />

found that they have claimed any land in the mining area.<br />

4.8.3 THE AFFECTED COMMUNITY<br />

4.8.3.1 Neighbouring landowners and farm-workers<br />

The mine is surrounded by <strong>com</strong>mercial farm land which is used primarily for ranching cattle with some<br />

game hunting and tourism use in varying <strong>com</strong>binations. The closest direct neighbouring farms encircling<br />

the mine farms clockwise are: Erhadtshof, Bergershof, Okaruiputa, Erpfsfarm, Houmoad, Okaputa,<br />

Okaputa West, Stark, Fisher, Lardner, Hester, Embla and Tirol.<br />

Figure 4-24 shows the location of the mine site in relation to the neighbouring farms.<br />

FIGURE 4-24: LOCATION OF EPL AND MINE FARMS<br />

29 Murphy A., Southern Africa, Retrieved on 27 February 2012 at Google books, p.346<br />

30 NACSO 2010, Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: a review of progress and challenges in 2009.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.8.3.2 Otavi<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-58<br />

The town of Otavi is situated near the cross roads of the main north-south National Road B1, the road to<br />

Grootfontein and the road to Outjo. The town (and proposed mine site) is also on the north-south railway<br />

line that runs from Ondangwa to Walvis Bay.<br />

Since 2009, Otavi has experienced a boost through the construction of Southern Africa’s most modern<br />

cement plant, situated 25km north of Otavi. The Ohorongo Cement plant is able to produce 700,000 tons<br />

of cement annually of which 300,000 tons will be for Namibian consumption. The reserves are expected<br />

to last for 300 years. In full production the plant employs about 300 people of whom 40% stay in Otavi<br />

and 60% in Tsumeb and are bussed to and from work. Dozens of Namibians have received training in<br />

Germany. It is expected that up to 2,000 indirect jobs will be created in the security services, catering,<br />

and transport and logistics sectors. To save on coal, the <strong>com</strong>pany is investing a further N$120 million on<br />

de-bushing equipment to harvest invader bush in the Otavi area on nearly 50 farms. This is expected to<br />

create a further 50 direct jobs and further jobs might be created for transporting the harvested bush to the<br />

plant.<br />

In 2010, Government upgraded Otavi from village to town status and an entirely new leadership has<br />

taken over since the ESIA Scoping Phase. The council is very positive and is enthusiastically promoting<br />

the town.<br />

Otavi can offer:<br />

� Large reserves of rain-fed groundwater;<br />

� Up-graded state health centre, 2 private doctors and a private veterinarian;<br />

� 3 primary schools and one secondary school;<br />

� Limited service sector: AGRA, Spar, FNB and Standard Bank, Post Office, Tele<strong>com</strong>, Magistrates<br />

court, a regional council office and a small range of retail and service suppliers;<br />

� Limited manufacturing - Mossi Nets, Namib Mills (a maize mill, mahangu plant and sugar packing<br />

plant), protective clothing;<br />

� Upgraded sports field, <strong>com</strong>munity hall, swimming pool, library, night clubs and several churches;<br />

� Land earmarked for offices, housing development for medium-upper in<strong>com</strong>e housing and for 300-<br />

400 low cost housing, through the Build Together programme (Ministry of Regional and Local<br />

Government, Housing and Rural Development (MRLGHRD). In 2008, the Ratepayers Association<br />

reported that there were many undeveloped, but already serviced plots available for building<br />

houses for people in the higher in<strong>com</strong>e bracket, which would encourage new<strong>com</strong>ers to integrate<br />

in the existing <strong>com</strong>munity;<br />

� Two lodges and several Bed and Breakfasts that serve passing tourists but otherwise the town’s<br />

facilities serve its resident population and surrounding farmland; and<br />

� In 2007, it twinned with Bloemfontein, South Africa which has offered technical support.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-59<br />

It seems to have strong political support from Cabinet and parliamentarians as many have farms in the<br />

area. Among the planned projects are a new Municipal <strong>com</strong>plex (N$11 million), the upgrade of sewerage<br />

and water reticulation (N$20 million), an artisan training centre and a new primary school.<br />

Otavi Town Council has a vision and plan to attract investors to the town 31 . It wants more job<br />

opportunities to “rekindle economic activity for the benefit of all that means the Village Council’s revenue<br />

base will expand, more SMEs and businesses will emerge and indirect jobs will be created”. It feels<br />

frustrated that larger Local Authorities in the region do not divert development opportunities to the smaller<br />

ones.<br />

Otavi’s Strategic Plan (2009-2013) aims to uplift the town and is based on the needs and expectations of<br />

its stakeholders – residents in both formal and informal housing, the local business <strong>com</strong>munity, investors,<br />

government ministries, NGOs, schools and churches. The plan honestly scrutinizes the many issues and<br />

challenges facing the town and highlights five strategic objectives, one of which is to promote sustainable<br />

socio-economic growth.<br />

The Council would like to encourage Auryx Gold’s to source labour from the town and to ac<strong>com</strong>modate its<br />

workforce in Otavi, thus bringing more economic benefits.<br />

4.8.3.3 Otjiwarongo<br />

Otjiwarongo is the regional capital and is 70km south of <strong>Otjikoto</strong> mine, on the main B1 northern highway.<br />

The town is six times the size of Otavi, with a population of 30,400 (2011) of which approximately 7,000<br />

own formal plots and are ratepayers 32 . Otjiwarongo’s larger population sustains a much larger and<br />

diverse economy including many service industries and institutions. Its industries are not large:<br />

polystyrene, tyre re-tread, taxidermist, Fabupharm (manufactures a wide range of cosmetic and toiletry<br />

preparations as well as registered pharmaceutical products for the private and the Government Tender<br />

Market), brick makers, two auction houses, Namaqua Meat for European export, and charcoal production<br />

based on a number of nearby farms.<br />

It has several government and private primary and secondary schools and has good medical services<br />

including doctors, dentists, pharmacists and a government and private hospital. A Multipurpose Help<br />

Centre was established with funding from its twin town in the Netherlands which provides afterschool<br />

support and a feeding programme (with food from Spar) to about 80 orphans and vulnerable children. The<br />

centre manager and two staff are funded by the council. A multi-market centre provides SME support.<br />

The Otjiwarongo Town Council’s five year strategic plan 2009 – 2013 has identified a number of<br />

developmental challenges: service provision backlogs, lack of institutional capacity, slack economic<br />

growth and job creation, inadequate and decaying infrastructure and inadequate funds to meet all the<br />

developmental needs of the town. Its strategic plan addresses these issues through five strategies:<br />

31 Otavi Village Council Strategic Plan 2009-2013<br />

32 Otjiwarongo Town engineer at the stakeholder meeting<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Socio-economic development<br />

� Infrastructural development<br />

� Capacity building<br />

� Operational efficiency<br />

� Budget and finance<br />

To be achieved by:<br />

� Reducing poverty levels<br />

� Facilitating SME development<br />

� Ensuring a health & hygienic environment and<br />

� Mitigating HIV/AIDS<br />

� Infrastructural development<br />

� Budget and Financial<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-60<br />

The Town Council gets no money from central government for capital development such as street lighting<br />

and plot development to formalise informal settlements. They are proud that it has good town planning,<br />

even in informal areas.<br />

The town hopes to be the main service centre for Auryx Gold’s operations and its personnel.<br />

4.8.3.4 Otjozondjupa Regional Council<br />

Over the last decade, government has put considerable resources into building the capacity of regional<br />

structures with the aim of decentralising services closer to the people. Several line ministries, notably<br />

Education, Gender and Child Welfare, the Department of Works and the Directorate of Rural Water<br />

Supply are formally under the Regional Councils.<br />

The Otjozondjupa Region has seven elected council members, one for each constituency and one<br />

Governor appointed by the President of Namibia. The Council’s Strategic Plan 2009 - 2014 aims to<br />

ensure that Otjozondjupa makes a significant contribution toward the achievement of Vision 2030 over<br />

the five-year period. The strategic plan gives an analysis of the key development issues it faces in table<br />

4-12.<br />

TABLE 4-12: ANALYSIS OF THE REGION’S KEY CHALLENGES AND THEIR ROOT CAUSES<br />

Strategic Issue Root Causes<br />

Low revenue base<br />

� Low own in<strong>com</strong>e generation capacity - from existing<br />

services, new services and poor in<strong>com</strong>e collection<br />

� Lack of conducive investment environment<br />

Low Local Economic Development � Under utilization of available natural resources<br />

(LED) and high unemployment � Insufficient funding and skills; No proactive identification,<br />

marketing and tapping of LED potential<br />

Poor disaster preparedness<br />

�<br />

�<br />

Lack of funds; Poor planning<br />

Insufficient local capacity to handle emergencies<br />

� Unaffordability/High building standards & cost<br />

Shortage of appropriate housing � Unemployment; poverty<br />

� Insufficient funding<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-61<br />

Strategic Issue Root Causes<br />

High crime rate � Poverty, unemployment and moral decay<br />

� Ignorance/culture/peer pressure/poor education, poverty,<br />

High HIV/AIDS prevalence<br />

�<br />

weak moral values<br />

Ineffective implementation of legislation on HIV control and<br />

prevention<br />

� Historical political context<br />

� Lack of motivation, Inadequate education facilities &<br />

Low literacy/education levels<br />

�<br />

resource materials<br />

Poverty, poor early childhood development<br />

� Unfavourable education policy; Shortage of qualified<br />

teachers<br />

Limited <strong>com</strong>munity awareness and � Poor <strong>com</strong>munity engagement strategy<br />

knowledge of ORC and its services � Poor public relation and marketing of ORC services<br />

Limited involvement of private � Poor private sector engagement strategy<br />

sector<br />

� Poor marketing of ORC services and potential<br />

Low budget for rural electrification<br />

�<br />

�<br />

Inadequate funds<br />

Poor planning<br />

Source: ORC Strategic Plan 2009-2014, p11<br />

The Regional Council’s three strategic themes are: (i) Sustainable Socio-economic Development (ii)<br />

Good Governanceand(iii) Operational Excellence. The Regional Local Economic Development Strategy<br />

was adopted by Council in June 2011and it lists the needs and strategies for the region:<br />

AGRICULTURE– Key challenges identified include poor livestock quality on <strong>com</strong>munal and<br />

resettlement farms, livestock marketing challenges for <strong>com</strong>munal farmers, overstocking and<br />

resultant overgrazing of farm land, limited crop production, inadequate water infrastructure for<br />

agricultural development, unmet resettlement needs, bad road conditions and bad infrastructure,<br />

and inadequate financing agriculture development. Main LED initiatives identified are support to<br />

<strong>com</strong>munal farmers, outreach of existing skills development programmes, database development on<br />

skills development programmes for farmers, development of regional marketing calendar for<br />

livestock, regional Livestock Marketing Workshop, marketing infrastructure upgrade and<br />

maintenance in constituencies, Rangeland Management Training for <strong>com</strong>munal farmers, virgin land<br />

development for agricultural production, water infrastructure development in prioritized targeted<br />

<strong>com</strong>munal land, prioritize resettlement needs of people with livestock on town lands, horticultural<br />

production on resettlement farms, de-bushing of agricultural land (including exploring potential for<br />

energy production), urban agricultural (horticultural) initiative on settlement and town lands (including<br />

incentives), and up scaling of Ministry of Agriculture Water and Forestry (MAWF) pilots in the region.<br />

TOURISM– Key challenges identified include under-developed craft and cultural tourism,<br />

inadequate marketing & promotion for the tourism sector, inadequate or under-developed tourist<br />

attraction, and inadequate contribution of the <strong>com</strong>munal conservancies to tourism growth, and<br />

guest and tourist ac<strong>com</strong>modation inadequacies in certain urban localities. Main LED initiatives<br />

identified are safety & security coordinating mechanism in region, marketing agency<br />

establishment, establish regional tourism forum and revive local tourism forums, training of<br />

tourism operators, hospitality infrastructure in targeted urban localities (e.g. tourism info centre<br />

cum coffee shops, restaurants, Internet café’s, and craft market development), training institutions<br />

development in the region, product development for tourism (inclusive of tourism route<br />

development, day tours, etc), support to <strong>com</strong>munal conservancies (institutional and resource<br />

support mobilized), guest ac<strong>com</strong>modation in targeted locations.<br />

MANUFACTURING– Key challenges identified include challenges for the charcoal industry,<br />

procurement challenges for the manufacturing industry, <strong>com</strong>petition from South African and other<br />

suppliers, skills availability challenges for the manufacturing industry, high costs of inputs,<br />

uncertainties and unpredictability of the Angolan market, and work permits for skilled workers.<br />

Main LED initiatives identified are about exploring value addition in charcoal production, regulation<br />

and control of charcoal industry, encourage the introduction of entrepreneurship in school syllabus,<br />

vocational and technical skills, procurement of local products & services by public services,<br />

database development of manufacturers and other business in region, incentives package<br />

development for industry in the region, and marketing initiatives for manufactured products in the<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

region.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-62<br />

SERVICES– Key challenges identified include challenges of local authority services, inadequate<br />

stakeholder relationships and <strong>com</strong>munication, inadequate settlements development, limited<br />

serviced and prime land availability in urban areas, skills development gaps, housing and<br />

ac<strong>com</strong>modation demand not met, and poor levels of public services provision (related to essential<br />

services such as education, health, security, etc). Main LED initiatives identified are skills<br />

development for local authorities and settlements, strengthen Regional Education Forum,<br />

strengthen local stakeholder platforms, establish regional Local Authority (LA) platform,<br />

development of standardized LA profiles, strengthen attachment programmes of technical and<br />

vocational skills training facilities in region, regional trust fund establishment, develop strategies<br />

for improving revenue collection for LAs/settlements, explore support towards Public Private<br />

partnerships (PPPs) for servicing land in targeted LAs, engage TransNamib/Ministry of Works and<br />

Transport on prime land in LAs, engage Tele<strong>com</strong>/cellular phone <strong>com</strong>panies (MTC/LEO),<br />

ORC/CENORED/Namwater on service provision issues in the region, explore incentives for<br />

business and industrial development in LA areas, explore PPP’s on health services in targeted LA<br />

areas, identification of champions for local opportunities.<br />

MINING– Main LED initiatives identified under mining are to establish a regional trust fund,<br />

engage mining <strong>com</strong>panies on possible PPPs for developing declared settlements and nearby LAs,<br />

engage respective mining <strong>com</strong>pany and MRLGHRD on Kombat proclamation to a settlement or<br />

village, engage Ohorongo Cement on opportunities for SMEs, Memorandum of Understanding<br />

with Ohorongo Cement on cooperation with Otavi Town Council, and research on small-scale<br />

mining activities in Otjozondjupa and follow-up activities.<br />

SMES/INFORMAL– Key challenges identified include unavailability of affordable business<br />

premises, unresponsive business environment, expensive urban land for business purposes, and<br />

inadequate support service provision in region. Main LED initiatives identified are formalization of<br />

marketing structures in settlements and Local Authorities (LA), training and mentorship support for<br />

SMEs and informal sector, assessment of formal business opportunities in targeted localities,<br />

support formalization of SMEs and informal, regional fund for supporting SMEs, explore zoning<br />

solutions for SMEs, incubation facilities for SMEs, representation of SMEs & informal, advocating<br />

for procurement criteria and practices that make participation of local SMEs possible, LAs &<br />

regional council & other public agencies (voluntarily) procure from local SME suppliers or<br />

contractors, and develop regional database of accredited contractors for local procurement<br />

preferences.<br />

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM– Main LED initiatives identified are fuel-efficient wood<br />

cook stoves, hybrid biogas-diesel electricity generation for off-grid settlements (e.g. Gam),<br />

Affordable clay-house development using sun-baked clay bricks, production of wood pellets from<br />

invader bush for sale to the international energy market, local SME manufacture of transportable<br />

charcoal retorts, small-scale SME production of charcoal briquettes (in Otavi, Okahandja, and<br />

Grootfontein), avoidance of methane emissions and high value <strong>com</strong>post production using biogas<br />

digesters at <strong>com</strong>mercial poultry farms, <strong>com</strong>posting of municipal organic waste and collection of<br />

recyclable municipal waste by SME collectors using cargo bicycles, additional financial support to<br />

the Solar Revolving Fund and urban fruit tree orchards using treated municipal wastewater for<br />

irrigation (in addition looking at other uses for the recycled waste water).<br />

4.8.3.5 National Government<br />

The new Environmental Regulations recognise that any organ of state that may have jurisdiction over any<br />

aspect of the proposed project is regarded as an Interested and affected party. The National Planning<br />

Commission (NPC) is responsible for planning government priorities and directing the course of national<br />

development which is then implemented by the various government Offices, Ministries and Agencies. Of<br />

particular importance to the project and the surrounding area are:<br />

� The Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) facilitates and regulates the development and<br />

sustainable utilization of Namibia's mineral and energy resources for the benefit of all Namibians<br />

� The Ministry of Agriculture Water and Forestry (MAWF) is mandated to promote, develop,<br />

manage and utilize agricultural, water and forestry resources. It wants to diversify agricultural<br />

practices and products, create jobs, improve <strong>com</strong>petitiveness, develop Namibia’s market locally,<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-63<br />

regionally and internationally, ensure potable water and basic sanitation services, promote<br />

integrated environmental management, improve regulatory environment, build capacity for the<br />

people, promote food safety standards and most of all, ensure food security.<br />

� The Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) is tasked to manage the country’s ecological<br />

processes and life-support systems, conserve biological diversity, and ensure that natural resources<br />

are sustainable for the benefit of all Namibians, both present and future.<br />

� The Ministry of Works and Transport (MWT) is tasked to provide effective transport infrastructure<br />

and specialised services. This includes the Roads Authority (RA) which manages the national road<br />

network with a view to support economic growth.<br />

� The Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare (MLSW) is responsible for the execution of the<br />

Labour Act No. 11 of 2007, the Social Security Act No. 34 of 1994, the Employees Compensation<br />

Amendment Act No. 5 of 1995 and the Affirmative Action Act (Employment) No. 29 of 1998. The<br />

various Acts stipulate, amongst other things, sound labour relations, employment equity, fair<br />

employment practices, training, minimum basic conditions of service, workplace health and safety<br />

and retrenchment. Compliance is enforced and monitored by the Ministry of Labour through the<br />

office of the Labour Commissioner.<br />

� The Ministry of Health and Social Services (MHSS) oversees policy formulation, provides<br />

health facilities and manages healthcare provided by regional directorates.<br />

� The Ministry of Education (MoE) provides pre-primary schooling, formal general education at<br />

primary and secondary level (grades 1-12), higher education, vocational education and training,<br />

education for out-of-school youth and adults and life-long learning.<br />

� State Owned Companies such as the Roads Authority, NamPower, NamWater, TransNamib<br />

and Tele<strong>com</strong>.<br />

4.8.4 LABOUR AND INCOME<br />

The labour force in Otjozondjupa is approximately 55,000 people, of whom about 31,000 are male. The<br />

labour force participation rate (LFPR) or the economically active population is the proportion of the<br />

working population (both employed and unemployed) over 15 years old. Otjozondjupa has the fifth<br />

highest LFPR in the country at 71%, which is above the national average of 55% 33 . As to be expected<br />

urban rates are higher than rural rates and they are higher for males in all the constituencies (82% of<br />

males <strong>com</strong>pared to 60% of women). The 2008 Namibia Labour Force Survey found that the national<br />

unemployment rate was 51.2%. Unemployment rates (using a broad definition) in Otjozondjupa Region are<br />

significantly higher among women (65%) <strong>com</strong>pared to 27% male unemployment. Youth unemployment<br />

(15-34 years) is below the national average at 50% but young women, have the highest unemployment<br />

rate in the region, 73% <strong>com</strong>pared with men 31% 34 .<br />

Of those employed in the region, approximately 51% are employed in the private sector, 22% are employed by<br />

government and parastatals and approximately only 9% are subsistence farmers /farm workers. Agriculture<br />

(the data includes forestry) is an important source of employment accounting for almost 30% of<br />

33 MoLS. 2010. Namibia Labour Force Survey 2008, Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare<br />

34 NPC. 2005. 2001 Population and Housing Census; Otjozondjupa Region<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-64<br />

employment in Otjozondjupa. The manufacturing sector includes mining, quarrying, electricity, gas and<br />

construction and accounts for nearly 12% of the workforce. The largest occupational group is elementary<br />

occupations which includes labourers and other unskilled occupations and constitute 40% of all those<br />

employed. 35<br />

The main source of in<strong>com</strong>e in the region is derived from wages and salaries which make up 54% of a<br />

household’s total in<strong>com</strong>e source. Business and non-farming activities accounts for 5% whilst cash<br />

remittances sent home by family members from elsewhere account for 13% and 12% 36 . Over the whole<br />

region, 13% of households rely on pensions and only 10% on subsistence agriculture and cattle rearing 37 .<br />

Thirty nine <strong>com</strong>mercial farms in the region have been used for the resettlement of 116 farmers 38 which<br />

has generally not been economically beneficial to the families concerned or for the land’s productivity.<br />

The living standard of households can be partly expressed by examining patterns of consumption. From<br />

national statistics, annual consumption levels where the head of household is without formal education<br />

averaged N$16,530 in 2003-4 (approximately a quarter of Namibia’s population has never attended<br />

school). This <strong>com</strong>pares to N$147,477 where the household head has a tertiary qualification. The average<br />

annual consumption of households in <strong>com</strong>mercial farming was N$224,850, <strong>com</strong>pared to those in<br />

subsistence farming which was N$21,530. When shown by the dominant language groups nationally, the<br />

average annual household consumption of German households is N$193,684, of Afrikaans households is<br />

N$93,156, of Otjiherero households is N$42,478, of Nama/Damara households is N$23,920 and of San<br />

households it is N$14,505 39 . An atlas of poverty in Namibia 40 estimates the median annual expenditure<br />

per person living on <strong>com</strong>mercial land in this part of Namibia is N$5,000 – 6,000 (figure 4-25). A large<br />

number of Namibians seeking jobs in the formal sector are held back due to a lack of necessary skills or<br />

training.<br />

35 Ibid<br />

36 NPC. 2005. 2001 Population and Housing Census; Otjozondjupa Region<br />

37 MoLS. 2010. Namibia Labour Force Survey 2008, Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare<br />

38 Otjozondjupa Regional Council. 2011. Otjozondjupa Regional LED Strategy<br />

39 NPC. 2006. Namibia Household In<strong>com</strong>e and Expenditure Survey 2003/2004<br />

40 RAISON. 2011. An Atlas of Poverty in Namibia. Central Bureau of Statistics<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-65<br />

Source: RAISON. 2011. An Atlas of Poverty in Namibia.<br />

FIGURE 4-25: ESTIMATES OF MEDIAN ANNUAL EXPENDITURE PER PERSON IN THE WIDER PROJECT<br />

AREA.<br />

Namibia’s Gini coefficient is one of the highest in the world (0.63) and Otjozondjupa is the region with the<br />

fourth highest (0.60) which reflects the great inequalities of in<strong>com</strong>e between households 41 . The San are<br />

the poorest population group in the country and there were 1,350 San households in this region at the last<br />

census.<br />

4.8.5 BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING<br />

In Otjozondjupa Region in 2001, 39% of households lived in housing which was provided by their<br />

employer while 48% lived in their own homes. The proportion of households living in impoverished<br />

41 NPC. 2008. A Review of Poverty and Inequality in Namibia<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-66<br />

dwellings (shacks) was only 10% in the region. Nevertheless, in 2001, 40 - 60% of households along the<br />

road between Otjiwarongo and Otavi relied on the bush as their only toilet.<br />

Commercial farmers have generally improved the housing conditions of the workers considerably since<br />

independence by <strong>com</strong>parison whereas there has been a worsening situation in urban areas. The main<br />

concern for people who live in employer-provided housing is where they will live on retirement or when<br />

unemployed.<br />

Otavi has earmarked land for 300-400 low cost housing but a big challenge is to provide serviced plots as<br />

it relies on government funding to install water, sewerage and electricity. The decentralised Build<br />

Together Programme of the Ministry of Regional Local Government Housing and Rural Development<br />

(MRLGHRD) and the parastatal – the Namibia Housing Enterprise (NHE), provide loans for house<br />

construction.<br />

Several NGOs operate in the low cost housing sector. The Shack Dwellers Federation of Namibia (SDFN)<br />

is a network of housing saving schemes that aims to improve the living conditions of low-in<strong>com</strong>e people<br />

living in shacks, rented rooms and those without any ac<strong>com</strong>modation, while promoting women’s<br />

participation.<br />

The Clay House Project is based in Otjiwarongo and provides building skills in alternative construction<br />

methods using locally produced clay bricks. 42 . It also offers dry toilets but these cost N$10,000 – 15,000<br />

each. The project has built more than 240 homes in informal settlements and several pre-schools and it<br />

started a pre-school support programme in 2008.<br />

4.8.6 HEALTH<br />

Rural households are more likely to be located nearest to a clinic and 59% of households in Otjozondjupa<br />

have a clinic as the nearest government health facility. Urban households are more likely to be nearest to<br />

a government hospital and 39% of households have a hospital as the closest facility. Overall, 49% of<br />

households walked to their nearest health facility which indicates the proximity of health facilities to the<br />

population they serve.<br />

Child immunisation rates are good in the region, with over 76% of children fully vaccinated. Incidence of<br />

diarrhoea among the under fives was 13% and 86% of mothers knew how to treat diarrhoea.<br />

The biggest concern is that 27% of children under 5 years in Otjozondjupa were found to be stunted<br />

(short for their age) while 15% were under weight for the age 43 . Both these indicators are used by<br />

Namibia’s Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to measure poverty and it show that chronic childhood<br />

malnutrition is widespread and worsening. The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MHSS) has a<br />

42 http://home.arcor.de/clayhouse/<br />

43 MHSS. 2008. Namibia Demographic and Health Survey 2006/07<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-67<br />

detailed implementation plan to reduce malnutrition that includes improved maternal nutrition,<br />

breastfeeding and feeding programmes at ECD centres and primary schools.<br />

In 2001, the top killer diseases in Otjozondjupa Region for 5 year olds and older were AIDS (19%), TB<br />

(15%) and cancer (9%) 44 .<br />

4.8.7 HIV/AIDS<br />

HIV/AIDS is regarded as far more than a health issue alone as it has impacted on every sector in<br />

Namibia. As with the rest of southern Africa, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has had a devastating impact on<br />

families and has put a considerable strain on government services. The government has yet to introduce a<br />

population-wide survey, so HIV prevalence among males is not known. The HIV prevalence ratio among<br />

pregnant women visiting the three sentinel hospitals closest to the mine site is shown in table 4-13 45 .<br />

TABLE 4-13: HIV PREVALENCE RATES FOR YOUTH AND ADULTS IN SELECTED SITES, 2004 - 2010<br />

Sentinel site<br />

% HIV prevalence rate<br />

15-24 years age group 25-49 years age group<br />

2004 2006 2008 2010 2004 2006 2008 2010<br />

Tsumeb 6.3 16.2 5.2 11.2 25.8 17.6 28.1 34.3<br />

Grootfontein 23.7 13.4 9.8 9.9 31.6 24.8 24.2 19.5<br />

Otjiwarongo 9.5 11.5 9.6 10 23.7 27.2 21.1 23.5<br />

Nationally 15.2 14.2 10.6 10.3 23.9 26.5 24.7 26.4<br />

The impressive decrease in Grootfontein recorded since 2004, among youth and adults, may reflect the<br />

intensive social and behavioural change programmes implemented by the Namibia Defence Force at their<br />

base and by NGOs in the town. Tsumeb now has the fourth highest rate in the country and this is thought<br />

to be linked to its highly mobile population, where there are a large number of men with cash,<br />

unac<strong>com</strong>panied by their families. Male dominated industries, such as defence, construction, mining and<br />

the transport sectors bring significant risk to the resident population.<br />

The main drivers of the epidemic in Namibia are multiple concurrent partnerships, inconsistent condom<br />

use and unprotected sex, mobility patterns of migrant workers, low perception of risk of HIV infection,<br />

alcohol use and abuse, and transactional and intergenerational sex. Of concern is the rate of infections<br />

amongst the youth has remained stable or even slightly increased at all three towns, <strong>com</strong>pared to the<br />

downward national trend.<br />

The early diagnosis of HIV, together with supportive counselling, on-going monitoring and good nutrition<br />

can lengthen the period before a person may need anti-retroviral treatment (ART). The Namibian<br />

Government and partners have rolled out anti-retroviral treatment to all district hospitals and some health<br />

44 El Obeid et al. 2001.Health in Namibia. RAISON<br />

45 MHSS. 2010. <strong>Report</strong> on the 2010 National HIV Sentinel Survey<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-68<br />

centres. Strict adherence to the treatment and a continued supportive environment can lengthen and<br />

improve the quality of life of people living with HIV by many years.<br />

4.8.8 EDUCATION<br />

4.8.8.1 Overview<br />

Largely due to pre independence apartheid policies, by 2001, only 21% of the people living in the<br />

Otjozondjupa Region had <strong>com</strong>pleted secondary school, of which 5% held some higher tertiary training.<br />

22% of the people had never attended school and a further 35% did not <strong>com</strong>plete primary school. The net<br />

result of this is that between 50-60% of households in the mine’s area have no member who has higher<br />

than primary education and this impacts detrimentally on in<strong>com</strong>e levels 46 .<br />

The literacy rate in Otjozondjupa in 2001 was 75% of people over 15 years but literacy rates vary<br />

tremendously across the region. Urban literacy rates were 88% <strong>com</strong>pared with 64% in the rural areas.<br />

Literacy rates in Otavi constituency were 65% 47 .<br />

There are 65 schools in Otjozondjupa, 44 primary, 12 <strong>com</strong>bined schools and 9 secondary schools. With<br />

the total number of school learners being 33,317 pupils, 30 119 of them attend state schools. Currently,<br />

school attendance among girls and boys is 85% and 82% respectively. The Ministry of Education’s<br />

(MoE) regional office has admitted that they are not able to support and attend to all the needs of the<br />

state schools sufficiently 48 .<br />

4.8.8.2 Early Childhood Development (ECD)<br />

In Namibia, early learning opportunities for young children are extremely limited, especially in rural areas.<br />

Programmes for the 2-5 year olds are primarily <strong>com</strong>munity or privately run with little or no government<br />

funding. The MoE is re-introducing state support for pre-primary education for the 5-6 year olds, while the<br />

Ministry of Gender and Child Welfare (MGECW) has overall responsibility for other ECD centres.<br />

Three thousand (24%) of the region’s 3-6 year olds are attending the 81 ECD centres in the region as in<br />

March 2011 but only 41% of their caregivers have received any training in ECD. Perhaps of greatest<br />

concern is that almost half of the centres have no trained staff at all. Many ECD centres simply enable<br />

mothers to go out and earn a living. ECD centres charge fees ranging from N$50 – N$400 per month,<br />

depending on their catchment areas.<br />

4.8.8.3 Primary and Secondary Education<br />

Otavi has three primary schools: Otavi Primary has 600 learners, Shalom Primary has 800 learners in<br />

double shifts (it is much harder for children in the second shift) and the private German school has 150<br />

learners. Currently, the German private school takes German speakers but some residents are<br />

46 RAISON. 2011. An Atlas of Poverty in Namibia. Central Bureau of Statistics<br />

47 NPC, 2005, 2001 Population and Housing Census; Otjozondjupa Region.<br />

48 MoE, 2011.Education Statistics 2009.Education and Management Information System (EMIS)<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-69<br />

advocating for a double medium school: German and English up to grade 4 and from there onwards<br />

English medium.<br />

Kharob Secondary School was originally a primary school and has expanded to offer Grade 12 ordinary<br />

level and higher level in Science, Biology and Geography. Of the 70 matriculates in 2010, about 55%<br />

passed. Many secondary school children in the Otavi area attend school in Tsumeb, 63km north of Otavi.<br />

In Namibia poor Grade 1 performance may be linked to lack of ECD opportunities.Nationally, grade 1<br />

repetition rates increased from 18.9% in 2002 to 20.7% in 2008. School leaving rates in grade 1<br />

increased from 2.3% in 2002 to 4.2% in 2008 49 . This is a unique and defining feature of Namibian<br />

education that one child in every five is a repeater. There are about 550 000 learners in grades 1-10 and<br />

110 000 of these have repeated at least one year of school. They occupy the time of 3 600 teachers and<br />

the space of over 300 schools which is a huge economic burden on the country. Grade 10s don’t ‘fail’;<br />

there are simply no places for them in grade 11 and so the Ministry of Education uses the results as a<br />

means of limiting entry. There is no standard required at grade 10 for progression to grade 11 because<br />

the grade 12 examination has been designed from the outset to cater for all abilities 50 .<br />

In 2011 across the country, only 51.5% of Grade 10s who took the Junior Secondary Certificate (JSC)<br />

examination qualified for admission to grade 11 in 2012 on the minimum requirement of 23 points in their<br />

best 6 subjects and above with an F grade (symbol) in English. Otjozondjupa Region performed better<br />

than both Khomas and Omaheke regions 51 .<br />

Learners who drop out of school early or who want to improve their grades can continue their education<br />

through distance learning at the Namibian College of Open Learning (NAMCOL).<br />

4.8.8.4 Vocational Training<br />

Since independence enrolment in Vocational Training Centres has increased more than sixteen times<br />

from about 150 trainees to 2,500 trainees. Community Skills Development Centres (COSDECs) have<br />

been established in nine locations, including Otjiwarongo and Tsumeb, to provide non-formal short-term<br />

training for youth and adults 52 . The KAYEC Trust, an NGO, has campuses in Windhoek and Ondangwa<br />

and it provides level 1 training in a range of vocational skills on 13 week highly practical courses.<br />

The Otjiwarongo COSDEC offers one year, Level One <strong>com</strong>petency-based training in baking, bricklaying<br />

and plastering, building maintenance, hairdressing, needlework and office administration. It has trained<br />

80 trainees / year in full time courses since 2004 and it has run additional, shorter courses too. The<br />

Tsumeb COSDEC offers basic <strong>com</strong>puter literacy, bricklaying and plastering, building maintenance, food<br />

preparation, leather tanning, office administration, plumbing and pipefitting, welding and fabrication. The<br />

49 MoE. 2011, Ibid<br />

50 Clegg, A. 2011.The Namibian education Time Bomb. The Namibian 01.02.2011<br />

51 http://www.moe.gov.na/news_article.php?id=49&title=Results of The 2011, Junior Secondary<br />

Certificate<br />

52 http://www.cosdef.org.na/<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-70<br />

Tsumeb SME Support Centre provides business training courses and counselling to small business<br />

owners and entrepreneurs. It has Small Business Incubation Units which it rents to local SME operators<br />

as part of their business support services.<br />

The Namibian Institute of Mining and Technology (NIMT) is reputed to be the best vocational training<br />

centre in the country by the mining sector. It has three campuses, at Tsumeb, Arandis and<br />

Keetmanshoop which are providing training in:<br />

� Fitting & Turning (including Machining): Arandis, Tsumeb and Keetmanshoop<br />

� Boiler making/Plating/Welding: Arandis, Tsumeb and Keetmanshoop<br />

� Diesel-/Petrol Mechanics: Arandis, Tsumeb and Keetmanshoop<br />

� Electrical: Arandis, Tsumeb and Keetmanshoop<br />

� Instrumentation<br />

� Bricklaying/Plastering<br />

� Carpentry/Joinery<br />

� Plumbing/Sheet metalwork<br />

� Refrigeration/Air-conditioning<br />

� Clothing Production<br />

� Millwright (Electrical) – Tsumeb only<br />

� Autotronics – Tsumeb only<br />

4.8.8.5 Summary<br />

The baseline study has found that within Otjozondjupa Region there are great differences between<br />

in<strong>com</strong>e groups and it is the fourth most unequal region in the country. Low education levels affect<br />

employability and many households’ ability to earn a decent wage. The median expenditure per person<br />

living on <strong>com</strong>mercial land along this section of the B1 is only N$5,000 – 6,000 per annum. Although the<br />

region has a relatively high labour force participation rate (71%), unemployment is high among women<br />

(65%), particularly among young women (73%). Unemployment is higher in rural than in urban areas and<br />

is higher in small towns such as Otavi <strong>com</strong>pared to Otjiwarongo. Poverty is widespread, as reflected in<br />

levels of child stunting affecting 27% of children under 5 years.<br />

Urban migration is continuous as reflected in the growth of both neighbouring towns, as people move to<br />

seek better opportunities. The development plans for the region and towns seek socio-economic<br />

development which provides in<strong>com</strong>e-earning opportunities.<br />

4.9 Archaeology<br />

The information provided in this baseline description is taken from the following archaeology<br />

reports:Archaeological assessment of current mineral exploration works at <strong>Otjikoto</strong>, Otjozondjupa Region<br />

(QRS, May 2007) and Archaeological assessment of current mineral exploration works at <strong>Otjikoto</strong>,<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-71<br />

Otjozondjupa Region: additional observations (QRS, June 2007). The reports can be found in Appendix<br />

I. The findings are incorporated into this Chapter.<br />

4.9.1 THE PROJECT AREA<br />

Previous archaeological work in the project area is limited to two extended transects running<br />

approximately parallel to the National Road B1. These were carried out as part of the archaeological<br />

assessment of major electricity transmission lines. No archaeological sites were located on either<br />

transect, indicating that few archaeological sites would be found in the study area.<br />

For the current project, within the survey area transect lines covering a total of 71 km were searched by<br />

foot or vehicle. Transect were selected using aerial photos and 1:50 000 topographical maps, to provide<br />

a maximum coverage of calcrete remnants and other outcrop, as well as areas of low ground. Historical<br />

maps were consulted, e.g. Kriegskarte Deutsch-SWA, (Dietrich Riemer, 1904) to determine possible sites<br />

of old settlements, and local residents were interviewed for information on burial places and other sites of<br />

cultural or historical significance.<br />

Archaeological sites in Namibia are protected by the National Heritage Act (No. 27 of 2004) and graves<br />

are protected under the Burial Places Ordinance (27 of 1966).<br />

4.9.2 FINDINGS<br />

Two site of archaeological / historical interest were located on the farm <strong>Otjikoto</strong> during the first site visit<br />

and are protected under the above mentioned Act / Ordinance.<br />

Location QRS 83/1&2 (Lat. -20.00593 / Long. 17.11444) is set in dense thorn bush in a low lying area<br />

characterised by sandy loamy soil. Approximately eighteen (18) cairns were found <strong>com</strong>posed of loose<br />

calcrete fragments in roughly circular or elliptic arrangements, ranging from 0.6 to 3.2 m in diameter<br />

(figure 4-26). No cultural items were observed on or near the cairns, but they appear to be of artificial<br />

origin. Similar heaps could result from natural root-heaving, but these are unusually characterised by<br />

larger calcrete fragments standing in the near-vertical position. Small heaps of stones may also result<br />

from shallow grading of tracks, but these are generally characterised by poorly sorted fragments with<br />

some heaping of soil. In this instant the cairns appear to be of hand-sorted fragments, and are therefore<br />

considered as possible burial cairns.<br />

It has to be noted that the sites are low lying which would have been favoured as winter grazing by<br />

Herero pastoralists who occupied the area in the 18th and 19th centuries. Winter grazing areas were<br />

usually the sites of permanent homesteads (ozonganda) and these were occupied for up to 30 years.<br />

Burial cairns are often the only remaining traces on these sites. The Otavi sheet of the Kriegskarte<br />

Deutsch-SWA indicates a number of major settlements and main routes in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> area, which also<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-72<br />

raise the likelihood that the cairns are burial sites. On these evidences and inferences the site QRS<br />

83/1&2 is considered to be an important site until proven otherwise.<br />

When considering existing potential impacts from on-site exploration activities, the significance rating<br />

(ranging from 0 – 5) QRS 83/1&2 is rated as 4 which means that QRS 83/1&2 is a ‘multi-<strong>com</strong>ponent site,<br />

or central site with high research potential’. The vulnerability ranking (0 - 5) is also rated as 4, translating<br />

as ‘high likelihood of partial disturbance due to proximity of development’.<br />

FIGURE 4-26: CAIRNS IN THE OTJIKOTO AREA.<br />

Location QRS 83/3 (Lat. -19.98297 / Long. 17.11588) is located on an east-facing side of a low calcrete<br />

remnant with very dense thorn bush cover. A group of approximately twelve (12) graves was<br />

encountered in an area of about 30m x 15m showing the remains of a boundary fence of wire and<br />

wooden poles (figure 4-27). The cemetery contains four graves with rectangular stones and concrete<br />

surroundings, and three of these have (partly) legible inscriptions. A further six graves are extended<br />

cairns, oriented east-west, and the remaining two are traditional grave cairns, possibly individuals who<br />

were not baptized.<br />

When considering existing potential impacts from on-site exploration activities, the significance rating<br />

(ranging from 0 – 5) QRS 83/3 is rated as 5 which means that QRS 83/3 is a ‘major archaeological site<br />

containing unique evidence of high regional significance’. The vulnerability ranking (0 - 5) is also rated as<br />

5, translating as ‘direct or certain threat of major disturbance or total destruction’.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-27: GRAVES FOUND NEAR FARM OTJIKOTO.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-73<br />

An additional archaeological survey and assessment of farms Gerhardshausen and Okaputa Nerd (also<br />

named Felsenquelle) was conducted on 11 and 12 June 2007. Four Christian burial sites of historical<br />

interest were located during this site visit and are protected under the above mentioned Act / Ordinance.<br />

Site QRS 83/5 (Lat -20.04588/Long 17.11324) is located among trees and shrubs on the southern edge<br />

of a clearing around the Gerhardshausen farmhouse, which was apparently abandoned in the 1940ties.<br />

A single Christian grave within a small fenced-off area was located. The grave has a brick and mortar<br />

surround and a grey marble headstone surmounted by an iron crucifix. The inscription is clearly<br />

readable.<br />

Sites QRS 83/4, QRS 83/6 and QRS 83/7 are located on farm Okaputa Nord.<br />

QRS 83/4 (Lat -20.06808/Long 17.09664) lies in low thornbush vegetation on the edge of a clearing near<br />

the farmhouse. Two Christian graves within a small fenced-off area were located. The graves are<br />

probably those of farm labourers, with rough stone cairns and some bottles. No names are available, but<br />

the farm manager stated that relatives occasionally visit the graves to tidy up.<br />

QRS 83/6 (Lat. -20.0697/Long. 17.09872) is located in a low calcrete and marble ridge within the dense<br />

thornbush. The site looks like a single Christian grave without a headstone.<br />

QRS 83/7 (Lat. -20.06907/Long. 17.0947) is situated beneath a large tress close to the farmhouse. The<br />

four Christian graves are surrounded by a stone-wall. Two graves have grey marble headstones and the<br />

inscription is clearly visible. The two remaining graves have thick lead plates set onto the headstones<br />

and on these the inscription are barely legible.<br />

The provisional significance ratings (ranging from 0 – 5) of QRS 83/4 – QRS 83/7 are rated as 3 which<br />

means that all four archaeological ‘sites forming part of an identifiable local distribution or group’. The<br />

vulnerability rankings (0 - 5) are rated as 2-3, translating as ‘low or indirect threat from possible<br />

consequences of development’ or ‘probable threat from inadvertent disturbance due to proximity of<br />

development’.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.9.3 SUMMARY<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-74<br />

Location QRS 83/1&2 of eighteen (18) cairns and Location QRS 83/3 of approximately twelve (12) graves<br />

are both sites of high significance and vulnerability. At present it is re<strong>com</strong>mended that both sites are<br />

fenced off for the time being.<br />

Four Christian burial sites on farms Gerhardshausen and Okaputa Nerd (also named Felsenquelle) are<br />

reasonably visible and their location is well known to the present property owner. As the farms might be<br />

bought by the client it is important to integrate these sites with the project Global Information System<br />

(GIS), to ensure that they can be taken into account in the planning of further exploration and possible<br />

mining development.<br />

All sites are protected by the Burial Ordinance.<br />

4.10 VISUAL BACKGROUND<br />

4.10.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

A site visit was conducted by VRM in October 2010 and a preliminary report was submitted in December<br />

2010. A follow on report was <strong>com</strong>pleted in May 2012. The information provided below is taken from the<br />

Visual Impact Assessment – Proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mining Project’, (VRM, May 2012). The report is<br />

attached in Appendix J<br />

Visual impact is defined as ‘The effect of an aspect of development on a specified <strong>com</strong>ponent of the<br />

visual, aesthetic or scenic environment within a defined time and space.’ 53 As identified in this definition,<br />

‘landscapes are considerably more than just the visual perception of a <strong>com</strong>bination of landform,<br />

vegetation cover and buildings as they embody the history, land use, human culture, wildlife and seasonal<br />

changes to an area.’ 54 These elements <strong>com</strong>bine to produce distinctive local character that will affect the<br />

way in which the landscape is valued and perceived.<br />

The study made use of the Visual Resource Management (VRM) methodology. 55 This is a systematic<br />

process developed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from the United States Department of<br />

Internal Affairs to evaluate potential visual impacts associated with landscape modifications.<br />

4.10.2 VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE<br />

The project area is covered by Tree and Shrub Savannah type vegetation. This is the dominant<br />

vegetation type in central Namibia. An ephemeral pan, situated on farms <strong>Otjikoto</strong> and Gerhardshausen, is<br />

surrounded by woody species, whereas the rest of the project area is <strong>com</strong>posed of thorn bush thicket.<br />

53 Oberholzer, B. 2005. Guideline for involving visual and aesthetic specialists in <strong>EIA</strong> processes: Edition 1.<br />

CSIR <strong>Report</strong> No ENV-S-C 2005 053 F. Republic of South Africa, Provincial Government of the Western<br />

Cape, Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Cape Town<br />

54 U.K Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA, ‘Guidelines for Landscape and<br />

Visual Impact Assessment’, Second Edition, Spon Press, 2002., Pg 9.<br />

55 Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of Interior. 2004. Visual Resource Management Manual<br />

8400<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-75<br />

Figure 4-28shows the topography of the area and figure 4-29andfigure 4-30show photographs of the<br />

site’s open space sense of place.<br />

FIGURE 4-28: SITE TOPOGRAPHIC AND RIDGE MAP<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-29: GPS 3 SHOWING LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF EXISTING CATTLE FARM<br />

FIGURE 4-30: GPS1 VIEW NORTH-WEST TOWARDS PROPOSED SITE<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-76<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.10.3 VIEWSHED<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-77<br />

A viewshed is ‘the outer boundary defining a view catchment area, usually along crests and ridgelines’. 56<br />

This reflects the area or extent where the landscape modification would probably be seen. However,<br />

visibility tends to diminish exponentially with distance which is well recognised in visual analysis<br />

literature. 57 Therefore the views of a landscape modification would not necessarily influence the<br />

landscape character within all areas of the viewshed.<br />

The area where a landscape modification does start to influence the landscape character is termed the<br />

Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) and is defined by the U.K Institute of Environmental Management and<br />

Assessment (IEMA), ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ as the ‘area within which<br />

a proposed development may have an influence or effect on visual amenity (of the surrounding areas).’<br />

This concept is addressed in the VRM methodology Distance Ratings. These are defined by the Bureau<br />

of Land Management (U.S. Department of Interior) and subdivide the landscape into three distance<br />

zones based on the relative visibility from travel routes or observation points: 58<br />

� Foreground / Middle ground, up to approximately 6km, which is where there is potential for<br />

the sense of place to change;<br />

� Background areas, from 6km to 24km, where there is some potential for change in the<br />

sense of place, but would only take place with very large landscape modifications; and<br />

� Seldom seen areas which fall within the Foreground / Middle ground area, but as a result<br />

of no receptors, they are not viewed, or seldom viewed.<br />

As depicted in the Viewshed Map on Figure 4-31, the potential visible extent of the mining activities<br />

(without vegetation screening) shows two different scenarios: proposed infrastructure with a height of<br />

40m and proposed infrastructure with a height of 60m. Both scenarios extend extensively well beyond the<br />

24km buffer to the north-west due to the flat nature of the landscape.<br />

56 Oberholzer, B. 2005. Guideline for involving visual and aesthetic specialists in <strong>EIA</strong> processes: Edition<br />

1. CSIR <strong>Report</strong> No ENV-S-C 2005 053 F. Republic of South Africa, Provincial Government of the<br />

Western Cape, Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Cape Town.<br />

57 Hull, RB; Bishop, ID.Journal of Environmental Management. Vol 27, no. 1, pg 99-108.<br />

58 Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of Interior. 2004. Visual Resource Management<br />

Manual 8410<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 4-31: VIEWSHED MAP.<br />

4.10.4 PHYSIOGRAPHIC RATING UNITS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-78<br />

During the study, the following criteria were used to undertake a broad-brush landscape characterization<br />

exercise to identify the dominant landscapes as well as to define the physiographic units within the<br />

defined Viewshed area. These are land parcels within the property which have physical as well as<br />

graphic similarities.’ 59 The assessment criteria are:<br />

� Similar visual patterns, texture, colour, variety (vegetation);<br />

� Like geographic character;<br />

� Similar impacts from manmade modifications (land use);<br />

� Areas of high prominence; and<br />

� Topography.<br />

As depicted on figure 4-32, the following landscapes were defined as falling within the ZVI of the<br />

proposed project. The landscape character of each physiographic rating unit PRU are:<br />

� Game farms;<br />

59 Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of Interior. 2004. Visual Resource Management<br />

Manual 8410<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Agricultural;<br />

� Road/railway corridor;<br />

� Ephemeral pan;<br />

� Existing modified landscapes (e.g. from prospecting, power lines); and<br />

� Ridgeline.<br />

FIGURE 4-32: PHYSIOGRAPHIC RATING UNITS (PRU).<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-79<br />

In order to understand the landscape character, the major landscapes (PRUs) affecting the visual context<br />

within the ZVI were identified and rated in terms of the VRM Scenic Quality rating criteria, the sensitivity<br />

of the property and the distance of the property from major access routes and viewing points.<br />

4.10.5 SCENIC QUALITY<br />

The landscape character is defined as ‘the distinct and recognisable pattern of elements that occurs<br />

consistently in a particular type of landscape, and how this is perceived by people. It reflects particular<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-80<br />

<strong>com</strong>binations of geology, landform, soils, vegetation, land use and human settlement.’ It creates the<br />

specific sense of place or essential character and ‘spirit of the place’. 60<br />

Our visual sense of landscape is created by more than just a <strong>com</strong>bination of landform, vegetation cover<br />

and buildings. The landscape represents the history, use of land, culture, wildlife and seasonal changes<br />

of an area, which <strong>com</strong>bine to produce a distinctive local character and affect the way the landscape is<br />

experienced and valued. The landscape continually evolves in response to natural or manmade<br />

processes.<br />

In the visual resource inventory process, Scenic Quality is determined using seven key factors: landform,<br />

vegetation, water, colour, adjacent scenery, scarcity, cultural modifications.<br />

During the rating process, each of these factors is ranked on a <strong>com</strong>parative basis with similar features<br />

within the physiographic province. The evaluation of scenic quality is done in relation to the natural<br />

landscape. This does not mean that manmade features within a landscape necessarily detract from the<br />

scenic value. Manmade features that <strong>com</strong>pliment the natural landscape may enhance the scenic value.<br />

Landscape type TOTAL Scenic Quality<br />

Game farms 12 B - Medium<br />

Cattle farms 8 C - Low<br />

Main tarred road/Railway corridor 12 B - Medium<br />

Ephemeral pan 16 B - Medium<br />

Minor gravel road 12 B - Medium<br />

Ridgeline 12 B - Medium<br />

Game Farms<br />

Landform: The game farming areas are located more to the south-east of the site and<br />

closer to the more tourist-related area of the Waterberg National Park. Landform<br />

is mainly uniform, with slight undulations and some small hilly outcrops<br />

(Doppelkopf).<br />

Vegetation: Although the field study did not extend to this area, the vegetation appears<br />

Water: None<br />

similar to the Tree and Shrub Savannah vegetation of the site. The vegetation<br />

type is interesting but fairly <strong>com</strong>mon.<br />

Adjacent Scenery: Colours are subtle and mostly secondary and tertiary. The adjacent scenery is<br />

Cultural<br />

Modifications:<br />

similar.<br />

Cultural modifications are limited, which increases the wilderness landscape<br />

character and adds value to the area as a tourist destination. A NamPower<br />

60 U.K Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA), ‘Guidelines for Landscape and<br />

Visual Impact Assessment’ Second Edition, Spon Press, 2002.Pg 120/121. Latin genius locī :genius,<br />

spirit + locī, genitive sing. of locus, place<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-81<br />

200KV powerline lies in the vicinity of the game farming area, which runs<br />

between the region and the site. The power line, at the entrance to the<br />

Kambaku Game Lodge, detracts from the sense of place within a 1km buffer<br />

from the line.<br />

Scenic Quality: The overall scenic quality of this area is defined as moderate.<br />

Cattle Farms<br />

Landform: The cattle farming areas are very similar in landscape character to the game<br />

farming areas, but with less undulation of terrain. This reinforces the uniformity<br />

of the terrain and vegetation.<br />

Vegetation: Veldt grasses, used as a source of cattle food, have been allowed to grow in<br />

Water: None<br />

some areas of the natural tree and shrub vegetation.<br />

Adjacent Scenery: The adjacent scenery is similar.<br />

Cultural<br />

Modifications:<br />

The area reflects more cultural modifications, as the farms are smaller in size<br />

and have more dwellings.<br />

Scenic Quality: As a result of these cultural modifications, and the uniformity of the landscape<br />

Road / Rail Infrastructure<br />

with low scarcity, the scenic quality of the area would be moderate to low.<br />

Landform: The landscape is uniform, but with slight undulations, which localize the visibility.<br />

Vegetation: The vegetation has been mainly removed for safety reasons, but the vegetation<br />

zone between the road and the rail is a vital <strong>com</strong>ponent of the landscape<br />

character. This visual screening contains the views from the road and effectively<br />

creates a corridor effect. Due to probable higher moisture from road run-off and<br />

access to more sunlight from road clearing, the trees adjacent to the road are<br />

also slightly larger than the surrounding bush, which increases the vegetation<br />

value for this landscape.<br />

Colours Mid to light tone ochres, greens and greys are predominant.<br />

Water: None apparent<br />

Adjacent Scenery: Similar in landform, vegetation and colour.<br />

Scarcity: Clearing of the bush by cattle farmers, and the buffer between the road and the<br />

Cultural<br />

Modifications:<br />

site, increases the scarcity of the road / rail corridor. The section of the road in<br />

the vicinity of the mine still has a strong corridor effect.<br />

Well balanced with a visual separation of the road and rail. The vegetation<br />

dominates the view.<br />

Scenic Quality: Due to the increased size of the trees with a corridor effect, as well as the<br />

scarcity of the adjacent trees, the scenic quality of the road / rail corridor is<br />

moderate.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Minor Road<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-82<br />

Landform: A uniform landscape, but with slight undulations, which localize the visibility.<br />

Vegetation: The vegetation grows close to the road, creating a narrow cutting through the<br />

Water: None<br />

thick bush. This increases the value of the scenic quality.<br />

Adjacent Scenery: Similar in landform, vegetation and colour.<br />

Cultural<br />

Modifications:<br />

Modifications are limited to the extent of the road.<br />

Scenic Quality: Although the narrow road cuts though the bush, it does increase the value. The<br />

Ephemeral Pan<br />

feature is fairly <strong>com</strong>mon in the area and the scenic quality is moderate to low.<br />

Landform: The shallow bowl effect of the landscape in this area increases the scenic<br />

quality.<br />

Vegetation: According to the Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, the<br />

ephemeral pan has marginal vegetation, but a diverse species <strong>com</strong>position.<br />

Some areas have been cultivated or heavily grazed. Other areas appear<br />

relatively pristine. 61<br />

Water: During the rainy season, if the pan fills with water, then the water would create a<br />

strong focal point, adding value to the scenic quality of the surrounds.<br />

Adjacent Scenery: The scenery is fairly <strong>com</strong>mon within the area, with slightly undulating terrain and<br />

Cultural<br />

Modifications:<br />

uniform vegetation.<br />

From a visual perspective, the cultural modifications are limited and the natural<br />

vista has value.<br />

Scenic Quality: Due to the presence (inference) of water, and the scarcity of the feature, the<br />

Ridgeline<br />

scenic quality of the area is moderate to high.<br />

Landform: The underlying geology of the area has resulted in a sight elevation due to<br />

weather resistant rock. In a mainly flat terrain, the slight elevation does increase<br />

the value of this area.<br />

Vegetation: Similar to the surrounding Tree and Shrub Savannah type.<br />

Water: None<br />

Adjacent Scenery: Similar in landform, vegetation and colour.<br />

Cultural<br />

Modifications:<br />

Limited to cattle farming activities which do not dominate the landscape.<br />

Scenic Quality: Due to the increased scarcity of this subtle landform, the scenic quality is<br />

61 ASEC. Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Mine Project<br />

for Auryx Gold Corporation. September 2010. Pg 49<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

moderate to low.<br />

4.10.6 KEY OBSERVATION POINTS<br />

Page 4-83<br />

Key Observation Points (KOPs) are defined by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Visual Resource<br />

Management, as the people located in strategic locations surrounding the property that make consistent<br />

use of the views associated with the site where the landscape modifications are proposed. These<br />

locations are important in terms of the VRM methodology as it requires that the degree of contrast that<br />

the proposed landscape modifications will make to the existing landscape is measured from these most<br />

critical locations within the zone of visual influence. 62<br />

Surrounding the proposed site are the following receptors:<br />

� B1 National Road northbound and southbound;<br />

� D2808 district road;<br />

� Receptors alongside the site such as Okariuputa Game Farm;<br />

� The farm north of the site, Erhardtshof;<br />

� Okapuka Nord, a game farm immediately to the south which is part of a conservancy;<br />

� A smallholding on the B1 National Road at Platveld; and<br />

� Kambaku Safari Lodge and Game Farm to the east of the site. 63<br />

4.10.7 SUMMARY<br />

As a result of the moderate levels of landscape character, only the core receptors were identified as Key<br />

Observation Points (KOPs). The following KOPs were selected to be assessed in the Contrast Rating<br />

stage in order to determine visual impacts:<br />

� B1 northbound;<br />

� B1 southbound; and<br />

� Cattle farm/ D2808 eastbound.<br />

4.11 Noise<br />

4.11.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The information provided in this baseline description is taken from the ‘Noise Impact Study for<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment’ undertaken by M2 Environmental Connections. The full report is<br />

included in Appendix G.<br />

62<br />

Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of Interior. 2004. Visual Resource Management Manual<br />

8400<br />

63<br />

ASEC. Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Mine Project<br />

for Auryx Gold Corporation. September 2010. Pg 63<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.11.2 NOISE SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENTS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-84<br />

Noise-Sensitive Developments (NSDs) were initially identified using Google Earth ® , supported by a site<br />

visit to confirm the status of the identified dwellings.<br />

The reason for the site visit, apart from sampling ambient sound levels, is that there could be a number of<br />

deserted or abandoned dwellings that could be seen as a sensitive receptor, or small dwellings that could<br />

not be identified on the aerial image, or those that were built after the date of the aerial photograph.<br />

4.11.3 CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SOUND CHARACTER<br />

4.11.3.1 Measurement Techniques<br />

Ambient (background) noise levels were measured at appropriate times in accordance with the South<br />

African National Standard SANS 10103:2008 "The measurement and rating of environmental noise with<br />

respect to land use, health, annoyance and to speech <strong>com</strong>munication". The equipment used to gather<br />

data were a Sound Level Meter (SLM) a Microphone (which was fitted with an appropriate windshield), a<br />

Preamplifier, a Calibrator and an Anemometer.<br />

Measurements were taken during the day and early morning on 1 and 2 November 2010 respectively.<br />

The sound measuring equipment was referenced directly before, and directly after the measurement was<br />

taken. In all cases drift was less than 0.2 dBA from the 94 dBA reference signals.<br />

4.11.3.2 On-Site Measurement<br />

Measurements were taken during the day and early morning on 1 and 2 November 2010 respectively.<br />

The sound measuring equipment was referenced directly before, and directly after the measurement was<br />

taken. In all cases drift was less than 0.2 dBA from the 94 dBA reference signal.<br />

The locations used to measure ambient (background) sound levels are presented in figure 4-33. These<br />

points are considered sufficient to determine the ambient (background) sound levels in the area. The<br />

results are presented in table 4-14below.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-85<br />

FIGURE 4-33: MONITORING POINTS SELECTED NEAR THE PROPOSED SITE (MARKED AS BLUES<br />

SQUARES)<br />

TABLE 4-14: RESULTS OF AMBIENT SOUND LEVEL MONITORING (DATUM TYPE: UTM, ZONE 33<br />

SOUTH)<br />

Point name Co-ordinates<br />

East, South<br />

Wind speed<br />

Ave. (m/s)<br />

LAeq,T<br />

(dBA)<br />

LA90<br />

(dBA)<br />

LA, max<br />

(dBA)<br />

LA, min<br />

(dBA)<br />

Temp<br />

( o C)<br />

Humidity<br />

(%)<br />

AG01 (D) 719959 7794918 1.9 42.4 33.5 57.2 29.3 35.5 19.0<br />

AG02 (D) 724068 7791125 2.7 40.8 33.9 51.0 28.6 34.5 16.6<br />

AG03 (D) 726694 7784209 1.7 34.0 22.4 49.3 18.6 34.3 17.6<br />

AG04 (N) 717386 7790734 0.4 65.6 20.5 89.7 18.4 16.1 30.4<br />

AG05 (N) 718350 7790431 0.1 41.5 24.1 41.5 19.4 15.6 30.0<br />

AG06 (N) 719286 7790139 1.3 28.3 21.8 53.5 17.9 15.1 32.9<br />

From the data obtained, it can be seen that the ambient daytime sound levels ranges between 22.4<br />

(LA,90) and 18.6 (LA,min) dBA. The average ambient night-time sound levels (LA,90) ranged between 20.5<br />

and 15.1 dBA (LA,min). All samples illustrate the rural character of the area during periods with light winds<br />

and mainly natural sounds defining the acoustic character, the area is considered rural. According to<br />

South African National Standard (SANS) 10103:2008, the maximum average ambient noise levels for<br />

rural residential areas are 45dBA (day) and 35dBA (night).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

4.11.4 SUMMARY<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 4-86<br />

Based on these observations it is suggested that ambient noise levels of 22.4 -18.6 dBA and 20.5 – 15.1<br />

dBA for the day and night, respectively, be used as a reference for calculating the impact caused by the<br />

proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> mining operation.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-1<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project area can be reached from the capital city, Windhoek, some 300 km to the south<br />

along the B1 national road, which is a surfaced road in excellent condition. Windhoek is connected by<br />

direct <strong>com</strong>mercial air travel from several European countries, South Africa and other African countries.<br />

The large regional town of Tsumeb, a mining centre in its own right, is located some 110 km north of the<br />

project area, also along the B1 road. A domestic airport is located at Tsumeb, currently with both<br />

scheduled and charter flights connecting with Windhoek. The smaller town of Otavi lies some 50 km<br />

north from the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project area near the cross roads of the main north-south National Road B1, the<br />

road to Grootfontein and the road to Outjo. Otavi is also on the north-south railway line that was<br />

constructed to transport goods from Tsumeb to Swakopmund and Walvisbay. Otjiwarongo lies some 70<br />

km southwest from the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project area and is situated on the B1. Internal access to the project area<br />

is via a well-maintained network of secondary roads and farm tracks. Given the arid climate of the area,<br />

these roads are generally passable all year-round.<br />

The project description has been separated into the following phases: construction, operation,<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure. These phases are described below. A site plan of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong><br />

mine development is provided as Figure 5-1.<br />

5.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE<br />

The purpose of the construction phase is primarily to establish the infrastructure and activities required for<br />

the operational phase. The construction phase will <strong>com</strong>mence in Q1 2013 and last for approximately two<br />

years.<br />

A summary of the key construction facilities, activities and other construction related issues are discussed<br />

below.<br />

5.2.1 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES<br />

The fence around the construction site will be the final fencing required for the plant. It will be 2.4 m high,<br />

with barbed wire at the top. Site access will be controlled via a boomed entrance, which will also be<br />

locked outside of normal working hours. These areas will be fenced and will incorporate some or all of<br />

the facilities described below:<br />

� Workshop and maintenance areas;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-2<br />

� Stores for storing and handling fuel, lubricants, solvents, paints and construction materials;<br />

� Bunded areas for waste handling and storage;<br />

� Contractors lay-down areas;<br />

� Mobile site offices;<br />

� Temporary first aid station;<br />

� Explosive magazines;<br />

� Temporary ac<strong>com</strong>modation camp;<br />

� Waste collection and storage areas;<br />

� Wash bay for washing equipment and vehicles;<br />

� Parking area for cars and equipment;<br />

� Change houses;<br />

� Clean water reservoir;<br />

� Canteen;<br />

� Ablution facilities;<br />

� Temporary power and water supply infrastructure;<br />

� Storage yard for Capital and First Fill items; and,<br />

� Fire fighting station.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 5-1: PROPOSED MINE LAYOUT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-3<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.2.2 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-4<br />

Construction activities will take place during the establishment and preparation of the site for mining and<br />

the mineral processing plant. Early mining activities, such as soil stripping, removal of bushes in the<br />

construction area and pit area and the stripping of the overburden / waste removal will coincide with the<br />

construction phase. A table of construction activities is provided in Table 5-1. The “x’s” in the table<br />

indicate which activities may be associated with the construction of the various infrastructure items.<br />

5.2.3 TOPSOIL MANAGEMENT<br />

Topsoil is to be stripped to a depth of 300 mm from all areas that are planned to be disturbed. This would<br />

include all the contractor laydown areas, plant and mining <strong>com</strong>plex, construction camp area and mine<br />

workshops and offices. This topsoil will be placed in stockpiles and will be considered a future<br />

rehabilitation growth medium. Topsoil from the internal access roads and, the mining haul roads and<br />

power lines will be placed in low windrows.<br />

The greatest volumes of topsoil will be from the surface area of the open pit area, run of mine (RoM)<br />

stockpile and the mineralised waste facilities. The topsoil will be removed in advance of the mine and<br />

mineralised waste facilities’ development and stockpiled in berms.<br />

5.2.4 CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT<br />

The mine is located on an existing district road, the D2808. Provision for the relocation of the road to the<br />

northern boundary of the mine property has been made. The road will include a new intersection on the<br />

B1 road with a rail crossing. The road will be tarred for the first 250 m past the rail crossing. The<br />

remainder of the road will run parallel to the farm boundary (250 meters off of the boundary) and turn<br />

southwest along the farm boundary and join the current road as it passes over the farm boundary in a<br />

south easterly direction.<br />

During the construction of the project there will be a limited increase in the number of people carrying<br />

vehicles travelling to and from site and there will be an increase in heavy vehicles (approximately 10 to 20<br />

a day) supplying input materials. While most people will be based on site during construction, there will be<br />

a regular bus service (approximately 4 trips a day) from Otavi and Otjiwarongo to site.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

TABLE 5-1: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES<br />

Activity<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-5<br />

A1 Earthworks: Drilling and blasting activities x<br />

A2 Earthworks: Cleaning and grubbing and bulldozing<br />

activities<br />

Site offices and admin<br />

facilities<br />

Process plant, mine<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex, workshops<br />

Sewage treatment plant<br />

On site power<br />

infrastructure<br />

On site Water<br />

infrastructure<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

Contractors camp and<br />

lay-down<br />

Pit development<br />

Run of mine storage<br />

Mineralised waste<br />

facilities & stockpiles<br />

x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A3 Earthworks: Soil excavation x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A4 Earthwork: Stockpiling of topsoil and other material x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A5 Disposal or treatment of contaminated soil x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A6 Backfill of material (specific grade) from borrow pits x<br />

A7 Opening and management of borrow pits x<br />

A8 Construction and use of new on site roads – clearing<br />

of areas<br />

x x x x x x x x x<br />

A9 Civil works: Foundation excavations x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A10 Building activities x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A11 Storage and handling of material: Sand, rock,<br />

cement, chemical additives in cements<br />

x x x x x x x x x x<br />

On site roads<br />

Explosives magazine


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Activity<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Site offices and admin<br />

facilities<br />

Page 5-6<br />

A12 Water utilization x x x x x x x x<br />

A13 Mixing of concrete (batch plant) and concrete work<br />

(casting)<br />

A14 Operation and movement of construction vehicles<br />

and machinery<br />

Process plant, mine<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex, workshops<br />

Sewage treatment plant<br />

On site power<br />

infrastructure<br />

On site Water<br />

infrastructure<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

Contractors camp and<br />

lay-down<br />

Pit development<br />

Run of mine storage<br />

Mineralised waste<br />

facilities & stockpiles<br />

x x x x x x x x x<br />

x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A15 Refuelling of equipment x x x<br />

A16 Use of cranes x x x x x x<br />

A17 Erection and dismantling of scaffolding x x x x x<br />

A18 Building of shutters x x x x<br />

A19 Installing re-enforcement Steel x x x<br />

A20 Handling, storage and disposal of hazardous waste<br />

� Blasting media packing material<br />

� Empty paint containers<br />

� Cements bags<br />

� Chemical additives (for cement)<br />

containers<br />

� Contaminated PPE<br />

x x x x x x x x<br />

On site roads<br />

Explosives magazine


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Activity<br />

� Redundant concrete<br />

� Earth moving tyres<br />

� Oil contaminated waste<br />

� Used oils and grease<br />

A21 Handling, storage and disposal of non-hazardous<br />

waste<br />

� Steel off-cuts<br />

� Domestic waste<br />

� Wood off-cuts<br />

� Grinding wheels<br />

� Other construction waste<br />

� Building rubble and concrete<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Site offices and admin<br />

facilities<br />

Process plant, mine<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex, workshops<br />

Sewage treatment plant<br />

On site power<br />

infrastructure<br />

Page 5-7<br />

On site Water<br />

infrastructure<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

Contractors camp and<br />

lay-down<br />

Pit development<br />

Run of mine storage<br />

Mineralised waste<br />

facilities & stockpiles<br />

x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A22 Transportation of hazardous material x x x x x x<br />

A23 Transportation of non-hazardous material x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A24 Handling and storage of hazardous material<br />

� Blasting media<br />

� Lubricants, fuel<br />

� Paints<br />

� Gas (welding)<br />

� Cement<br />

x x x x x x x x x<br />

On site roads<br />

Explosives magazine


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Activity<br />

� Chemical additives for cement<br />

A25 Installation of pipelines for water and process<br />

solutions (Above ground)<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Site offices and admin<br />

facilities<br />

Process plant, mine<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex, workshops<br />

Sewage treatment plant<br />

On site power<br />

infrastructure<br />

Page 5-8<br />

On site Water<br />

infrastructure<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

Contractors camp and<br />

lay-down<br />

x x x x x x x<br />

A26 Installation of electricity lines x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A27 Use of electricity generators x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A28 Installation of transformers x x x<br />

A29 Construction of parking bay for trucks x x x<br />

A30 Manage construction site x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A31 Painting, grind and welding x x x x x x x x x x<br />

A32 Provision and operation of water for washing and<br />

toilet facilities<br />

A33 Slope stabilization and erosion control (where<br />

required)<br />

Pit development<br />

x x x x x x x<br />

Run of mine storage<br />

Mineralised waste<br />

facilities & stockpiles<br />

x x x x x x x x<br />

A34 Appointment of contractors, labourers, etc. x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

On site roads<br />

Explosives magazine


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.2.5 EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-9<br />

The labour requirements for the construction phase (for the plant and TDF) will be to a maximum number<br />

at any time of around 800 skilled and unskilled workers, most of which will be housed in a dedicated<br />

Construction Camp which will be situated on the farm Wolfshag, about 800 meters from the plant<br />

construction site.<br />

Mining operations will also kick off during the construction phase and the number of personnel involved<br />

with mining operations during year one will be 188. This number will gradually increase to around 300 at<br />

the peak of production. Most of the permanent employees will be housed either in Otavi or Otjiwarongo.<br />

Process and management staff will also be recruited during the construction phase and the numbers will<br />

increase from around five initially to around 135 at full production. These employees will also be housed<br />

at either Otavi or Otjiwarongo.<br />

5.2.6 WATER SUPPLY FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES<br />

Water will be supplied from boreholes (pre-sunk and equipped prior to construction) and pumped to a<br />

temporary tank with a polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) piping distribution network throughout the construction<br />

site. Borehole water will be supplied for showers and ablution facilities. Bottled water will be supplied for<br />

drinking during the period when the Potable supply facility is still not <strong>com</strong>missioned and in operation.<br />

5.2.7 POWER SUPPLY FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES<br />

Temporary construction power (400 V) will be supplied from the 33 kV line that feeds the existing<br />

homestead supply. It is anticipated that camp consumption during construction will be 400 MWh/month<br />

at a maximum demand of 850 kW and that construction power usage will be 30 MWh/month at a<br />

maximum demand of 150 kW.<br />

5.2.8 SANITATION FOR CONSTRUCTION<br />

Initially, portable toilets with associated septic tanks will be used until such time as the permanent<br />

infrastructure is established. Sewage from ablution and wash facilities as well as grey water from the<br />

kitchens will gravitate towards septic tanks positioned at the lowest point in the construction areas. A<br />

sewage truck will collect and transport sewage to Otavi or Otjiwarongo for treatment and disposal by the<br />

local municipalities.<br />

The same arrangements will apply for the handling of sewage and other effluents from the Construction<br />

Camp.<br />

5.2.9 MEDICAL SERVICE<br />

Medical surveillance and testing will be conducted at approved facilities in Otjiwarongo. Emergency<br />

facilities and hospitals are available at Otjiwarongo. A first aid station (manned with qualified personnel)<br />

will be located at the construction site.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.2.10 FIRE PROTECTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-10<br />

The fire truck for the plant will be procured at an early stage of the project to be delivered to site when<br />

construction <strong>com</strong>mences.<br />

5.2.11 NON-MINERALIZED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION<br />

Waste will be separated at source, stored in a manner that there can be no discharge of contamination to<br />

the environment and either recycled or reused where possible. The remainder will be transported off site<br />

to appropriate recycling or disposal facilities (Otavi or Otjiwarongo for general waste and Walvis Bay for<br />

hazardous waste). A single waste management contractor will service the entire site.<br />

TABLE 5-2 presents the waste management specification that has been developed for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong><br />

Project and outlines the waste management for all waste types. In summary, the types of non-<br />

mineralised waste expected to be generated during the construction phase include:<br />

� General waste (domestic waste and other non-hazardous waste)<br />

� Industrial waste<br />

� Hazardous waste<br />

TABLE 5-2: WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE<br />

Waste type Waste specifics<br />

(example of<br />

waste types)<br />

Nonhazardous<br />

solid waste<br />

(nonmineralised)<br />

Hazardous<br />

contaminated<br />

solid waste<br />

(nonmineralised).<br />

Pallets and<br />

wooden crates,<br />

cable drums, scrap<br />

metal, general<br />

domestic waste<br />

such as food and<br />

packaging<br />

Building rubble and<br />

waste concrete<br />

Treated timber<br />

crates, printer<br />

cartridges,<br />

batteries,<br />

fluorescent bulbs,<br />

paint, solvents, tar,<br />

empty hazardous<br />

material containers<br />

etc.<br />

Hydrocarbons<br />

(oils, grease)<br />

Storage facility End use<br />

Skips in relevant work areas<br />

will be provided for different<br />

waste types. A waste<br />

management contractor will<br />

remove skips regularly to a<br />

dedicated waste handling and<br />

storage area.<br />

Designated rubble collection<br />

points will be determined to<br />

which contractors will take<br />

rubble and concrete.<br />

Hazardous waste will be<br />

separated at source and<br />

stored in designated<br />

containers in bunded work<br />

areas. The waste<br />

management contractor will<br />

remove these drums regularly<br />

to a dedicated waste handling<br />

and storage area.<br />

Used oil and grease will be<br />

stored in drums in bunded<br />

Waste will be sorted further at a<br />

dedicated waste handling and<br />

storage area. Recyclable waste<br />

will be sent to a reputable<br />

recycling <strong>com</strong>pany. Some items<br />

may be distributed directly to the<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity such as pallets and<br />

wooden crates. The remainder<br />

of the waste will be transported<br />

by the waste management<br />

contractor to a permitted general<br />

landfill facility in Otavi or<br />

Otjiwarongo for disposal.<br />

The waste management<br />

contractor will regularly remove<br />

the waste from the designated<br />

collection points to the footprint<br />

of the waste rock dump.<br />

Hazardous waste will be<br />

disposed of at the permitted<br />

hazardous disposal site in Walvis<br />

Bay by the waste management<br />

contractor.<br />

Used oil will be sent to a<br />

reputable recycling <strong>com</strong>pany for<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Waste type Waste specifics<br />

(example of<br />

waste types)<br />

Medical<br />

waste<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Storage facility End use<br />

areas at key points in work<br />

areas. The bunds will be able<br />

to ac<strong>com</strong>modate 110 % of the<br />

container contents and include<br />

a sump and oil trap. The<br />

waste management contractor<br />

will remove these drums<br />

regularly to a dedicated waste<br />

handling and storage area.<br />

The yard will have a dedicated<br />

used oil storage area which<br />

will include a concrete slab,<br />

proper bunding and an oil<br />

sump. The appointed bulk fuel<br />

supplier will collect used oil for<br />

recycling.<br />

Sewage Sewage will be collected and<br />

stored in a septic tank on site.<br />

Syringes, material<br />

with blood stains,<br />

bandages, etc.<br />

5.2.12 CONCURRENT MINING OPERATIONS<br />

Medical waste will be stored in<br />

sealed containers at the clinic.<br />

A waste management<br />

contractor will remove these<br />

drums regularly to a dedicated<br />

waste handling and storage<br />

area.<br />

recycling.<br />

Page 5-11<br />

Sewage will be collected on a<br />

regular basis and transported for<br />

treatment at the municipal<br />

sewage treatment facilities in<br />

Otavi or Otjiwarongo.<br />

Medical waste will be transported<br />

by the waste management<br />

contractor to a permitted medical<br />

waste treatment facility in<br />

Otjiwarongo.<br />

The <strong>com</strong>mencement of mining operations (pit development etc.) will start during the construction phase,<br />

and the required permanent offices, workshops, operator’s messing area and laydown areas will be<br />

established during the construction phase. This will allow for the transition into the operational phase.<br />

The explosive magazines will also be <strong>com</strong>missioned during the construction phase. The explosive<br />

magazine will allow storage of detonators, detonator cords and boosters. The prills and emulsion will be<br />

stored separately.<br />

5.3 OPERATIONAL PHASE<br />

5.3.1 SITE FACILITIES FOR OPERATIONS<br />

The operational phase will consist of the following on-site facilities (some of these facilities are indicated<br />

on Figure 5-1):<br />

� Single open pit;<br />

� RoM stockpiles;<br />

� RoM pad;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Processing plant;<br />

� Mine dewatering settling ponds<br />

� Access roads and haul roads;<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-12<br />

� Mineralised waste disposal facilities (Waste rock dump, Low grade dump, and a high sulphide<br />

tailings facility) and associated Offices and ablution facilities;<br />

� Explosives magazine;<br />

� Soil stockpiles;<br />

� Conveyors (in the plant, between plant and RoM <strong>com</strong>plex);<br />

� Workshops;<br />

� Wash bay for washing equipment and vehicles;<br />

� Tyre bay for changing tyres on vehicles;<br />

� Refuelling areas;<br />

� Hazardous substances storages areas;<br />

� Salvage yard and temporary non mineralised waste handling facilities;<br />

� Stores (Plant and mine <strong>com</strong>plexes);<br />

� On site water supply infrastructure;<br />

� Compressed air supply station;<br />

� Storm water management facilities;<br />

� Water treatment facility;<br />

� Clean and dirty water holding facilities;<br />

� On site power supply infrastructure;<br />

� Change houses;<br />

� Ablution facilities;<br />

� Medical First Aid station facilities;<br />

� Sewage treatment plant;<br />

� Weighbridge;<br />

� Loading and off-loading areas;<br />

� Administration offices;<br />

� Parking areas;<br />

� Security infrastructure;<br />

� Laboratory;<br />

� Communication infrastructure; and,<br />

� Lighting infrastructure.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.2 OPERATION PHASE ACTIVITIES – MINING<br />

5.3.2.1 Ore Body<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-13<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> gold deposit presents as a shallow dipping, sheeted vein system within a package of<br />

metasediments <strong>com</strong>prising marbles, albitites and hornfelsbiotiteschists of the Karibib Formation. The<br />

deposit is situated within the northern zone of the DamaraOrogen, approximately 1 km northwest of the<br />

“Main Marble Marker”, which <strong>com</strong>prises an open synformal structure immediately east of the deposit.<br />

Gold mineralisation is associated with a fabric parallel sheeted vein system. Typically, the widths of the<br />

individual veins vary between 1 cm and 10 cm, with an apparent strong correlation between vein density<br />

and grade. The mineralogy of the veins is characterised by varying amounts of pyrrhotite, magnetite and<br />

pyrite.<br />

Associated with these minerals are almandine garnets, amphibole and free gold. At present, the<br />

mineralisation is interpreted as being of metamorphogenic origin. The mineralised package, referred to<br />

as the OTC Zone, is between 30 m and 40 m thick and has been traced over a strike distance of<br />

approximately 1.5 km. Within the OTC Zone, two separate mineralised packages have been identified<br />

based on vein density and grade distribution, namely the Upper Zone and the Lower Zone 1.<br />

5.3.2.2 Mine Plan<br />

The mine methodology of conventional open pit mining (that is, drill and blast followed by load and haul)<br />

will be employed at the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project. Mine production has been scheduled at 2.4 million tonnes per<br />

annum (mtpa). Actual mining will take place up to year 10 after which the low grade material will be<br />

reclaimed from the low grade dump and will be processed in years 11 and 12. The stripping ratio<br />

increases gradually from 7.19 to 9.37 over the LoM with the average stripping ratio over the LoM being<br />

7.32. Maximum tonnes moved over the LoM will be 28 mtpa.<br />

Drilling and blasting would be performed on 5 m high benches in the mineralised zones and a 110 tonne<br />

hydraulic excavator will be employed to load the 5 m high flitches. The waste benches will be mined in a<br />

bulk mining approach where drilling and blasting will be performed on 10 m high benches and a 190<br />

tonne hydraulic face shovel be utilised to load the full 10 m bench. In both cases 100 tonne capacity off-<br />

highway dump trucks will be used and standard open-cut drilling and auxiliary equipment be required.<br />

The ultimate pit will have two ramp systems in the north which will be used for ore and waste hauling.<br />

The dimensions of the pit are as follows:<br />

Length 2 060 m;<br />

Width 635 m;<br />

Depth 245 m;<br />

Area 931 057 m 2 (93.10 ha).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.2.3 Drilling and Blasting Operations<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-14<br />

Rock fragmentation will be undertaken by drilling and blasting and it is assumed that all of the material to<br />

be mined at the project will require blasting. The pit configuration bench height (5m for ore benches and<br />

10 m for waste benches) and material type suit a drill rig capable of drilling drill holes with a diameter of<br />

up to 171 mm. For this project a 403 kW diesel crawler down the hole (DTH) hammer drill rig has been<br />

selected for the production holes for the ore and waste benches and the wall control blasting holes. Drill<br />

burden, spacing and sub-drill design will be functions of inter alia the selected powder factor, required<br />

fragmentation and type of explosives to be used.<br />

5.3.2.4 Load and Haul Operations<br />

The overall scale of mining envisaged at the project is medium size with a total material movement of<br />

approximately 28 mtpa. As a result of the limited extent of mineralisation, with its narrow mineralisation<br />

envelopes, it is envisaged that selective mining will be necessary and, as such, the scale of the ore<br />

mining operation would be smaller <strong>com</strong>pared to the waste mining operation.<br />

For the waste mining operation it is envisaged that large hydraulic excavators of up to 840 kW and a fleet<br />

of 100t capacity rigid dump trucks will be suitable, while the ore mining fleet will <strong>com</strong>prise of 570 kW<br />

excavators and 100t capacity rigid dump trucks.<br />

The mining operation will excavate and load the ore and waste in accordance with the marked ore and<br />

waste boundaries and ensure minimum contamination and maximum recovery of ore. The ore will be<br />

hauled to a single RoM pad located north-west of the pit exit.<br />

Waste, which includes barren material and mineralised material with a grade lower than 0.4 g/t, will be<br />

dumped on the waste rock dump. All low-grade material, with a grade range of between 0.4 g/t to 0.6 g/t,<br />

will be stockpiled separately for post-mining reclamation and processing.<br />

5.3.2.5 Other Mining Activities<br />

All haul roads, dumps and stockpiles that will be required for the LoM will be constructed during the first<br />

year of mining. In-pit water management will mainly consist of run-off control and temporary sumps at<br />

the lowest elevation in the pit. A mobile trailer-mounted pit-dewatering pump will pump excess water to<br />

the mine return water dam close to the plant to be used as processing water.<br />

5.3.3 OPERATION PHASE ACTIVITIES – MINERAL PROCESSING<br />

The process plant is designed for 2.4 mtpa run of mine (RoM) ore feed. RoM ore will be fed to the<br />

Primary Crusher situated about 200m from the pit. The crushed rock from the Primary crusher will be<br />

delivered to the process plant by means of an 800 m conveyor belt, discharging into a storage stockpile.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-15<br />

The metallurgical processing route, which is indicated in Figure 5-2, is made up of the following major unit<br />

processes:<br />

� Single Stage Crusher;<br />

� Two stage milling, classification and gravity circuit;<br />

� Intensive Cyanidation of the Gravity Concentrate;<br />

� Cyanide Leaching of the mill cyclone overflow;<br />

� Carbon adsorption; and<br />

� Elution, electrowinning, regeneration and smelting.<br />

5.3.3.1 Ore Receipt and Primary Crushing<br />

RoM ore will be fed to the Primary Crusher from the mine pit by dump trucks and from the RoM stockpiles<br />

with Front end Loaders, which deliver their load into the RoM bin. A static grizzly on top of the RoM bin<br />

will ensure that a size fraction of less than 600 mm is fed to the primary crusher. A rock breaker will<br />

reduce the oversize material. An apron feeder will withdraw ore from the RoM bin to feed the Primary<br />

Crusher. The crusher product with a P80 of 150 mm will be discharged onto the conveyor belt feeding the<br />

Crushed ore Stockpile.<br />

5.3.3.2 Milling, Classifying, and Gravity Circuit<br />

Ore will be drawn from the crushed ore stockpile by belt feeders which then feed the two stage milling<br />

circuit. The milling circuit consists of a variable speed SAG (Semi-Autogenous Grinding) mill (7.3m<br />

diameter with an effective grinding length of 3.8m and with a 3,5 MW motor) as well as a Secondary Ball<br />

mill (4.58m diameter and 8.7 m length with a 2,9 MW motor). Steel balls (90mm diameter) will be added<br />

to the milling circuit using overhead magnets and chute systems. The SAG mill will discharge onto a<br />

double deck screen, cutting at 19mm and 2mm. The +2mm material will be recycled back to the SAG Mill<br />

feed though a secondary crusher circuit, while the -2mm material will report to the SAG mill discharge<br />

sump. The sump discharge will be pumped to a cluster cyclone for classification. The classification<br />

density will be controlled by adding process water to the SAG mill discharge sump. The slurry will be<br />

pumped to the classification cyclone cluster, which <strong>com</strong>prises of 500 mm diameter cyclones. The<br />

cyclone overflow will be directed to the Leach plant, while the Cyclone underflow will be directed to the<br />

secondary ball mill. The secondary ball mill discharge will be fed to a sump from which the slurry will be<br />

fed to the gravity concentration feed box. The milling circuit will be housed in a bunded area sized to<br />

contain the full volume of the mills, during a maintenance relining activity, including the balls.<br />

The gravity concentration feed box will feed the gravity scalping screens, which will ensure the removal of<br />

+2 mm particles. The oversize from the gravity scalping screens will be returned to the Secondary Ball<br />

mill feed box for further grinding while the undersize will proceed to the gravity concentrators.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

FIGURE 5-2: BLOCK FLOW DIAGRAM OF THE METALLURGICAL PROCESSING ROUTE<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-16<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-17<br />

The gravity circuit will be equipped with two concentrators that produce a concentrate which will be<br />

treated in an intensive cyanidation (IC) step. The IC reactor will have a dedicated electrowinning system<br />

which recovers gold from the pregnant solution, ensuring that the gravity recovery of gold is carried out<br />

up to the point of electroplating in a secured gold room.<br />

The gravity concentrator will gravitate to the SAG mill discharge sump. The intensive cyanidation tailings<br />

will be pumped to the leach plant. The gravity concentrator circuit will be housed in a bunded area sized<br />

to contain the full volume of a catastrophic failure of the single largest vessel in the area.<br />

5.3.3.3 Cyanide Leach and Carbon Recovery Plant<br />

The overflow of the mill classification circuit cyclones will feed into the Leach feed thickener. The leach<br />

thickener underflow will be pumped to the leach circuit. The leach circuit will be made up of seven<br />

separate leach vessels which provide 48 hours leach time. Gold will be dissolved using cyanide in<br />

solution. Cyanide, lime and air will be added in the leach circuit to allow the maximum dissolution of gold<br />

during the leach process.<br />

The slurry containing the dissolved gold in solution will then be pumped to the Carbon in Pulp (CIP)<br />

circuit, consisting of six CIP tanks, where the dissolved Gold will be adsorbed onto activated carbon. In<br />

the CIP circuit, slurry and carbon will be transferred counter currently. Slurry will gravitate downstream<br />

from CIP tank to CIP tank via interstage screens and will launder through the CIP tanks while activated<br />

carbon will be pumped from tank to tank in a counter current direction. The CIP circuit will have a<br />

residence time of one hour per tank.<br />

The Leach and CIP circuits will be housed in a single bunded area, which will be sized to allow<br />

containment of a catastrophic failure of the single largest vessel in the area.<br />

All CIP tanks will be equipped with mechanical agitators that keep the slurry in suspension. Interstage<br />

screens will be used to transfer the slurry between the CIP tanks while recessed-impellor vertical spindle<br />

pumps will be used to transfer the carbon in a counter current direction.<br />

The loaded carbon from the first CIP tank will be pumped to the loaded carbon screen, with the undersize<br />

returning back to the tank and the oversize, loaded carbon, transferring to the acid wash hopper in the<br />

elution section of the plant.<br />

The CIP tailings slurry will pass over a carbon safety screen to prevent carbon losses to tailings. The<br />

screen oversize will be collected for gold recovery. The slurry passing through the safety screen will be<br />

routed to the cyanide destruction tank where the residual cyanide in solution will be reduced prior to<br />

being pumped to the high density thickener for dewatering at the TDF. The high density slurry will then<br />

be pumped to the TDF for deposition.<br />

The overflow from the high density thickener will be returned to the process water circuit for use<br />

throughout the Leach and CIP plants as required.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.3.4 Elution, Electrowinning and Regeneration<br />

Acid Wash and Elution<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-18<br />

Elution of the loaded carbon will be carried out in a ZADRA circuit using a 10 m 3 batch size for the elution<br />

circuit. It is intended to operate the elution column seven days per week with two strips per day.<br />

The loaded carbon will be sampled before the acid wash in order to determine the gold loading. Once<br />

sampled, the carbon will undergo acid washing. Acid washing will be carried out by circulating a dilute<br />

solution of approximately 3% hydrochloric acid through the carbon ahead of the elution column. This<br />

process dissolves calcium and magnesium carbonates that build up on the carbon pores and surface<br />

over time and block the adsorption or desorption of gold. The acid wash and pumping sequence will be<br />

automated. The dilute hydrochloric acid solution will be pumped in an upward direction through the<br />

activated carbon. The carbon will then be gravity transferred to the elution column.<br />

During elution of the gold from the carbon, a dilute solution of caustic sodium cyanide will be pumped<br />

through the column and in so doing the gold and any silver will be desorbed from the activated carbon.<br />

The solution will be heated through an oil heating system. After the elution process, the carbon will be<br />

transferred to the carbon regeneration kiln.<br />

Electrowinning<br />

The solution (eluate) exiting the column will be passed through a reclaim heat exchanger, where it will be<br />

cooled down by exchanging some of its heat with the eluent entering the column. Once the exit<br />

temperature is at the desired level, the eluate will be cooled down to 90°C by the reclaim heat exchanger<br />

before being directed to the electrowinning cells.<br />

The eluate will then be directed to the electrowinning cell header tank, from where the flow will be<br />

directed to the electrowinning cell for the recovery of gold. Once the gold solution has <strong>com</strong>pleted its flow<br />

through the cells, the spent electrolyte will <strong>com</strong>bine in a <strong>com</strong>mon header and will gravitate to the eluent<br />

tank to <strong>com</strong>plete the closed circuit.<br />

A fume extraction system will be installed to collect any poisonous and/or explosive gases that may<br />

evolve during electrowinning.<br />

Carbon Regeneration<br />

After the elution process is <strong>com</strong>pleted, the barren carbon will be pneumatically transferred from the<br />

elution column to the eluted carbon hopper. The carbon sludge will be dewatered before being fed to the<br />

carbon regeneration kiln.<br />

In the kiln the carbon will be heated to between 650°C and 750°C for half an hour to regenerate the<br />

carbon before it is recycled through the CIP circuit. Approximately 5% to 15% by weight of the carbon<br />

bed will be burnt off during the regeneration.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-19<br />

Regenerated carbon will then be discharged into a quench tank before being transferred via a vibrating<br />

screen into the regenerated carbon hopper. Thereafter a dewatering screen will be used to collect<br />

activated carbon particles that have broken down to less than 1 mm in size.<br />

The regenerated carbon that is larger than 1 mm in size will be returned to the adsorption circuit, where it<br />

will again cycle through the CIP leach tanks in a counter-current manner relative to the slurry.<br />

Calcining and Smelting<br />

Once plated with gold, the cathodes will be lifted from the electrowinning cells and then the gold will be<br />

removed before the cathodes are reused. The resulting gold sludge will be placed in calcining trays,<br />

which are used for drying the sludge. This will be achieved in a calcining oven which operates at 800°C.<br />

The dried product from the calcining oven will then be mixed with fluxes in a specified ratio. The mixture<br />

will then be transferred to a smelting crucible, which will then be placed in the smelting furnace, where it<br />

will be subjected to temperatures of between 1 200 and 1 400°C and melted in preparation for the final<br />

step in gold purification on site.<br />

Once the smelt is <strong>com</strong>pleted the now molten furnace charge will be poured into cascading bullion moulds<br />

mounted on a trolley. Owing to the significant difference in the density of gold and silver <strong>com</strong>pared to the<br />

other contents of the furnace, charge bullion collects in the first mould, with any excess being collected in<br />

the second mould. Slag produced from the fluxes introduced in the furnace charge will be collected in the<br />

slag-collection crucible. Slag produced from the fluxes added to the furnace charge will be used to form<br />

a molten phase in which impurities in the gold sludge gather. In this way the gold bullion purity is<br />

improved.<br />

The bullion moulds will be cooled and the bullion will be solidified before the small amount of slag that<br />

invariably collects on the top is manually chipped off with a hammer. A prill will then be removed from the<br />

cleaned bullion bars for sampling purposes before the bars are stamped and stored in the bullion safe for<br />

transport to the refinery.<br />

The slag collected in this process will still contain some gold, and for this reason it will be treated through<br />

a slag crusher, pulveriser and shaking table to produce a concentrate which will be recycled in the<br />

furnace.<br />

The gold room will be equipped with a self-contained ventilation system to ensure that the environment is<br />

safe to work in should any hazardous fumes evolve during the smelting and pouring process.<br />

5.3.3.5 Reagents required in the plant<br />

Cyanide<br />

Cyanide will be dissolved in solution and used in the process to leach gold from ore. It will be received as<br />

solid sodium cyanide briquettes, which will be delivered in 25 kg water resistant bags in wooden crates.<br />

The cyanide will be stored before use in a dedicated area that will contain any spillage of cyanide.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-20<br />

The bags will be lifted by a hoist to the bag breaker above the make-up tank, and dissolved to the<br />

required concentration before being transferred to the storage tank ready for dosage into the process as<br />

required. The bag breaker will be sealed and ventilated through a scrubber to ensure a safe working<br />

environment.<br />

The sodium cyanide storage area will be a roofed structure with a specially prepared concrete base<br />

<strong>com</strong>plete with plastic lining to prevent groundwater contamination by any spillages. The structure will<br />

have short berm walls and open sides to allow for adequate air circulation. The area will be fenced and<br />

access controlled to minimise the risk to the environment and personnel. Safe operating procedures will<br />

be used when unloading, mixing, transferring and handling cyanide in all forms (solid and solution), such<br />

procedures will be put in place prior to operation.<br />

Caustic soda<br />

Caustic will be used for acid neutralisation and eluent make-up. In order to make up a batch of caustic to<br />

the required strength, the required number of 25 kg bags will be fed to the make-up tank, making use of<br />

the bag breaker on the top of the tank. Once the required amount of water has been added to the tank,<br />

the make-up tank agitator will ensure that the caustic pearls are <strong>com</strong>pletely dissolved before the solution<br />

is transferred to the dosage tank.<br />

Caustic soda will be stored in a cool, dry, well ventilated, bunded area with physical barriers to prevent<br />

mixing with other products. The floor of the building will be concrete with suitable sealant.<br />

Hydrochloric Acid<br />

Hydrochloric acid will be delivered in 1,000 litre intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) and will be diluted to<br />

33% strength. The IBCs will be returned to the supplier. When required, the IBCs will be transported by<br />

forklift from the store area to the point of use. Acid will then be gravitated into the diluted tanks.<br />

The IBCs will be stored in a covered steel structure with a bunded, concrete floor. The floor of the<br />

building will be concrete and designed to prevent contamination from any spillages. This area willalso<br />

have a sump to allow for recovery of any spillage.<br />

Flocculant<br />

Flocculant will be delivered in powder form and made up in a dedicated make-up plant. The addition rate<br />

of flocculant to the thickeners in the plant will be based on the flow of solids to the thickeners and the<br />

density of the underflow from the thickeners.<br />

Flocculants will typically be stored in 25 kg bags, with 40 bags loaded onto each pallet within a dry<br />

storage area. The floor of the building will be concrete and designed to prevent contamination from any<br />

spillages.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Lime<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-21<br />

Lime will be used throughout the plant to control pH and in particular in the CIP circuit, where a relatively<br />

high pH is targeted for leaching.<br />

Burned lime will be delivered to site in 1 ton bags, which will be blown into a lime silo for storage. Milk of<br />

lime will then be made up for distribution through the plant.<br />

Sodium Metabisulphite (SMBS)<br />

SMBS will be used in the cyanide destruction step to render the tailings cyanide concentrations harmless.<br />

SMBS will be delivered in 1200 kg bags and will be kept in dry storage. The floor of the dry storage area<br />

will be concrete and designed to prevent contamination from any spillages of SMBS.<br />

Copper Sulphate<br />

Copper sulphate is a catalyst in the cyanide destruction reactions and will be delivered in 1000 kg bulk<br />

bags and kept in dry storage before use. The floor of the dry storage area will be concrete and designed<br />

to prevent contamination from any spillages of copper sulphate.<br />

Activated Carbon<br />

Coconut shell-activated carbon will be used in the plant for the adsorption of gold in the CIP circuit. This<br />

source of carbon will have high gold adsorption activity as well as good abrasion resistance properties.<br />

The carbon will be delivered in air-tight, 500 kg bags before being added to the circuit as required during<br />

operation. It will be stored in a closed and well-ventilated area, away from heat, ignition sources and<br />

<strong>com</strong>bustible materials.<br />

Borax, Sodium Nitrate and Silica<br />

Both borax and silica will be used as fluxes in smelting of the gold sludge. They will form the slag phase<br />

of the molten liquids once the solids melt.<br />

These smelting reagents will be delivered in 25 kg bags and stored in a dedicated dry area of the gold<br />

room, the floor of which will be concrete and designed to prevent contamination from any spillages.<br />

5.3.4 MINERALIZED WASTE FACILITIES<br />

The following mineralised waste facilities are planned for this project:<br />

� Waste rock dump;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Low grade dump (waste rock); and<br />

� Tailings disposal facility.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-22<br />

The footprint sizes and final heights for the TDF and waste rock dump are summarised in Table 5-3.<br />

TABLE 5-3: TDF and Waste Rock Dump - General Dimensions<br />

Facility<br />

Footprint<br />

(ha)<br />

Max. Height<br />

(m)<br />

Tailings Disposal Facility 161 18<br />

Waste Rock Dump 217 40<br />

5.3.4.1 Waste Rock Dumps<br />

Two waste rock dumps will be generated, one <strong>com</strong>prising waste rock and the other low grade material.<br />

The low grade dump will be reclaimed and processed in the latter years of the LoM. The current<br />

production schedule does not allow for backfilling and thus all waste generated will be dumped on the<br />

waste rock disposal sites. Taking into consideration a degree of <strong>com</strong>paction on the dumps, an effective<br />

bulking factor of 32% was utilised.<br />

The footprint of the waste dump will be constructed from <strong>com</strong>pacted calcrete layer with a drain system.<br />

During the active waste tipping phase the waste dump will be constructed at the material’s natural angle<br />

of repose of approximately 35 degrees. This will then be contoured to 18 degrees to allow for slope<br />

stability and re-vegetation.<br />

The key principles for the construction of the waste rock dump as per the preliminary environmental<br />

impact assessment were taken into consideration. Storm water diversion trenches will be constructed on<br />

the upstream side of the rock dump to prevent ingress of storm water beneath the dump and to facilitate<br />

clean/dirty water separation. Waste rock dump benches will be covered with a soil layer paddocked and<br />

vegetated as soon as practical after dumping. The top surface of the dump will be soil clad and graded<br />

back at a grade of approximately 1:200 to prevent ponding on the top surfaces.<br />

The waste rock will be placed mechanically with haul trucks. Storm water runoff from the side slopes will<br />

contain some eroded solids. A terraced side slope profile (including progressive rehabilitation) and<br />

catchment paddocks along the perimeter of the <strong>com</strong>plex will be implemented in order to ensure runoff<br />

control and to prevent silt from discharging into the surrounding environment. The side slopes will be<br />

constructed to an average overall side slope angle of 1v:3h.<br />

Pollution control measures will be implemented in order to reduce acid rock drainage to an acceptable<br />

level of risk. These measures include base preparation in the form of <strong>com</strong>pacted calcrete layers and<br />

vertical perimeter seepage cut-off trenches.<br />

Waste rock will also be required for the construction of mine infrastructure such as RoM pad and tailings<br />

disposal dam walls.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.4.2 Tailings Disposal Facility<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-23<br />

This final design for this dam will be determined once test work currently underway is <strong>com</strong>pleted. During<br />

the definitive feasibility study test work on the tailings stacking option and cyanide destruction options will<br />

be conducted. The results of this work will be used to finalise the tailings facility design before<br />

construction. Regardless of the test work results the dam will conform to international best practise and<br />

the international cyanide code.<br />

The TDF will ac<strong>com</strong>modate tailings generated in the leaching section of the processing plant, which is<br />

estimated at 200 000 tpm for a design life of 12 years.<br />

The following points outline the design objectives for the TDF irrespective of the test work results:<br />

� Create a safe and stable TDF and minimise risk to human lives, health and property;<br />

� Create a design that will remain fit for the intended purpose and resist all external environmental<br />

influences that are reasonably likely to occur (sustainability);<br />

� Create a design that conserves all resources as far as possible, i.e. land area, water, airspace,<br />

topsoil, mineralisation and energy;<br />

� Comply with Namibian legal requirements (benchmarking against South African standards and<br />

best practice international standards);<br />

� Minimise environmental impacts;<br />

� Ensure separation of clean and dirty water;<br />

� Minimum storage of supernatant on the TDF;<br />

� Ensure cost-effective construction, operation and closure;<br />

� Situate the TDF in such a way that it does not sterilise any ore and is not in conflict with any<br />

mining activity; and<br />

� Locate the TDF on the mine property.<br />

Design Philosophy<br />

In order to <strong>com</strong>ply with the design objectives, it was decided to opt for a high-density slurry disposal<br />

system. To achieve this, a high-density thickener system has been included in the layout. The low-<br />

density slurry, pumped from the process plant, will pass through the high-density thickener located at the<br />

tailings disposal facility from where it will be extracted as thickened slurry underflow for release into the<br />

basin of the storage facility. The bulk of the process water will be returned directly from the high-density<br />

thickener to the process plant. As a result, the slurry water in the deposition stream (thickener underflow)<br />

reduces significantly from approximately 1,22 to 0,66 m 3 per dry ton.<br />

When deposited in the tailings disposal facility basin, the thickened slurry underflow is expected to<br />

display the following characteristics (provided that thin layer deposition is achieved):<br />

� High viscosity;<br />

� Non-segregating;<br />

� High consolidation rates;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� High dry density; and<br />

� Low permeability.<br />

As a result, the benefits can be summarised as follows:<br />

� Steeper beach angles - and therefore improved beach freeboard and a smaller pool area;<br />

� More efficient volumetric storage – higher average dry density;<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-24<br />

� Reduced risk for groundwater contamination – lower seepage rate as a result of lower average<br />

permeability and initial moisture content of non-segregated tailings;<br />

� Improved water return – returning the thickener overflow to the process plant reduces the<br />

evaporation and seepage losses that normally occur on the tailings disposal facility;<br />

� Higher allowable rate of rise–more rapid drying and self-weight consolidation of the tailings.<br />

� Reduced risk for structural instability-liquefaction potential is reduced when thin layer deposition<br />

is implemented through multiple discharge points and an optimised deposition cycle. This<br />

achieves rapid drying to maximum density and shear strength; and<br />

� Accelerated rehabilitation - more rapid consolidation and drying, allowing earlier access to the top<br />

surface of the facility.<br />

Disadvantages of implementing a high-density tailings disposal system include:<br />

� The additional capital cost associated with the purchase of thickening and pumping equipment;<br />

and<br />

� High-density tailings disposal systems may be more prone to pipeline blockages and contingency<br />

measures may be required to ensure operational continuity.<br />

The high-density thickener system will be located at the TDF in order to eliminate the requirement for<br />

positive displacement pumps, which will result in high capital and operating costs. The installation of the<br />

thickener at the TDF will also allow the facility operator to control the thickener operation to suit<br />

deposition requirements (i.e. rheology control etc.).<br />

The design <strong>com</strong>ponents associated with the thickener system can be summarised as follows:<br />

� A 20 m-diameter paste thickener;<br />

� The thickener plant will have its own SCADA facility;<br />

� A dedicated flocculent plant will service the thickener plant;<br />

� Duty and standby trains of centrifugal pumps will pump thickened underflow via a single duty<br />

pipeline from the thickener to several deposition points along the perimeter of the TDF. Under<br />

normal conditions the high-density slurry can be pumped up to a distance of approximately two<br />

kilometres and all discharge points can be utilised if the stream is split into a clockwise and anti-<br />

clockwise direction at the perimeter impoundment embankment;<br />

� Emergency paddocks will allow containment of potential spills from the slurry delivery system;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-25<br />

� Overflow from the thickener will gravitate to a water tank from where it will be returned to the<br />

process plant for re-use in the process; and<br />

� A dedicated electrical substation will be located at the thickener plant for power supply to the<br />

thickener and auxiliaries, slurry underflow pumping system and return water pumping system.<br />

The TDF will be developed as a single <strong>com</strong>partment, fully impounded, side hill type disposal facility with a<br />

footprint of approximately 161 ha.<br />

The construction will occur in two phases. In Phase 1 tailings deposition will initially take place behind a<br />

<strong>com</strong>pacted earth starter embankment. The maximum height of the embankment will be approximately 10<br />

m. The embankment construction material will be sourced from the water storage dam and tailings dam<br />

basins.<br />

Then for Phase 2 an upstream construction methodology will be implemented above the starter<br />

embankment crest. The implementation of low perimeter embankments is re<strong>com</strong>mended for the<br />

purposes of this study. The embankment construction material will be sourced from the head of the<br />

beach. Thickened slurry will be discharged from the perimeter embankments through open ends and/or<br />

spigots in order to form a beach that slopes downwards away from the embankments. This will create a<br />

top surface geometry that will result in a supernatant pool that is maintained in the immediate vicinity of<br />

the decant system. An average beach angle of approximately 1,0% is expected for the non-segregated<br />

tailings material.<br />

� The supernatant will be decanted from the top surface of the tailings disposal facility because<br />

retained water could:<br />

� Reduce the freeboard and the storm water storage capacity, and so increase the potential for<br />

overtopping;<br />

� Increase the potential for slurry flows in the event of a breach.<br />

� Increase the hydraulic gradient of seepage and pore water pressures, which could lead to lower<br />

factors of safety for side slope stability;<br />

� Inhibit consolidation and so reduce the strength and disposal capacity of the facility; and<br />

� Increase water losses through evaporation and seepage and so increase the environmental<br />

impacts on water consumption and groundwater.<br />

In view of the above, it is strongly re<strong>com</strong>mended that decant return should be maximized at all times in<br />

order to ensure minimum storage of supernatant. Excess water will therefore only be temporarily stored<br />

during high rainfall periods.<br />

The consolidation of the tailings is important in enhancing stability and reducing the probability of a flow<br />

failure should structural instability occur. It also ensures the best utilisation of the volume capacity by<br />

increasing the stored tons of tailings per cubic metre.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-26<br />

The expected low permeability of the non-segregated tailings material implies that there will be virtually<br />

no drainage of entrained water by normal consolidation processes during the life of the facility. The<br />

effective operation of the facility therefore depends on the consolidation of the tailings by drying, which is<br />

a very efficient method. The drying consolidation of the tailings can be inhibited by several factors:<br />

� A large decant pool, preventing drying in the supernatant pool area;<br />

� Concentrated deposition in one area;<br />

� Low slurry densities;<br />

� High rainfall periods; and<br />

� High rates of rise.<br />

It is considered that these problems can be over<strong>com</strong>e by good operation management practice (i.e. thin<br />

layer deposition through the implementation of optimised tipping cycles etc.).<br />

The design <strong>com</strong>ponents associated with the tailings disposal facility can be summarised as follows:<br />

� During stripping operations, topsoil will be separated from trees and brush and placed in a<br />

dedicated stockpile for future rehabilitation purposes. Topsoil is defined as unconsolidated soil<br />

with sufficient organic content and moisture retaining capacity to sustain vegetation growth;<br />

� A boundary fence will keep livestock out and will discourage people from gaining access to the<br />

site;<br />

� The access road (unpaved gravel road) will provide access to all major <strong>com</strong>ponents of the TDF;<br />

� A storm water diversion trench will divert non-contaminated run-off from the upstream external<br />

catchment area. Clean water run-off arising from the external catchment will therefore be<br />

prevented from flowing onto the TDF and consequently be<strong>com</strong>ing contaminated;<br />

� The thickener with the associated flocculent plant, slurry underflow pumping system and overflow<br />

tank will be located at the TDF;<br />

� Catchment paddocks along the perimeter of the TDF will collect silt and run-off from the side<br />

slopes of the facility;<br />

� The starter embankment will provide initial tailings containment capacity. A geotechnical<br />

engineer should sign off the box-cut depths and foundation preparation requirements for the<br />

embankment;<br />

� The under drainage system (toe and blanket drains) are designed to achieve phreatic surface<br />

draw down at the perimeter of the TDF and consequently improve stability. A solution trench will<br />

divert the drainage flows to the return water dam;<br />

� Tailings will be discharged as thickened slurry through a single duty pipeline to open ends and/or<br />

spigots located on the perimeter embankments to form a beach that slopes downwards away<br />

from the embankments; and<br />

� A penstock will decant supernatant from the TDF basin. Timber walkways and platforms will<br />

provide access to the penstock intake towers. Safety measures and procedures will be<br />

implemented to ensure safe operation of the decant system.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Capacity analysis<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-27<br />

The penstock outlet pipe will report to a HDPE lined silt trap. The silt trap will overflow into a HDPE lined<br />

return water dam, which in turn will overflow into an unlined storm water dam.<br />

The TDF basin was three-dimensionally modelled for an accurate determination of the relationship<br />

between the height, area and capacity. The detail was processed to calculate the rates of rise for<br />

average deposition rates and eventually the design life.<br />

The capacity analysis results are summarised in table 5-4 below.<br />

TABLE 5-4: CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS<br />

Item Description Unit Value<br />

1 Assumed average dry density t/m 3 1.60<br />

2 Airspace required m 3 18 million<br />

3 Average monthly deposition rate tpm 200 000<br />

4 Lowest basin elevation mamsl 1 494<br />

5 Starter embankment crest elevation mamsl 1 504<br />

6 <strong>Final</strong> elevation mamsl 1 512<br />

7 Maximum vertical height of starter embankment m 10<br />

8 Maximum final vertical height (including freeboard) m 18<br />

9 Rate of rise at starter embankment crest m/annum 1,0<br />

10 <strong>Final</strong> rate of rise m/annum 0.93<br />

11 Time behind starter embankment years 4,5<br />

12 Design life years 12<br />

13 <strong>Final</strong> basin area ha 161<br />

The above table indicates that there is sufficient disposal capacity for the life of mine tailings production<br />

profile.<br />

Water Balance<br />

The water balance is a deficit water balance, and significant quantities of make-up water will be required.<br />

The make-up requirements are seasonal. During the wet season, storm water will be harvested from the<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-28<br />

tailings disposal facility basin and return water dam. Returns consequently increase and make-up<br />

requirements decrease. The opposite is true during the dry season.<br />

The average annual return is 19% of the slurry water. This is low due to a <strong>com</strong>bination of relatively low<br />

rainfall, high evaporation, and the specific deposition method. The majority of this return is storm water<br />

since the footprint is large in relation to the tonnage.<br />

The monthly water balance results were statistically analysed to produce monthly average return and<br />

make-up flows (see Figure 5-3). The make-up demands were further analysed to produce a non-<br />

exceedance probability distribution (see Figure 5-4). Make-up demands range between 354 m 3 /day and<br />

3 402 m 3 /day. Figure 5-4 shows that make-up will exceed 3 000 m3/day 64% of the time. Make-up will<br />

be less than 1 750 m 3 /day for 10% of the time.<br />

FIGURE 5-3: MONTHLY AVERAGE DEMAND AND MAKE-UP<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Make-up Demands (m 3 /day)<br />

4,000<br />

3,500<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

FIGURE 5-4: NON-EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION OF MAKE-UP DEMAND<br />

Decant System<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-29<br />

The penstock is sized to remove the runoff generated by a 50-year, 24-hour design storm in less than 5<br />

days. This is to minimise the time that a large pool is stored on the tailings disposal facility basin. The<br />

storm water volume generated during a 50-year, 24-hour storm event is approximately 122 000 m 3 . The<br />

TDF requires a penstock capable of decanting 24 400 m 3 /day, or 1 017 m 3 /h, assuming a 24-hour<br />

decanting day. Two 510 mm diameter penstock intakes and a 600 mm ND concrete outlet pipe will have<br />

sufficient capacity to decant this volume. This will ensure that the pool volume rarely exceeds 50 000 m 3<br />

provided the penstock is operated to the design intent.<br />

Water Storage System<br />

0.001 1 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 99 99.999<br />

Non Exceedance probability (Percentile)<br />

The return water dam receives decant water from the tailings disposal facility and therefore the return<br />

water dam has no upstream catchment. Clean storm water diversion trenches are assumed to divert all<br />

clean storm water around the return water dam.<br />

The water balance is a deficit water balance. As a result, negligible storage occurs in the return water<br />

dam, as most inflows are consumed during the month. However, it should be noted that while negligible<br />

storage occurs on a monthly time step, significant storage could occur within the month. The dam sizing<br />

methodology was based on the principle that the dam needs to ac<strong>com</strong>modate the greater of:<br />

� Runoff generated from a 50-year, 24 hour rainfall event or the excess water resulting from a long-<br />

term monthly water balance.<br />

In view of the above, it is concluded that the return water dam should be sized for the 1 in 50 year, 24<br />

hour storm event with an associated capacity of at least 122 000 m 3 .<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Water Return System<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-30<br />

The water return system will be sized to return 100% of the slurry water requirement. This is 108 000 m 3<br />

/ month, or 3 540 m 3 / day. Assuming a 22-hour pumping day, this equates to 161 m 3 / hour.<br />

Clean Diversion Channel Sizing<br />

The TDF is a side hill TDF with a 120 ha external catchment. Two storm water diversions will be<br />

constructed to divert clean storm water around the TDF. The northern channel drains generally<br />

northwards and the southern channel drains generally southwest. Two channels are required as there is<br />

a local watershed midway along the TDF south-eastern boundary. The channels have been sized to<br />

ac<strong>com</strong>modate the 50-year design flood peak.<br />

5.3.5 WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES<br />

5.3.5.1 Raw Water Storage and Distribution<br />

Raw water will be pumped from the production and the pit dewatering boreholes to a receiving tank at the<br />

water treatment facility (WTF) and the process water tank. Raw water treatment includes coagulation,<br />

settling and filtration.<br />

Once treated, raw water will be distributed to the following areas:<br />

� Crushing and milling for dust suppression;<br />

� Potable water treatment plant;<br />

� Gland service water distribution tank.<br />

� Process water<br />

5.3.5.2 Potable Water Distribution<br />

A portion of treated raw water will undergo a chlorinating disinfection stage at the WTF to produce<br />

potable water. Potable water will be pumped to a potable water storage tank with a bottom section<br />

dedicated to fire water storage. Potable water will be fed to consumption points through a gravity-<br />

pressurised pipe network and circulated to the various safety showers throughout the plant to avoid any<br />

heat build-up in the line.<br />

The treatment plant will be of a modular design installed on an elevated concrete slab. The plant will be<br />

sized to ac<strong>com</strong>modate reagent make-up water requirements as well as the consumption requirements of<br />

all personnel on site. It is estimated that 130 l of potable water per person per day must be provided for<br />

human consumption; both plant and mining facilities will be fed from this facility.<br />

The elevated storage tank is designed to ac<strong>com</strong>modate the single biggest water usage event during<br />

reagent make-up or the change house requirement for a shift change.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.5.3 Process Water<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-31<br />

Raw plant water supply and potable water supply will be achieved through abstraction of groundwater.<br />

Water will be re-cycled in the process water system to the extent that this is possible without<br />

<strong>com</strong>promising the metallurgical process, but will have to be augmented by clean raw water from the raw<br />

water storage tank.<br />

Process water will be directed to a process water tank via a sieve bend that will remove any foreign solid<br />

material. Raw water pumps will be used to distribute water to the crushing and milling areas (for dust<br />

suppression), intensive cyanidation, potable water supply, carbon transfer, process water top-up, gland<br />

water tank top-up, final tails sump flushing water and high pressure wash pumps.<br />

Water in the tailings stream will be recovered at the high-density thickener and returned to the process<br />

water tank at the process plant.<br />

The water lost in the system will be made up from the process water dam. The process water piping<br />

network will distribute process water through the plant in its respective circuits.<br />

In-pit water management will mainly consist of run-off control and temporary sumps at the lowest<br />

elevation in the pit. A mobile trailer-mounted pit-dewatering pump will pump excess water to the mine<br />

return water dam close to the plant to be used as process water.<br />

5.3.5.4 Tailings water<br />

The tailings from the plant will be pumped to a paste thickener at the TDF through High Density<br />

Polyethylene (“HDPE”) pipe. The tailings line will be placed within a lined trench and will have collection<br />

sumps. These will be pumped dry using a 7m³ / hr. submersible pump. Water will be transported to the<br />

process water tank.<br />

5.3.5.5 Gland water distribution – process plant<br />

Gland water pumps, one on-line and another on standby, will transfer gland water from a 10 m³ tank to<br />

the glands of all slurry pumps that require gland water.<br />

Gland service water will be distributed to pumps throughout the plant from a duty/standby gland service<br />

water pump arrangement. Raw water will be used for gland service water.<br />

5.3.5.6 Storm Water Management<br />

Plant and workshops areas<br />

Berms will be used to enclose the plant and workshop and associated areas. All runoff from within the<br />

berms’ areas will be contained in the dams, with zero discharge. These berms will be designed to divert<br />

natural runoff away from the enclosed area, ensuring that only the runoff from within the berm area is<br />

directed into the dams.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

The area enclosed by the berm is as follows:<br />

� Plant area 125 000 m²<br />

� Mine workshop area 50 000 m²<br />

Dam Philosophy<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-32<br />

The dam sizing methodology was based on the principle that the dam needs to ac<strong>com</strong>modate the runoff<br />

generated from a 1 in 50-year, 24 hour storm event (147 mm).<br />

The catchment dams are not storage dams, and will be kept empty. A zero discharge design capacity<br />

has been utilised to <strong>com</strong>ply with IFC standards.<br />

Each enclosed area will flow into its own, lined, primary dam. Secondary lined dams will also be provided<br />

to contain any excess runoff. For each set of two dams, the minimum <strong>com</strong>bined volume will be equal to<br />

the total runoff volume expected from the areas within the berms.<br />

Dam liners should be polyethylene sheeting, a minimum of 1.5 mm thick. The dams will be constructed<br />

within calcrete layer, providing a second level of containment such that material with acid rock draining<br />

potential that may form spillage will have minimal environmental impact.<br />

Each dam will have a submersible pump installed, with a capacity to pump 7 m³ per hour installed. The<br />

water will be pumped to the process water tank for plant usage.<br />

A flume will be installed on all overflow points to measure the overflow of the dams. This will be recorded<br />

by the plant SCADA system.<br />

The dam will have a sloped bottom to allow for cleaning and keeping the dam with a minimal wet volume<br />

after an event.<br />

Dam Volumes and Design<br />

The <strong>com</strong>bined volume required is as follows:<br />

� Plant area 18 375 m³<br />

� Mine workshop area 6 125 m³<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Figure 5-5: DAMS IN PLANT AND WORKSHOP AREAS<br />

In the figure, the dams are located on the far left of the respective areas.<br />

Stockpile area<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-33<br />

A seepage catchment dam will be provided for. The catchment of any seepage water will be pumped to<br />

the plant process water tank.<br />

5.3.5.7 Pollution Control Dam<br />

Lined pollution control dams will be located downstream of the mine and process plant and will prevent<br />

uncontrolled release of water into natural watercourses. Water will be returned to the process plant as<br />

process water.<br />

5.3.5.8 Fire Water Distribution<br />

A pressurised fire water reticulation system will be installed throughout the plant, the mine and the office<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex. A pump driven by an electrical motor will serve as the main pump, with a diesel-driven pump<br />

on standby. A jockey pump will maintain the system pressure.<br />

Fire water and potable water will be stored in the same tank. This will prevent algae growth within the fire<br />

water tank. Fire water will be drawn from the bottom of the tank while potable water will be withdrawn<br />

from a higher level in the tank. This will ensure that the minimum required amount of fire water will be<br />

available regardless of the potable water consumption.<br />

A fire tender will be used for areas not covered by hose reels or where booster facilities are required.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.6 POWER SUPPLY FOR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-34<br />

The total installed power requirement for the facility is 11.5 MW. Power is supplied in Namibia by<br />

NamPower, a public utility <strong>com</strong>pany. Auryx has recently made an application to NamPower in order to<br />

connect the planned mining operation into the regional high voltage power grid.<br />

The project is situated close to a 220 kV power line from where a T-off line is proposed. The 220 kV line<br />

runs from the Gerus substation to the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> substation and forms the main power line to the northern<br />

part of Namibia. The 220 kV electrical power upon transformation should cater for the requirements of a<br />

metallurgical plant as well as all general mine site requirements.<br />

A T-in connection will be established on the nearby 220 kV line to supply power to the plant. This 220 kV<br />

connection will be extended towards the plant site, where it will be stepped down to 11 kV next to the<br />

plant. The 220 kV overhead line design capacity will be 40 MVA (owing to the NamPower standard<br />

transformer sizing) whereas the plant estimated power requirement is 11.5 MVA. Allowance has been<br />

made for a single 40 MVA step down transformer.<br />

A plant sub-station will be established adjacent to the 220 kV/11 kV sub-station to reticulate power at 11<br />

kV to all the plant transformers and mill motors. The plant sub-station will house the single busbar indoor<br />

switchgear and the mill motor starting panel.<br />

5.3.7 AIR REQUIREMENTS – PROCESS PLANT<br />

Two air <strong>com</strong>pressors, one working and one on standby, will deliver 300 Nm 3 /h of <strong>com</strong>pressed air, at a<br />

pressure of 750 kPa, to the plant air receiver via one of the air filters. The receiver will distribute<br />

<strong>com</strong>pressed air to the lime make-up area, workshop and various points in the plant for general usage.<br />

Instrument air will be supplied by a dedicated <strong>com</strong>pressor. An Instrument air dryer and filters will be<br />

provided in order to ensure that instrument air will be moisture-free and of good quality prior to storage in<br />

an air receiver. Provision will be made to supply air from the discharge of the main <strong>com</strong>pressors to the<br />

instrument air filters and dryer, if the instrument air <strong>com</strong>pressor is off-line. All three <strong>com</strong>pressors will be<br />

housed in a <strong>com</strong>pressor shed.<br />

5.3.7.1 Blower Air<br />

Leach aeration blowers, one on-line and another on standby, will deliver air (at 250 kPa), which will be<br />

distributed to the leach circuit.<br />

Flotation aeration blowers, two on-line ad one standby will also be installed.<br />

5.3.8 FUEL SUPPLY<br />

The mine has limited requirements for bulk services. Bulk services are limited to hydrocarbon supply for<br />

the vehicles and the emergency power generation facility. Diesel and petrol will be the two main<br />

consumables and will be stored in bulk tanks located in a bunded area at the mining workshop area.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-35<br />

Bulk tanks are available in Namibia as a free-on-loan facility provided by the bulk fuel suppliers in<br />

Namibia, at no additional cost. It is expected that a storage capacity of minimum 1 000 000 liters of diesel<br />

and 20 000 liters of Petrol will be required.<br />

5.3.9 EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING<br />

The mining operations are scheduled to work 365 days per year, less unscheduled delays such as high<br />

rainfall events which may cause mining operations to be temporarily suspended. It was decided to opt for<br />

a full calendar (three panel shift) operation bearing in mind equipment utilisation and fatigue<br />

management.<br />

The four shifts will rotate each week (7 days) from night shift to afternoon shift to day shift to a week off,<br />

<strong>com</strong>pleting a cycle every 28 days. All shift personnel will receive a monthly shift allowance.<br />

The maximum mine labour requirements for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project will <strong>com</strong>prise 22 in the owner’s team and<br />

289 for the mining contractor. This excludes an absenteeism factor of 14% on the operator <strong>com</strong>plement<br />

to cater for annual and sick leave, refresher training or medical checks.<br />

The processing plants will ac<strong>com</strong>odate135 employees at full production.<br />

No onsite housing for the site labour is envisaged.<br />

5.3.10 SEWERAGE COLLECTION AND TREATMENT<br />

Sewerage will be collected and will use gravity reticulation via buried sewer pipes to be transported to the<br />

treatment facility. Sewage will be treated in a package sewerage treatment plant (STP). The plant will<br />

have the capacity to treat the sewerage generated on site per day. The water output from the STP will be<br />

suitable for use in dust suppression, vehicle washing, irrigation, fire water and process water.<br />

The STP will also produce a small quantity of sludge, which will be dried in a sludge-drying bed located at<br />

a point lower than the plant. Dried sludge will be used as fertiliser in the rehabilitation of vegetation on<br />

the TDF slopes.<br />

5.3.11 NON-MINERALISED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR THE OPERATION PHASE<br />

Waste will be separated at source, stored in a manner that there can be no discharge of contamination to<br />

the environment, and either recycled or reused where possible. On site facilities will be provided at a<br />

dedicated waste storage facility for sorting and temporary storage prior to removal and disposal to<br />

appropriate recycling or disposal facilities off-site (Otjiwarongo for general waste and Walvis Bay for<br />

hazardous waste).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-36<br />

Industrial waste will be sorted on site and disposed of at appropriate facilities. Hazardous waste includes<br />

inter alia: fuels, chemicals, lubricating oils, hydraulic and brake fluid, paints, solvents, acids, detergents,<br />

resins, brine, solids from sewerage and sludge.<br />

A waste specification has been developed for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project and details waste management on site<br />

with a summary of this provided in TABLE 5-5.<br />

TABLE 5-5: NON MINERALISED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR OPERATIONS<br />

Waste type Waste specifics<br />

(example of waste<br />

types)<br />

Nonhazardous<br />

solid waste<br />

(nonmineralised)<br />

Hazardous<br />

contaminated<br />

solid waste<br />

(nonmineralised).<br />

Pallets and wooden<br />

crates, rubber,<br />

cardboard, paper,<br />

cable drums, metal<br />

cut-offs. scrap metal,<br />

general domestic<br />

waste such as food<br />

and packaging<br />

Building rubble and<br />

waste concrete<br />

Treated timber<br />

crates, printer<br />

cartridges, batteries,<br />

fluorescent bulbs,<br />

paint, solvents, tar,<br />

empty hazardous<br />

material containers<br />

etc.<br />

Hydrocarbons (oils,<br />

grease)<br />

Storage facility End use<br />

Skips in relevant work areas<br />

will be provided for different<br />

waste types. A waste<br />

management contractor will<br />

remove skips regularly to a<br />

dedicated waste handling and<br />

storage facility.<br />

Designated rubble collection<br />

points will be determined to<br />

which rubble and concrete will<br />

be taken.<br />

Hazardous waste will be<br />

separated at source and<br />

stored in designated<br />

containers in bunded work<br />

areas. The waste<br />

management contractor will<br />

remove these drums regularly<br />

to a dedicated waste handling<br />

and storage facility.<br />

Used oil and grease will be<br />

stored in drums in bunded<br />

areas at key points in work<br />

areas. The bunds will be able<br />

to ac<strong>com</strong>modate 110 % of the<br />

container contents and<br />

include a sump and oil trap.<br />

The waste management<br />

contractor will remove these<br />

drums regularly to a<br />

dedicated waste handling and<br />

storage facility. The yard will<br />

have a dedicated used oil<br />

storage area which will<br />

include a concrete slab,<br />

proper bunding and an oil<br />

sump. The appointed bulk<br />

fuel supplier will collect used<br />

oil for recycling.<br />

Waste will be sorted further at<br />

the a dedicated waste handling<br />

and storage facility. Recyclable<br />

waste will be sent to a reputable<br />

recycling <strong>com</strong>pany. Some items<br />

may be distributed directly to the<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity such as pallets and<br />

wooden crates. The remainder<br />

of the waste will be transported<br />

by the waste management<br />

contractor to a permitted general<br />

landfill facility in Otjiwarongo for<br />

disposal.<br />

Building rubble will be disposed<br />

of to a designated area in the<br />

waste rock dump as part of the<br />

mineralised waste facility.<br />

Hazardous waste will be<br />

disposed of at the permitted<br />

hazardous disposal site in<br />

Walvis Bay by the waste<br />

management contractor.<br />

The yard will have a dedicated<br />

used oil storage area that will<br />

include an impermeable<br />

concrete slab, bunding, an oil<br />

trap and sump.<br />

Used oil will be sent to a<br />

reputable recycling <strong>com</strong>pany for<br />

recycling.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Waste type Waste specifics<br />

(example of waste<br />

types)<br />

Medical<br />

waste<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Storage facility End use<br />

Sewage Sewage will be treated at a<br />

sewage treatment plant (STP)<br />

with a capacity of 0.5 Ml per<br />

day.<br />

Syringes, material<br />

with blood stains,<br />

bandages, etc.<br />

5.3.12 ADDITIONAL SITE FACILITIES<br />

5.3.12.1 Explosives use and storage<br />

Medical waste will be stored<br />

in sealed containers at the<br />

clinic. A waste management<br />

contractor will remove these<br />

drums regularly to a<br />

dedicated waste handling and<br />

storage facility.<br />

Page 5-37<br />

Sewage effluent will be reused<br />

in the process water circuit.<br />

Sewage sludge will be dried and<br />

either buried in the mineralised<br />

waste facility or used for bioremediation.<br />

Medical waste will be<br />

transported by the waste<br />

management contractor to a<br />

permitted medical waste<br />

treatment facility in Otjiwarongo.<br />

All explosive transportation, storage and handling will be governed by the Namibian regulations with<br />

periodic inspections undertaken by the Police and the Ministry of Mines. Handling of explosives on the<br />

mine will be under the direct supervision of an appointed person who will be the holder of a Namibian<br />

surface blasting certificate.<br />

An explosives magazine will be located in a remote area south east of the open pit. The magazine will be<br />

specially designed, constructed and approved facilities used for the storage of blasting consumables.<br />

These magazines will be surrounded by earth bunds, which will be in a fenced off area, free of all plant<br />

growth. Lightning conductors shall be erected as additional protection. The magazines will be kept under<br />

lock and key with access restricted to authorised, approved trained personnel only. The only time people<br />

will be in the magazines will be during receiving of stock or delivery of consumables required for blasting<br />

operations.<br />

5.3.12.2 Laboratory<br />

The role of the laboratory is to provide an analytical service to the gold plant and the mine by the<br />

assaying of samples received from these areas. The prescribed methodology will be fire assay for the<br />

determination of gold. Owing to the occurrence of coarse gold within the deposit, the screened fire assay<br />

procedure will be used for the assaying of geology and plant feed samples for gold.<br />

The laboratory will consist of the following discrete areas:<br />

� Sample receiving and preparation area<br />

� Fluxing room<br />

� Furnace room<br />

� Prill weighing and parting area<br />

� Digestion area<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and sulphur area<br />

� Ablution and wash room<br />

� Kitchen<br />

� Offices<br />

5.3.12.3 Product Transport<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-38<br />

Doré bullion will be packed in plastic boxes with a maximum weight of 25 kg per box. The transporting of<br />

the doré bullion bars from the gold vault to the refinery will be outsourced to the selected refinery.<br />

5.3.12.4 Medical facility/clinic<br />

There will be an on-site medical facility and First Aid Station which will be able to address day to day<br />

medical issues and emergency medical cases. Medical surveillance and testing will be conducted at<br />

approved facilities in Otjiwarongo. Emergency facilities and hospitals are available at Otjiwarongo.<br />

5.3.12.5 Security and access control<br />

The electronic security system will provide an integrated real time viewing security application utilising<br />

CCTV and intruder detection. All equipment will be non-proprietary, generally available products. The<br />

integrated alarm and access control system will provide live-event recording of all movements in<br />

controlled areas and immediate indication of programmed alarm events. The surveillance facility will be<br />

located in a secure location with access control.<br />

The security system will incorporate an access control system that will allow predetermined permission<br />

rights to card holders and interface to a database system for logging and reporting. On-site parking will<br />

be provided. A bus parking area has been allowed for at the process plant entrance area.<br />

Currently the farm <strong>Otjikoto</strong> is fenced for cattle farming. This fence will be upgraded to the same game<br />

fence type present on the other portion of the property. The fence will also be erected to isolate the<br />

mining area from the neighbouring areas.<br />

5.3.12.6 Information Technology and Communication<br />

Communication facilities are readily available, including modern fixed line and cellular<br />

tele<strong>com</strong>munications. Mobile phone networks will provide the basis of the general site <strong>com</strong>munication<br />

systems. A two-way radio system will be utilised between operators on the mine area.<br />

5.3.12.7 Weighbridge<br />

A weighbridge will be positioned just off the main access road to the North and outside the plant <strong>com</strong>plex.<br />

The weighbridge will monitor the in<strong>com</strong>ing delivery of reagents and consumables. The weighbridge will<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-39<br />

be a load cell type, single truck length unit installed above ground. A waiting area will be sized to<br />

ac<strong>com</strong>modate additional trucks.<br />

5.3.12.8 Lighting<br />

Where possible, general plant lighting will be fixed to the structures of the process plant. Access points<br />

will be illuminated using high mast lights with eight 400 W luminaires. Roads within the process plant<br />

which cannot be illuminated from structures will be illuminated from standard street pole lights.<br />

Lighting of the plant will have the dual purpose of improving security and providing adequate lighting for<br />

safe operation and maintenance. Where pole lights are used they will be focussed downwards.<br />

5.3.12.9 Offices, visitors centre and administrative buildings<br />

Buildings will be prefabricated steel framed buildings installed on a concrete foundation. The proposed<br />

surface buildings will be as follows:<br />

� Administration building;<br />

� Plant engineering office;<br />

� Plant change house building;<br />

� Mine change house building;<br />

� Laboratory building;<br />

� Plant workshop store and offices;<br />

� Mining workshop and maintenance bays;<br />

� Mining engineering office;<br />

� Security office and weighbridge station; and<br />

� Control room;<br />

� First aid Facility.<br />

The following building will be located in brick and mortar buildings on elevated concrete slabs.<br />

5.3.12.10 Cranage<br />

� Motor Control Centres;<br />

� Switch Rooms;<br />

In-plant maintenance will be serviced by a centrally located tower crane. In the reagent mixing areas,<br />

milling area and at the ball loading areas dedicated electric hoists will be installed. For other lifting<br />

requirements crawl beams will be fitted for suitable hoists.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.12.11 Fire Fighting Services<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-40<br />

Foam spray fire extinguishers will be placed in accessible locations at each conveyor drive. Dry powder<br />

extinguishers will be placed at the entry and emergency exits of electrical rooms or where there is the<br />

potential for electrical fires occurring. Foam spray fire extinguishers will also be located throughout the<br />

workshops, stores, offices, change houses and other infrastructure facilities.<br />

In addition, fire hydrant points <strong>com</strong>plete with fire hoses will be located throughout the plant within a radius<br />

of 60 m from each other. Points will be located next to access routes for easy access. Fire hydrant<br />

points will also be installed along the conveyor line and throughout the office <strong>com</strong>plex buildings. These<br />

points will be fed from the pressurised fire water distribution network.<br />

Water cannons will be installed at the highest points of the plant and will be fed from the pressurised fire<br />

water distribution network.<br />

5.3.12.12 Workshops and stores<br />

Mine workshops will be required for large truck and support equipment and light vehicles. The mine<br />

workshop will have four bays with 20 t overhead crane to service the haul trucks. An additional four bays<br />

designed to ac<strong>com</strong>modate track-driven utility vehicles will be located adjacent to the haul truck<br />

workshops.<br />

Separate wash, tyre, lube and refuelling bays have been included to ac<strong>com</strong>modate the haul trucks. Fuel<br />

storage will be located in a bunded area. The fuel will be stored in bulk storage tanks. This facility will be<br />

provided by the hydrocarbon supplier to the mine as a Build Owned Operated (BOO) facility.<br />

The Plant general workshop will be required for electrics, drills and general maintenance. Activities<br />

associated with the workshops include painting, grinding, welding, and repairs.<br />

Covered Stores will be located in the following areas:<br />

� The plant will have a reagents store which will be a structural steel building with a concrete floor<br />

and a bund around the perimeter.<br />

� The engineering workshops will have storage facilities.<br />

� The mine <strong>com</strong>plex will have a covered <strong>com</strong>ponent store for heavy mobile mining equipment,<br />

batteries and specialised tools.<br />

� The heavy vehicle workshop will have a storage facility.<br />

General storage facilities for large items will be located in a fenced off area adjacent to the Plant and<br />

mine main store.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.12.13 Salvage yard/waste handling and storage area<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-41<br />

The salvage yard will be a separately fenced off area, in the rehabilitated borrow pit area on the south<br />

side of the plant area. Run-off from the salvage yard will be contained and pumped to the plant <strong>com</strong>plex<br />

water system.<br />

5.3.12.14 Internal roads<br />

All internal roads will be gravel roads. The main access road to the facility is based on diverting the<br />

current D2808 road along the border of the mine property in the northeast. The new intersection and the<br />

road up to 250 meter from the rail crossing will be a tar road, and the rest a gravel road. The new road<br />

will reconnect the D2808 to the B1. This diversion will <strong>com</strong>ply with the district road specification in<br />

Namibia.<br />

The roads in the plant have been designed as gravel roads with paved corner areas. The road servicing<br />

the tailings line and borehole pumps has been designed as a one-way road, forming a loop with other<br />

roads.<br />

5.3.12.15 Dust control (roads)<br />

Suppression of dust within the mining operation is planned to be predominately controlled by spraying of<br />

water by large adapted haul trucks. Mining areas include the pits, active haul roads, stockpiles and<br />

dumps. The potential use of appropriate specialised <strong>com</strong>mercial dust suppression products are planned<br />

to be fully investigated to reduce water consumption as well as the potential use of treated process water.<br />

This is planned to be undertaken in the first year of mining operation.<br />

5.3.12.16 Internal pipelines<br />

Various on-site pipelines have been described in the discussion above. The pipelines will be placed in<br />

the following manner:<br />

� Pipelines within the plant will all be located on the surface of the ground.<br />

� All water pipelines will be on the surface of the ground.<br />

� The sewage pipelines will all be below ground.<br />

5.3.12.17 Conveyors<br />

Conveyors will be constructed, to transport the RoM ore from the Primary Crusher to the Processing<br />

plant. A number of small conveyors will also be located within the processing plant.<br />

5.3.12.18 Ongoing exploration<br />

Exploration drilling will continue. It will be used to upgrade the mineral resource on a yearly basis as well<br />

as to assist with detailed mine planning going forward.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

5.3.12.19 Ongoing contractor work<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-42<br />

The contractor administration and lay-down area, excluding the temporary ac<strong>com</strong>modation area will<br />

remain in use as and when required for the life of mine. This is particularly relevant to any alterations,<br />

maintenance or refurbishment that may be required from time to time and that may require the services of<br />

contractors.<br />

5.3.13 TIME TABLE<br />

Key assumptions with respect to project timing used in developing the financial model are:<br />

� Capital expenditure spread during the first 2 years;<br />

� First ore mined in year 3;<br />

� Process plant <strong>com</strong>missioned, first ore in the plant in year 3;<br />

� 14 year mine life (2012 to 2025), inclusive of the construction phase.<br />

5.4 DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE<br />

At a conceptual level, de<strong>com</strong>missioning can be considered a reverse of the construction phase with the<br />

demolition and removal of the majority of infrastructure and activities very similar to those described with<br />

respect to the construction phase. The closure phase occurs as soon as possible on the waste stockpile<br />

and the TDF and then after the cessation of all de<strong>com</strong>missioning activities. Relevant closure activities<br />

are those related to the after care and maintenance of remaining structures.<br />

5.4.1 CLOSURE OBJECTIVES<br />

The planning stage for de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure has <strong>com</strong>menced and in broad terms the main<br />

objective will be to remove as much infrastructure as possible and rehabilitate what remains to resemble<br />

the pre project land state as closely as possible. At this stage, the proposed post closure land use will be<br />

a <strong>com</strong>bination of conservation and wilderness. The following objectives have been set:<br />

� Disturbed areas other than those <strong>com</strong>prising the open pit and mineralised waste facilities will be<br />

returned to as close to the natural habitat (Thorn Bush Savannah) as practicable.<br />

� Permanent visible features such as the mineralised waste facilities and related environmental<br />

bunds as well as safety bunds around the open pit will be left in a form that blends with the<br />

surrounds.<br />

� Contamination beyond the mine site by wind, surface runoff or groundwater movement will be<br />

prevented through appropriate erosion resistant covers, containment bunds and drainage to the<br />

open pit.<br />

� Linear infrastructure <strong>com</strong>prising roads, pipelines, power lines, conveyors and related <strong>com</strong>ponents<br />

will be removed and the disturbed land rehabilitated to blend with the surrounding natural<br />

environment.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-43<br />

� Socio-economic impacts (including the loss of employment) will be minimised through careful<br />

planning and preparation for closure beginning three to five years before closure takes place.<br />

The above principles and concepts will be refined as part of ongoing detailed closure planning and<br />

costing during the life of mine.<br />

5.4.2 DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES<br />

At a conceptual level this is a reverse of the construction phase with infrastructure and activities very<br />

similar to those described in Section 5.2. The conceptual de<strong>com</strong>missioning plan is as follows:<br />

� Surface infrastructure will be demolished and removed, with the exception of the mineralised<br />

waste facilities which will remain in perpetuity. The open pits will also remain in perpetuity.<br />

� Areas where infrastructure has been removed will be levelled and restored in terms of soils<br />

horizons, vegetation and drainage.<br />

5.4.2.1 Open pit de<strong>com</strong>missioning<br />

An exclusion bund will be constructed around the northern, western and southern rims of the open pit and<br />

connect to the mineralised waste facilities which will form the eastern exclusion bund.Seepage water and<br />

all other contaminated water that can drain naturally to the open pit will be directed to the pit where it will<br />

evaporate.<br />

Access ramps to the open pit will be bunded off to prevent access down the ramps and the top berm of<br />

the pit will be sloped to an angle of approximately 20 degrees.<br />

Pit slopes will be assessed and stabilised for long term stability performance.<br />

5.4.2.2 Mineralised Waste Facilities<br />

The minimum objectives for the closure and rehabilitation of the mineralised waste facilities must be to<br />

prevent air and water pollution in accordance with the requirements of the relevant regulations and in line<br />

with good international practice. The intended end use should take into consideration the prior land use<br />

and the location with respect to current and potential future socio-economic development.<br />

The purpose of a closure plan is to ensure that the design, construction and operation procedures are<br />

<strong>com</strong>patible with the achievement of final closure and rehabilitation to acceptable environmental standards<br />

and at a reasonable cost. The principles of the closure considerations can be summarised as follows:<br />

� The non-segregated tailings materials are expected to have a low permeability with the result<br />

that seepage from rainwater infiltration will be very limited.<br />

� The required final side slope and top surface geometries will be achieved during the<br />

operation phase.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-44<br />

� The side slopes will be covered with topsoil in order to establish vegetation. The top<br />

surfaces will be covered with a vegetated engineered layer (waste rock and topsoil).<br />

� Emergency spillways will be included in the final closure design.<br />

� The water storage dams will remain in place.<br />

� Generally all surface structures (i.e. pumps, pipelines, power lines etc.) will be removed.<br />

5.4.2.3 Process plant<br />

The processing plant, primary crusher and conveyors will all be dismantled, and salvageable elements<br />

will be de-contaminated and sold. The remainder of the processing plant including steelwork, concrete,<br />

liners, brickwork etc. will be dismantled or broken up and disposed of at a site approved by the relevant<br />

authorities. Any contaminated soil below the processing plant will also be uplifted and disposed of at a<br />

site approved by the relevant authorities. Conveyor belts and concrete footings as well as non-<br />

salvageable steel will be disposed of in a similar fashion.<br />

The residual excavations after removal of the processing plant and primary crusher will be backfilled and<br />

levelled with selected overburden material from the open pit mining operations and covered with a<br />

thickness necessary to provide a productive layer for reclamation. The plant area will be landscaped and<br />

levelled to ensure that it is contiguous with, and blends into, the surrounds. Runoff from the primary<br />

crusher site will be directed to the open pit, since this area falls within the open pit access exclusion<br />

bund. The soil and vegetation function of the land will be restored.<br />

5.4.2.4 Workshops, diesel and oil storage facilities and explosives areas<br />

All structures associated with these facilities will be broken and salvageable elements will be de-<br />

contaminated and sold. The remainder of the infrastructure will be dismantled or broken up and disposed<br />

of at a site approved by the relevant authorities. Contaminated soils underlying the structures will be<br />

excavated for disposal at a hazardous waste disposal facility or for bio remediation at a designated area<br />

on the ML after which the soils will be carted to the open pit. Residual excavations will be backfilled and<br />

levelled using selected overburden material from open pit mining operations. The soil and vegetation<br />

function of the land will be restored. Runoff from these areas will be directed to the open pit.<br />

All other hard surfaces will be ripped and waste will be carted to the open pit. Pipelines and infrastructure<br />

will be removed and residual excavation will be backfilled and levelled with selected overburden material<br />

and covered with between 300mm and 500mm of stockpiled topsoil.<br />

5.4.3 CLOSURE ACTIVITIES<br />

All mining activities and processing operations will have ceased by the closure phase of the mining<br />

project. The potential for impacts during this phase will depend on the extent of demolition and<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 5-45<br />

rehabilitation efforts during de<strong>com</strong>missioning and on the features which will remain, such as the open pit<br />

and mineralised waste facilities.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

6 ALTERNATIVES<br />

6.1 CURRENT AND FUTURE LAND USED ALTERNATIVES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 6-1<br />

In the area where the proposed project is located, current land–use <strong>com</strong>prises wilderness/conservation<br />

and prospecting in EPL2410. Should the proposed project go ahead, the land use will change from<br />

prospecting and wilderness/conservation to mining within the EPL. Should the proposed project not go<br />

ahead the land within the EPL will revert back to conservation and wilderness.<br />

6.2 THE “NO PROJECT OPTION LINKED TO NEED AND DESIRABILITY<br />

The assessment of this option requires a <strong>com</strong>parison between the alternative of proceeding with the<br />

proposed project with that of not proceeding with the proposed project.<br />

Proceeding with the proposed project will result in significant positive economic impacts such as<br />

increased employment, investment and procurement of goods and services but will have potential<br />

negative environmental and social impacts associated with the proposed project.<br />

The added potential economic benefits are expected to override the potential negative environmental and<br />

social impacts of significance. Therefore proceeding with the proposed project will allow the exploitation<br />

of the mineral resource at the mine and therefore allow for the associated positive economic impacts.<br />

6.3 TECHNICAL ALTERNATIVES FOR MILLING<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> preliminary economic assessment (PEA) was <strong>com</strong>pleted in September 2011 and considered<br />

a flotation and leach (flotation/leach) processing route. Subsequent testing indicated that whole ore leach<br />

should be evaluated. Therefore, a trade off study was <strong>com</strong>missioned in January of 2012. Economic<br />

analyses clearly favoured the whole ore leach process based on increased recoveries. Additionally,<br />

characteristics such as the perceived environmental and <strong>com</strong>munity sensitivity, as well as the<br />

susceptibility to recovery loss due to process upsets were considered for each option. Table 6-1 shows a<br />

<strong>com</strong>parison of the flowsheet characteristics.<br />

TABLE 6-1: COMPARISON OF THE FLOWSHEET CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Characteristic Whole Ore Leach Flotation/Leach<br />

Simplicity of design and ease of<br />

operation<br />

Ability to handle different ore<br />

types<br />

Environmental and <strong>com</strong>munity<br />

sensitivity<br />

Single process route – more<br />

simple<br />

Can process all major ore types<br />

tested with high gold recover<br />

Higher due to 100% lined tailings<br />

facility<br />

More process circuits – more<br />

<strong>com</strong>plex<br />

Produces high gold recovery for<br />

sulphide ore, but lower recovery<br />

with oxide and transition ores<br />

Lower due to 10% lined tailings<br />

facility<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Characteristic Whole Ore Leach Flotation/Leach<br />

Susceptibility to recovery loss<br />

due to process upsets<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 6-2<br />

Less susceptible More susceptible due to flotation<br />

circuit<br />

Expandability Less <strong>com</strong>plex More <strong>com</strong>plex<br />

Water quality sensitivity Can handle much poorer water<br />

quality<br />

Water management Easier More <strong>com</strong>plex<br />

Ability to handle clay Less suitable in leaching and<br />

CIP. Blending will minimise clay<br />

issue.<br />

Ability to handle variable grade Good with aggressive gravity<br />

recovery circuit.<br />

More sensitive, needs low CN<br />

water for flotation<br />

More suited for leach/CIP<br />

however flotation may be<br />

affected – Blending would also<br />

minimize the clay issue<br />

Good with aggressive gravity<br />

recovery circuit.<br />

Other saleable by-products None identified Possibly sell High sulphide float<br />

concentrate leach residue to local<br />

smelter<br />

6.4 POWER REQUIREMENTS<br />

The <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold project has an indicated power need of approximately 11.5 MW. The parastatal power<br />

<strong>com</strong>pany, NamPower, have provided an initial proposal to Auryx Gold to supply this power. This<br />

alternative has been included in the <strong>EIA</strong> and permit application. However, based on information provided<br />

by NamPower (Presentation to the Namibian Chamber of Mines dated 24 February 2012), Namibia and<br />

the SADC region will continue to experience supply deficits through 2015. This includes an 80 MW deficit<br />

in 2012 that grows to a 350 MW deficit by 2015. Additionally, NamPower is indicating that considerable<br />

costs increases will incur and that there is potentially short periods of time where load shedding may be<br />

necessary (affecting plant operations). Therefore, the project is investigating on-site power generation<br />

options. These options may include:<br />

� Installation of ancillary diesel or heavy fuel oil (HFO) power generators to maintain capacity<br />

during times of mandatory load shedding; or,<br />

� Installation of stand-alone diesel or heavy fuel oil (HFO) power generators to operate<br />

independently of the national power grid.<br />

These options have not been developed for this <strong>EIA</strong> due to the recent changes in NamPower’s<br />

philosophy and proposals but if they are adopted, the project will emit additional <strong>com</strong>bustion gases (SOx,<br />

NOx, fine particulates, and CO). If the <strong>com</strong>pany deems that this alternative is preferable, the air quality<br />

impacts sections will be updated and a brief amendment to the <strong>EIA</strong> will be submitted detailing the<br />

additional impacts.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT<br />

7.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-1<br />

Potential environmental impacts were identified in consultation with IAPs, regulatory authorities and<br />

specialist consultants. In case of people’s health and safety related impacts, the assessment focused on<br />

third parties only (third parties include members of the public and the contractors camp after working<br />

hours) and did not assess health and safety impacts on workers because the assumption was made that<br />

these aspects are separately regulated by health and safety legislation, policies and standards.<br />

The discussion and impact assessment for each sub-section covers the construction, operational,<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure phases where relevant. This is indicated in the table at the beginning of<br />

each sub-section. Included in the table is a list of project activities/infrastructure that could cause the<br />

potential impact per mine phase. The activities/infrastructure that are summarised in this chapter, link to<br />

the description of the proposed project (see Section 5 of the <strong>EIA</strong> report).<br />

Mitigation measures to address the identified impacts are discussed in this section and included in more<br />

detail in the EMP report that is attached in Appendix M. These mitigation measures have been taken into<br />

account in the assessment of the significance of the mitigated impacts only.<br />

Both the criteria used to assess the impacts and the method of determining the significance of the<br />

impacts is outlined in Table 7-1. This method <strong>com</strong>plies with the Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

Regulations: Environmental Management Act, 2007 (Government Gazette No. 4878) <strong>EIA</strong> regulations.<br />

Part A provides the approach for determining impact consequence (<strong>com</strong>bining severity, spatial scale and<br />

duration) and impact significance (the overall rating of the impact). Impact consequence and significance<br />

are determined from Part B and C. The interpretation of the impact significance is given in Part D. Both<br />

mitigated and unmitigated scenarios are considered for each impact.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

8.2 TOPOGRAPHY<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

EXAMPLE SHOWING HOW THIS CHAPTER HAS BEEN STRUCTURED<br />

8.2.1 ISSUE: HAZARDOUS EXCAVATIONS<br />

Project phase and link to activities/infrastructure<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

N/A*<br />

Activity/infrastructure 1<br />

Activity/infrastructure 2<br />

* N/A – not applicable.<br />

Assessment of impact<br />

Activity/infrastructure 1<br />

Activity/infrastructure 2<br />

Activity/infrastructure 1<br />

Description of the issue and associated impact in terms of severity, duration, spatial scale,<br />

consequence, probability and significance – considering all phases of project including any<br />

cumulative impacts<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated L M L M M M<br />

Mitigated L L L L L L<br />

Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Identification of mitigation objectives and conceptual description of mitigation actions<br />

Emergency situation<br />

Environmental <strong>com</strong>ponent heading<br />

Issue heading<br />

Bars showing phase of operation in which<br />

impacts could occur, and link to project<br />

activities<br />

Description of any emergency situations where relevant with reference to relevant procedures<br />

Page 7-2<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

-


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

TABLE 7-1: CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING IMPACTS<br />

PART A: DEFINITION AND CRITERIA<br />

Definition of SIGNIFICANCE Significance = consequence x probability<br />

Definition of CONSEQUENCE Consequence is a function of severity, spatial extent and duration<br />

Criteria for ranking of<br />

the SEVERITY/NATURE<br />

of environmental<br />

impacts<br />

Criteria for ranking the<br />

DURATION of impacts<br />

Criteria for ranking the<br />

SPATIAL SCALE of<br />

impacts<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-3<br />

H Substantial deterioration (death, illness or injury). Re<strong>com</strong>mended level will<br />

often be violated. Vigorous <strong>com</strong>munity action. Irreplaceable loss of<br />

resources.<br />

M Moderate/ measurable deterioration (dis<strong>com</strong>fort). Re<strong>com</strong>mended level will<br />

occasionally be violated. Widespread <strong>com</strong>plaints. Noticeable loss of<br />

resources.<br />

L Minor deterioration (nuisance or minor deterioration). Change not<br />

measurable/ will remain in the current range. Re<strong>com</strong>mended level will never<br />

be violated. Sporadic <strong>com</strong>plaints. Limited loss of resources.<br />

L+ Minor improvement. Change not measurable/ will remain in the current<br />

range. Re<strong>com</strong>mended level will never be violated. Sporadic <strong>com</strong>plaints.<br />

M+ Moderate improvement. Will be within or better than the re<strong>com</strong>mended<br />

level. No observed reaction.<br />

H+ Substantial improvement. Will be within or better than the re<strong>com</strong>mended<br />

level. Favourable publicity.<br />

L Quickly reversible. Less than the project life. Short term<br />

M Reversible over time. Life of the project. Medium term<br />

H Permanent. Beyond closure. Long term.<br />

L Localised - Within the site boundary.<br />

M Fairly widespread – Beyond the site boundary. Local<br />

H Widespread – Far beyond site boundary. Regional/ national<br />

PART B: DETERMINING CONSEQUENCE<br />

SEVERITY = L<br />

DURATION Long term H Medium Medium Medium<br />

Medium term M Low Low Medium<br />

Short term L Low<br />

SEVERITY = M<br />

Low Medium<br />

DURATION Long term H Medium High High<br />

Medium term M Medium Medium High<br />

Short term L Low<br />

SEVERITY = H<br />

Medium Medium<br />

DURATION Long term H High High High<br />

Medium term M Medium Medium High<br />

Short term L Medium Medium High<br />

L M H<br />

PROBABILITY<br />

(of exposure<br />

to impacts)<br />

Localised<br />

Within site<br />

boundary<br />

Site<br />

Fairly widespread<br />

Beyond site<br />

boundary<br />

Local<br />

SPATIAL SCALE<br />

Widespread<br />

Far beyond site<br />

boundary<br />

Regional/ national<br />

PART C: DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE<br />

Definite/ Continuous H Medium Medium High<br />

Possible/ frequent M Medium Medium High<br />

Unlikely/ seldom L Low Low Medium<br />

L M<br />

CONSEQUENCE<br />

H<br />

PART D: INTERPRETATION OF SIGNIFICANCE<br />

Significance Decision guideline<br />

High It would influence the decision regardless of any possible mitigation.<br />

Medium It should have an influence on the decision unless it is mitigated.<br />

Low It will not have an influence on the decision.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7.2 TOPOGRAPHY<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-4<br />

The topography (as described in Section 4.3) will be changed by the proposed project. The following<br />

related issues have been identified and are discussed further in the sections highlighted in brackets:<br />

� surface excavations and infrastructure and the dangers they present to humans and animals<br />

(Section7.2.1);<br />

� changes to surface water flow and related impacts (Section 7.3.1); and<br />

� visual impacts (Section 7.8.1).<br />

7.2.1 ISSUE: SURFACE EXCAVATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

7.2.1.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to table 7-2, surface excavations and infrastructure include all structures into or off which<br />

third parties can fall and be harmed. Included in this category are facilities that can fail (such as<br />

mineralised waste facilities). Surface excavations and infrastructure occur in all project phases from<br />

construction through operation to de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure. In the construction and<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases these surface excavations and infrastructure are usually temporary in nature,<br />

usually existing for a few weeks to a few months. The operational phase will present more long term<br />

surface excavations and infrastructure and the closure phase will present final land forms that are<br />

considered hazardous.<br />

TABLE 7-2: SURFACE EXCAVATIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE - LINK TO PROJECT PHASES &<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Foundations<br />

Trenches<br />

Stockpiles<br />

Scaffolding<br />

Cranes<br />

Borrow pits<br />

Ongoing mining activities<br />

7.2.1.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Open pit<br />

Stockpiles<br />

Mineralised waste facilities<br />

Water dams/reservoirs<br />

Evaporation ponds<br />

Voids<br />

Trenches<br />

Buildings and equipment<br />

Surface subsidence<br />

Processing plant<br />

Open pit<br />

Stockpiles<br />

Mineralised waste facilities<br />

Water dams/reservoirs<br />

Voids<br />

Trenches<br />

Surface subsidence<br />

Scaffolding<br />

Cranes<br />

Piles of rubble<br />

Piles of scrap<br />

Permanent mineralised waste<br />

facilities<br />

Open pit<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, most of the identified surface excavations and infrastructure present a<br />

potential risk of injury and/or death to third parties which includes contractors and drillers staying at the<br />

mine overnight. This is a potential high severity in both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Duration<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-5<br />

In the context of this assessment, death or permanent injury is considered a long term impact in both the<br />

unmitigated and mitigated scenario.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

For the most part, the direct impacts will be located within the infrastructure footprint, but the indirect<br />

impacts will extend to the <strong>com</strong>munities to which the people belong.<br />

Consequence<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenario, the consequence of this potential impact is high.<br />

Probability<br />

The project area is approximately 2-3km east of the B1 National Road and it is not impossible that third<br />

parties may access the site by mistake or out of curiosity. In the unmitigated scenario, it is possible that<br />

the surface excavations and infrastructure present a risk to unac<strong>com</strong>panied third parties during all<br />

phases.<br />

The proposed mitigation measures will focus on infrastructure safety and on limiting access to third<br />

parties and animals which reduces the probability of the impact occurring.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the significance of this potential impact is high. In the mitigated scenario, the<br />

significance of this potential impact is medium because there will be a reduction in probability that the<br />

impact occurs. SLR’s confidence level is high for this significance rating.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – surface excavations and infrastructure<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H H M H M H<br />

Mitigated H H M H L M<br />

7.2.1.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to prevent physical harm to third parties (including animals)<br />

from surface excavations and infrastructure.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will ensure that:<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� The working area of the ML will be fenced;<br />

� Warning signs will be erected and maintained on the site boundary;<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-6<br />

� Security control points will be in place, to prevent uncontrolled vehicle access to existing and<br />

future mining, stockpile and waste facility areas during the construction, operation and<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases;<br />

� The permanent aboveground waste facilities will be designed, constructed and operated in a<br />

manner that flood protection is provided and that the risk of failure is limited to acceptable levels;<br />

� Permanent aboveground waste facilities and stockpiles will be rehabilitated in a manner that they<br />

present land forms that will be stable, protected from flood damage, and slopes will be re-<br />

vegetated; and<br />

� Any mining voids that remain open will be made safe to ensure that there is no risk to the safety<br />

of people and animals.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

If people do fall off or into surface excavations or infrastructure causing injury, or if any mineralised waste<br />

facilities fail causing injury to people, the Auryx Gold emergency response procedure will be followed.<br />

7.3 SURFACE WATER<br />

7.3.1 ISSUE: ALTERING DRAINAGE PATTERNS<br />

The identified impacts associated with altering surface water drainage are addressed in Section 7.7.3. In<br />

this regard, the key issue is the loss of surface water flow volume as an important ecological driver.<br />

7.3.2 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY<br />

7.3.2.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to Table 7-3, there are a number of pollution sources in all project phases that have the<br />

potential to pollute surface water, particularly in the unmitigated scenario. In the construction and<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases these potential pollution sources are temporary in nature, usually existing for a<br />

few weeks to a few months. Although these sources may be temporary, the potential pollution may be<br />

long term. The operational phase will present more long term potential sources and the closure phase will<br />

present final land forms that may have the potential to contaminate surface water through long term<br />

seepage and/or run-off.<br />

TABLE 7-3: SURFACE WATER POLLUTION SOURCES–LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

General building activities<br />

Management of dirty water<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

Servicing equipment<br />

Management of dirty water<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

General de<strong>com</strong>missioning<br />

activities<br />

Management of dirty water<br />

Seepage, runoff and dust<br />

fallout from remaining<br />

mineralised waste facilities<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management (nonmineralised<br />

and mineralised)<br />

Equipment servicing<br />

Use of vehicles and equipment<br />

that may leak lubricants and<br />

fuel<br />

Dust fallout<br />

7.3.2.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management<br />

(mineralised and nonmineralised)<br />

Stockpile development<br />

Dust fallout<br />

Ore processing<br />

Evaporation ponds<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management<br />

(mineralised and nonmineralised)<br />

stockpiles<br />

Equipment servicing<br />

Use of vehicles and<br />

equipment that may leak<br />

lubricants and fuel<br />

Dust fallout<br />

Page 7-7<br />

As discussed in Section 4.3.2, surface water flow occurs infrequently and for short durations after rainfall<br />

events. Most of this water seeps into the topsoil and shallow alluvial aquifer. The related pollution issues<br />

on shallow groundwater have been assessed in section 7.4.2 of this <strong>EIA</strong>.<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, surface water may collect contaminants (hydrocarbons, salts, chemicals,<br />

metals, etc.) from numerous sources. At elevated pollution concentrations these contaminants can be<br />

harmful to humans if ingested directly or indirectly through contaminated vegetation, vertebrates and<br />

invertebrates (impacts on biodiversity are assessed in Section 7.7 and will not be reassessed in this<br />

section). Therefore the precautionary approach has been applied with the result that contaminated<br />

surface water from the mine will be contained, re-used and/or treated.<br />

Despite this precaution one can assume that due to the site specific climatic and hydrological conditions,<br />

if a surface run-off occurs, a large fraction of the surface water seeps into the ground water alluvium.<br />

However mitigation measures are based on the principle of containing dirty water and diverting clean<br />

water as far as possible, so the drainage scheme will ensure that clean surface water flow is directed<br />

around structures such as the waste rock dumps and tailings disposal facility.<br />

In the mitigated scenario, most surface water run-off should be relatively clean and the severity reduces<br />

to low because:<br />

� by implementing a system where the dirty areas will be isolated from clean run-off and dirty water is<br />

contained and reused wherever possible rather than discharged into the environment, and<br />

� by implementing dust control measures the fallout of dust that can be collected and pollute surface<br />

water should also have been managed to acceptable levels.<br />

Duration<br />

The frequency and duration of surface water flows are limited but the potential health impacts, particularly<br />

for humans in the unmitigated scenario, are long term. In the mitigated scenario, the duration of any<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-8<br />

impacts is considered to be medium to short term because third parties will not be exposed to polluted<br />

water and there should not be significant related health risks.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

The spatial scale of the potential unmitigated impacts will be restricted to potential surface water use for<br />

as far as the contaminated surface water travels either on surface or in the shallow underlying zones. In<br />

the mitigated scenario contaminated water will be contained within the proposed mining project area,<br />

which is a localised spatial scale.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the consequence of this potential impact is high due to the potential for<br />

longer term health impacts, assuming pollution and ingestion occur. In the mitigated scenario, this<br />

reduces to low because the severity, duration and spatial scale of the impact are all reduced.<br />

Probability<br />

Given that any surface water will only be on the surface a short time, the probability of impacts is<br />

considered to be low. The additional mitigation measures re<strong>com</strong>mended based on preventing pollution,<br />

containing any impacts on site and diverting clean water around the mining activities will ensure that the<br />

proposed project does not increase the probability of impacts on surface water.<br />

This translates into a low impact probability in the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the significance of this potential impact is medium. In the mitigated scenario,<br />

the significance is reduced to low because of the reduction in severity, duration and probability. SLR’s<br />

confidence level in this rating is high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – surface water pollution<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated M-L H M H L M<br />

Mitigated L M-L L L L L<br />

7.3.2.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to prevent pollution of surface water run-off and related health<br />

impacts on third parties.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Actions<br />

In the construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases the mine will ensure that:<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-9<br />

� Pollution prevention through infrastructure design and operational procedures and through education<br />

and training of workers (permanent and temporary);<br />

� All hazardous chemicals (new and used), dirty water, mineralised wastes and non-mineralised<br />

wastes are handled in a manner that they do not contaminate surface water run-off or where this is<br />

not possible Auryx Gold will demonstrate through monitoring that the potential contamination is within<br />

acceptable limits from a human health and related risk perspective.<br />

� Where possible, surface water management facilities will be designed, constructed and operated so<br />

that dirty water is kept separate from clean water run-off through a system of berms, channels,<br />

trenches, flood protection measures, erosion protection or dams. The need for long term controls<br />

around the open pit, waste rock dump and TDF will be determined as part of closure planning.<br />

As part of closure planning, the designs of any permanent and potentially polluting structures will<br />

consider the requirements for long term surface water pollution prevention and confirmatory monitoring.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

Major spillage incidents that contaminate surface waters will be handled in accordance with the Auryx<br />

Gold emergency response procedure.<br />

7.4 GROUNDWATER<br />

The information in this section was sourced from the specialist groundwater studies in Appendix E (AGES<br />

2012).<br />

7.4.1 ISSUE: DEWATERING OF MINE PIT AND WATER SUPPLY<br />

7.4.1.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to Table 7-4, there are two activities that have the potential to reduce the local<br />

groundwater level: dewatering of the pit and borehole abstraction. Both activities will cease in the<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning phase. The impacts on biodiversity have been assessed in Section 7.7 therefore this<br />

section will focus on third party groundwater users.<br />

TABLE 7-4: LOWERING OF GROUNDWATER LEVELS – LINK PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Borehole abstraction<br />

Pit dewatering<br />

Pit dewatering<br />

Borehole abstraction<br />

Pit dewatering<br />

Borehole abstraction<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7.4.1.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

A range of potential impacts have been identified as followed:<br />

� Damage to water supply pipeline from vandalism or flood/storm water.<br />

� Potential for pipeline to impact on water quality through corrosion/algae growth.<br />

� Potential for <strong>com</strong>munities to cause pollution in the vicinity of abstraction boreholes.<br />

� Water losses through leaks, transmission and evaporation.<br />

� Depletion in water levels in boreholes due to over pumping.<br />

� Lower of water levels due to seepage into the open pit.<br />

� Depletion of neighbouring farms and/or <strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes.<br />

� Permanent radius of influence due to mine dewatering.<br />

� Recovery of water levels in Karibib Marbles.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-10<br />

The overall severity of these impacts without mitigation is considered to be high but the majority can be<br />

reduced to low with mitigation. However, the potential impact on the neighbouring farms’ supply<br />

boreholes means that the severity with mitigation is medium to low.<br />

Duration<br />

The impacts are either short term or in the case of abstraction and de-watering activities for the life of<br />

mine. This is a medium to low duration.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In the mitigated and unmitigated scenario the drawdown and related potential for impacts will be<br />

localised, but may extend beyond the proposed project boundary to as far as some of the neighbouring<br />

farms. Other impacts on water supply will be limited to the project area. This is a medium to low spatial<br />

scale.<br />

Consequence<br />

The consequence is medium in the unmitigated scenario and reduces to medium/low with mitigation.<br />

Probability<br />

The probability of impacts occurring is considered high to moderate in all cases without mitigation and<br />

while this reduces to low for most impacts with mitigation the impact on borehole supplies on<br />

neighbouring farms is moderate.<br />

Significance<br />

The significance of this potential impact is medium without mitigation and reduces to medium/low with<br />

mitigation. Auryx Gold will, as far as practicable possible, use pit water and will ensure maximum<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-11<br />

dewatering of tailings prior to placement in the pond, resulting in minimising the make-up water (water<br />

from boreholes).<br />

7.4.1.3 Tabulated summary of the assessed impact - dewatering and water supply<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H M-L M-L M H-M M<br />

Mitigated M-L M-L M-L M-L H-L M-L<br />

7.4.1.4 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Discussion of the management measures is provided below and in the EMP (Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the management measures is to manage the proposed water supply and to monitor and<br />

mitigate if required the loss of groundwater in <strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will ensure the following:<br />

� Pipeline construction in flood lines should be adequate to withstand flood conditions.<br />

� The pipeline should be visible and/ or marked to prevent damage to pipeline.<br />

� The pipeline and related infrastructure should be designed to minimise evaporation and transmission<br />

losses.<br />

� Pressure gauges should be installed at the pipeline for the early detection of pressure loss that may<br />

indicate leakages.<br />

� Monthly visual checks for damp areas around borehole equipment and pipeline.<br />

� Communities should be consulted before construction of the pipeline.<br />

� Boreholes and related equipment should be in a fenced in area in a locked pump house for protection<br />

against theft and vandalism.<br />

� Communities should be consulted in advance about the potential lowering of water levels in their<br />

boreholes.<br />

� Auryx Gold will make sure that only permitted abstraction rates are applied and production boreholes<br />

are not over pumped.<br />

� Water saving measures in mining, operational and tailings deposition processes should be<br />

implemented to further reduce the use of groundwater resources for make-up water.<br />

� If <strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes are dewatered, they will be provided with an alternative water source.<br />

� Groundwater levels should be monitored in all pumping wells throughout the life of the mine as per<br />

the monitoring programme included in the EMP.<br />

� Groundwater levels should be monitored at all monitoring boreholes as well as the nearest<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity supply boreholes, as per the monitoring programme included in the EMP.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-12<br />

� Auryx Gold will ensure that it applies for the necessary permits, in terms of the Water Act of 1956, for<br />

abstraction and pit dewatering and that these permits are renewed as required.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.4.2 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY<br />

7.4.2.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to Table 7-5 there are a number of sources in all phases that have the potential to pollute<br />

groundwater particularly in the unmitigated scenario. In the construction and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases<br />

these potential pollution sources are temporary and diffuse in nature, usually existing for a few weeks to a<br />

few months. Even though the sources are temporary in nature, related potential pollution can be long<br />

term. The operational phase will present more long term potential sources and the closure phase will<br />

present final land forms that may have the potential to pollute water resources through long term seepage<br />

and/or run-off.<br />

TABLE 7-5: IMPACTS ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY –PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management (nonmineralised)<br />

Sanitation<br />

Servicing equipment<br />

7.4.2.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Mining development<br />

Ore processing<br />

Servicing equipment<br />

Dirty water management and<br />

related facilities<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management<br />

(mineralised and nonmineralised)<br />

Stockpile development<br />

Sanitation<br />

Pipelines<br />

Servicing equipment<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management<br />

(mineralised and non<br />

mineralised)<br />

Sanitation<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

Stockpiles and waste facilities<br />

Dirty water management and<br />

related facilities<br />

The main issues in the unmitigated scenario are considered to be the potential for:<br />

� Seepage from mineralised waste facilities (TDF and WRD);<br />

� Formation of acid drainage from the TDF;<br />

� Sulphate, metal, arsenic and nitrate leaching from the TDF<br />

� Seepage of dirty water into the aquifer;<br />

� Seepage into/flooding of mine pit;<br />

� Pollution from spillages of chemicals/fuel and sanitation facilities.<br />

Remaining infrastructure –<br />

surface water management<br />

system, TDFs, other<br />

mineralised stockpiles and<br />

other wastes<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-13<br />

The severity from these potential impacts is considered to be medium to high without mitigation. With<br />

mitigation some can be reduced but overall the potential remains high for seepage from the mineralised<br />

waste facilities and medium for other potential impacts.<br />

This gives an overall severity rating of medium to high in the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios<br />

Duration<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the duration is long term for all impacts. In the mitigated scenario the<br />

duration remains high.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In the unmitigated scenario pollution would travel off site which is medium but this reduces to medium to<br />

low with mitigation.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the consequence of this potential impact is high. In the mitigated scenario,<br />

this reduces to high/medium because the severity and spatial scale of the impact is reduced.<br />

Probability<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the probability of impact is definite but reduces to medium/low with mitigation.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the significance of this potential impact is high. In the mitigated scenario, the<br />

significance reduces to medium/low. SLR’s confidence level in this rating is moderate to high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – contamination of groundwater<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H-M H M H H H<br />

Mitigated H-M H M-L H-M M-L M-L<br />

7.4.2.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Discussion of the management measures is provided below and in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP (Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the management measures is to contain pollution at source and/or prevent the off-site<br />

migration of pollution and prevent unacceptable groundwater pollution related to seepage and<br />

groundwater flow disruption impacts.<br />

Actions<br />

The following measures will be implemented by Auryx Gold:<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Design Phase<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-14<br />

� Follow-up geochemical studies in more detail will be conducted to further constrain sulphide content<br />

in the TDF and to better quantify potential leachate and acid formation possibilities.<br />

� Potential arsenic (As) and sulphate leaching from the sulphide dump shows that the TDF will most<br />

probably have to be hydrologically isolated. This requirement will be confirmed and assessed in the<br />

detailed design phase.<br />

� It is re<strong>com</strong>mended that that the detailed design consider that a safety factor be built into the TDF<br />

base beneath the hydrologically isolating layer.<br />

� Measures identified during the detailed design phase of the mineralised waste facilities and low grade<br />

stockpiles aimed at minimising impacts on the environment and monitoring potential impacts on<br />

groundwater pollution will be implemented by the mine.<br />

Construction Phase<br />

� Adequate fuel containment facilities to be used during construction phase.<br />

� The use of all materials, fuels and chemicals which could potentially leach into groundwater must be<br />

controlled.<br />

� All materials, fuels and chemicals must be stored in a specific and secured area to prevent pollution<br />

from spillages and leakages.<br />

� Construction vehicles and machines must be maintained properly to ensure that oil spillages are kept<br />

at a minimum.<br />

� Spill trays must be provided if refuelling of construction vehicles are done on site.<br />

� Chemical sanitary facilities must be provided for construction workers. Construction workers should<br />

only be allowed to use temporary chemical / permanent toilets on the site. Chemical toilets shall not<br />

be within close proximity of any drainage system. Frequent maintenance should include removal<br />

without spillages.<br />

� No uncontrolled discharges from the construction camp shall be permitted.<br />

� Chemical storage areas should be sufficiently contained, and the use of chemicals should be<br />

controlled.<br />

Operation Phase<br />

� Adequate fuel containment facilities to be used.<br />

� The use of all materials, fuels and chemicals which could potentially leach into groundwater must be<br />

controlled.<br />

� All materials, fuels and chemicals must be stored in a bunded and secured area to prevent pollution<br />

from spillages and leakages.<br />

� Mine vehicles and machines must be maintained properly to ensure that oil spillages are kept at a<br />

minimum.<br />

� Spill trays must be provided for refuelling of mine vehicles.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-15<br />

� Proper sanitary facilities must be provided for mine workers. Chemical toilets shall not be within close<br />

proximity of any drainage system. Frequent maintenance should include the removal without<br />

spillages.<br />

� No uncontrolled discharges resulting in pollution of the receiving environment and aquifer shall be<br />

permitted.<br />

� Chemical storage areas should be sufficiently contained, and the use of chemicals should be<br />

controlled.<br />

� Water seeping into the open pit during mining should be directed into a sump and pumped to surface.<br />

� Water pumped from the open pit during mining should be pumped into a dirty water system and<br />

should not be allowed to enter any clean water system, natural drainage line, or the aquifer.<br />

� Seepage capturing boreholes, both shallow and deep, should be drilled west of the TDF and WRD.<br />

� A monitoring program must be implemented and honoured. Groundwater monitoring is re<strong>com</strong>mended<br />

upstream and downstream from the TDF specifically sulphate, manganese, nickel, cobalt and<br />

arsenic. Cyanide (CN) is to be included in the monitoring protocol, should CN be used in the gold<br />

processing process. Nitrate should be included in the monitoring protocol on mine waste streams.<br />

� All water retention structures, including tailings disposal facilities, return water dams, storm water<br />

dams, retention ponds etc. should be constructed to have adequate freeboard to be able to contain<br />

water from 1:50 year rain events.<br />

� The groundwater flow model should be updated within one year after approval of the project (if<br />

approved) and every two years subsequently.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

Major spillage incidents will be handled in accordance with the Auryx Gold emergency response<br />

procedure.<br />

7.5 AIR<br />

The information in this section was sourced from the air specialist study in Appendix F (Airshed, 2012).<br />

7.5.1 ISSUE: AIR POLLUTION<br />

7.5.1.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to table 7-6, there are a number of activities in all phases that have the potential to pollute<br />

the air. In the construction and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases these activities are temporary in nature. The<br />

operational phase will present more long term activities and the closure phase will present final land<br />

forms that may have the potential to pollute the air through long term wind erosion.<br />

Air pollution related impacts on biodiversity are discussed in Section 7.7 and therefore this section<br />

focuses on the potential for human health impacts. The air quality assessment focused on airborne<br />

particulates (PM10 emissions and total suspended particles). Gaseous pollutants (such as sulphur<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-16<br />

dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide etc.) deriving from mine vehicles and equipment and from<br />

the gold smelting operations could not be assessed but were regarded by the specialist as potentially<br />

negligible in <strong>com</strong>parison to particulate emissions.<br />

TABLE 7-6: AIR POLLUTION – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Soil stripping<br />

Overburden removal<br />

Cleaning and grubbing<br />

Preparation of the<br />

foundations<br />

Compacting bases<br />

Opening borrow pits and<br />

trenches<br />

General building activities<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

Building internal linear<br />

infrastructure<br />

Vehicle movement and<br />

exhaust fumes<br />

Diesel generators<br />

limited drilling and blasting for<br />

mining<br />

7.5.1.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Soil stripping<br />

Overburden removal<br />

Drilling and blasting<br />

Crushing and screening<br />

Vehicle movement and<br />

exhaust fumes<br />

Soil management activities<br />

Mineralised waste<br />

management<br />

Stockpile development<br />

Conveyors<br />

Processing plant<br />

Diesel Generators<br />

General materials handling<br />

Removal of infrastructure<br />

Vehicle movement and<br />

exhaust fumes<br />

General material handling<br />

Soil management activities<br />

General building activities<br />

Mineralised waste<br />

management<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

Diesel Generators<br />

Mineralised waste facilities,<br />

Predicted off site PM10 ground level concentrations are high and exceed the annual and daily WHO-IT3<br />

limits at the six sensitive receptors that have been identified. With mitigation these exceedances can be<br />

reduced by between 63 to 70% and the impact area be<strong>com</strong>es much smaller with the WHO-IT3 daily limit<br />

exceeded at Farms 1 to 5. The annual limit is not exceeded at any of the Farms. The long term<br />

predictions from the model being used by the air quality specialist are more accurate than the short term<br />

predictions.<br />

Dust fall out rates are low for both the unmitigated and mitigated operations and are predicted to be well<br />

below SA residential limits of 600mg/m 2 /day and German limits of 350mg/m 2 /day.<br />

The overall severity of potential air quality impacts is considered to be high in the unmitigated scenario<br />

and reduces to medium because the annual WHO-IT3 limits for PM10ground level concentration are not<br />

exceeded at any potential receptor areas.<br />

Duration<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios, if human health impacts occur, these are potentially<br />

medium to long term in nature. This is a medium to high duration.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

Air quality impacts will be experienced off site in both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios so the<br />

spatial scale is medium.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Consequence<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-17<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the consequence of this potential impact is high, which reduced to medium to<br />

high in the mitigated scenario.<br />

Probability<br />

The main contributing sources to both the unmitigated and mitigated PM10 predicted impacts are firstly<br />

the unpaved roads specifically between the open-pit and the waste rock dump, and secondly the<br />

materials handling operations and over the short term windblown dust from the TDF. In the unmitigated<br />

scenarios the PM10ground level concentrations exceed the WHO-IT3 limit at all sensitive receptors. With<br />

mitigation this reduces but there are still predicted to be exceedances at sensitive receptors. However, a<br />

number of uncertainties are associated with the calculation and simulation of fugitive dust from unpaved<br />

roads and windblown dust resulting in expected conservative ground level concentrations (GLCs). This is<br />

in addition to the inherent model uncertainty of -50% to 200%. With effective mitigation the impacts<br />

reduce significantly and can be limited to on-site only as indicated by the annual average GLCs.<br />

The probability of impacts in the unmitigated scenario is therefore high and in the mitigated scenario low<br />

to medium.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the significance is high and with mitigation medium to high. SLR’s confidence<br />

in this rating is moderate.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact –air pollution<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H M-H M H H H<br />

Mitigated M M-H M M-H L-M M-H<br />

7.5.1.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective is to limit the mine’s contribution to air pollution impacts.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will ensure the following:<br />

Construction phase<br />

� Drilling as part of the construction to be with water to ensure minimal dust generation.<br />

� Blasting as part of the construction should only occur during day-time hours.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

� Moist topsoil if excessive dust is generated by land clearing activities.<br />

� Ensure travel distance between clearing area and topsoil piles to be at a minimum.<br />

� Water sprays on all roads before grading.<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-18<br />

� Dust fallout bucket to be placed next to the main haul road from the proposed pit to the WRD with<br />

monthly dust fallout rates not exceeding 1 200 mg/m²/day.<br />

� Ensure all construction equipment is subject to an Inspection & Maintenance programme to<br />

ensure proper <strong>com</strong>bustion.<br />

Operation Phase<br />

� Drilling to be with water to ensure minimal dust generation.<br />

� Blasting to only occur during day-time hours.<br />

� Ensure tip distance is minimal i.e. drop height into truck.<br />

� Should material transfer points generate visible dust, these must be controlled through effective<br />

mitigation measures.<br />

� Dust fallout bucket to be placed near the RoM pad (OT4) and at the Gold Plant (OT8) with<br />

monthly dust fallout rates not exceeding 1 200 mg/m²/day.<br />

� Ensure vegetation of TDF side slopes up to 1m from the top. Vegetation cover should be dense1<br />

to ensure >60% control efficiency.<br />

� Should wind erosion from exposed storage piles result in visible dust generation these must be<br />

controlled through effective mitigation measures.<br />

� Dust fallout bucket to be placed directly downwind of the TDF (OT5) with monthly dust fallout<br />

rates not exceeding 1 200 mg/m²/day.<br />

� Monthly visual inspections to ensure sufficient vegetation cover on TDF side-slopes. Should<br />

areas be exposed, vegetation cover should be extended.<br />

� Continuous water sprays on in-pit roads and onto WRD and at the RoM pad where the front-end-<br />

loader move to ensure >75% control efficiency.<br />

� If available and practical, chemical or biological based suppressants on permanent haul roads to<br />

WRD and to RoM storage pile to ensure >90% control efficiency. This requirement can be<br />

supported by sampling and analysing the silt content of the on-site unpaved roads in order to<br />

determine the actual silt content of the road material on-site.<br />

� Speed limits on all haul roads.<br />

� Ensure an Inspection & Maintenance programme for the entire mine fleet to ensure proper<br />

<strong>com</strong>bustion of fuel.<br />

� Dust fallout buckets to be placed next to the main haul road to the WRD (OT3) and next the<br />

access road (OT6) with monthly dust fallout rates not exceeding. 1 200 mg/m²/day.<br />

� Water sprays at primary crusher to ensure 50% control efficiency.<br />

� Dust fallout buckets to be placed at the RoM pad (OT4) with monthly dust fallout rates not<br />

exceeding. 1 200 mg/m²/day.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-19<br />

� PM10 sampler to be placed at Farm 1 and at Farm 5 with annual average concentrations not to<br />

exceed 30 μg/m³ and daily concentrations not to exceed 75 μg/m³ for more than 1% of the time.<br />

� Dust fallout buckets to be placed at Farm 1 (OT2) and at Farm 5 (OT1) with monthly dust fallout<br />

rates not exceeding 600 mg/m²/day.<br />

� Dust fallout buckets to be placed for background at Farm 4 (OT7) with monthly dust fallout rates<br />

Closure Phase<br />

not exceeding 600 mg/m²/day.<br />

� Topsoil recovered from stockpiles for rehabilitation and revegetation of surroundings.<br />

� Topsoil cover onto TDF and vegetate with native grass species.<br />

� Contour berm at pit and vegetate with native grass species.<br />

� Should the infrastructure removal at the processing plant site including primary crusher and<br />

conveyors produce significant dust, mitigation measures should be applied.<br />

� Demolition of infrastructure that necessitates blasting should only be done during daytime hours.<br />

� Replant any previously removed native plant species in disturbed areas.<br />

� Indigenous plant species should be used in the final landscaping of the rehabilitated mine site.<br />

� Ensure a dense vegetation cover on WRD and TDF as defined by the final closure and<br />

de<strong>com</strong>missioning plan.<br />

General re<strong>com</strong>mendations<br />

� Install a new weather station. The wind direction was confirmed through MM5 data but the wind<br />

speed in general is very low with exceptionally high percentage of calm condition.<br />

� Determine and model the emissions from the Gold Plant to ensure the impacts are below the<br />

ambient air quality limits.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.6 NOISE AND VIBRATION<br />

7.6.1 ISSUE: NOISE POLLUTION<br />

Introduction<br />

With reference to Table 7-7, there are a range of construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning activities<br />

that have the potential to generate noise and cause related pollution. Potential noise impacts on<br />

biodiversity are addressed in Section 7.7.4 and so this section will focus on the potential human related<br />

noise impacts.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

TABLE 7-7: NOISE POLLUTION – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-20<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Generators<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

Earth moving equipment<br />

General building activities<br />

Drilling<br />

Blasting<br />

Processing plant<br />

Crushing and conveyors<br />

7.6.1.1 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Drilling<br />

Blasting<br />

Earth moving equipment<br />

material tipping<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

Crushing<br />

Processing plant<br />

conveyors<br />

Generators<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

Earth moving equipment<br />

Material tipping<br />

Stripping of buildings and<br />

equipment<br />

Generators<br />

Noise pollution will have different impacts on different receptors because some are very sensitive to noise<br />

and others are not. For example, workers in general do not expect an environment free of work related<br />

noise and so they will be less sensitive to environmental noise pollution at work. In contrast, residents in<br />

the area are likely to be more sensitive to unnatural noises and so any change to ambient noise levels<br />

because of mine related noise will have a negative impact on them and their experience. Excluding one<br />

noise sensitive development (NSD01), the severity of the noise impact is considered to be low for all<br />

potentially noise-sensitive developments. Considering a worse-case scenario the severity of the potential<br />

noise impact could be a medium on NSD01. It should be noted that the unmitigated medium severity is<br />

based on the fact that there is the potential that the operation of the mine will increase the ambient sound<br />

levels at night by more than 7 dBA at this one property. As such, it is possible that the receptor (NSD01)<br />

will detect the change in ambient sound level, yet is it is unlikely that the receptor may <strong>com</strong>plain, as the<br />

total cumulative night-time noise level is still predicted to be less than 35 dBA (a level determined to be<br />

the level where rural <strong>com</strong>munities may start to <strong>com</strong>plain about the increased noise levels). NSD01 (farm<br />

house), however, belongs to the developer, hence the implementation of mitigation measures can include<br />

no permanent occupation of the farm house during operations.<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, it is estimated that noise will have a medium to low severity because of the<br />

potential impact on one receptor but that this can be reduced to low with mitigation.<br />

Duration<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios the noise pollution impacts will occur until the closure<br />

phase of the mine. This is a medium duration.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios the noise impacts will extend beyond the proposed<br />

project site. This is a medium spatial scale.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

N/A


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the consequence is medium and this reduces to low with mitigation.<br />

Probability<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-21<br />

The probability of the noise impact occurring is definite in both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios.<br />

The related probability is therefore high.<br />

Significance<br />

The significance of this impact is medium to low in the unmitigated and low in the mitigated scenarios.<br />

SLR’s confidence level is high for this significance rating.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – noise impacts<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated M -L M M M-L H M-L<br />

Mitigated L M M L H L<br />

7.6.1.2 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the measures is to limit noise pollution impacts.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will ensure that:<br />

� Communication channels are established to ensure prior notice to the sensitive receptor if work is<br />

to take place close to them. Information that should be provided to the potential sensitive<br />

receptor(s) include:<br />

o Proposed working times;<br />

o how long the activity is anticipated to take place;<br />

o what is being done;<br />

o contact details of a responsible person where any <strong>com</strong>plaints can be lodged should there<br />

be an issue of concern.<br />

� Plant and equipment is well-maintained and fitted with the correct and appropriate noise<br />

abatement measures.<br />

� The development of a noise barrier between NSD01 and the open pit development, should<br />

people permanently live at the farm house. This would take the form of a topsoil berm of a height<br />

of at least 5 meters. Alternatively, no people will permanently stay at the farm house during the<br />

operational phase of the mine.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-22<br />

� A noise monitoring programme is developed and implemented before the start of the operation.<br />

Quarterly monitoring is re<strong>com</strong>mended at the location of NSD01 (if people live at the farm house),<br />

as well as any other NSDs that have <strong>com</strong>plained to the developer regarding noise originating<br />

from the facility. Annual feedback regarding noise monitoring should be presented to all<br />

stakeholders and other Interested and Affected Parties in the area. It is re<strong>com</strong>mended that the<br />

noise monitoring results be used in a sound propagation model to illustrate the extent of the<br />

noise impact from the operation.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.6.2 ISSUE: BLASTING HAZARDS<br />

7.6.2.1 Introduction<br />

The proposed mining project will introduce blasting in to the area. Blasting activities have the potential to<br />

impact on people, animals and structures located in the vicinity of the operation. Blast hazards include<br />

ground vibration, airblast, fly rock, blast fumes and dust. Ground vibrations travel directly through the<br />

ground and have the potential to cause damage to surrounding structures. Airblasts result from the<br />

pressure released during the blast resulting in an air pressure pulse (wave), which travels away from the<br />

source and has the potential to damage surrounding structures. Fly rock is the release of pieces of rock<br />

over a distance and can be harmful to people and animals and damage structures and property. Blast<br />

fumes and dust, caused by the explosion, can be considered significant nuisance factors. Ground<br />

vibrations and airblasts have the potential to cause nuisance to people and animals even if blasts occur<br />

within legal limits.<br />

Table 7-8 identifies that blast related impacts are an issue during the construction and operational<br />

phases. Issues relating to blasting noise and blasting dust have been assessed as part of Section 7.6<br />

and Section 7.5. This section focuses on the impacts of ground vibration, airblast and flyrock, collectively,<br />

as they relate to people, biodiversity and associated land uses.<br />

TABLE 7-8: BLASTING HAZARDS– LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Blasting Blasting<br />

7.6.2.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

N/A N/A<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, ground vibrations and airblasts can cause damage to third party structures<br />

and can be a nuisance for animals and people, within the zone of influence. When considering fly rock,<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-23<br />

in the unmitigated scenario, fly rock (of varying sizes) has the potential to travel some distances from the<br />

blast site and might cause injury and death to people and animals and damage to plants and structures.<br />

If any damage or injury occurs it is considered to be a high severity in the unmitigated scenario which<br />

may be reduced to medium in the mitigated scenario because the potential for blast related incidents is<br />

expected to decrease with properly designed blasts.<br />

Duration<br />

Injury or death is considered to be long term in nature. Therefore the unmitigated and mitigated duration<br />

is high.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, potential impacts will be felt outside of the mine boundary but for the most<br />

part will still be localised. Injury and/or or death to people will, however, be felt by families and<br />

<strong>com</strong>munities beyond the site boundary. Although no third party structures are expected to be at risk,<br />

there may be the odd curious third party that approaches the open pit area.<br />

Consequence<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios the consequence is high.<br />

Probability<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the probability of blasting hazards resulting in either damage and/or creating<br />

a nuisance is low due to the remote setting of the project site and limited third party infrastructure in the<br />

vicinity of the open pit. In addition, as the pit deepens, the blast will be contained within the pit. With<br />

mitigation the low probability is reduced even more because access to the fly rock zone will be controlled<br />

and proper blast design will be adhered to thereby minimising vibrations.<br />

Significance<br />

The significance of this potential impact is medium in the unmitigated and medium to low in the mitigated<br />

scenarios. SLR’s confidence level in this rating is high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – blasting hazards<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H H M H L M<br />

Mitigated M H L-M H L M-L<br />

7.6.2.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the measures is to prevent blast related damage to third parties and infrastructure.<br />

Actions<br />

The blast design, implementation and monitoring will, as a general rule, ensure that:<br />

� Fly rock is contained within a maximum of 500m of the blast site;<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-24<br />

� Prior to each blast the blast area will be cleared of third parties to a safe distance determined by<br />

appropriate legislation and safe working procedures. Prior to each blast an audible warning will be<br />

sounded;<br />

� ground vibration at the closest third party structures is less than 12mm/s peak particle velocity; and<br />

� air blast at the closest third party structures is less than 130dB; and<br />

� All registered <strong>com</strong>plaints will be documented, investigated and efforts made to address the area of<br />

concern where possible.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

If a person or animal is injured by fly rock or damage is caused to third party infrastructure this must be<br />

handled in accordance with the Auryx Gold emergency response procedure.<br />

7.7 BIODIVERSITY<br />

The information in this section was sourced from the biodiversity specialist studies in Appendix H.<br />

7.7.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The section is intended to be a high level assessment of biodiversity impacts. Therefore, readers must be<br />

aware of the content of the baseline description (Section 4.6), the content of the specialist reports<br />

(Appendix H) and the content of the EMP (Appendix M) when reading this section.<br />

The assessment covers the following broad topics: physical destruction of biodiversity and related<br />

functions, impacts on water resources as an ecological driver, general disturbances to biodiversity. Each<br />

of these topics is individually assessed below in relation to the proposed mining project.<br />

7.7.2 ISSUE: PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY<br />

7.7.2.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to Table 7-9, there are a number of activities/infrastructure in all phases of the project that<br />

have the potential to impact on biodiversity in the broadest sense, although the principle impacts would<br />

occur in the construction and operation phases. In this regard, the discussion relates to the physical<br />

destruction of specific biodiversity areas, of linkages between biodiversity areas and of related species<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-25<br />

which are considered to be significant because of their status, and/or the role that they play in the<br />

ecosystem.<br />

TABLE 7-9: PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY - LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Infrastructure establishment<br />

Soil stripping<br />

Cleaning and grubbing<br />

Preparation of the<br />

foundations<br />

Compacting bases<br />

Opening borrow pits and<br />

trenches<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

Open pit development<br />

Stockpile development<br />

7.7.2.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Soil stripping<br />

Mining development<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

waste management<br />

(mineralised)<br />

stockpile development<br />

Exploration<br />

Material movement<br />

General building activities<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

Erosion of final land forms<br />

The project is located in an area of low biodiversity sensitivity and there are extensive areas of similar<br />

habitat in the surrounding area. However, the removal or killing of individual organisms during<br />

construction, operational and de<strong>com</strong>missioning activities has the potential to impact on:<br />

� Plants, particularly trees, some of them protected<br />

� Satellite fauna and flora of above-mentioned trees<br />

� Animals, especially reptiles and invertebrates, as a result of being struck by vehicles and<br />

machinery moving earth or using roads<br />

� Dormant organisms, such as frogs, outside their season of activity<br />

� Seeds and eggs, and their loss prevents establishment of the next generation<br />

� Nests of bird species of sensitive conservation status are destroyed, as are dens or crèches of<br />

mammals<br />

Given the above discussion, the unmitigated severity is medium which may reduce to between medium<br />

and low with the successful implementation of the mitigation measures.<br />

Duration<br />

Direct destruction will be limited to the life of the mine and given the low sensitivity of the habitat impacted<br />

there should be no longer term impacts. The duration is therefore medium in both the unmitigated and<br />

mitigated scenarios.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

Given that there are extensive areas of similar habitat surrounding the project area the impacts will be<br />

confined to the project area, the spatial scale of impacts is therefore low in both the unmitigated and<br />

mitigated scenarios.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Consequence<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-26<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the consequence of the potential impact is medium and this reduces to<br />

medium/low with mitigation.<br />

Probability<br />

Without any mitigation the probability associated with the impacts is definite. With mitigation, the<br />

probability of impacts will be reduced because emphasis will be placed on conserving and restoring areas<br />

and related biodiversity.<br />

Significance<br />

The significance of this potential impact is medium in the unmitigated scenario and remains medium for<br />

the mitigated scenario as the physical destruction of some biodiversity is unavoidable. SLR’s confidence<br />

level in this rating is moderate to high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – physical destruction of biodiversity<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated M M L M H M<br />

Mitigated M-L M L M-L M M<br />

7.7.2.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to prevent, as far as is possible, the unacceptable loss of<br />

biodiversity and related functionality through physical disturbance.<br />

Actions<br />

In the construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases Auryx Gold will:<br />

� Design footprints of all facilities as small as possible and generally limit mine infrastructure, activities<br />

and related disturbance to those specifically identified and described in this <strong>EIA</strong> report;<br />

� Mark out all construction footprints and clearly convey the rule of staying inside these boundaries to<br />

all relevant contractors;<br />

� Prior to construction, and in consultation with a specialist, scan proposed construction sites for any<br />

more sensitive flora and fauna and implement the re<strong>com</strong>mendations of the specialist –these could<br />

include but not be limited to: a search and rescue of dens, crèches and burrows,<br />

relocating/demarcating nests, demarcating flora (protected trees) to either be conserved within the<br />

construction site or relocated;<br />

� Clearly demarcate boundaries of the waste rock dump and TDF;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-27<br />

� At least a 100 m wide boundary zone around pans should be kept free of developments and mine-<br />

related activities, specifically, the large ephemeral pan located east of the mine site should be<br />

avoided - the delineation of the pan as provided by the specialist should be used as the pan<br />

boundary;<br />

� Where possible avoid cutting or relocating protected trees and develop plans to care for them during<br />

the life of mine until their surroundings have been restored;<br />

� Where disturbance of protected trees is unavoidable, apply for the necessary permits in a timely<br />

manner;<br />

� As much as possible and as is feasible, evacuate any animals of conservation significance from the<br />

mining area before disturbance;<br />

� Remove and stockpile topsoil, along with its soil fauna and seed banks, and devise plans for its<br />

management during stockpiling and redeployment for restoration;<br />

� Where feasible, remove other organic material, including litter and dead wood, and stockpile<br />

separately for future use in restoration. Appropriate stockpiling methods should be investigated, and<br />

should promote the viability of the <strong>com</strong>munities they contain;<br />

� Construction crews and mining staff should be held to the rule of staying inside the demarcated<br />

boundaries of the construction and mining site areas;<br />

� Earthen-bund the perimeter of the mining pit to reduce the chances of animals being killed or injured<br />

by blasting, or incurring damage by mining equipment;<br />

� Construct roads as narrow as operationally feasible and maintain all roads in good condition so that<br />

diversions off roads will not be necessary;<br />

� Aggregate borrow pits for road construction should be sited on the proposed mining site to reduce<br />

overburden stockpiling and unnecessary environmental disturbance;<br />

� Develop road use policy, including speed limits, and enforce this;<br />

� Upon <strong>com</strong>pleting construction, initiate restoration of all roads and other sites that were only impacted<br />

during construction and will not be required for mining operation;<br />

� Increase environmental awareness through training of key staff, including their ability to handle<br />

animals during evacuation; and<br />

� Rigorously police the construction crews’ and mining staff’s adherence to the rules and do not<br />

hesitate to invoke penalty clause/s.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.7.3 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON WATER RESOURCES AS AN ECOLOGICAL DRIVER<br />

7.7.3.1 Introduction<br />

Water is a key ecological driver (an element that is important for the functioning of that habitat and related<br />

ecosystem). In the context of the proposed mining project the potential issues of concern are the de-<br />

watering of the mine pit, the introduction of the proposed TDF as a potentially large water body and the<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-28<br />

potential for the blocking or deviation of water flow caused by the placement of project infrastructure in<br />

particular the waste rock dump and the TDF. Table 7-10 sets out the activities/infrastructure in all phases<br />

that have the potential to reduce (or increase in the case of the TDF) the availability of surface water, and<br />

change drainage patterns within and adjacent to the proposed project site.<br />

TABLE 7-10: IMPACT ON WATER RESOURCES AS AN ECOLOGICAL DRIVER – LINK TO PROJECT<br />

PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Placement of all<br />

infrastructure, particularly the<br />

mineralised waste facilities<br />

Construction of surface water<br />

containment and/or diversion<br />

infrastructure – berms,<br />

channels, dams.<br />

7.7.3.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Pit dewatering<br />

Placement of all<br />

infrastructure, particularly the<br />

mineralised waste facilities<br />

Water containment and/or<br />

diversion infrastructure –<br />

berms, channels, dams.<br />

Placement of all<br />

infrastructure, particularly the<br />

mineralised waste facilities<br />

Water containment and/or<br />

diversion infrastructure –<br />

berms, channels, dams.<br />

Open pit<br />

Placement of final land forms<br />

with associated water<br />

containment and/or diversion<br />

infrastructure – berms,<br />

channels, dams.<br />

Open pit<br />

Periodic surface water run-off and the existence of near-surface water resources are understood to be<br />

key ecological drivers for vegetation, vertebrates and invertebrates within and downstream of the<br />

proposed project site because it recharges the moisture content of the aquifer. This in turn supports a<br />

range of vegetation, in particular larger trees which in turn support a range of invertebrates and<br />

vertebrates. In addition, water points on farms, on which wild mammals and birds also depend, may<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e more difficult to replenish.<br />

The proposed TDF raises potential impacts by introducing a large source of water which could disrupt the<br />

normal population dynamics with local increases as a result of the increase in this resource and then<br />

increased mortality once the resource is removed. There is also the potential impact that ingesting this<br />

water may have on the mortality/morbidity of species.<br />

Having regard to the available water resources and sensitivity of the habitats involved, the unmitigated<br />

severity is considered to be medium which would reduce to low with the successful implementation of the<br />

mitigation measures.<br />

Duration<br />

De-watering will be limited to the life of the mine and with mitigation, the reduction in water resource<br />

availability should be avoided or temporary. Impacts associated with surface water flow and the TDF<br />

should also be restricted to life of mine and therefore the duration is medium.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Spatial scale<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-29<br />

Without mitigation, the spatial scale of the de-watering impacts may extend beyond the site boundary in<br />

the unmitigated scenario which is a medium spatial scale. With mitigation impacts should be confined to<br />

the project area.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the consequence of this potential impact is medium. In the mitigated<br />

scenario this reduces to low.<br />

Probability<br />

The probability of impacts is considered to be medium without mitigation reducing to low with mitigation.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the significance of the impact is medium. In the mitigated scenario, the<br />

significance reduces to low. SLR’s confidence in this rating is moderate to high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – water resource as an ecological driver<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated M M M M M M<br />

Mitigated L M L L L L<br />

7.7.3.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to prevent significant reductions in water flows and related<br />

loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functionality.<br />

Actions<br />

In the construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases Auryx Gold will ensure that:<br />

� Design footprints of all facilities as small as possible and generally limit mine infrastructure, activities<br />

and related disturbance to those specifically identified and described in this <strong>EIA</strong> report;<br />

� Clean surface water diversion measures are provided around infrastructure and activities;<br />

� Ensure long term designs for waste rock dump and TDF allow for the diversion of water to maintain<br />

natural surface water flow paths as far as practically possible;<br />

� Minimise water abstraction other than dewatering of the pit by reducing the mine’s water<br />

requirements as much as possible;<br />

� Access to the TDF should be prevented as far as practically possible;<br />

� If tree condition declines, investigate measures to improve it without abstracting more water and<br />

investigate possibilities for offsetting significant tree mortalities;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-30<br />

� During mining operations it may be<strong>com</strong>e necessary to extract excess water from the open-cast pit.<br />

Water extracted in the process should be recycled and reused by the mine thereby reducing its need<br />

for external water supply.<br />

� Monitor groundwater levels in boreholes on an on-going basis; and<br />

� Annually record health condition of a sample of large trees throughout the life of mine in a reasonable<br />

radius (i.e. a radius that reflects the out<strong>com</strong>e of hydrogeological modelling studies) around the mine<br />

pit and should there be a significant decline in health or increase in mortalities that can be linked to<br />

groundwater changes, a detailed action plan should be drafted that will define and refine further<br />

mitigation options. Should there be no mitigation options, biodiversity offsets should be considered.<br />

As part of closure planning, the designs of any permanent structures will take into consideration the<br />

requirements related to surface water flow.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.7.4 ISSUE: GENERAL DISTURBANCE OF BIODIVERSITY<br />

7.7.4.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to table 7-11 there are a number of activities/infrastructure that have the potential to<br />

disturb vegetation, vertebrates and invertebrates in all mine phases, particularly in the unmitigated<br />

scenario. In the construction and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases these activities are temporary in nature,<br />

usually existing for a few weeks to a few months. The operational phase will present more long term<br />

occurrences and the closure phase will present final land forms that may have pollution potential through<br />

long term seepage and/or run-off.<br />

TABLE 7-11: GENERAL DISTURBANCE OF BIODIVERSITY – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

General construction activities<br />

Management of dirty water<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management (nonmineralised)<br />

Servicing equipment<br />

Use of vehicles and equipment<br />

that may leak lubricants and<br />

fuel<br />

Security lights<br />

Contractors camp<br />

Vehicle movement on access<br />

roads, internal roads and off<br />

road<br />

Servicing equipment<br />

Management of dirty water<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management (nonmineralised<br />

and mineralised)<br />

Vehicle movement on<br />

access roads, internal roads<br />

and off road<br />

Use of vehicles and<br />

equipment that may leak<br />

lubricants and fuel<br />

Security lights<br />

Mine development<br />

Material handling<br />

Ore processing<br />

General building activities<br />

Management of dirty water<br />

Storage and handling of new<br />

and used materials and<br />

chemicals (including<br />

hydrocarbons)<br />

Waste management (nonmineralised<br />

and mineralised)<br />

Equipment servicing<br />

Use of vehicles and<br />

equipment that may leak<br />

lubricants and fuel<br />

Material handling<br />

Security lights<br />

Vehicle movement on access<br />

roads, internal roads and off<br />

road<br />

Remaining mineralised waste<br />

facilities<br />

Any remaining mine voids<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7.7.4.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, biodiversity will be disturbed in the following ways:<br />

� Firewood collection can lead to loss of woody plants and their key role as a nutrient source;<br />

� Illegal poaching of game, game birds, reptiles and other animals;<br />

� Illegal collection and loss of seeds and plants;<br />

� Deposition of dust on plant <strong>com</strong>munities and impact on plant vitality;<br />

� Introduction of invasive plant species;<br />

� Interference with movement of large game;<br />

� Habitat fragmentation isolates organisms from wider populations;<br />

� The presence of vehicles in the area can cause road kills especially if drivers speed;<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-31<br />

� White light attracts large numbers of invertebrates which be<strong>com</strong>e easy prey for predators - this can<br />

upset the invertebrate population balances;<br />

� Noise and vibration pollution may scare off vertebrates and invertebrates and influence migration<br />

paths;<br />

� The presence of open pits and water dams may lead to the death/injury of animals; and<br />

� Pollution emissions, residues from the mining activities and general litter may impact on the survival<br />

of individual plants, vertebrates and invertebrates.<br />

Cumulatively, these disturbances will have a medium to high severity in the unmitigated scenario. In the<br />

mitigated scenario, many of these disturbances can be prevented or mitigated to acceptable levels, which<br />

reduces the severity to medium/low.<br />

Duration<br />

In both the mitigated and unmitigated scenarios, the impacts are linked to the life of the mine, so the<br />

duration is medium.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

The movement of species and linkages between biodiversity areas extend beyond the mine site leading<br />

to a medium impact in the unmitigated scenario. This is could be reduced to low with mitigation.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the consequence of this potential impact is medium. In the mitigated<br />

scenario, this reduces to between medium and low because the severity and spatial scale of the impact is<br />

reduced.<br />

Probability<br />

Without any mitigation the probability of negatively impacting biodiversity through multiple disturbance<br />

events is high. With mitigation, the probability will be reduced to medium because most of the<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-32<br />

disturbances can be controlled through implementation and enforcement of practices, policies and<br />

procedures.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios, the significance of this potential impact is medium. SLR’s<br />

confidence level in this rating is high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact- general biodiversity disturbance<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H-M M M M H M<br />

Mitigated M-L M L M-L M M<br />

7.7.4.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to prevent unacceptable disturbance of biodiversity.<br />

Actions<br />

In the construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases Auryx Gold will:<br />

� The working area of the ML will be fenced;<br />

� Develop a policy that limits independent movements by staff into the veld outside the fenced-in<br />

mining site. Strictly prevent poaching and harvesting, including of firewood, or possession of any<br />

such natural materials. Enforce rules with “zero tolerance”;<br />

� Provide or ensure that there is adequate food for workers on site and at the ac<strong>com</strong>modation camp;<br />

� Allow only mining personnel, service providers and construction staff, as well as registered mine<br />

visitors on site;<br />

� Train all mine staff to appreciate the natural non-consumptive values of biodiversity, as well as<br />

legislation relating to protected species;<br />

� Raise awareness concerning recognising venomous snakes/invertebrates from non-dangerous ones,<br />

and ensure that sufficient personnel are trained to handle snakes/invertebrates so as to move them<br />

away from the mine without killing;<br />

� In general, where feasible, ‘mosquito’ screens should be installed on door and window openings to<br />

exclude flying insects from indoor working areas. This is particularly important if an on-site kitchen<br />

and canteen area is planned;<br />

� Compensate farmers for livestock and game losses, based on valid claims.<br />

� Train all drivers of vehicles in the necessary procedures for the safe operation of all vehicles and to<br />

maintain regulated speed;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-33<br />

� Carry out regular training to instil appropriate vehicle control and a high degree of professional road<br />

conduct;<br />

� Enforce speed limits, including using speed-reducing methods and speed-monitoring devices;<br />

� As much as operationally feasible, driving to and from the mining site should be avoided at night and<br />

limited, if possible, only to within the mining area;<br />

� Use yellow outdoor lights (sodium vapour floodlights with orange covers, or yellow bulbs/tubes for<br />

incandescent and fluorescent lights) wherever possible as this is less glaring to invertebrates while<br />

serving human requirements;<br />

� Reduce the attraction to invertebrates to indoor lights by installing self-closing doors and non-opening<br />

windows in night-time operations buildings;<br />

� If automated, UV-attractant pest management devices have to be deployed, such systems should be<br />

either kept indoors (e.g. in maintenance sheds, inside administrative blocks, or inside production<br />

plants) or should be covered with wire mesh to ensure that only target organisms of the right size are<br />

electrocuted;<br />

� Ensure that animals have no access to contaminated water sources;<br />

� Fence in TDF and other areas that are regularly artificially wetted and use other proven means to<br />

deter birds from reaching them; wetted areas should be kept to a minimum;<br />

� All chemicals, emissions, and leaching products as well as tailings must be strictly contained and<br />

regularly timely cleaned or neutralised, adhering to best practises;<br />

� Develop a site waste management policy and actively enforce it;<br />

� Develop policy for the management of hazardous materials and actively enforce it;<br />

� Provide temporary waste deposition facilities on site (rubbish bins, skips), which are secure from<br />

scavengers, storms, or other disturbance;<br />

� Provide adequate toilet facilities for all workers at work sites and enforce a strict policy of not<br />

defecating in the field;<br />

� Apply appropriate hydrocarbon-handling principles (storage tanks should have bunding and be<br />

regularly inspected, lubricants should be stored in properly designated and appointed facilities,<br />

spillages should be cleaned up immediately, adequate control over use of fuels);<br />

� Contain all contaminated water and purify it to potable quality before reuse, or release into the<br />

environment (if applicable);<br />

� Where possible, avoid destroying trees or disturbing their proximity, so that animals can continue to<br />

use them;<br />

� Locate linear infrastructure in a way that minimises new fragmentation, e.g. using infrastructure<br />

corridors;<br />

� Rehabilitate areas around linear infrastructure after installing it such that they minimise habitat<br />

fragmentation, allowing populations to be connected across them;<br />

� Implementing strict controls over the movement of materials onto and off the site to minimise the<br />

spread of invasive species; if this be<strong>com</strong>es a problem monitor the occurrence and spread of invasive<br />

species so as to instigate steps for their control, following expert advice;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-34<br />

� An expert study on the effects of the mine and its related activities on the cheetah population should<br />

be conducted, specifically focusing on those cheetahs whose home ranges are within an area of<br />

about 25 km of the mine; the study should determine how mining activities affect the movements and<br />

local population of cheetahs.<br />

As part of closure planning, the designs of any permanent and potentially polluting structures will take<br />

consideration of the requirements for long term pollution prevention and confirmatory monitoring.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

Major spillage incidents will be handled in accordance with the Auryx Gold emergency response<br />

procedure.<br />

Certain instances of injury to animals may be considered emergency situations. These will be managed<br />

in accordance with the Auryx Gold emergency response procedure.<br />

7.8 VISUAL<br />

The information in this section was sourced from the visual specialist study in Appendix J.<br />

7.8.1 ISSUE: VISUAL IMPACT<br />

7.8.1.1 Introduction<br />

With reference to table 7-12, visual impacts may be caused by activities and infrastructure in all project<br />

phases. The more significant activities and infrastructure are associated with the operational phase when<br />

the waste rock dump and TDF are being developed.<br />

TABLE 7-12: VISUAL IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Existing mine development<br />

Foundations<br />

Trenches<br />

Stockpiles<br />

Scaffolding<br />

Cranes<br />

Borrow pits<br />

Roads<br />

Power lines<br />

Pipelines<br />

Lights<br />

7.8.1.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Open pits<br />

Stockpiles<br />

Mineralised waste facilities<br />

Processing plant<br />

Trenches<br />

Buildings and equipment<br />

Pipelines<br />

Power lines<br />

Conveyors<br />

Lights<br />

Stockpiles<br />

Mineralised waste facilities<br />

Processing plant<br />

Trenches<br />

Scaffolding<br />

Cranes<br />

Piles of rubble<br />

Piles of scrap<br />

Pipelines<br />

Power lines<br />

Conveyors<br />

Lights<br />

Permanent mineralised waste<br />

facilities<br />

The severity of visual impacts is determined by assessing the change to the visual landscape as a result<br />

of mine related infrastructure and activities. The most visible aspect of the proposed mining project will be<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-35<br />

the proposed waste rock dump which, at 40m high, is considered to have a high visual impact without<br />

mitigation. Other elements of the mine including the processing plant, open pit and TDF are all lower in<br />

height and benefit from the screening provided by surrounding vegetation.<br />

Overall, because of the impacts of the waste rock dump, the severity is considered to be high in the<br />

unmitigated scenario but reduces to medium with mitigation.<br />

Duration<br />

The duration is high in the unmitigated scenario because the visual impacts would be experienced after<br />

the life of the mine. Depending on the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures for the waste<br />

rock dump in particular this may be reduced to medium as the processing plant would be removed and<br />

the open pit and TDF would be screened from view.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

This is a medium spatial scale in both the mitigated and unmitigated scenarios.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the mitigated scenario the consequence is high and with mitigation it is medium.<br />

Probability<br />

The probability of the visual impact occurring is high in the unmitigated scenario and could be reduced to<br />

medium with the successful implementation of mitigation.<br />

Significance<br />

The significance is high in the unmitigated scenario and reduces to medium with mitigation. SLR’s<br />

confidence in this rating is moderate to high because it is dependent on the successful implementation of<br />

mitigation measures to reduce the impact of the waste rock dump.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact - visual<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H H M H H H<br />

Mitigated M M M M M M<br />

7.8.1.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the measures is to limit visual impacts.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Actions<br />

During construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning the following general principles apply:<br />

� Signage on the B1 for the mine should be limited,<br />

� All vegetation within the mine site that is not removed needs to be managed and protected,<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-36<br />

� In all areas which are to be excavated, topsoil needs to be removed and stockpiled in a suitable<br />

location and utilised in rehabilitation of the TDF and WRD, plant and infrastructure areas.<br />

� The use of face brick should be avoided and glass surfaces should be shielded to avoid glare and<br />

reflections.<br />

� All lighting is to be kept to a minimum within the requirements of safety and efficiency. Overly tall light<br />

poles are to be avoided and if exposed to the public line of site, low wattage and directional lighting<br />

should be used as appropriate. Security and perimeter lighting, where required, must also be<br />

shielded so that no light falls outside the area needing to be lit.<br />

� Dust suppression mitigation as re<strong>com</strong>mended in Section 7.5should be applied;<br />

� Unless utilized in the operation phase, construction structures need to be removed and the area<br />

rehabilitated back to scrub thicket;<br />

� The areas of the old road which will not be utilised for the mine need to be ripped and rehabilitation to<br />

scrub thicket;<br />

� Special attention needs to be given to the entrance to the B1, as well as to the eastern section where<br />

the new road diverges from the old. At these locations, a 2.5 meter natural looking berm needs to be<br />

raised to act as a screening wall. The berms need to be planted with local endemic plants to ensure<br />

that the views down the old road are screened;<br />

� All painted surfaces should blend into the natural surroundings.<br />

� Rehabilitation of all the faces of the WRD to grass / scrub bushes and some trees;<br />

� Reduce the angle of the WRD slope if not suitable for rehabilitation;<br />

� There will be continuous rehabilitation of the TDF dam walls as they are raised;<br />

� An agreement needs to be reached with the local municipality to ensure that the trees between the<br />

railway line and the road are not removed; and<br />

� For the closure phase:<br />

o Auryx will establish a mechanism to ensure that the rehabilitation of the mine is properly funded<br />

to ensure that sufficient funds are available to implement the rehabilitation and mitigations<br />

required for closure.<br />

o All <strong>com</strong>ponents of the infrastructure used during operation, apart from the WRD and TDF, must<br />

be removed. The site must be visually ‘cleaned up’ so as to portray an uncluttered landscape.<br />

o The ground where processing plants were located must be decontaminated and then covered by<br />

the earth used for the berm and landscaped into a natural form in alignment with the natural<br />

hydrological patterns.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7.9 ARCHAEOLOGY<br />

The information in this section was sourced from the archaeology specialist studies in Appendix I.<br />

7.9.1 ISSUE: IMPACTS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND LANDSCAPES<br />

7.9.1.1 Introduction<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-37<br />

With reference to table 7-13, there are a number of activities/infrastructure in all phases of the proposed<br />

project that have the potential to damage archaeological resources.<br />

TABLE 7-13: ARCHAEOLOGY IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Infrastructure establishment<br />

Soil stripping<br />

Cleaning and grubbing<br />

Preparation of the<br />

foundations<br />

Compacting bases<br />

Opening borrow pits and<br />

trenches<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

Building internal linear<br />

infrastructure<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

7.9.1.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Mining development<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

waste management<br />

(mineralised)<br />

stockpile development<br />

Removal of infrastructure<br />

Vehicle movement<br />

Material movement<br />

Slope stabilization<br />

The nature of the likely impacts on the archaeological sites include the direct impacts of earthmoving<br />

activities and the indirect impacts of accelerated soil erosion caused by the clearance of vegetation, and<br />

potential damage from blasting activities. Given the sensitive nature of the archaeological sites and when<br />

taking into account existing impacts from on-site exploration activities, the severity of these impacts<br />

without mitigation is high, but this could be reduced to low/medium with mitigation.<br />

Duration<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the loss of archaeological sites and the related losses to the broader<br />

archaeological landscape is long term and will continue after the life of the mine. With mitigation, which<br />

includes the documenting and relocation of burial sites, where applicable, and preservation of sites in-<br />

situ, the duration is reduced to low.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

The spatial scale is considered to extend beyond the site boundary in the unmitigated scenario and is a<br />

medium impact. With mitigation, the spatial scale will be localised to within the site boundary<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012<br />

N/A


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Consequence<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-38<br />

The consequence of this potential impact is high in the unmitigated scenario. It reduces to low in the<br />

mitigated scenario because the severity, duration and spatial scale are reduced.<br />

Probability<br />

Without mitigation the probability of impact is considered high but this can be reduced to low with<br />

mitigation.<br />

Significance<br />

The significance of this potential impact is high in the unmitigated scenario and low in the mitigated<br />

scenario. SLR’s confidence in this rating is high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact - archaeology<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H H M H H H<br />

Mitigated M-L L L L L L<br />

7.9.1.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the measures is to prevent the unacceptable loss of archaeological sites and related<br />

historical information.<br />

Actions<br />

In the construction, operation and de<strong>com</strong>missioning phases Auryx Gold will ensure that:<br />

� It limits mine infrastructure, activities and related disturbance to those specifically identified and<br />

described in this <strong>EIA</strong> report.<br />

� The sites reported in Appendix I will be marked and protected, and the area within cleared of all<br />

encroaching bush. In the case of QRS 83/ 1 & 2, if the cutline running past the site will be used in the<br />

future, it should be re-routed to provide a 20m buffer around the site.<br />

� The site localities should be indicated on the project GIS and all relevant field mapping and should be<br />

made known to all contractors whose activities might encroach on the sites. Test excavation may be<br />

required to confirm the identification of the cairns as burial sites.<br />

� A formal “No-Go Area” policy, as set out in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP, will be developed and implemented.<br />

� All workers (temporary and permanent) will be educated about the archaeological sites that may be<br />

encountered and appropriate training will be provided.<br />

� In the event that mining activities will unavoidably encroach on the sites, the <strong>com</strong>pany is legally<br />

obliged to take all necessary steps either to protect the sites, or to re-locate the burials according to<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-39<br />

official directives. In the case of QRS 83/1 & 2, it may be appropriate to approach the National<br />

Heritage Council for a permit to be issued under Part V (Sections 48 and 52) of the National Heritage<br />

Act. In the case of QRS 83/3, the site would also fall under the protection of the Burial Places<br />

Ordinance (27 of 1966).<br />

Emergency situations<br />

If there are any chance finds of archaeological sites that have not been identified and described in the<br />

specialist report, Auryx Gold will follow its chance find procedure. The key <strong>com</strong>ponent of which is to<br />

ensure that the site remains undisturbed until a specialist has assessed the site, assessed the potential<br />

damage, advised on the necessary management steps and advised on the requirements for stakeholder<br />

consultation and permitting.<br />

7.10 TRAFFIC<br />

7.10.1 ISSUE: TRAFFIC IMPACT<br />

7.10.1.1 Introduction<br />

In the broadest sense (see Table 7-14), the activities associated with the proposed project will generate<br />

traffic in all phases, however the mine will have access off the main B1 road which is designed to carry<br />

traffic of this nature. Mine related traffic will travel from both the Otavi and Otjwarongo directions on a<br />

daily basis with all traffic using the B1 from which the re-routed D2808 will provide the site access. Traffic<br />

on the B1would be a <strong>com</strong>bination of Auryx Gold, other mining and businesses together with private and<br />

tourism related traffic. The highest levels of traffic would be likely to be experienced during the<br />

construction phase which is relatively short term. Levels over the operational life of the mine would be<br />

lower and traffic in the de<strong>com</strong>missioning phase will reduce to the extent that production related traffic<br />

ceases. In the closure phase traffic will be limited to just occasional trips for monitoring and aftercare<br />

activities.<br />

The proposed re-routing of the D2808 does not form part of the scope of this <strong>EIA</strong> and will be addressed<br />

in a separate <strong>EIA</strong> process. It is anticipated that this separate <strong>EIA</strong> will consider issues associated with<br />

road capacity and road design as they relate to an increase in traffic from the mine’s operation. In this<br />

regard, the assessment below therefore focuses on the safety of road users in general based on<br />

experience with similar type mining projects and assuming that the current level of service is retained<br />

and/or upgraded (if required),<br />

TABLE 7-14: TRAFFIC IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Construction activities<br />

Proposed operational<br />

activities<br />

De<strong>com</strong>missioning activities Aftercare and maintenance<br />

activities<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7.10.1.2 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

Traffic impacts associated with additional vehicle numbers using the B1 include:<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-40<br />

� The high speed of the traffic using the road and the potential for road traffic or pedestrian<br />

accidents;<br />

� Loose gravel can lead to cracked windscreens; and<br />

� The presence of animals and the risk of collision.<br />

In the unmitigated and mitigated scenario, the potential for injury and death to road users gives this a<br />

high severity.<br />

Duration<br />

Any serious injury or death is considered a long term impact.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios, the impact will be experienced beyond the boundary of<br />

the mine. The spatial scale is medium.<br />

Consequence<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios the consequence is medium.<br />

Probability<br />

Additional traffic will be generated so the probability of impacts occurring without any mitigation is<br />

considered definite but with ongoing mitigation/maintenance measures it is considered the probability<br />

could reduce to low.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the significance of this potential impact is medium and reduces to low with<br />

mitigation. SLR’s confidence level in this rating is moderate to high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – traffic<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated L H M M H M<br />

Mitigated L H M M L L<br />

7.10.1.3 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to reduce the potential for traffic impacts on the B1.<br />

Actions<br />

From the outset Auryx Gold will ensure that:<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-41<br />

� It will implement a driver trainer programme for all Auryx Gold employees to include: <strong>com</strong>plying with<br />

speed limits, holding valid licences, ensuring vehicles are roadworthy, zero tolerance for drinking and<br />

driving and using lights appropriately for night driving; and<br />

� Contractors will be required to <strong>com</strong>ply with Namibian Roads Authority regulations.<br />

Although not part of the current scope, Auryx Gold will ensure that the relocation/re-routing of road D2808<br />

is done in consultation with the relevant roads authority and that the re<strong>com</strong>mendations of the traffic<br />

specialist report <strong>com</strong>pleted to support the application process are implemented to ensure the safety of all<br />

road users including pedestrians.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

Any mine related road accident will be handled in accordance with the Auryx Gold emergency response<br />

procedure.<br />

7.11 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC<br />

The information in this section was sourced from the social and economic specialist studies in Appendix<br />

K and Appendix L respectively.<br />

7.11.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

In the broadest sense (see table 7-15), the activities associated with the proposed project will have socio-<br />

economic impacts in all phases. Some of these are considered to be positive impacts and others are<br />

considered to be negative impacts. The separate groups of impacts are discussed below and must be<br />

read in the context of the baseline information included in Sections 4.7 and 4.8.<br />

TABLE 7-15: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS – LINK TO PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES<br />

Construction Operational De<strong>com</strong>missioning Closure<br />

Construction activities<br />

Recruitment of contractors<br />

and workers<br />

Construction camp<br />

Operational activities<br />

Recruitment of contractors and<br />

employees<br />

Human Resource Management<br />

De<strong>com</strong>missioning activities<br />

Retrenchment of contractors<br />

and workers<br />

Aftercare and maintenance<br />

activities<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

7.11.2 ISSUE: ECONOMIC IMPACT<br />

7.11.2.1 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-42<br />

The LoM is characterised by an 18 month intensive construction phase involving the capital investment of<br />

some US$187 million, followed by operations lasting some ten years, merging into a de<strong>com</strong>missioning<br />

phase, followed by mine closure after 14 years. Clearly investment costs, operational costs and in<strong>com</strong>e<br />

will vary over the 14 year LoM, but the average direct contribution to Gross Namibian In<strong>com</strong>e (GNI) of the<br />

mine during LoM will be between US$ 58 million and US$ 60 million which is very significant in local<br />

terms and would amount to around 0.6% of the total national GNI of Namibia. Further, due to the value<br />

added or in<strong>com</strong>e multiplier effect, this direct impact will induce some US$ 103 million in additional GNI<br />

within the broader economy.<br />

The whole mining and processing operation will create an average of 454 jobs which will peak to 491 jobs<br />

in 2020. Studies have calculated that for every job created by a mine in Namibia, a further additional 1.5<br />

job opportunities are created by suppliers and contractors, which would result in a further 680 jobs<br />

created by suppliers, contractors and service providers.<br />

Through employment and skills development, the proposed mine will contribute to the three national<br />

development goals of NDP4 – reducing in<strong>com</strong>e inequality, increasing job creation and economic growth.<br />

It will also contribute to the Otjozondjupa Regional Council’s strategic objective “to improve regional<br />

economic development and employment”.<br />

The economic spin-offs from the mine’s construction and operations will create empowerment opportunities<br />

in a range of skills and activities. Employment provides in<strong>com</strong>e to the employees, their immediate<br />

household members and to others living elsewhere in Namibia who depend on cash remittances. Thus the<br />

assessment of this impact can be summarised as having a high beneficial effect. The work experience<br />

and skills gained through the opportunities that the mine brings will have lasting benefits for all those<br />

employees.<br />

The negative land and natural resource use costs which are estimated to happen over the LoM have<br />

been measured at being just over 3% of the positive contribution of the mine. So the economic benefits<br />

clearly outweigh the negative economic impacts that may occur and the impact has a positive high<br />

severity both with and without mitigation.<br />

The other potential negative economic impact is concerned with mine closure. This is something which is<br />

<strong>com</strong>mon to all mines and must be planned for and mitigation provided because the major economic<br />

benefits that the increase in mining will bring to the country cannot be realised without the eventual<br />

impact of closure.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Duration<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-43<br />

The direct positive economic impacts associated with the mine will occur for the life of mine.<br />

Quantitatively assessing the post closure impacts is not possible because there are a number of<br />

important unknown factors such as the general state of the future economy (local, national and world<br />

wide) and the future state of the mining sector in particular.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios, the impact will be felt both in the Otjozondjupa region<br />

and nationally. The spatial scale is high.<br />

Consequence<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios the consequence is high and positive.<br />

Probability<br />

In the normal course of economic activity the net positive impacts will definitely occur. With mitigation, the<br />

negative impacts at mine closure are reduced.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated and mitigated scenario, the significance of this potential impact is high positive. SLR’s<br />

confidence in this rating is high.<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact – economic<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H+ M H H+ H+ H+<br />

Mitigated H+ M H H+ H+ H+<br />

7.11.2.2 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to enhance the positive economic impacts and limit the<br />

negative economic impacts.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will ensure that:<br />

� Tender selection is weighted in favour of suppliers of goods and services which use local<br />

suppliers down the supply chain (assuming that the vendor is qualified and that they can deliver<br />

the requested product of the required standard in the requested time;<br />

� Mine procurement policies promote the use of small and medium enterprises;<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-44<br />

� A human resources policy which prioritises the selection of women for training and recruitment<br />

and which supports women to perform well in the workplace;<br />

� Skills development strategies and programmes are in place prior to construction to maximise use<br />

of the local labour force;<br />

� Support employees and <strong>com</strong>munity members to continue learning and developing skills so they<br />

too benefit from being able to offer labour flexibility and productivity, throughout the LoM and on<br />

mine closure;<br />

� Promote continuous learning programmes to diversify and upgrade skills;<br />

� Ensure skills upgrading during employment at mine is documented and accredited where<br />

possible so skills are recognised with future employers;<br />

� Maximise the permanent workforce;<br />

� Provide training on personal financial management;<br />

� Enable and promote home ownership throughout the workforce; and<br />

� Assist Otavi and Otjiwarongo town councils to diversify their economic activities.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.11.3 ISSUE: CHANGE OF LAND USE AND NEIGHBOURING COMMUNITY<br />

7.11.3.1 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

The land use prior to Auryx Gold purchasing the four farms totalling more than 14,700 ha was ranching<br />

and some game farming. The average farm in this area of Namibia is about 5000 ha on which an average<br />

of 8 people are usually employed, including the owner. Specific data is not available for the four farms<br />

prior to their acquisition by Auryx. Currently Auryx has two employees working fulltime on the farms who<br />

supervise a number of labourers with the aim of upgrading and maintaining the farms. Some<br />

neighbouring farmers currently lease grazing land from Auryx.<br />

During construction, there will be up to 800 workers on site and the probability of poaching will be high.<br />

The mining footprint will be a small proportion of the four farms and once mining operations <strong>com</strong>mence,<br />

much of the land use could be used for game farming and bush clearance, if not cattle farming. From<br />

post closure, the pit, TDF and waste rock dumps will cause irreversible land use change of moderate<br />

severity within the site boundary but the remaining land could be returned to ranching beef cattle and<br />

game farming.<br />

The closest direct neighbouring farms encircling the mine farms are: Erhadtshof, Bergershof, Okaruiput,<br />

Erpfsfarm, Houmoad, Okaputa, Okaputa West, Stark, Fisher, Lardner, Hester, Embla and Tirol. Since<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-45<br />

2007, these farms have had the stress of possible impacts that might occur due to mining on Farm<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong>. The main perceived impacts include:<br />

� Their land may devalue due to mine development<br />

� Lowering of the groundwater and consequent long-term threat to sustainable farming<br />

� Loss of sense of place and subsequent loss of livelihoods from tourism during construction and<br />

operations.<br />

� Squatter camps, poaching and reduction of safety, especially if a construction camp is<br />

maintained on site.<br />

� The increase in traffic on the B1.<br />

Changes in land use will occur but the actual mine footprint is only a small part of the overall farming area<br />

and the remainder could continue to be used productively. In respect of neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munities whilst<br />

these are well separated from the mine the perceived fears identified above are potential negative<br />

impacts. In the unmitigated scenario the severity is considered medium but this could be reduced to low<br />

to medium with mitigation.<br />

Duration<br />

Some of the changes in land use will be permanent with or without mitigation however the impacts on<br />

adjoining farms should cease on the closure of the mine. The duration is therefore considered high to<br />

medium in both the mitigated and unmitigated scenarios.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

Land use change will be local to the mine but impact on neighbouring properties will extend beyond the<br />

mine boundary. The spatial scale is medium to low.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the consequence associated with land use and the neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munity<br />

is medium. This may reduce to medium to low in the mitigated scenario as the severity is reduced<br />

through management interventions.<br />

Probability<br />

The probability of impact occurring is likely in both the mitigated and unmitigated scenarios.<br />

Significance<br />

In the unmitigated and unmitigated scenarios, the significance of this potential impact is medium. SLR’s<br />

confidence level in this rating is moderate.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact–changes to land use and neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munity<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-46<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated M H-M M-L M M M<br />

Mitigated M-L H-M M-L M-L M M<br />

7.11.3.2 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to limit the impacts associated with changes of land use and<br />

neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munity.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will:<br />

� Manage the non-mining areas as productively as possible, including restoring bush encroached<br />

areas for productive farming.<br />

� During construction, the construction camp and mining area should be fenced as early as<br />

possible to minimise security problems on the Auryx and neighbouring farms.<br />

� Establish a platform for on-going dialogue with neighbouring farmers, as a special interest group<br />

and provide a named point of contact.<br />

� Give neighbouring farms opportunities to provide goods and services, as a form of<br />

<strong>com</strong>pensation, e.g. to run a shop, provide farm produce and visitor ac<strong>com</strong>modation.<br />

� Ensure the construction workers camp includes some senior management to ensure controls are<br />

enforced.<br />

� Grow bush fences/ thick shrubs around the construction camp and farm’s perimeters as shields<br />

from noise and dust and to prevent walkers.<br />

� Enforce strict rules of no walking except along roads.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

None identified.<br />

7.11.4 ISSUE: IN MIGRATION AND COMMUNITY HEALTH/SAFETY AND SECURITY<br />

7.11.4.1 Assessment of impact<br />

Severity<br />

The project has relatively high labour requirements, for both the construction and operations phase,<br />

which is likely to exceed local capacity, especially for semi and skilled work. In addition, with national<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-47<br />

unemployment at 51.2%, the lure of employment opportunities will encourage people to move to the<br />

mine’s recruitment points.<br />

The construction phase will last about 18 months and will require a workforce of about 500 people which<br />

will peak to 800 people at times. Operations will require about 454 people over the 11 year life of mine.<br />

Given the number of jobs to be created by the project, it is estimated that the potential number of people<br />

who could descend on Otjiwarongo and Otavi could to range from 3,700 to over 12,000 migrants.<br />

However, Otjiwarongo’s capacity to meet the needs of the project, in terms of available goods and<br />

services, is good. Therefore it would be sensible for the two towns to anticipate and plan for substantial<br />

in-migration of around 7 000 people, shared between the two towns. Most town councils perceive rapid<br />

in-migration as a threat and an inevitable but unwanted problem. Some try to implement restrictive<br />

policies which nearly always fail and often do great damage to the economy and to the lives of the<br />

migrants and their families. Migrants are generally seeking improved living conditions and economic<br />

opportunities from where they have <strong>com</strong>e from. They may be returning family or extended family<br />

members originally from the area, project employees from outside the area with or without their families,<br />

opportunistic entrepreneurs in the formal and informal sectors, unskilled or skilled job seekers.<br />

In the local context, Otavi has suffered out-migration and now has half the population it recorded ten<br />

years ago. By contrast, Otjiwarongo has grown by 10,000 people.<br />

In-ward migration can have positive and negative impacts such as:<br />

� Stimulating the local economy and <strong>com</strong>munity organization. Mineworkers will require housing<br />

and this will stimulate the construction of housing in both Otavi and Otjiwarongo. Wages and<br />

salaries will be injected into the local economy where they live.<br />

� Developing informal settlements which increase demand/ need for basic infrastructure –housing,<br />

clean water supplies, sanitation, electricity and waste management systems.<br />

� Increasing pressure on government services such as health and education facilities, their staffing<br />

and running cost requirements.<br />

� Increasing incidence of social ills including alcoholism, drug abuse, prostitution, gambling &<br />

criminality. Alcohol abuse is part of the accepted social norm in Namibia and is often stimulated<br />

by cash earnings which increase the likelihood of domestic violence (usually against women and<br />

children), unprotected sex and the spread of HIV. The influx of job seekers may increase over-<br />

crowding, which increase the spread of TB.<br />

The positive impacts have already been considered in Section 7.11.2 and this section will consider the<br />

negative impacts set out above. In addition neighbouring farms are concerned about their security and<br />

safety, particularly during construction when up to 800 people will be housed on site for over a year. They<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-48<br />

are concerned about the increased traffic on the B1 and road safety at the mine turn-off (assessed in<br />

Section 7.10).<br />

During public consultations, neighbours re<strong>com</strong>mended that the construction camp should be in Otavi.<br />

Although this would bring economic benefits to Otavi, it could cause a huge increase in social ills and<br />

health risks such as sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies. Experienced mine<br />

managers believe that it will be easier to restrict construction workers in a camp on the site and enforce<br />

tighter security than if it were in town.<br />

Unmanaged and unmitigated, these social ills can have severe consequences which last beyond the life<br />

of mine but a number of policies and actions can be taken which can mitigate the impact and reduce its<br />

severity. However these efforts must be carefully co-ordinated with those of local government and the<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity, through planned engagement and public-private partnerships.<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the inward migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health/safety and security issue is<br />

therefore predicted to have a high severity and in the mitigated scenario this could be reduced but the<br />

challenge is significant because it will involve a focussed and <strong>com</strong>bined effort from the local <strong>com</strong>munities<br />

and <strong>com</strong>mercial, NGO and Government sectors.<br />

Duration<br />

Social impacts associated with the project have the potential to extend well beyond the life of the mine.<br />

The duration is therefore considered high in the unmitigated scenario, with potential to reduce to medium<br />

with mitigation.<br />

Spatial scale<br />

In both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios, the impacts of in migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health/safety<br />

and security will be felt mainly in the Otjozondjupa Region. The spatial scale is medium.<br />

Consequence<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the consequence associated with in migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health/safety<br />

and security is high. This may reduce to medium to high in the mitigated scenario if the severity is<br />

reduced through management interventions.<br />

Probability<br />

In the unmitigated scenario the impact is definite. In the mitigated scenario this probability may be<br />

reduced but the challenge is significant and it involves multiple parties across different sectors in the<br />

public and private domain.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Significance<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-49<br />

In the unmitigated scenario, the significance of this potential impact is high. In the mitigated scenario, the<br />

significance may be reduced to medium to high. SLR’s confidence level in this rating is moderate<br />

because of the question around the chances of succeeding with the mitigation measures<br />

Tabulated summary of the assessed impact –in migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health/safety and security<br />

Mitigation Severity Duration Spatial<br />

Consequence Probability of Significance<br />

Scale<br />

Occurrence<br />

Unmitigated H H M H M-H H<br />

Mitigated M-L H-M M M-H M-H M-H<br />

7.11.4.2 Conceptual description of mitigation measures<br />

Conceptual discussion of the mitigation measures is provided below and detailed in the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> EMP<br />

(Appendix M).<br />

Objective<br />

The objective of the mitigation measures is to limit the impacts associated with in migration and<br />

<strong>com</strong>munity health/safety and security.<br />

Actions<br />

Auryx Gold will:<br />

� Form a representative stakeholder <strong>com</strong>mittee, genuinely representative of those most affected by<br />

the project – such as landowners, farm-workers, town councils and residents <strong>com</strong>mittees – to<br />

assist with the monitoring of social impacts and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures put<br />

in place.<br />

� Fence in the working area of the ML and employ strict security. Auryx must ensure that the<br />

security of personnel and property is carried out in accordance with relevant human rights<br />

principles and in a manner that avoids or minimizes risks to the neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munity.<br />

� Repeatedly inform the public that no workers will be recruited at the site gate to protect direct<br />

neighbours.<br />

� Take measures to prevent Platveld from be<strong>com</strong>ing a squatter settlement.<br />

� Have zero tolerance to alcohol in the workplace and on site.<br />

� Establish a <strong>com</strong>prehensive HIV / AIDS / TB workplace policy and wellness programme. Tender<br />

requirements for all contractors should stipulate clear HIV policies and programmes and should<br />

be part of their reporting requirements. Auryx Gold shall also develop <strong>com</strong>munity wellness<br />

programmes as and where required – in consultation with the neighbouring towns and farming.<br />

(This wellness programme to include HIV/AIDS/TB related issues).<br />

� Support partnerships that encourage a sense of <strong>com</strong>munity and that <strong>com</strong>bat social ills, e.g. multi-<br />

purpose <strong>com</strong>munity & skills development centres; networking points for new migrants; sports<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 7-50<br />

tournaments, social clubs, youth clubs, activities that promote women’s empowerment that can<br />

lead to gender equality and <strong>com</strong>munity policing.<br />

� Avoid constructing mine housing in <strong>com</strong>pounds in the nearby towns but should promote<br />

integration in existing residential areas, wherever possible. Home ownership should be promoted<br />

but many employees will prefer to invest in their areas of origin, which may not be from the<br />

Otjozondjupa Region. Such employees would then rent ac<strong>com</strong>modation in Otavi or Otjiwarongo.<br />

� Use Auryx’s Corporate Social Investment (CSI) strategy to give support to local economic<br />

development in Otavi from its operations phase. This will encourage, stimulate and support SME<br />

development.<br />

� Build up local skills before operations begin by working with local training establishments,<br />

providing bursaries for key skills. Actively recruit women for training and employment into the<br />

mining sector.<br />

� Give preferential recruitment to Otjozondjupa residents.<br />

� Include recruitment of Grade 10 school-leavers who pass an IQ, English and Maths test.<br />

� Through its CSI strategy, partner the National Housing Action group (NHAG) and the Shack<br />

Dwellers Federation (SHDF) to enable residents in Otavi’s informal settlement to negotiate with<br />

their town council and to help themselves..<br />

� Support the town councils to have enlightened town plans which enable affordable land tenure<br />

and business development.<br />

� Negotiate with the Ministry of Health and Social Services to provide primary health care services<br />

to neighbouring farm-workers around farm <strong>Otjikoto</strong>, from its mine clinic.<br />

� Continue to support Otavi schools through its CSI programme and listen to the schools priority<br />

requests and assess how it can best provide support.<br />

Emergency situations<br />

Auryx must maintain appropriate fire control measures throughout the four farms. Emergency procedures<br />

and contact numbers of neighbouring landowners and local Farmers Associations should be available for<br />

the site manager at all times.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

8 KEY ASSUMPTIONS, UNCERTAINTIES AND LIMITATIONS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 8-1<br />

Assumptions, uncertainties and limitations have been identified in the various specialist studies. The<br />

more significant of these are included below.<br />

8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LIMIT<br />

The environmental assessment focused on third parties only and did not assess health and safety<br />

impacts on workers because the assumption was made that these aspects are separately regulated by<br />

health and safety legislation, policies and standards, and that Auryx Gold will adhere to these.<br />

8.2 PREDICTIVE MODELS IN GENERAL<br />

All predictive models are only as accurate as the input data provided to the modellers. If any of the input<br />

data is found to be inaccurate or is not applicable because of project design changes that occur over<br />

time, then the model predictions will be less accurate.<br />

8.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE WATER<br />

No baseline surface water quality data was available<br />

8.4 GROUNDWATER<br />

The following assumptions were made for the groundwater flow model:<br />

� The geological structures (faults) were modelled as permeable linear zones. The faults were<br />

modelled as discontinuous across the schist –marble contact and the contact itself was modelled<br />

as impermeable.<br />

� Prior to development, the system is in equilibrium and therefore in steady state.<br />

� The open cast mine are modelled as drains which take water out of the system.<br />

� The accuracy and scale of the assessment will result in deviations at point e.g. individual<br />

boreholes.<br />

When assumptions were made or reference values used, a conservative approach was followed.<br />

8.5 AIR QUALITY<br />

Human health risk assessment is an intricate process based on high level data. Dispersion modelling<br />

results are directly related to the input data with any error introduced in the input data carried through to<br />

the results. Thus, it is important to list and evaluate all data limitations and assumptions to ensure these<br />

are considered during interpretation of the results.<br />

� Emissions were based on the process description and mine layout plan as provided.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 8-2<br />

� Since it is a proposed mine, no site specific particle size fraction-, moisture- or silt content data<br />

were available for the various sources and use was made of information obtained from existing<br />

gold mines in the region. Once the mine is operational, particle size distribution should be<br />

determined for the various wind dependent sources and the dispersion model simulations<br />

updated.<br />

� Routine emissions for the proposed operations were simulated. Blasting is regarded as non-<br />

routine (upset) event, occurring only intermittently for short durations. Blasting was accounted for<br />

in the modelling, simulated as if occurring for an hour every day.<br />

� Dispersion models don’t contain all the features of a real system but contain the feature of<br />

interest for the management issue or scientific problem to be solved (MFE, 2001). Gaussian<br />

plume models are regarded to have an uncertainty range of between -50% to 200%. It has<br />

generally been found that the accuracy of off-the-shelf dispersion models improve with increased<br />

averaging periods. The accurate prediction of instantaneous peaks are the most difficult and are<br />

normally performed with more <strong>com</strong>plicated dispersion models specifically fine-tuned and<br />

validated for the location. The duration of these short-term, peak concentrations are often only for<br />

a few minutes and on-site meteorological data are then essential.<br />

� The dispersion model (AERMOD) cannot <strong>com</strong>pute real time mining processes, therefore average<br />

mining process throughputs were utilised. Even though the nature of open pit mining operations<br />

(pit utilisation and roads) change over the life of mine, the proposed open pit mining area was<br />

modelled to reflect the worst-case condition (i.e. resulting in the highest impacts). For example,<br />

retention of dust generated within the open pit will result in up to 50% reduction in TSP emissions<br />

and 5% of PM10 emissions according to the NPI.<br />

� Emissions from unpaved roads were calculated using the US.EPA AP42 emission factor<br />

equation. This equation does not account for vehicle speed that will influence road emissions.<br />

The silt and moisture contents are assumed to remain constant over the entire road are, which<br />

may not be the case. Gaussian plume models require hourly average meteorological data and<br />

cannot account for the intermittent releases from vehicles moving over road surfaces. It is<br />

therefore likely that the predicted impacts from road emissions may be conservative.<br />

� The contribution from windblown was accounted for in the dispersion simulations as best possible<br />

(i.e. particle size distribution, moisture content and clay content of the TDF was assumed to be<br />

similar to other gold mines in southern Africa). Wind erosion emissions are very sensitive to<br />

source characteristics and atmospheric conditions. Any binding of the particles such as natural<br />

crusting, vegetation cover and moisture will reduce emissions significantly. A threshold wind<br />

speed of 5.4 m/s as per US.EPA description was used.<br />

� The reducing effect of rain on fugitive dust emissions have not been accounted for in this<br />

dispersion model and would result in lower average impacts.<br />

� The impact assessment was limited to airborne particulates (including TSP and PM10).<br />

Mechanical operations such as associated with mining give rise to particles mainly in the TSP<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 8-3<br />

and PM10 fraction whereas <strong>com</strong>bustion sources result in the finer PM2.5 fraction. For this<br />

reason, the main focus of this study was on TSP and PM10.<br />

� Gaseous emissions would result from mine vehicles and equipment, and from the Gold Smelter.<br />

Emission rates are dependent on the amount of fuel use and on the vehicle and equipment type<br />

and size. The Gold Plant emissions depends on the process, raw materials used and source<br />

parameters. Information on these processes was limited and these emissions could not be<br />

quantified as part of this assessment. These emissions are likely to be intermittent and the<br />

impacts should not be significant.<br />

� The construction, de<strong>com</strong>missioning and closure phases were assessed qualitatively.<br />

� It was assumed that all processing operations will have ceased by the de<strong>com</strong>missioning and<br />

closure phase. The potential for impacts during this phase will depend on the extent of demolition<br />

and rehabilitation efforts during closure and on features which will remain. Information regarding<br />

the extent of demolition and/or rehabilitation procedures were limited and therefore not included<br />

in the emissions inventory or the dispersion modelling.<br />

8.6 NOISE AND VIBRATION<br />

Not applicable<br />

8.7 BIODIVERSITY<br />

Not applicable<br />

8.8 VISUAL<br />

Not applicable<br />

8.9 ARCHAEOLOGY<br />

Not applicable<br />

8.10 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC<br />

The 2011 census has released some provisional population data however other source material available<br />

is still based on the 2001 census.<br />

8.11 TRAFFIC<br />

No surveys of the B1 were carried out.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 9-1<br />

The potential negative impacts associated with the proposed project are expected to be of mainly low to<br />

medium significance apart from air quality, groundwater and some social impacts and therefore provided<br />

that the relevant mitigation measures are successfully implemented there is no environmental reason<br />

why the proposed project should not be approved (a tabulated summary of the potential impacts is<br />

presented in table 9-1 below).<br />

In addition the project will have significant positive economic impacts of benefit to the local, regional and<br />

national economy of Namibia.<br />

TABLE 9-1: SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED MINING<br />

PROJECT<br />

Section Potential impact Significance of the impact<br />

(the ratings are negative unless<br />

otherwise specified)<br />

Topography Injury to people from hazardous excavations and<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Biodiversity Physical destruction of biodiversity from clearing land<br />

and placing infrastructure.<br />

Loss of biodiversity from the reduction of water<br />

resources as an ecological driver.<br />

General disturbance of biodiversity through a range of<br />

aspects including dust, noise, vibration, pollution,<br />

lighting, firewood collection, poaching, and vehicle<br />

movement.<br />

Unmitigated Mitigated<br />

High Medium<br />

Medium Medium<br />

Medium Low<br />

Medium Medium<br />

Surface water Pollution of surface water Medium Low<br />

Groundwater Dewatering and mine supply. Medium Medium to Low<br />

Groundwater contamination. High High to Medium<br />

Air quality Air pollution High Medium to High<br />

Noise Noise pollution in the context of noise sensitive<br />

developments.<br />

Medium to<br />

Low<br />

Vibration Blast injury to third parties or damage to structures. Medium Medium to Low<br />

Archaeology Damage to archaeological sites. High Low<br />

Visual impacts Visual impact from key viewpoints. High Medium<br />

Socioeconomic<br />

impacts<br />

Economic impact including the positive impacts on<br />

regional and national economies<br />

Low<br />

High+ High+<br />

Impacts on land use and neighbouring <strong>com</strong>munities, Medium Medium<br />

In migration and <strong>com</strong>munity health and safety High Medium to High<br />

Traffic impacts Traffic impacts on users of the B1. Medium Low<br />

Werner Petrick<br />

(Project Manager)<br />

Alex Pheiffer<br />

(Project Reviewer)<br />

Alex Speiser & Chris Herbert<br />

(Project Assistant)<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

10 REFERENCES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 10-1<br />

ASEC & Bittner Water Consult 2004. Preliminary environmental overview and impact identification for a<br />

proposed mining operation at the gold deposit at <strong>Otjikoto</strong>.-<strong>Report</strong> No. 049/03 to AVMIN Namibia,<br />

Windhoek.<br />

ASEC. Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Mine Project<br />

for Auryx Gold Corporation. September 2010. Pg 49<br />

ASEC. Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Mine Project<br />

for Auryx Gold Corporation. September 2010. Pg 63<br />

Avdale Namibia (Pty) Ltd 2003. <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Project: Pre - Feasibility Mining Geotechnics <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

Barnes, J. & Jones, B. 2009.Game ranching in Namibia. In: Suich, H., Child, B. with Spenceley, A. (Eds.).<br />

Evolution and innovation in wildlife conservation: From parks and game ranches to transfrontier<br />

conservation areas. Earthscan, London, UK.113-126.<br />

Barnes, J. & Alberts, M. 2012.Assessment of peoples' engagement in sustainable use activities on the<br />

coastal zone of Namibia.Namibian Coast Conservation and Management (NACOMA) Project, Ministry of<br />

Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia. 47pp.<br />

BIWAC, 2007.Environmental Impact Assessment of the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine Project, Otjozondjupa Region,<br />

Namibia.Preliminary hydrocensus.<br />

Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of Interior. 2004. Visual Resource Management Manual<br />

8400<br />

Chamber of Mines. Dec 2011. Statement at the Mining Industry briefing meetings with MME.<br />

Clegg, A. 2011.The Namibian education Time Bomb. The Namibian 01.02.2011<br />

El Obeid S., Mendelsohn J., Lajars M., Forster N., Brule G. 2001. Health in Namibia – Progress and<br />

Challenges, RAISON<br />

Griffin, E. & Dippenaar-Schoeman, A.S. 1991. A checklist of, and references to, the Namibian sppider<br />

fauna (Arachnida, Araneae).Cimbebasia13: 115-183.<br />

Griffin, R.E. 1998. Species richness and biogeography of non-acarine arachnids in Namibia.Biodiversity<br />

and Conservation7: 467-481.<br />

Griffin, M. 2007. Specialist report on the potential influence of the proposed <strong>Otjikoto</strong> mine on indigenous<br />

Namibian amphibians, reptiles and mammals. <strong>Report</strong> prepared for A. Speiser Environmental Consultants<br />

cc.<br />

Giess, W. 1971. A preliminary vegetation map of Namibia Dinteria 4: 5-114.<br />

GRN. 2011. The New Equitable Economic Empowerment Framework (NEEEF).<br />

Hull, RB; Bishop, ID.Journal of Environmental Management. Vol 27, no. 1, pg 99-108.<br />

Humavindu, M., Barnes, J., Nott, C., de Klerk, N. & Kruger, B. 2011.Economic valuation of good<br />

rangeland management and incentives for efficient implementation of the National Rangeland<br />

Strategy.Country Pilot Partnership Programme, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek,<br />

Namibia. 53pp.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 10-2<br />

IEMA, ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’, U.K Institute of Environmental<br />

Management and Assessment Second Edition, Spon Press, 2002., Pg 9.<br />

IEMA, ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ U.K Institute of Environmental<br />

Management and Assessment Second Edition, Spon Press, 2002.Pg 120/121. Latin genius locī :genius,<br />

spirit + locī, genitive sing. oflocus, place<br />

IFC Policy on Social and Environmental Sustainability (paragraph 20).<br />

Lange, G-M. 2003. National wealth, natural capital and sustainable development in Namibia. Research<br />

Discussion Paper No 54, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism,<br />

Windhoek, Namibia. 15pp.<br />

Magurran, A.E. 2004.Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.<br />

May, R.M. 1978.The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas. 188 - 204. In Mound, L.A. & Waloff, N.<br />

Diversity of insect faunas. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.<br />

Mendelsohn J, Jarvis A, Roberts C, Robertson T 2002. Atlas of Namibia: a portrait of the land and its<br />

people. David Philip, Cape Town.<br />

Mendelsohn et al 2009<br />

Mey, W. 2001. Observations of the caddisfly fauna (Insecta: Trichoptera) of three perennial rivers in<br />

northern Namibia. Cimbebasia 17: 229-236.<br />

MHSS. 2008. Namibia Demographic and Health Survey 2006/07<br />

MHSS. 2010. <strong>Report</strong> on the 2010 National HIV Sentinel Survey<br />

MoE. 2011, Ibid<br />

MoE, 2011.Education Statistics 2009.Education and Management Information System (EMIS)<br />

MoLS. 2010. Namibia Labour Force Survey 2008, Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare<br />

Murphy A., Southern Africa, Retrieved on 27 February 2012 at Google books, p.346<br />

Namib Hydrosearch (Pty) Ltd 2004. Groundwater Resource Assessment for the <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Project.<br />

NACSO 2010, Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: a review of progress and challenges in 2009.<br />

NPC. 2005. 2001 Population and Housing Census: Otjozondjupa Region.<br />

NPC. 2006. Namibia Household In<strong>com</strong>e and Expenditure Survey 2003/2004<br />

NPC. 2008. A Review of Poverty and Inequality in Namibia<br />

NPC. 2012. Namibia 2011 Population and Housing Census Preliminary Results<br />

Oatley TB, Oschadleus HD, Navarro RA, Underhill LG 1998 Review of ring recoveries of birds of prey in<br />

southern Africa: 1948-1998. Avian Demography Unit University of Cape Town.<br />

Oberholzer, B. 2005. Guideline for involving visual and aesthetic specialists in <strong>EIA</strong> processes: Edition 1.<br />

CSIR <strong>Report</strong> No ENV-S-C 2005 053 F. Republic of South Africa, Provincial Government of the Western<br />

Cape, Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Cape Town<br />

Otavi Village Council Strategic Plan 2009-2013<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

Otjozondjupa Regional Council. 2011. Otjozondjupa Regional LED Strategy<br />

ORC Strategic Plan 2009-2014, p11<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page 10-3<br />

Prendini, L. 2005 New Records and Observations on the Natural History of Lisposoma elegans and L.<br />

josehermana (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae). American Museum Novitates 3487: 1-11.<br />

RAISON. 2011. An Atlas of Poverty in Namibia. Central Bureau of Statistics<br />

SAIEA 2003.Environmental Impact assessment in southern Africa. Southern African Institute for<br />

Environmental Assessment publication, Windhoek.<br />

Samways, M.J. 1993. A spatial and process sub-regional framework for insect and biodiversity<br />

conservation research and management. In Gaston, K.J., New, T.R. & Samways, M.J. Perspectives on<br />

insect conservation. Intercept, Andover.<br />

Saunders, D. 2010. Arrival City. Heinemann<br />

Scholes, R.J. 1997. Savanna, pp. 258-277. In: Cowling, R.M., Richardson, D.M. & Pierce, S.M.<br />

Vegetation of southern Africa. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.<br />

Seimons, W. S. 1989. Omarassa-Otjiwarongo RWSS: <strong>Report</strong> on the geohydrological investigation and<br />

evaluation of the Marble Aquifer to supplement water supply to Otjiwarongo town.- DWA <strong>Report</strong> no.<br />

12/7/G8.<br />

Sherbourne, R. 2010. Guide to the Namibian economy 2010. Institute for Public Policy Research,<br />

Windhoek, Namibia. 410pp.<br />

Suhling, F & Martens, A. 2007.Dragonflies and damselflies of Namibia. Gamsberg Macmillan, Windhoek.<br />

Sutherland, W.J. 2000. The Conservation Handbook: Research, Management and Policy. Blackwell<br />

Science, Oxford.<br />

Turpie, J. et al. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment for Namibia's biodiversity and<br />

protected area system. Strengthening the Protected Area Network (SPAN) Project, Ministry of<br />

Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia. 248pp.<br />

UNSD/United Nations Statistical Division. 2012. National accounts main aggregates database<br />

downloads. United Nations Statistical Division, New York, USA.<br />

[Accessed at: < http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnlList.asp >]<br />

Van Wyk, J.D., van Rensburg, B. & van Rensburg, A. 2011.Namibian economic research: Namibia<br />

macro-economic outlook 2011-2012. Investment House Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia. 54pp.<br />

World Bank. 2009. World Development <strong>Report</strong> 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington:<br />

IBRD.<br />

World Health Organization, 2000<br />

http://www.equator-principles.<strong>com</strong>/principles.shtml<br />

http://209.88.21.36/opencms/opencms/grnnet/OPM/ProgramsProjects/Tesef.html (<br />

www.npc.gov.na/vision/vision_2030bgd.htm<br />

http://home.arcor.de/clayhouse/<br />

http://www.moe.gov.na/news_article.php?id=49&title=Results of The 2011, Junior Secondary Certificate<br />

http://www.cosdef.org.na/<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX A: PROJECT TEAM CVS<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page A<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX B: INFORMATION SHARING RECORD<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page B<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX C: IAP DATABASE<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page C<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX D: ISSUES TABLE<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page D<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX E: GROUNDWATER STUDIES<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page E<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX F: AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page F<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX G: NOISE ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page G<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX H: BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page H<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX I: CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page I<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX J: VISUAL ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page J<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX K: SOCIAL ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page K<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX L: ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page L<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

APPENDIX M: OTJIKOTO EMP<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

Page M<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012


SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd<br />

SLR Reference: 733.01023.00002<br />

Title: <strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine EMP<br />

<strong>Report</strong> Number: Doc. no. 1<br />

Proponent: Auryx Gold<br />

SLR Ref. 733.01023.0002<br />

<strong>Report</strong> No.1<br />

RECORD OF REPORT DISTRIBUTION<br />

Name Entity Copy No. Date issued Issuer<br />

Mr. Theo Nghitila,<br />

Environmental<br />

Commissioner<br />

Ministry of Environment & Tourism 1 16 July 2012<br />

Page N<br />

W. Petrick<br />

Erasmus Shivolo Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) 2 16 July 2012 W. Petrick<br />

COPYRIGHT<br />

Copyright for these technical reports vests with SLR Consulting unless otherwise agreed to in<br />

writing. The reports may not be copied or transmitted in any form whatsoever to any person<br />

without the written permission of the Copyright Holder. This does not preclude the authorities’<br />

use of the report for consultation purposes or the applicant’s use of the report for project-<br />

related purposes.<br />

<strong>Otjikoto</strong> Gold Mine <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Report</strong> July 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!